Evaluation of peak side resistance for rock socketed shafts in weak sedimentary rock from an extensive database of published field load tests: a limit state approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 1816-1831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouyan Asem ◽  
Paolo Gardoni
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Deformation Modulus ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Strength Limit ◽  
Side Resistance ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor

This paper presents analyses of the measured peak side resistance of rock sockets constructed in weak claystone, shale, limestone, siltstone, and sandstone. The peak side resistance is obtained from in situ axial load tests on drilled shafts, anchors, and plugs. The parameters that affect the development of peak side resistance are determined using in situ load test data. It is found that peak side resistance increases with the unconfined compressive strength and deformation modulus of the weak rock, and decreases with the increase in length of the shear surface along the rock socket sidewalls. The increase in socket diameter also slightly decreases the peak side resistance. Additionally, it is found that the initial normal stresses do not significantly affect the measured peak side resistance in the in situ load tests. The in situ load test data are used to develop an empirical design equation for determination of the peak side resistance. The proposed model for peak side resistance and the reliability analysis are used to determine the corresponding resistance factors for use in the load and resistance factor design framework for assessment of the strength limit state.

Resistance Factors at Serviceability Limit State Using the Texas Cone Penetrometer as the Predictive Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rozbeh Moghaddam
Keyword(s):  
Limit State ◽  
Drilled Shafts ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Deep Foundations ◽  
Driven Piles ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Serviceability Limit State ◽  
First Order Second Moment ◽  
Texas Cone Penetrometer ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor

This study presents the development and calibration of resistance factors for the serviceability limit state (SLS) condition (φSLS) used in the load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of deep foundations. The performance function was established based on load corresponding to tolerable displacement (Qδtol) and design load (Qd). A dataset of published full-scale load tests including projects from Texas, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico was compiled and consisted of 60 load test cases comprising 33 driven piles and 27 drilled shafts. Resistance factors for SLS conditions were calibrated for tolerable displacements using both the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and the First Order Second Moment (FOSM) approaches. From the calibration study, resistance factors at SLS conditions were obtained ranging from 0.33 to 0.62 using FOSM method and 0.37 to 0.67 using the MCS for driven piles. In the case of drilled shafts, SLS resistance factors ranged from 0.37 to 0.77 following the FOSM method and 0.41 to 0.86 based on MCS.

Resistance Factors for Drilled Shafts in Weak Rock Based on O-Cell Test Data

2008 ◽  
Vol 2045 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Yang ◽  
Jie Han ◽  
Robert L. Parsons ◽  
Robert W. Henthorne
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Drilled Shafts ◽  
Rock Properties ◽  
Weak Rock ◽  
Foundation Design ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Side Resistance ◽  
Measured Resistance ◽  
Log Normal ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor

Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) has been mandatory for all FHWA-funded bridges since October 2007. The resistance factors included in the current AASHTO specifications for foundation design are not all calibrated by using field data. A calibration of resistance factors for side resistance of drilled shafts in weak rock is based on the statistical data collected from 19 O-cell tests in the midwestern United States. The field test data were used to determine the measured resistance, and the in situ rock properties and the dimensions of drilled shafts were used to calculate the predicted resistance by using the FHWA method. The Monte Carlo method was selected to perform the calibration. On the basis of the normally distributed loads and log normal distributed resistance from the test data, side resistance factors were determined at a target reliability index of 3.0. The calibrated resistance factors were compared with those in the current AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.

Reliability-based load and resistance factors for soil-nail walls

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.L. Sivakumar Babu ◽  
Vikas Pratap Singh
Keyword(s):  
Limit Equilibrium ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Input Parameter ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Soil Nail ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Strength Limit ◽  
Load And Resistance Factors ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor ◽  
Parameter Values

Existing soil nailing design methodologies are essentially based on limit equilibrium principles that together with a lumped factor of safety or a set of partial factors on the material parameters and loads account for uncertainties in design input parameter values. Recent trends in the development of design procedures for earth retaining structures are towards load and resistance factor design (LRFD). In the present study, a methodology for the use of LRFD in the context of soil-nail walls is proposed and a procedure to determine reliability-based load and resistance factors is illustrated for important strength limit states with reference to a 10 m high soil-nail wall. The need for separate partial factors for each limit state is highlighted, and the proposed factors are compared with those existing in the literature.

scholarly journals Development of Rock Embedded Drilled Shaft Resistance Factors in Korea based on Field Tests

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 2201
Author(s):  
Seok Jung KIM ◽  
Sun Yong KWON ◽  
Jin Tae HAN ◽  
Mintaek YOO
Keyword(s):  
Design Method ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Drilled Shaft ◽  
Displacement Curve ◽  
Base Resistance ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Shaft Resistance ◽  
The Us

Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) is a limit state design method that has been applied worldwide. Because the data for determining LRFD factors in Korea has been insufficient, the resistance factors suggested by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in the US have been used for design in Korea; however, these resistance factors were defined based on the characteristics of the predominant bedrock types in the U.S. As such, it remains necessary to determine resistance factors that reflect the bedrock conditions in Korea. Accordingly, in this study, LRFD resistance factors were determined using 13 sets of drilled shaft load test data. To obtain accurate resistance factors, calibration of the elastic modulus of the drilled shaft and the equivalent load–displacement curve considering the axial load and elastic settlement was conducted. After determining accurate resistance values, a reliability analysis was performed. The resistance factors were determined to be within 0.13–0.32 of the AASHTO factors for the shaft resistance, 0.19–0.29 for the base resistance, and 0.28–0.42 for the total resistance. This is equivalent to being 30–60% of the AASHTO-recommended values for the shaft resistance and 40–60% of the AASHTO-recommended values for the base resistance. These differences in resistance factors were entirely the result of discrepancies in the conditions of the rock in the US and Korea in which the shafts were founded.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC DEFORMATION MODULUS

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mindaugas Mikolainis ◽  
Marijus Ustinovičius ◽  
Danutė Sližytė ◽  
Tatyana Zhilkina
Keyword(s):  
Soil Compaction ◽  
Dynamic Deformation ◽  
Deformation Modulus ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Plate Load Test ◽  
Test Execution ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Different Depths ◽  
Result Interpretation

This article summarises dynamic deformation modulus correlation with second reload of static plate load test results for an even thickness soil strata layer. An analysis of execution and result interpretation of both static deformation modulus and dynamic deformation modulus is provided also. Different correlations between the two modulus according to different authors are provided. Since dynamic plate load test is not regulated in Lithuania as a soil compaction contron method, a few dynamic plate load tests and static plate load tests were executed in order to compare compaction results. The additional experiments for dynamic plate load tests in different depths were executed which showed that deformation modulus is dependant on depth of test execution, thus it is worthwile to mention to be cautious on compaction results in trenches.

scholarly journals Load and resistance factor design of drilled shafts subjected to lateral loading at service limit state

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Minh Dinh Uong
Keyword(s):  
Limit State ◽  
Design Procedure ◽  
Drilled Shafts ◽  
Resistance Factor ◽  
Lateral Loading ◽  
Drilled Shaft ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Service Limit State ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor ◽  
Aashto Lrfd

Since 2007, the American Association of State Highway Administration Officials (AASHTO) has made utilization of Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) mandatory on all federally-funded new bridge projects (AASHTO, 2007). However, currently, there are no guidelines implementing LRFD techniques for design of drilled shaft subjected to lateral loads using reliability-based analysis. On a national level, the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO, 2012) specify that a resistance factor of 1.0 be used for design of drilled shafts subjected to lateral loading at service limit state, which means reliability-based analyses for calibration of resistance factors have not been performed. Therefore, there is a need to create a LRFD procedure for drilled shafts subjected to lateral loading at service limit state that has reliability-based calibrated resistance factors applicable for future projects. The research focuses on the reliability-based analysis of drilled shaft subjected to lateral loading, characterize lateral load transfer model of drilled shafts in shale, probabilistic calibrate resistance factor and contribute to the development of design procedure using LRFD. The objective of this work is to improve the design of drilled shaft subjected to lateral loading using LRFD at service limit state by providing a more reliable design procedure than the current AASHTO LRFD procedure for drilled shafts subjected to lateral loading at service limit state.

scholarly journals Reliability-Based Ultimate Limit State Design of Micropiles in Ontario Soils

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre P. R. P. Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Ultimate Limit State ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Ground Conditions ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Ultimate Limit State Design ◽  
Ultimate Limit

The design practice of micropiles in Ontario soils under the ultimate limit state was improved through both statistical and reliability analyses of a database of 40 micropile load tests. Micropile design is extremely dependent on engineering experience and judgement due to the lack of an accurate estimation of the bond strength. The FHWA manual of micropiles only provides wide ranges of bond strength in different ground conditions. Micropile load tests were conducted by Keller Foundations Ltd and collected for this study. From a statistical analysis, Fuller and Hoy’s method was selected as the best method to estimate the failure load from non-failed tests. Adjusted parameters were given to predict the bond strength of micropiles. A method was proposed to estimate the contributions from the cased length and the tip to the total resistance. In the end, a reliability analysis was conducted and the resistance factors were recalibrated.

GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF FOUNDATION INVESTIGATIONS FOR PRODUCTION PLATFORMS AT NORTH RANKIN

1980 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
R.W. King
Keyword(s):  
Load Test ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Foundation Design ◽  
The North ◽  
Limited Experience ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Petroleum Development ◽  
First Time

Production platforms required for the development of the North Rankin gas/condensate field will be founded on deep deposits of loose to weakly cemented calcareous material of predominantly marine origin. Although the data base for foundation design in these materials is extremely limited, experience has shown that calcareous sediments exhibit unusual engineering characteristics and that in situ load tests appear to be the most reliable indicator of soil-bearing potential.The foundation investigations performed at North Rankin, in 1978, integrated conventional soil sampling techniques with cone penetrometer testing (CPT), which is a small-scale load test that provides a semicontinuous profile of soil resistance. This being the first time that CPT had been used extensively in calcareous sediments, a series of innovative prototype in situ load tests were performed to provide data for calibration of the core resistance profile.A modified carbonate classification system was introduced into the programme and, together with detailed geological analysis of specimens, it provided an insight into subtle variations in lithology and cementation throughout the profile.These new developments and the comprehensive nature of the investigation produced a large amount of data that are relevant to other locations where similar sediments exist.As a result of these investigations and subsequent studies, Woodside Petroleum Development has been able to progress confidently in the definition of a suitable foundation system and the design of the North Rankin platforms.

Characterization of model uncertainty in predicting axial resistance of piles driven into clay

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1098-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong Tang ◽  
Kok-Kwang Phoon
Keyword(s):  
Model Uncertainty ◽  
Driven Piles ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Pile Diameter ◽  
Measured Resistance ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Similar Accuracy ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor ◽  
Axial Resistance

This paper summarizes 239 static load tests to evaluate the performance of four static design methods for axial resistance of driven piles in clay. The methods are ISO 19901-4:2016, SHANSEP, ICP-05, and NGI-05. The database is categorized into four groups depending on the load type (compression or uplift) and pile tip condition (open or closed end). The model uncertainty in resistance prediction is quantified as a ratio between measured and calculated resistance, which is called a model factor. The measured resistance is interpreted as a load producing a settlement level of 10% pile diameter. Database studies show that the four methods present a similar accuracy, where the mean and coefficient of variation (COV) of the model factor are around 1 and 0.3, respectively. The COV values are smaller than those for driven piles in sand available in literature. The model statistics determined from the database are applicable to a simplified or full probabilistic form of reliability-based design (RBD) of driven piles in clay. As an illustration, the resistance factors in load and resistance factor design (LRFD, a simplified form of RBD) are calibrated by Monte Carlo simulations.

Consequence factors in the ultimate limit state design of shallow foundations

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon A. Fenton ◽  
D. V. Griffiths ◽  
Olaide O. Ojomo
Keyword(s):  
Limit State ◽  
Shallow Foundations ◽  
Resistance Factor ◽  
Shallow Foundation ◽  
Ultimate Limit State ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Limit State Design ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Load And Resistance Factors ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor

The reliability-based design of shallow foundations is generally implemented via a load and resistance factor design methodology embedded in a limit state design framework. For any particular limit state, the design proceeds by ensuring that the factored resistance equals or exceeds the factored load effects. Load and resistance factors are determined to ensure that the resulting design is sufficiently safe. Load factors are typically prescribed in structural codes and take into account load uncertainty. Factors applied to resistance depend on both uncertainty in the resistance (accounted for by a resistance factor) and desired target reliability (accounted for by a newly introduced consequence factor). This paper concentrates on how the consequence factor can be defined and specified to adjust the target reliability of a shallow foundation designed to resist bearing capacity failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document