scholarly journals P32 Are junior doctors safe to perform pleural procedures? An audit of junior doctor knowledge and competency of pleural procedures before and after dedicated lecture-based and practical teaching sessions

Thorax ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (Suppl 4) ◽  
pp. A80-A81
Author(s):  
S. V. Ruickbie ◽  
G. MacDonald ◽  
N. Walters ◽  
A. Draper ◽  
Y. E. Ong
BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S156-S157
Author(s):  
Mostafa Shalaby ◽  
Mehtab Rahman

Aims•To improve the quality and consistency of medical seclusion reviews at St Charles Hospital and across the Trust.•To ensure at least 80% compliance with minimum standards for seclusion review documentation by the end of December 2020.•To increase doctors' mean perceived competence and confidence scores to 4.5/5 by the end of December 2020MethodSeclusion is commonly used to manage patients at high risk of aggression or violence, but is a high risk and very restrictive intervention. As such, it requires regular nursing and medical reviews. Work has been done recently at St Charles to improve the timeliness and effectiveness of nursing reviews including detailed guidance. Medical reviews are usually performed by junior doctors, many with limited experience in psychiatry. There is •A lack of consistent local or national guidance for junior doctors undertaking seclusion reviews•The quality and scope of these reviews is not consistent•There may be a need to ensure that there is more standardization and to improve junior doctors' confidence – and therefore patient safety and experience – overall.•The following interventions were used to improve the quality of seclusion reviews at the hospital:•Minimum standard guidelines•Presenting in Restrictive interventions meeting.•Feedback from PICU consultants for guidelines•Changing guidelinesFuture plans: •Guidelines teaching (Early November)•Re-audit and new survey (Early November)•Simulation training (Mid November)•Seclusion teaching video (Early December- to be ready for Induction)•Re-audit and new survey (Beginning of April)ResultSurveys were conducted before and after quality improvement interventions were put in place. The average confidence levels of junior doctors increased from 38.5% to 87% following these interventions.ConclusionRevision of seclusion guidelines, junior doctor teaching and simulation training are effective interventions to improve junior doctor confidence levels in conducting seclusion reviews.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Razan Nour ◽  
Kerry Jobling ◽  
Alasdair Mayer ◽  
Salma Babikir

Abstract Background Otolaryngology (ENT), plastic surgery, ophthalmology and dermatology are medical specialties which tend to receive less coverage in UK medical school curricula compared to larger, generalist specialties. As a result, there are fewer opportunities for medical students to learn and to cultivate an interest. There are numerous papers that report concerns about junior doctors’ ability to manage conditions within these specialties, which may jeopardise patient safety. The aim of our pilot project was to increase medical students’ interest and knowledge of ENT, plastic surgery, ophthalmology and dermatology. In addition to describing our project, we present and discuss literature on UK undergraduate education in these specialties and its impact on preparedness of junior doctors and future career choices. Methods One hundred twelve final year medical students at Newcastle University were invited to take part in a voluntary two-part (written and clinical) exam, in which prizes could be won and all participants would receive a certificate of participation. We distributed two online surveys to the students, one administered before the exam and one afterwards. Data was collected regarding the students’ motivation for entering the prize exam and the students’ baseline interest and knowledge in these specialties before and after the prize exam. Free-text responses were collected about the students’ opinion of the project and whether participation was beneficial. Results Sixteen students participated in the exam. There was a statistically significant increase in the students’ knowledge in ENT (p < 0.000), plastic surgery (p < 0.000), ophthalmology (p < 0.028) and dermatology (p < 0.012) after participation in the exam, but not in their interest levels. ENT was the preferred specialty of our cohort. The students reported that they found participation beneficial to their learning, particularly receiving exam feedback and explanations to exam questions. Conclusions This pilot project was a useful intervention in increasing medical students’ knowledge in these specialties, but not in their levels of interest. It also demonstrates that medical students are willing to participate in voluntary initiatives (in their spare time) to gain more learning opportunities and that medical students value timely exam feedback to guide their revision.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-155
Author(s):  
Kassia Lowe ◽  
Fiona Hynes

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address and understand recruitment difficulties into psychiatry; however, to date there is no published research with respect to forensic psychiatry. Forensic psychiatry has always been considered to be a popular specialty amongst junior doctors and therefore the recent trend in local unfilled core training (CT) (junior doctor) posts and national reduced competition ratios for higher specialist training has triggered concern. The impact vacant CT posts within the Forensic Service may have on the future workforce must be considered. Further understanding of this trend is required. Design/methodology/approach – A short statement-style survey addressing attitudes and opinions with respect to the field of forensic psychiatry was devised and distributed to all West Midlands core psychiatry trainees who attended post-graduate teaching (November 2014). Findings – Response rate was 64 per cent. In total, 52 per cent of participants expressed an interest in the specialty, but only 13 per cent wished to pursue a career in forensic psychiatry. In total, 68 per cent of responses deemed forensic psychiatry to be a demanding speciality, with over 50 per cent perceiving forensic patients as difficult to work with. There were high rates of uncertain responses with respect to specialty work life. In total, 78 per cent of responses considered experience of the specialty to be useful. Research limitations/implications – The method chosen to distribute the survey maximised response rate, but may have introduced a Hawthorne effect, as well as response bias, with the visual presence of the researcher. Participants were limited to those who attended teaching on the specified day. This could potentially skew results with an absence of opinions of non-attenders. It may be that characteristics and therefore attitudes and opinions of these two groups are different. A further limitation of the study is that opinions explored are limited to statements included within the survey. Practical implications – The current views may represent stigma, negative media portrayal and misinformed opinions. Action must be taken to increase understanding, interest and experience. Increased exposure to the specialty needs to occur. This could occur as early as high school, using case-study exercises and career sessions. Teaching sessions, summer school placements and elective opportunities should be made available for medical students. At post-graduate level, taster days as well as earlier access to rotations may be a way forward. Originality/value – Although entry into Forensic Higher Training remains comparatively competitive, the potential impact of vacant junior doctor (CT) posts within the speciality is concerning. This is likely to negatively influence recruitment into higher training, which may ultimately lead to decreased numbers of qualified forensic psychiatrists. Specialised care for such a risky and challenging patient group could thus be significantly compromised in the near future. Hence, it is vital to understand the current trend in order to act pre-emptively and address the underlying problems. To date no such research has been conducted.


2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
AK Arya ◽  
KP Gibbin

The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) has led to a reduction in the number of hours that a junior doctor is allowed to work. The Hospital at Night project aims to reduce juniors' presence at night through more efficient working. Otolaryngology has been considered to be one of the surgical specialties in which generic junior doctors covering more than one specialty could effectively function. The hope is to reduce junior doctors' hours sufficiently without compromising their training or patient safety.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e001482
Author(s):  
Derya Tireli ◽  
Michael Broksgaard Jensen

The workflow in a stroke unit can be very high, and this is especially noticeable during evening and night shifts, where staffing is reduced but the patient’s need for frequent and intensive care is not. The specialised and standardised settings in a stroke regime are constant and demanding for healthcare providers who, therefore, must work efficiently. Patient admissions, acute situations and routine tasks are major contributors to the burden of work during evening and night shifts for junior doctors on call. Thus, it is important to reduce the number of potentially avoidable tasks done by these junior doctors during night shifts so they have more time to perform tasks of high priority. The aim of this project was to reduce the potentially avoidable tasks occurring at night for the on-call junior doctor to only one per shift. We investigated the types of tasks that frequently occur for the on-call junior doctor during the night shift and improved our daily morning and evening rounds to reduce the number of tasks during the night shift. Using the plan–do–study–act method, we made improvements through education, knowledge sharing, checklists and feedback, and we reduced the number of potentially avoidable tasks for on-call junior doctors from a median of 11 to a median of 3 per week, demonstrating that the workload for the on-call junior doctor during the night shift can be reduced through a systematic approach to improving the work routines of doctors and nurses.


2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (9) ◽  
pp. 318-319
Author(s):  
MBS Brewster ◽  
R Potter ◽  
D Power ◽  
V Rajaratnam ◽  
PB Pynsent

For the last few years all the hospitals in the UK have been changing junior doctors' rotas to become compliant with the European Working Time Directive (EWTD). The first stage, requiring a junior doctor to work a maximum of 58 hours per week averaged over a 6-month period, became law in August 2004. In addition to new posts for junior doctors there have been schemes to facilitate the transition, such as the Hospital at Night programme. This was designed to use the minimum safe number of doctors from appropriate specialties with supporting medical staff to cover the hospital out of hours. It was required to make the most efficient use of this team and allow the junior doctor rotas to be compliant with the appointment of as few new posts as possible.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S162-S162
Author(s):  
Sharadha Wisidagama ◽  
Martin Schmidt

AimsTo analyse the current psychiatry induction programme with regards to national guidance, local requirements, trainee and trainer feedback and implement recommendations to streamline where possible.BackgroundJunior doctors in training rotate every 4 or 6 months depending on the grade/programme group. GP and FY trainees are often new to psychiatry therefore require a comprehensive induction.Our Trust has had a three day induction for new junior doctors comprised of 1 day Corporate Induction, 1 day Electronic Records Training and 1 day Local induction.During the 3 day induction programme there is often a service gap with covering out of hours and acute services. Trainees and trainers have expressed concern regarding the service gap.We therefore embarked on a review of the induction programme to investigate whether it could be improved in content and length of time to deliver.MethodReview the regulatory bodies requirements for junior doctor induction.Gain an understanding of the trainees and trainers perspective of the induction programme.Review the items in the induction programme according to the requirements of the regulatory bodies.Tailor the induction programme for junior doctors’ needs whilst complying with the regulatory bodies requirements.ResultThe General Medical Council (GMC), British Medical Association (BMA), Gold Guide, Health Education England (HEE) and National Health Service (NHS) employment have no specific statutory and mandatory training requirements for induction.The regulatory bodies have generic standards for junior doctor induction.Induction is the responsibility of the Trust.Trainee perspective: Electronic record system, Mental Health Act (MHA) and pharmacy training were agreed as needing review in terms of its content and length.Trainees also requested extra items to be included in the induction programme to support successful transition in to their work placements.The education department met with the Digital Team, MHA Team and Pharmacy Team to develop new and more relevant course content and add in the requested items.The new induction programme was launched in December 2019 and was reduced in length from 3 to 2 and a half days. Trainee satisfaction improved as evidence by trainee feedback.ConclusionThe review was helpful in establishing the requirements for a good induction and highlighting areas for improvement.The new induction was more focussed, shorter in duration and had improved trainee feedback.The Medical Education Department will assess the changes following the December 2019 induction and continue to review its induction programme.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Aamer Sarfraz ◽  
Yvonne Igunma ◽  
Ben Harman-Jones

Background/Aims Handover is a procedure that ensures efficient transfer of clinical information across teams. It is also an opportunity for junior doctors to develop clinical competencies, communications skills and leadership. Poor handovers can result in delays, clinical errors, duplication of work, poor morale, increased length of hospital stay, and risk of harm to patients. Poor handovers were identified as an area of concern for two successive years in the General Medical Council's survey. Methods Measures were undertaken to address this by updating their handover policy, developing a new handover protocol and instigating rota monitoring by involving junior doctors and consultants through focus groups. A survey was conducted among the same cohort of junior doctors before and after the interventions. Findings There was a remarkable improvement in junior doctors' attitudes towards safety, frequency of face-to-face handover, use of a handover book, and overall positive experiences of the handover procedure. Conclusions It is worth examining the approach to handover among other health professionals and perhaps between professions regarding the same patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e000222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Punith Kempegowda ◽  
Joht Singh Chandan ◽  
Richard Hutton ◽  
Lauren Brown ◽  
Wendy Madden ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe number of falls in hospital ranges from 3.8 to 8.6 falls per 1000 bed days. 1 Around 30% of falls as inpatients are injurious, and 4%–6% can result in serious and life-threatening injury. 2 3 This results in significant health burdens and economic burdens due to increased hospital stays following a fall. Junior doctors are usually the first point of contact for managing patients who fall in hospital. It is therefore important they understand the preventative measures and postfalls management.AimTo assess the retention of knowledge regarding falls management in foundation year 1 (FY1) doctors before and after a short educational intervention.MethodsA 3-stage quality improvement project was conducted at a West Midlands teaching hospital to highlight issues regarding falls management. A questionnaire assessing areas of knowledge regarding assessment and management of falls was delivered to 31 F1s. This was followed by a short presentation regarding falls management. The change in knowledge was assessed at 6 and 16 weeks postintervention. The questionnaire results were analysed using unpaired t-tests on STATA (V.14.2).ResultsThe mean score for knowledge regarding falls management in the preintervention, early postintervention and late postintervention were 73.7%, 85.2% and 76.4%, respectively. Although there was an improvement in the knowledge at 6 weeks’ postintervention, this returned to almost baseline at 16 weeks. The improvement in knowledge did not translate to clinical practice of falls management during this period.ConclusionAlthough educational interventions improve knowledge, the intervention failed to sustain over period of time or translate in clinical practice. Further work is needed to identify alternative methods to improve sustainability of the knowledge of falls and bring in the change in clinical practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (01) ◽  
pp. 72-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Leng ◽  
Kavita Sharma

ABSTRACT Background: Consent for surgical procedures is an essential part of the patient's pathway. Junior doctors are often expected to do this, especially in the emergency setting. As a result, the aim of our audit was to assess our practice in consenting and institute changes within our department to maintain best medical practice. Methods: An audit of consent form completion was conducted in March 2013. Standards were taken from Good Surgical Practice (2008) and General Medical Council guidelines. Inclusion of consent teaching at a formal consultant delivered orientation programme was then instituted. A re-audit was completed to reassess compliance. Results: Thirty-seven consent forms were analysed. The re-audit demonstrated an improvement in documentation of benefits (91–100%) and additional procedures (0–7.5%). Additional areas for improvement such as offering a copy of the consent form to the patient and confirmation of consent if a delay occurred between consenting and the procedure were identified. Conclusion: The re-audit demonstrated an improvement in the consent process. It also identified new areas of emphasis that were addressed in formal teaching sessions. The audit cycle can be a useful tool in monitoring, assessing and improving clinical practice to ensure the provision of best patient care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document