A microseismicity study of the Queen Charlotte Islands region

1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2556-2566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joane Bérubé ◽  
Garry C. Rogers ◽  
Robert M. Ellis ◽  
Elizabeth O. Hasselgren
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Events ◽  
Seismic Gap ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Thrust Faulting ◽  
Queen Charlotte Islands ◽  
Composite Focal Mechanism ◽  
Predominant Orientation ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs

Nineteen land and three ocean-bottom seismographs were operated in the Queen Charlotte Islands region for periods of up to 9 weeks and 5 days, respectively, during the summer of 1983. Three hundred and seventeen seismic events were detected. One hundred and nine earthquakes ranging in size from magnitude −0.5 to 5.1 were well recorded at three or more stations and could be accurately located. Of these, 84 lie on or close to the Queen Charlotte Fault, most within the rupture zone of the great 1949 earthquake (MS = 8.1). The seismic gap, between the rupture zones of the 1949 event and the 1970 earthquake (MS = 7.4) that occurred just south of the Queen Charlotte Islands, exhibited little activity. Eighteen earthquakes, the largest with ML = 3.8, were located east of the fault on northern Graham Island or in adjacent Hecate Strait. Focal depths were generally less than 20 km, and none could be associated with known faults. Composite focal mechanism solutions were obtained for four suites of earthquakes along the Queen Charlotte Fault and for a group east of the fault zone on northern Graham Island. In all cases the solutions indicate thrust mechanisms with the predominant orientation of pressure axes northeast–southwest. The presence of thrust faulting close to the Queen Charlotte Fault suggests that the microseismicity is not occurring on the main transcurrent fault but on subsidiary faults that are moving due to the regional stress regime. Thrust faulting on northern Graham Island can best be interpreted as reflecting the stress field from a locked Pacific and North American boundary.

Queen Charlotte fault zone: microearthquakes from a temporary array of land stations and ocean bottom seismographs

1981 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 776-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Hyndman ◽  
R. M. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Small Component ◽  
Queen Charlotte Islands ◽  
The North ◽  
Vertical Fault ◽  
Linear Sections ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs ◽  
Steep Slopes

A temporary array of land and ocean bottom seismograph stations was used to accurately locate microearthquakes on the Queen Charlotte fault zone, which occurs along the continental margin of western Canada. The continental slope has two steep linear sections separated by a 25 km wide irregular terrace at a depth of 2 km. Eleven events were located with magnitudes from 0.5 to 2.0, 10 of them beneath the landward one of the two steep slopes, some 5 km off the coast of the southern Queen Charlotte Islands. No events were located beneath the seaward and deeper steep slope. The depths of seven of these events were constrained by the data to between 9 and 21 km with most near 20 km. The earthquake and other geophysical data are consistent with a near vertical fault zone having mainly strike-slip motion. A model including a small component of underthrusting in addition to strike-slip faulting is suggested to account for the some 15° difference between the relative motion of the North America and Pacific plates from plate tectonic models and the strike of the margin. One event was located about 50 km inland of the main active zone and probably occurred on the Sandspit fault. The rate of seismicity on the Queen Charlotte fault zone during the period of the survey was similar to that predicted by the recurrence relation for the region from the long-term earthquake record.

The Queen Charlotte Islands refraction project. Part I. The Queen Charlotte Fault Zone

1988 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1857-1870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonya A. Dehler ◽  
Ron M. Clowes
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
Oceanic Lithosphere ◽  
North American Plate ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Queen Charlotte Islands ◽  
Lower Terrace ◽  
Vertical Fault ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs

The active margin between the continental North American plate and oceanic Pacific plate west of the Queen Charlotte Islands was the site of an extensive onshore–offshore seismic refraction project in 1983. An airgun line shot over two ocean-bottom seismographs (OBS's) and a 32-charge explosion line recorded on the two OBS's and eight land-based seismographs (LBS's) deployed across northern Moresby Island were selected to study the structure of the predominantly transform Queen Charlotte Fault Zone and the associated offshore terrace. Two-dimensional ray tracing and synthetic seismogram modelling produced a pronounced laterally varying velocity structural model showing three major crustal components (oceanic, terrace, and continental) separated by an outer, crustally pervasive fault and active Queen Charlotte Fault, respectively. The 3 km thick block-faulted upper terrace unit, overlain by deformed sediments, is indistinguishable from adjacent oceanic sediments and upper crustal basalts located to the west. The upper part of the 10–17 km thick lower terrace unit has anomalously low velocities relative to the adjacent oceanic and continental crustal units. A high gradient increases terrace velocity rapidly with depth until the contrast becomes negligible at approximately 17 km depth. Changes in depth to Moho beneath the terrace suggest an increase in eastward Moho dip from 2–5 °observed west of the terrace to 19 °below it. Tectonic mechanisms proposed to explain the anomalous terrace structure involve sediment accretion during subduction of oceanic lithosphere, alternating or combined with compressive upthrusting of material along near-vertical fault planes during periods of active transform motion.

scholarly journals Ocean-Bottom Seismographs Based on Broadband MET Sensors: Architecture and Deployment Case Study in the Arctic

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3979
Author(s):  
Artem A. Krylov ◽  
Ivan V. Egorov ◽  
Sergey A. Kovachev ◽  
Dmitry A. Ilinskiy ◽  
Oleg Yu. Ganzha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Site Response ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Laptev Sea ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Arctic Seas ◽  
Shirshov Institute ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs ◽  
The Laptev Sea

The Arctic seas are now of particular interest due to their prospects in terms of hydrocarbon extraction, development of marine transport routes, etc. Thus, various geohazards, including those related to seismicity, require detailed studies, especially by instrumental methods. This paper is devoted to the ocean-bottom seismographs (OBS) based on broadband molecular–electronic transfer (MET) sensors and a deployment case study in the Laptev Sea. The purpose of the study is to introduce the architecture of several modifications of OBS and to demonstrate their applicability in solving different tasks in the framework of seismic hazard assessment for the Arctic seas. To do this, we used the first results of several pilot deployments of the OBS developed by Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IO RAS) and IP Ilyinskiy A.D. in the Laptev Sea that took place in 2018–2020. We highlighted various seismological applications of OBS based on broadband MET sensors CME-4311 (60 s) and CME-4111 (120 s), including the analysis of ambient seismic noise, registering the signals of large remote earthquakes and weak local microearthquakes, and the instrumental approach of the site response assessment. The main characteristics of the broadband MET sensors and OBS architectures turned out to be suitable for obtaining high-quality OBS records under the Arctic conditions to solve seismological problems. In addition, the obtained case study results showed the prospects in a broader context, such as the possible influence of the seismotectonic factor on the bottom-up thawing of subsea permafrost and massive methane release, probably from decaying hydrates and deep geological sources. The described OBS will be actively used in further Arctic expeditions.

Microseismicity and tectonics of the Nevada Seismic Zone

1971 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1413-1432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Gumper ◽  
Christopher Scholz
Keyword(s):  
Sierra Nevada ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Basin And Range ◽  
Mono Lake ◽  
Tectonic Activity ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
Owens Valley ◽  
Western Basin ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Composite Focal Mechanism

abstract Microseismicity, composite focal-mechanism solutions, and previously-published focal parameter data are used to determine the current tectonic activity of the prominent zone of seismicity in western Nevada and eastern California, termed the Nevada Seismic Zone. The microseismicity substantially agrees with the historic seismicity and delineates a narrow, major zone of activity that extends from Owens Valley, California, north past Dixie Valley, Nevada. Focal parameters indicate that a regional pattern of NW-SE tension exists for the western Basin and Range and is now producing crustal extension within the Nevada Seismic Zone. An eastward shift of the seismic zone along the Excelsior Mountains and left-lateral strike-slip faulting determined from a composite focal mechanism indicate transform-type faulting between Mono Lake and Pilot Mountain. Based on these results and other data, it is suggested that the Nevada Seismic Zone is caused by the interaction of a westward flow of mantle material beneath the Basin and Range Province with the boundary of the Sierra Nevada batholith.

Ocean-Bottom Seismographs

1983 ◽  
pp. 257-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Whitmarsh ◽  
R. C. Lilwall
Keyword(s):  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs

scholarly journals A functional tool to explore the reliability of micro-earthquake focal mechanism solution for seismotectonic purposes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Maria Adinolfi ◽  
Raffaella De Matteis ◽  
Rita De Nardis ◽  
Aldo Zollo
Keyword(s):  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
Seismic Network ◽  
Fault System ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solution ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Earthquake Focal Mechanism

Abstract. Improving the knowledge of seismogenic faults requires the integration of geological, seismological, and geophysical information. Among several analyses, the definition of earthquake focal mechanisms plays an essential role in providing information about the geometry of individual faults and the stress regime acting in a region. Fault plane solutions can be retrieved by several techniques operating in specific magnitude ranges, both in the time and frequency domain and using different data. For earthquakes of low magnitude, the limited number of available data and their uncertainties can compromise the stability of fault plane solutions. In this work, we propose a useful methodology to evaluate how well a seismic network used to monitor natural and/or induced micro-seismicity estimates focal mechanisms as function of magnitude, location, and kinematics of seismic source and consequently their reliability in defining seismotectonic models. To study the consistency of focal mechanism solutions, we use a Bayesian approach that jointly inverts the P/S long-period spectral-level ratios and the P polarities to infer the fault-plane solutions. We applied this methodology, by computing synthetic data, to the local seismic network operated in the Campania-Lucania Apennines (Southern Italy) to monitor the complex normal fault system activated during the Ms 6.9, 1980 earthquake. We demonstrate that the method we propose can have a double purpose. It can be a valid tool to design or to test the performance of local seismic networks and more generally it can be used to assign an absolute uncertainty to focal mechanism solutions fundamental for seismotectonic studies.

Turbidity Current in the Northern Suruga Bay Recorded by Ocean Bottom Seismographs after Passing Typhoon No. 24 in 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (0) ◽  
pp. 197-207
Author(s):  
Hisatoshi BABA ◽  
Nagisa NAKAO ◽  
Takahito NISHIMIYA ◽  
Masanao SHINOHARA ◽  
Shintaro ABE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Turbidity Current ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Suruga Bay ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs

Characteristics of Low-Frequency Horizontal Noise of Ocean-Bottom Seismic Data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao An ◽  
Chen Cai ◽  
Lei Zhou ◽  
Ting Yang
Keyword(s):  
Water Waves ◽  
Noise Source ◽  
Random Noise ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Coherent Noise ◽  
Infragravity Waves ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Bottom Currents ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs

Abstract Horizontal records of ocean-bottom seismographs are usually noisy at low frequencies (< 0.1 Hz). The noise source is believed to be associated with ocean-bottom currents that may tilt the instrument. Currently horizontal records are mainly used to remove the coherent noise in vertical records, and there has been little literature that quantitatively discusses the mechanism and characteristics of low-frequency horizontal noise. In this article, we analyze in situ ocean-bottom measurements by rotating the data horizontally and evaluating the coherency between different channels. Results suggest that the horizontal noise consists of two components, random noise and principle noise whose direction barely changes in time. The amplitude and the direction of the latter are possibly related to the intensity and direction of ocean-bottom currents. Rotating the horizontal records to the direction of the principle noise can largely suppress the principle noise in the orthogonal horizontal channel. In addition, the horizontal noise is incoherent with pressure, indicating that the noise source is not ocean surface water waves (infragravity waves). At some stations in shallow waters (<300 m), horizontal noise around 0.07 Hz is found to be linearly proportional to the temporal derivative of pressure, which is explained by forces of added mass due to infragravity waves.

Secondary faulting near the terminus of a seismogenic strike-slip fault: Aftershocks of the 1976 Guatemala earthquake

1979 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-444
Author(s):  
C. J. Langer ◽  
G. A. Bollinger
Keyword(s):  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Linear Trend ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Strike Slip Fault ◽  
Aftershock Activity ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
The North ◽  
Composite Focal Mechanism ◽  
Theoretical Pattern ◽  
Main Fault

abstract Aftershocks of the February 4, 1976 Guatemalan earthquake (Ms = 7.5) were monitored by a network of portable seismographs from February 9 to February 27. Although seismic data were obtained all along the 230-km surface rupture of the causal Motagua fault, the field program was designed to concentrate on the aftershock activity at the western terminus of the fault. Data from that locale revealed several linear or near-linear trends of aftershock epicenters that splay to the southwest away from the western end of the main fault. These trends correlate spatially with mapped surface lineaments and, to some degree, with ground breakage patterns near Guatemala City. The observed splay pattern of aftershocks and the normal-faulting mode of the splay earthquakes determined from composite focal mechanism solutions, may be explained by a theoretical pattern of stress trajectories at the terminus of a strike-slip fault. Composite focal mechanism solutions for aftershocks located on or near the surface break of the Motagua fault, to the north and east of the linear trend splay area, agree with the mapped surface movements, i.e., left-lateral strike-slip.

30-DAY OCEAN-BOTTOM SEISMOGRAPH: MODIFICATION AND TESTING OF NINETEEN OCEAN-BOTTOM SEISMOGRAPHS

1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph R. Guidroz ◽  
Terence W. Harley ◽  
G. Dale Ezell
Keyword(s):  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismograph ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document