Impact of Noninterest Income on Bank Risk-Taking and Bank Lending Spread

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jawad ◽  
Munazza Naz ◽  
Muhammad Aftab Shamsi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Regulatory Authority ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Bank Lending ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Risky Assets ◽  
Interest Income ◽  
Regulatory Perspective ◽  
The Impact

This study investigates the impact of diversification between traditional margin income and nontraditional income (noninterest-based income) on bank risk-taking and bank lending spread for banks operating in Pakistan. Bank risk is measured with the nonperforming loan ratio and bank [Formula: see text]-score. Data of this study is obtained from financial statements, which are an annual publication of State Bank of Pakistan, for the period 2006–2016 for 52 banks in Pakistan. Panel regression with the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator is employed. The study reveals that an increase in noninterest income increases bank risk-taking (spending on highly risky assets), as noninterest income is riskier than interest income. It is also revealed that banks with greater dependence on noninterest income may grant a loan with lower lending spread. These results have implications for the betterment of the banking system, regulatory authority, and stakeholders as well. From a regulatory perspective, the study provides guidelines for making rules and regulations to control and monitor the dependence on noninterest income as well as on interest income. Pakistan banks regulatory authority should focus on the increase in disclosure of the composition of noninterest income and this disclosure would increase understanding of changing environment of banking in Pakistan.

The impact of multimarket contacts on bank stability in Vietnam

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tu DQ Le ◽  
Son H. Tran ◽  
Liem T. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Asia Pacific Region ◽  
Bank Stability ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of multimarket contacts on bank stability in the Vietnamese banking system between 2006 and 2015. Design/methodology/approach The system generalized method of moments proposed by Arellano and Bover (1995) is used to examine the relationship between multimarket contacts and bank stability. Findings The findings show that multimarket contacts among Vietnamese commercial banks improve bank stability. In addition, more x-efficient banks appear to be more stable. The same is true for banks with less holding liquid assets, for those with less excessive lending, for smaller banks, for those with the greater level of intermediation and for those with a higher level of foreign ownership. Listed banks are found to be less-risk taking than unlisted banks. Originality/value This study is the first attempt to examine the relationship between multimarket contacts and bank stability in an emerging market in the Asia-Pacific region.

scholarly journals Impact of non-interest income and revenue concentration on bank risk in South Asia

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
Ahmed Imran Hunjra ◽  
Qasim Zureigat ◽  
Tahar Tayachi ◽  
Rashid Mehmood
Keyword(s):  
Sri Lanka ◽  
South Asia ◽  
South Asian ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Interest Income ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Revenue Concentration

Banks not only rely on the traditional way of generating income, they also opt for non-interest income (NII) to survive in a competitive environment. Banks in South Asia are diversifying their income from interest to non-interest sources in order to reduce risk and generate high returns. This study examines the impact of non-interest income (NII) and revenue concentration on banks’ risk in South Asian countries such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka, India and Bangladesh. Panel data for eighty-five banks from 2009 to 2018 is used. Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) is employed to analyze the data. The study finds that non-interest source income and revenue concentration significantly affect bank risk in the overall analysis. The study finds different results depending on the regulations and application of the regulatory system in each country. Non-interest income reveals a significant impact on bank risk for Pakistan, India and Bangladesh, but insignificant for Si Lanka. Revenue concentration has a significant effect on bank risk in Pakistan and India, however, it does not affect bank risk in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. This study recommends that bank managers focus on different sources of revenue generation in order to minimize their level of risk through a diversification strategy to enhance efficiency. This study contributes to the banking sector literature of South Asian markets.

scholarly journals The Impact of Cross-Border Capital Flows on the Chinese Banking System

SAGE Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 215824402110214
Author(s):  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Zichun Xu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Capital Flows ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Capital Account ◽  
Political Condition ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
The Impact

With the accelerated opening of China’s capital account, China’s banking sector is exposed to the impacts of cross-border capital flows. This article explores the impact of cross-border capital flows on banks’ risk-taking in China. Employing bank-level data of 50 Chinese commercial banks from 2005 to 2018 and a sys-GMM (system generalized method of moments) estimation method, we show that cross-border capital flows are positively associated with the risk-taking of Chinese commercial banks. Moreover, banks that are larger, more capital adequate, and more profitable are more sensitive to the degree of capital account openness toward risk-taking, and the capital account openness has the greatest influence on the profitability-driven bank risk-taking. Nevertheless, such positive effects of capital account openness on bank risk-taking may be weakened under bad macro-environment, indicated by low economic growth, poor legitimate law enforcement, and unstable political condition.

scholarly journals The Impact of Regulatory Capital and Bank Characteristics on the Relationship between Bank Competition and Risk Taking in the Banking System

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Eman Abdel-Wanis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Bank Competition ◽  
Regulatory Capital ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Positive Effect

This paper explores the association between bank competition, regulatory capital, and bank risk taking in an Egyptian setting and to examine the interaction between bank competition and regulatory capital and their impact on bank risk taking in developing countries like Egypt and also investigate the effect of bank characteristics on the relationship between bank competition and bank risk taking through a sample of 27 Egyptian listed banks during the period 2012-2018 using OLS regression . Results indicated that there is a negative impact of bank competition on the bank risk taking and a positive effect of regulatory capital on bank risk taking in the Egyptian listed banks. Results show that increase regulatory play a vertical role in enhance association between competition and bank risk taking and also, there is a positive impact of bank characteristics like: bank size and divarication on bank risk taking in the Egyptian banks. Results refer to there is no effect of bank type, leverage and profitability to support the relationship between bank competition and risk taking

scholarly journals Low Interest Rates and Bank Risk-Taking: Has the Crisis Changed Anything? Evidence from the Eurozone

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alin Marius Andries ◽  
Vasile Cocriş ◽  
Ioana Pleşcău
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Interest Rates ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Loan Loss ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThis paper examines the impact of monetary policy on bank risk-taking and the influence of the recent financial crisis on this relation. We use a dataset of 571 commercial banks from Eurozone and analyze the relation on the period from 1999 to 2011, with emphasize on the period 2008 to 2011. We use non-performing loans, loan loss provisions and Z-score as measures for bank risk-taking, while for monetary policy the proxies are short-term interest rates (computed using a Taylor rule) and long-term interest rates. We determine the relation between the two by taking into account some specific control variables and analyze it using an entity fixed-effects model and Generalized Method of Moments, alternatively. Empirical results point to a negative relation between interest rates and bank risk-taking. In addition to this, results show that the crisis has led to an additional negative impact on the relation between interest rates and bank risk-taking for the turmoil period 2008-2011.

Diversification, corporate governance, regulation and bank risk-taking

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Imran Hunjra ◽  
Mahnoor Hanif ◽  
Rashid Mehmood ◽  
Loi Viet Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Emerging Economies ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Diversification Strategies ◽  
Capital Regulations ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of diversification, corporate governance and capital regulations on bank risk-taking in Asian emerging economies. Design/methodology/approach The authors applied the generalized method of moments to analyze a sample of 116 listed banks of ten Asian emerging economies for the years 2010–2018. Findings The authors found that diversification, board size, CEO duality and board independence, block holders and capital regulations significantly affect bank risk-taking. In particular, nontraditional income sources such as noninterest income and adoption of diversification strategies minimize bank risk-taking. Practical implications It is expected that the outcomes of this study can be used by banks in Asian emerging economies that seek to reduce risk-taking by managing the diversification of their income streams and managing the impacts of capital regulation and implementing sound corporate governance features in monitoring their operations. This study suggests practical risk minimizing strategies for banks. First is the sourcing of nontraditional income and adoption of diversification strategies. Second, maintaining nonexecutive directors on the board would enhance monitoring of business activities. Third, maintaining deposit insurance would reduce bank’s risk. Government provides insurance to depositors to motivate them to deposit their funds into the banks. This, in return, facilitates banks to overcome risk. However, banks need to be cautious of any increase in capital ratio, as channeling funds into risky investments would increase risk. Originality/value This study is the first to investigate the impacts of corporate governance, diversification and regulation on bank’s risk-taking in a cross-country setting of ten Asian emerging economies.

scholarly journals DOES DIGITAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION MATTER FOR BANK RISK-TAKING? EVIDENCE FROM THE DUAL-BANKING SYSTEM

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-430
Author(s):  
Hasanul Banna ◽  
Md Rabiul Alam
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Default Risk ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Financial Inclusion ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Banking Stability ◽  
Conventional Banks

This paper examines the nexus between digital financial inclusion (DFI) and levels of bank risk-taking, using a sample of 283 commercial banks (Islamic and conventional) from six countries over the period 2011 to 2019 and deploying panel-corrected standard errors, two-stage least squares-instrumental variables and dynamic panel two-step generalized method of moments estimators. The findings suggest that Islamic banks take more risks than their counterpart conventional banks. The empirical evidence also indicates that an increase in the DFI index score reduces the overall level of bank risktaking and increases that of banking stability for commercial and conventional banks compared to Islamic ones. A strong association between DFI and bank risk-taking suggests that DFI not only reduces the default risk, leverage risk and portfolio risk of banks, but also increases financial mobility in the sample countries. Consequently, an inclusive digitalised banking industry ensures sustainable economic growth, which is likely to help maintain financial sustainability in times of crisis such as the Covid-19 pandemic. Our results are shown to be robust by various robustness checks. The study contributes to both the Islamic and conventional banking, as well as the digital financial inclusion, literature. The findings of the study provide various policy implications for policymakers and standard-setters in the countries examined.

scholarly journals Competition and Financial Stability in the European Listed Banks

SAGE Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824402110326
Author(s):  
Maria Celia López-Penabad ◽  
Ana Iglesias-Casal ◽  
José Fernando Silva Neto
Keyword(s):  
Market Power ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Political Community ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Bank Competition ◽  
Banking Competition ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

The analysis of the relationship between bank competition and financial stability remains a controversial issue and widely discussed in the academic and political community. Using a sample of 117 listed banks in 16 European countries for the years 2011 to 2018, the article explores the impact of market power, measured by the Lerner index, on the bank stability, measured by distance-to-default and Z score. Our results show that for the overall sample, higher market power in banking decreases the risky behavior of banks, confirming the “competition-fragility” view. We do not find any support for a U-shaped relationship between competition and bank risk-taking. However, our findings differ from previous studies pointing out that the relationship between bank competition and risk-taking is differentiated depending on whether the bank is based in a country with a more stable banking system or a less stable one. In countries with a less financially stable banking system, increased competition leads to increased bank risk-taking. In countries with a more stable banking system, market power seems not to influence banks’ financial stability. Public policies must guarantee banking competition but limiting excessive bank risk-taking, especially in countries with less financially sound banking systems. The consolidation of European banking can be a key element for achieving these policies.

Internal Control Quality and Bank Risk-Taking and Performance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Baugh ◽  
Matthew Ege ◽  
Christopher G. Yust
Keyword(s):  
Internal Control ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Internal Controls ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Material Weakness ◽  
Control Quality ◽  
Interest Income ◽  
Upside Risk ◽  
And Performance

Using a sample of bank-years from 2005 to 2017, we examine the effect of internal control quality on future risk-taking and performance. We find that banks that disclose a material weakness in internal controls have higher risk-taking and worse performance in the future, including having a higher (lower) likelihood of experiencing large losses (gains). These findings suggest that weak controls increase (reduce) downside (upside) risk-taking or conversely that strong controls increase (reduce) upside (downside) risk-taking. Path analyses suggest that 22.3 to 43.7 percent of the effect of internal control quality on future performance is through risk-taking. Additionally, material weaknesses are negatively associated with total asset, loan, interest income, and non-interest income growth, suggesting that internal control quality affects both core and non-core activities of banks. Overall, results suggest that strong internal controls improve bank risk-taking, in part through asymmetrically reducing downside risk-taking while facilitating upside risk-taking, ultimately improving bank performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document