Balint groups: psychosocial nonsense or a real insight into the doctor-patient relationship?

BMJ ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 328 (Suppl S4) ◽  
pp. 0404172
Author(s):  
Bruno Rushforth ◽  
Wendy Brown
BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S342-S342
Author(s):  
Anu Priya ◽  
Hardev Bhogal

AimsTo evaluate feedback from Balint style case based discussion groups and to reflect on learning points.We have three medical students from Sheffield University on six week psychiatry placements at Bassetlaw Hospital and we get eighteen students in a year. In order to further develop their approach towards reflection and their understanding towards the doctor patient relationship we developed the Balint style case based discussion group, and each group of students attend three sessions during their placement.MethodThe groups are held on a weekly basis and consist of the three medical students and 1-2 facilitators. As the group is small one of the facilitators may participate with the students for the Balint process and to help encourage the students. Following completion of the third session of the discussion group we gain written feedback from the students. A total of 17 feedbacks have been reviewed over the period of November 2018 -November 2019.Result16 students stated that this was their first experience at Balint Group and all except one student felt that they were given a good introduction about Balint groups before starting. When asked about the most significant thing that they have learnt in the group, the majority of students marked reflecting feelings to improve relationships with patients, exploring why they feel a certain way with patients and that the doctor patient relationship can affect the consultation.One student stated that they would not recommend it to colleagues as they felt it was relevant more to doctors rather than medical students. Another student recommended having more people in a group.ConclusionOverall, it has been a positive experience with the medical students during the groups and with feedbacks. We have reflected on difficult topics like bereavement, fantasized about the purpose of a patient's delusion and shared the joy of a patient who was discharged after a long stay. While we think we have been able to teach the students some tips on reflection, we ourselves have been able to reflect on certain topics we would not have if not raised by the students. Some medical students have contacted the larger Balint Group in Sheffield for further sessions. Considering our experience, we will continue with the sessions at Bassetlaw Hospital.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S259-S259
Author(s):  
Sudha Jain ◽  
Emma Adams ◽  
Alyson Lee

Aims1. To compare the experience of psychiatric trainees in Ireland of online Balint Groups (BG) in contrast to face to face groups.2. To assess the general attitudes of trainees to BG using the Psychological Medical Inventory (PMI) (Ireton and Sherman, 1988) scale.MethodAn online survey comprising two sections: 1. A questionnaire exploring participants experience, effectiveness and obstacles to attending the two formats of BG with a free text box response. 2. General attitude of trainees towards BG using PMI scale.An online cross-sectional survey using Survey Monkey. An invitation to participate in the survey was emailed to all trainees by the College of Psychiatrists in Ireland. All data were anonymised, and all data processing was conducted in line with GDPR. Statistical analysis was undertaken using Microsoft Excel. Thematic analysis was applied to the free-text box responses.Result16.49% (64/388) responded to the survey. Responses were uniform across all stages of training. 97% of respondents attended BG; 72% attended both formats, 25% attended only face-to-face and 3% online only. 65% of respondents preferred face to face compared to 18% online, whilst 11% stated no preference.On thematic analysis, trainees asserted a preference for face-to-face, describing better group cohesion, feeling safer to share, increased ease of interpreting non-verbal communication, and that conversation was more fluid. They described greater ease of engagement with the group/facilitator and preferred direct social interaction with peers.Conversely, most trainees acknowledged that online groups were convenient to attend, less time consuming & mitigated COVID risk associated with face-to-face meetings. Common themes against the use of online groups were: less psychotherapeutic in nature, technical issues, silences, unable to see participants faces and as though speaking “into the void”.Regarding trainees' attitudes to attending BG, most of the trainees found BG had been beneficial in developing more interest and confidence in dealing with the psychological aspects of patient care. Trainees agreed that skills improved in developing an excellent doctor-patient relationship, recognising patients under stress/ in distress, systemically obtaining psychological information and making treatment decisions based upon psychological needs and psychotherapeutic engagement. They agreed that they could better understand the influence of doctors' emotions on the doctor-patient relationship.ConclusionThis survey showed that most trainees find BG beneficial in developing better doctor-patient relationships, preferring face-to-face rather than online BG. However, they found online more convenient. A blended learning approach could provide trainees with the benefits of both formats of BG.


1972 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Wittkower ◽  
W. J. Stauble

The psychiatric role of the general practitioner covers a wide field and depends crucially upon his efforts to understand himself, his patient, and the doctor-patient relationship. The patient must be approached in terms of how he is affected emotionally by physical illness, and how his state of physical health is affected by his emotions. His behavior during initial stages of physical illness, his reaction to the diagnosis, and his feelings and interactions during the full-blown stages of illness are important areas for the doctor to explore in order to deal more effectively with a patient's withdrawal, depression, narcissism, frustration, or anxiety. The doctor must also explore his own motivations for choosing the medical profession in order to implement his role in caring for patients. Each of the models of the doctor-patient relationship–activity-passivity, guidance-cooperation, mutual participation-requires different degrees of emotional involvement on the part of the doctor. An understanding of the psychodynamics of this relationship, involving the attitudes and conflicts of both members, can help the general practitioner to handle effectively and successfully his patients in everyday practice. Practical suggestions are made for teaching psychological concepts to general physicians: improved courses in psychiatry in medical schools, emphasizing the “whole person” approach; ongoing seminars for doctors in practice–“Balint Groups”–in which the aim is to understand the nature of the patient's emotional conflicts, the doctor-patient relationship, and the part the doctor plays in it; refresher courses; and consultations with psychiatrists.


2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Jing ◽  
Heide Otten ◽  
Leonie Sullivan ◽  
Laurie Lovell-Simons ◽  
Martine Granek-Catarivas ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A735-A735
Author(s):  
C STREETS ◽  
J PETERS ◽  
D BRUCE ◽  
P TSAI ◽  
N BALAJI ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-50
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Turabian

Psychology and sociology share a common object of study, human behaviour, but from different perspectives. Sociologists have focused on macro variables, such as social structure, education, gender, age, race, etc., while psychology has focused on micro variables such as individual personality and behaviours, beliefs, empathy, listening, etc. Despite the importance of interpersonal relationship skills, they depend on the community or social context in which communication takes place, and by themselves may have little relevance in the consultation. The purely psychological analysis of the doctor-patient relationship often leads to an idyllic vision, with the patient-centred consultation as the greatest exponent, which rarely occurs in real life. The purely sociological or community / social analysis of the doctor-patient relationship leads to a negative view of the consultation, which is always shown as problematic. But, the psychological system in the doctor-patient relationship cannot be neglected, and its study is of importance, at least as an intermediate mechanism that is created through socio-community relations. Although the same social causes are behind the doctor-patient relationship, when acting on psychological factors in the consultation, they act as an optical prism scattering socio-community relations that affect the doctor and the patient, giving rise to a beam of different colors of doctor-patient relationship. In doctor-patient relationship there is a modality of psychotherapy, where attitudes, thoughts and behaviour of the patient, can be change, as well as it can be extended on the way of understanding and therefore changing, his social context. Because of the distance between socio-community relations and the form of doctor-patient relations is growing in complex societies, under these conditions, the sociological factor gives the important place to the psychological factor. Given these difficulties of the doctor-patient relationship one may ask how general medical practice can persist with the usual model of doctor-patient relationship. Pain and the desire to relieve them are the basic reasons for the patient and the doctor, and they do not disappear due to the contradictions of the doctor-patient relationship. In this way, the confrontation between sociological and psychological vision is replaced by an alliance of both currents, and each of them takes on meaning only in the general vision.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document