Unit activity in the superior colliculus of the cat following passive eye movements

1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. C. Abrahams ◽  
G. Anstee
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Unit Activity ◽  
Initial Position ◽  
Passive Movement ◽  
Unit Response ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
Saccadic Velocity ◽  
Facial Area ◽  
Low Threshold

Unit response in the superior colliculus and underlying structures has been examined in the chloralose-anaesthetized cat following passive movement of an occluded eye. One group of units was sensitive to small saccadic movements, responded regardless of the initial position of the eye, and in most instances responded to movements in opposite directions. A second numerically smaller group also responded when the eye was moved at saccadic velocity but only when the eye passed a fixed point. Such units with fixed positional thresholds were found following movements in both nasal and temporal directions as well as to both upward and downward movement. Both types of unit response were found after transection of the optic nerve and were also recorded when individual extraocular muscles were subjected to controlled stretch, It is assumed that most unit activity seen after passive movement of the occluded eye is due to activity in extraocular muscle receptors. In the deep layers of the superior colliculus responses to small eye movements were found to be due to the activation of very low threshold receptors sensitive to vibration in the facial area.

New Mechanism That Accounts for Position Sensitivity of Saccades Evoked in Response to Stimulation of Superior Colliculus

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 3373-3379 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Moschovakis ◽  
Y. Dalezios ◽  
J. Petit ◽  
A. A. Grantyn
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Initial Position ◽  
Characteristic Vector ◽  
Extraocular Motoneurons ◽  
Position Sensitivity ◽  
Stimulation Of

Moschovakis, A. K., Y. Dalezios, J. Petit, and A. A. Grantyn. New mechanism that accounts for position sensitivity of saccades evoked in response to stimulation of superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 3373–3379, 1998. Electrical stimulation of the feline superior colliculus (SC) is known to evoke saccades whose size depends on the site stimulated (the “characteristic vector” of evoked saccades) and the initial position of the eyes. Similar stimuli were recently shown to produce slow drifts that are presumably caused by relatively direct projections of the SC onto extraocular motoneurons. Both slow and fast evoked eye movements are similarly affected by the initial position of the eyes, despite their dissimilar metrics, kinematics, and anatomic substrates. We tested the hypothesis that the position sensitivity of evoked saccades is due to the superposition of largely position-invariant saccades and position-dependent slow drifts. We show that such a mechanism can account for the fact that the position sensitivity of evoked saccades increases together with the size of their characteristic vector. Consistent with it, the position sensitivity of saccades drops considerably when the contribution of slow drifts is minimal as, for example, when there is no overlap between evoked saccades and short-duration trains of high-frequency stimuli.

Evidence Against a Moving Hill in the Superior Colliculus During Saccadic Eye Movements in the Monkey

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 2778-2789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robijanto Soetedjo ◽  
Chris R. S. Kaneko ◽  
Albert F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Topographic Map ◽  
Hill Model ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
The Hill

Saccadic eye movements of different sizes and directions are represented in an orderly topographic map across the intermediate and deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC), where large saccades are encoded caudally and small saccades rostrally. Based on experiments in the cat, it has been suggested that saccades are initiated by a hill of activity at the caudal site appropriate for a particular saccade. As the saccade evolves and the remaining distance to the target, the motor error, decreases, the hill moves rostrally across successive SC sites responsible for saccades of increasingly smaller amplitudes. When the hill reaches the “fixation zone” in the rostral SC, the saccade is terminated. A moving hill of activity has also been posited for the monkey, in which it is supposed to be transported via so-called build-up neurons (BUNs), which have a prelude of activity that culminates in a burst for saccades. However, several studies using a variety of approaches have yet to provide conclusive evidence for or against a moving hill. The moving hill scenario predicts that during a large saccade the burst of a BUN in the rostral SC will be delayed until the motor error remaining in the evolving saccade is equal to the saccadic amplitude for which that BUN discharges best, i.e., its optimal amplitude. Therefore a plot of the burst lead preceding the “optimal” motor error against the time of occurrence of the optimal motor error should have a slope of zero. A slope of −1 indicates no moving hill. For our 20 BUNs, we used three measures of burst timing: the leads to the onset, peak, and center of the burst. The average slopes of these relations were −1.09, −0.79, and −0.58, respectively. For individual BUNs, the slopes of all three relations always differed significantly from zero. Although the peak and center leads fall between −1 and 0, a hill of activity moving rostrally at a rate indicated by either of these slopes would arrive at the fixation zone much too late to terminate the saccade at the appropriate time. Calculating our same three timing measures from averaged data leads us to the same conclusion. Thus our data do not support the moving hill model. However, we argue in the discussion that the constant lead of the burst onset relative to saccade onset (∼27 ms) suggests that the BUNs may help to trigger the saccade.

scholarly journals Activation and Inactivation of Rostral Superior Colliculus Neurons During Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements in Monkeys

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 892-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele A. Basso ◽  
Richard J. Krauzlis ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Superficial Layer ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pursuit Initiation ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
Stimulation Of

Neurons in the intermediate and deep layers of the rostral superior colliculus (SC) of monkeys are active during attentive fixation, small saccades, and smooth-pursuit eye movements. Alterations of SC activity have been shown to alter saccades and fixation, but similar manipulations have not been shown to influence smooth-pursuit eye movements. Therefore we both activated (electrical stimulation) and inactivated (reversible chemical injection) rostral SC neurons to establish a causal role for the activity of these neurons in smooth pursuit. First, we stimulated the rostral SC during pursuit initiation as well as pursuit maintenance. For pursuit initiation, stimulation of the rostral SC suppressed pursuit to ipsiversive moving targets primarily and had modest effects on contraversive pursuit. The effect of stimulation on pursuit varied with the location of the stimulation with the most rostral sites producing the most effective inhibition of ipsiversive pursuit. Stimulation was more effective on higher pursuit speeds than on lower and did not evoke smooth-pursuit eye movements during fixation. As with the effects on pursuit initiation, ipsiversive maintained pursuit was suppressed, whereas contraversive pursuit was less affected. The stimulation effect on smooth pursuit did not result from a generalized inhibition because the suppression of smooth pursuit was greater than the suppression of smooth eye movements evoked by head rotations (vestibular-ocular reflex). Nor was the stimulation effect due to the activation of superficial layer visual neurons rather than the intermediate layers of the SC because stimulation of the superficial layers produced effects opposite to those found with intermediate layer stimulation. Second, we inactivated the rostral SC with muscimol and found that contraversive pursuit initiation was reduced and ipsiversive pursuit was increased slightly, changes that were opposite to those resulting from stimulation. The results of both the stimulation and the muscimol injection experiments on pursuit are consistent with the effects of these activation and inactivation experiments on saccades, and the effects on pursuit are consistent with the hypothesis that the SC provides a position signal that is used by the smooth-pursuit eye-movement system.

The Saccadic System

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Wong
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
The Body ◽  
Visual Hemifield ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
System P ◽  
Burst Neuron ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
Orbital Position

Saccades are fast conjugate eye movements that move both eyes quickly in the same direction, so that the image of an object of interest is brought on the foveae. Saccades can be made not only toward visual targets, but also toward auditory and tactile stimuli, as well as toward memorized targets. Saccades can be generated reflexively, and they are responsible for resetting the eyes back to the mid-orbital position during vestibulo-ocular or optokinetic stimulation. Saccades need to be fast to get the eyes on the target as soon as possible. They also need to be fast because our eyes act like cameras with slow shutters—vision is so blurred during saccades that the eyes have to move quickly to minimize the time during which no clear image is captured on the foveae. Indeed, saccades are the fastest type of eye movements, and they are among the fastest movements that the body can make. Saccade speed is not under voluntary control but depends on the size of the movement, with larger saccades attaining higher peak velocities. It has been estimated that we make more than 100,000 saccades per day. The burst neuron circuits in the brainstem provide the necessary motor signals to the extraocular muscles for the generation of saccades. There is a division of labor between the pons and the midbrain, with the pons primarily involved in generating horizontal saccades and the midbrain primarily involved in generating vertical and torsional saccades. However, because eye movements are a component of cognitive and purposeful behaviors in higher mammals, the process of deciding when and where to make a saccade occurs in the cerebral cortex. Not only does the cortex exert control over saccades through direct projections to the burst neuron circuits, it also acts via the superior colliculus. The superior colliculus is located in the midbrain and consists of seven layers: three superficial layers and four intermediate/ deep layers. The three superficial layers receive direct inputs from both the retina and striate cortex, and they contain a retinotopic representation of the contralateral visual hemifield.

Sensorimotor integration in the primate superior colliculus. I. Motor convergence

1987 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Jay ◽  
D. L. Sparks
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
M Cells ◽  
Efferent Pathway ◽  
Saccadic Velocity ◽  
Visual Targets ◽  
Sensory Responses

Orienting movements of the eyes and head are made to both auditory and visual stimuli even though in the primary sensory pathways the locations of auditory and visual stimuli are encoded in different coordinates. This study was designed to differentiate between two possible mechanisms for sensory-to-motor transformation. Auditory and visual signals could be translated into common coordinates in order to share a single motor pathway or they could maintain anatomically separate sensory and motor routes for the initiation and guidance of orienting eye movements. The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) that discharge before saccades to visual targets also discharge before saccades directed toward auditory targets. If they do, this would indicate that auditory and visual signals, originally encoded in different coordinates, have been converted into a single coordinate system and are sharing a motor circuit. Trained monkeys made saccadic eye movements to auditory or visual targets while the activity of visual-motor (V-M) cells and saccade-related burst (SRB) cells was monitored. The pattern of spike activity observed during trials in which saccades were made to visual targets was compared with that observed when comparable saccades were made to auditory targets. For most (57 of 59) V-M cells, sensory responses were observed only on visual trials. Auditory stimuli originating from the same region of space did not activate these cells. Yet, of the 72 V-M and SRB cells studied, 79% showed motor bursts prior to saccades to either auditory or visual targets. This finding indicates that visual and auditory signals, originally encoded in retinal and head-centered coordinates, respectively, have undergone a transformation that allows them to share a common efferent pathway for the generation of saccadic eye movements. Saccades to auditory targets usually have lower velocities than saccades of the same amplitude and direction made to acquire visual targets. Since fewer collicular cells are active prior to saccades to auditory targets, one determinant of saccadic velocity may be the number of collicular neurons discharging before a particular saccade.

scholarly journals Electrical stimulation of superior colliculus affects strabismus angle in monkey models for strabismus

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 1281-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suraj Upadhyaya ◽  
Hui Meng ◽  
Vallabh E. Das
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Topographic Map ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
Fixation Task ◽  
Saccade Direction ◽  
Stimulation Of

Disruption of binocular vision during the critical period for development leads to eye misalignment in humans and in monkey models. We have previously suggested that disruption within a vergence circuit could be the neural basis for strabismus. Electrical stimulation in the rostral superior colliculus (rSC) leads to vergence eye movements in normal monkeys. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of SC stimulation on eye misalignment in strabismic monkeys. Electrical stimulation was delivered to 51 sites in the intermediate and deep layers of the SC (400 Hz, 0.5-s duration, 10–40 μA) in 3 adult optical prism-reared strabismic monkeys. Scleral search coils were used to measure movements of both eyes during a fixation task. Staircase saccades with horizontal and vertical components were elicited by stimulation as predicted from the SC topographic map. Electrical stimulation also resulted in significant changes in horizontal strabismus angle, i.e., a shift toward exotropia/esotropia depending on stimulation site. Electrically evoked saccade vector amplitude in the two eyes was not significantly different ( P > 0.05; paired t-test) but saccade direction differed. However, saccade disconjugacy accounted for only ~50% of the change in horizontal misalignment while disconjugate postsaccadic movements accounted for the other ~50% of the change in misalignment due to electrical stimulation. In summary, our data suggest that electrical stimulation of the SC of strabismic monkeys produces a change in horizontal eye alignment that is due to a combination of disconjugate saccadic eye movements and disconjugate postsaccadic movements. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus in strabismic monkeys results in a change in eye misalignment. These data support the notion of developmental disruption of vergence circuits leading to maintenance of eye misalignment in strabismus.

Extraretinal Inputs to Neurons in the Rostral Superior Colliculus of the Monkey During Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 2629-2633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Krauzlis
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Related Activity ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
Almost All

The intermediate and deep layers of the monkey superior colliculus (SC) are known to be important for the generation of saccadic eye movements. Recent studies have also provided evidence that the rostral SC might be involved in the control of pursuit eye movements. However, because rostral SC neurons respond to visual stimuli used to guide pursuit, it is also possible that the pursuit-related activity is simply a visual response. To test this possibility, we recorded the activity of neurons in the rostral SC as monkeys smoothly pursued a target that was briefly extinguished. We found that almost all rostral SC neurons in our sample maintained their pursuit-related activity during a brief visual blink, which was similar to the maintained activity they also exhibited during blinks imposed during fixation. These results indicate that discharge of rostral SC neurons during pursuit is not simply a visual response, but includes extraretinal signals.

Auditory response properties of neurons in deep layers of cat superior colliculus

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 674-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Z. Wise ◽  
D. R. Irvine
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Noise Burst ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
Spatial Fields

1. The auditory responses of 207 single neurons in the intermediate and deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC) of barbiturate -or chloralose-anesthetized cats were recorded extracellularly. Sealed stimulating systems incorporating calibrated probe microphone assemblies were employed to present tone- and noise-burst stimuli. 2. All acoustically activated neurons responded with onset responses to noise bursts. Of those neurons also tested with tonal stimuli, approximately 30% were unresponsive over the frequency range tested (0.1-40 kHz), while the others had higher thresholds to tones than to noise. 3. Details of frequency responsiveness were obtained for 55 neurons; 21 were broadly tuned, while 34 were sharply tuned with clearly defined characteristic frequencies (CFs). All sharply tuned neurons had CFs greater than or equal to 10 kHz. 4. The majority of neurons (81%) responded with latencies in the range 8-20 ms; only 11% of neurons had latencies greater than 30 ms. 5. Binaural response properties were examined for 165 neurons. The great majority (79%) received monaural excitatory input only from the contralateral ear (EO). However, most EO cells were binaurally influenced, the contralateral response being either inhibited (EO/I; 96 of 131 units) or facilitated (EO/F; 33 of 131 units) by simultaneous ipsilateral stimulation. Small subgroups were monaurally excited by either ear (EE cells; 8%) or were unresponsive monaurally but responded strongly to binaural stimulation (OO/F cells; 7%). 6. EO/I, EO/F, and OO/F neurons showed characteristic forms of sensitivity to interaural intensity differences (IIDs). The IID functions of EO/I neurons would be expected to produce large contralateral spatial receptive fields with clearly defined medial borders, such as have been described in studies of deep SC neurons employing free-field stimuli. 7. Preliminary evidence suggests a possible topographic organization of IID sensitivity in deep SC, such that the steeply sloping portion of the function (corresponding to the medial edge of the receptive field) is shifted laterally for EO/I neurons located more caudally in the nucleus. 8. The auditory properties of deep SC neurons are compared with previous reports and implications for the organization of auditory input are considered. The binaural properties and auditory spatial fields of deep SC neurons suggest that any representation of auditory space in this structure is unlikely to be based on restricted spatial fields.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document