DO CEOS WITH SHARE PLEDGE SUPPRESS THE FIRMS’ INNOVATION?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-44
Author(s):  
FANG JIA ◽  
XINPING XIA ◽  
XICHAN CHEN ◽  
CHENLIN YANG ◽  
LIHONG CAO

It is a common phenomenon for corporate insiders to pledge their stock as collateral for personal loans in China. Using Chinese data, this paper examines the effects of CEOs’ share pledge on the firms’ future innovation output. Evidence suggests that the existence of CEOs with share pledge has a significantly negative effect on firms’ innovation output. The baseline results are consistent with a variety of robust tests. Furthermore, we propose the effect of CEOs’ share pledge works on the corporate innovation through the market value management channel. Finally, we find that the good corporate governance is a possible channel to relieve the agency cost on CEOs.

Author(s):  
Chermian Eforis

Objective - The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of good corporate governance (GCG) on Indonesia's SOEs and the influence of state ownership on company performance. Methodology/Technique - This study examines State Owned Enterprises in Indonesia that were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2011 and 2015. Findings - The empirical results show that GCG and state ownership both have a positive influence on the company's financial performance (in this case, Return On Assets). However, the percentage of state ownership has a negative effect on the relationship between Good Corporate Governance and Return On Assets. Novelty - One agency cost is monitoring expenditure by the principal. Privatization is one way to improve the performance of SOEs. Privatization is believed to improve the performance of SOEs, as a result of increased supervision of the performance of SOEs in Indonesia. Type of Paper: Empirical Keywords: State Owned Enterprises; Good Corporate Governance; State Ownership; Return On Assets; Indonesia. JEL Classification: G32, H70, G34.


Author(s):  
Ni Luh Ayu Yulita Utami ◽  
Ida Bagus Panji Sedana

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect spreads, market value, variance return and dividend payout ratio of the holding period of the stock chemical and basic industry sectors 2011-2014 period. The study was conducted using the method of non-participant observation, the data used is secondary data obtained in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) through the site www.idx.co.id. The sample used in the study of eight companies which were determined using purposive sampling method. The analysis technique used in this research is multiple linear regression. Based on the analysis, variable spreads had a negative influence is not significant, the market value has a significant negative effect, return variance has no significant negative effect and the dividend payout ratio has a significant positive pengeruh. Simultaneously independent variables significantly influence the holding period. Based on the results of this study should investors pay attention to the variable market value and the dividend payout ratio that has a significant influence on the holding period


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 211-234
Author(s):  
Levi Martantina ◽  
R. Soerjatno

This study aims to examine the effect  of Corporate Social Responsibility on Tax Avoidance in which Good Corporate Governance is moderating variable. Corporate Social Responsibility is independent variable whereas dependent variable is Tax Avoidance. The result of testing the first hyphothesis found that Corporate Social Responsibility has a negative effect on Tax Avoidance. In other words, the company that does extensive disclosure, the company does not practice Tax Avoidance. The result of testing the second hypothesis found that the exixtence of Good Corporate Governance in the board of directors mediate the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility with Tax Avoidance. So that the existence of the board of directors is able to contribute in making extensive disclosure towards Corporate Social Responsibility and practice of Tax Avoidance.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Citra Chairunissa ◽  
Raden Rosiyana Dewi

<p><em>T</em><em>he  objective  of  the  emperical  study  is  to  examine  and  to analyze  1)  The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Financial Performance, 2 ) The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Market Value, 3) The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Financial Performance with Corporate Governance as an Moderating  4) The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Market Value with Corporate Governance as an  Moderating  Variable.  The sample of  this emperical  study is the company financing company that listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 2010-2012</em>.<em>  </em><em></em><em>T</em><em>his  research  uses  purposive  sampling  method. Data  analysis  techniques include  1)  Descriptive  statistics, 2)  Normality  Test, 3)  Classical  Test Assumptions : Multicollinearity and Heteroskidastity , 4) Regression Testing : Coefficient of Determination Test , F Test , danUji T. The results of this empirical study are 1) Intellectual Capital significant positive effect on the company 's financial  performance ,  2)  Intellectual  Capital significant  negative effect  on market valuation , 3) Intellectual Capital no significant effect on the financial performance of companies   with   moderated Corporate Governance, 4) Intellectual Capital  had  no  significant  effect  assessment  of  the  performance market with moderated Corporate Governance</em></p>


2022 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-879
Author(s):  
Risal Rinofah ◽  
Pristin Prima Sari ◽  
Heni   Nur Amrina

The purpose of this study is to find out whether the effect of Market Value Added, Profitability, and Market Value Added on stock price. Sampling in this study is a purposive sampling method. Then the data is tested using multiple regression analysis. The results of the t test showed that the Economic Value Added has a signification value of 0,018 which means smaller than 0,05 and the calculated value of -2.441<t tablel 2.00758 then H1 is accepted. Profitability has a signification value of 0,034 greater than 0,05 and a calculated value of 2.182>t table 2.00758 then H2 is accepted, Market Value Added has significant  value of 0,223 greater than 0,05 and the value of t calculated -1.235<t table 2.00758 then H3 is rejected. The results of the F test showed that Economic Value Added, Profitability, Market Value Added have a calculated F value of 2,933 and sig. 0,042. Because the value F calculated 2.933>F table 2.773 and sig. value 0,042<0,05. It can be concluded that partially Economic Value Added has a significant negative effect on stock price, Profitability has a significant effect on stock price, Market Value Added has no significant effect on stock price and simultaneously Economic Value Added, Profitability, Market Value Added has a significant effect on stock price Keywords: Economic Value Added, Profitabilitas, Market Value Added, Stock Price


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 883
Author(s):  
Ketut Krisna Savitri ◽  
I Wayan Ramantha

This study aims to empirically examine the effect of the risk-based bank rating component as measured by non-performing loans, loan to deposit ratio, good corporate governance, return on assets and capital adequacy ratio on the value of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) Year 2013-2017. The research sample was selected using the nonprobability sampling method with a purposive sampling technique and obtained as many as 6 banking companies, so that the number of observations with a study period of 5 years was 30 observations. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that non-performing loans and loan to deposit ratios have a negative effect on the value of banking companies. Return on assets and capital adequacy ratio have a positive effect on the value of banking companies and good corporate governance does not affect the value of banking companies. Keywords : Risk Based Bank Rating;  Company Value; Banking.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Liu ◽  
Wen Qu ◽  
Janto Haman

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the association between firm performance and product market competition (PMC), and then examine the mitigation effect of corporate governance and/or state-ownership (SOEs) in the association between PMC and firm performance using Chinese listed firms. Design/methodology/approach The authors consider three determinants of the PMC that affect the nature of competition, and use market concentration, product substitutability and market size as proxies for PMC. The authors construct a corporate governance index which measures the extent of board independence, monitoring strength of supervisory board over board of directors, and monitoring strength of board of directors over CEO. The authors use Tobin’s Q as a proxy for firm performance. The authors use a sample of 20,706 firm-year observations listed on the Chinese stock market between 2001 and 2016 to empirically investigate the research questions proposed in the paper. Findings The authors find that higher PMC is associated with lower firm performance. The authors find that good corporate governance practices moderate the negative effect of higher PMC on firm performance. The association between higher PMC and lower performance is weaker for firms controlled by SOEs compared to non-SOEs. Further, the moderation effect of SOEs on the association between higher PMC and lower performance is more pronounced for firms with good corporate governance practices compared to firms with weak corporate governance practices. Originality/value Extant studies investigating the relationship between PMC and corporate governance suggest an either complementary or substitution relationship in developed economies. Our study highlights the interactive role played by SOEs and good corporate governance practices in firm performance in highly competitive product markets in an emerging economy. The findings provide insightful information to regulators of other emerging countries that SOEs with good corporate governance practices can play an important role in the economy by mitigating the negative effect of higher PMC on firm performance.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Huei Chiao ◽  
Bin Qiu ◽  
Bin Wang

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of common ownership on corporate innovation, including innovation input, innovation output and postgrant patents.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses the ordinary least square model and the difference-in-differences technique to evaluate the effect of institutional interlocking shareholdings on the life cycle of corporate innovation.FindingsThe results show that common ownership impedes innovation measured by patent grants and citations through reduced R&D expenditures. However, common ownership protects postgrant patents by lowering the likelihood that a co-owned firm gets involved in patent litigation and by accelerating the settlement of lawsuits between co-owned firms.Practical implicationsFrom a regulatory perspective, common ownership in younger firms that rely heavily on R&D investment to produce innovation outputs is detrimental and needs to be regulated. However, common ownership in mature firms, which hold a big pool of patents or rely on acquiring patents to compete, is of less concern because of the protective role detected.Originality/valueThe paper provides a first comprehensive look into how same-industry common ownership affects innovation input, innovation output and postgrant patents. The research also reconciles the anticompetitive effect and the coordinative effect of common ownership documented in the literature.


2019 ◽  
pp. 505
Author(s):  
Putu Elsa Pratiwi Dewi ◽  
Ni Gusti Putu Wirawati

Earnings management is driven by number of factors that are wrong to say leverage. One way to reduce management actions taken by management is the existence of good corporate governance in the company. This study aims to find evidence that is used to influence corporate earnings management in moderating the effect of leverage on earnings management. This research was conducted in all non-financial companies recorded in the Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI) in 2011-2016. The method of determining the sample used is purposive sampling. The number of companies that meet the requirements is 5 companies with 30 observations. Data collection is done by non-participant techniques. The data analysis technique used is Moderation Regression Analysis (MRA). Based on the results of the study, namely leverage has a negative effect on earnings management. This study also found that Corporate Governance was able to moderate the influence of leverage on earnings management. Keywords: Earnings Management, Leverage, Corporate Governance


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document