scholarly journals Ventilatory and perceptual responses to cycle exercise in obese women

2007 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 2217-2226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dror Ofir ◽  
Pierantonio Laveneziana ◽  
Katherine A. Webb ◽  
Denis E. O'Donnell
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Flow Limitation ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Cycle Exercise ◽  
Expiratory Flow Limitation ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Mechanical Factors ◽  
Expiratory Flow ◽  
Relationship Of

The main purpose of this study was to examine the relative contribution of respiratory mechanical factors and the increased metabolic cost of locomotion to exertional breathlessness in obese women. We examined the relationship of intensity of breathlessness to ventilation (V̇e) when exertional oxygen uptake (V̇o2) of obesity was minimized by cycle exercise. Eighteen middle-aged (54 ± 8 yr, mean ± SD) obese [body mass index (BMI) 40.2 ± 7.8 kg/m2] and 13 age-matched normal-weight (BMI 23.3 ± 1.7 kg/m2) women were studied. Breathlessness at higher submaximal cycle work rates was significantly increased (by ≥1 Borg unit) in obese compared with normal-weight women, in association with a 35–45% increase in V̇e and a higher metabolic cost of exercise. Obese women demonstrated greater resting expiratory flow limitation, reduced resting end-expiratory lung volume (EELV)(by 20%), and progressive increases in dynamic EELV during exercise: peak inspiratory capacity (IC) decreased by 16% (0.39 liter) of the resting value. V̇e/V̇o2 slopes were unchanged in obesity. Breathlessness ratings at any given V̇e or V̇o2 were not increased in obesity, suggesting that respiratory mechanical factors were not contributory. Our results indicate that in obese women, recruitment of resting IC and dynamic increases in EELV with exercise served to optimize operating lung volumes and to attenuate expiratory flow limitation so as to accommodate the increased ventilatory demand without increased breathlessness.

Expiratory flow limitation and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure in obesity

1998 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 1236-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Pankow ◽  
T. Podszus ◽  
T. Gutheil ◽  
T. Penzel ◽  
J.-H. Peter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supine Position ◽  
Lateral Position ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Upright Position ◽  
Flow Limitation ◽  
Positive End Expiratory Pressure ◽  
Expiratory Flow Limitation ◽  
Transdiaphragmatic Pressure ◽  
Expiratory Flow ◽  
The Right

Breathing at very low lung volumes might be affected by decreased expiratory airflow and air trapping. Our purpose was to detect expiratory flow limitation (EFL) and, as a consequence, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) in grossly obese subjects (OS). Eight OS with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44 ± 5 kg/m2 and six age-matched normal-weight control subjects (CS) were studied in different body positions. Negative expiratory pressure (NEP) was used to determine EFL. In contrast to CS, EFL was found in two of eight OS in the upright position and in seven of eight OS in the supine position. Dynamic PEEPi and mean transdiaphragmatic pressure (mean Pdi) were measured in all six CS and in six of eight OS. In OS, PEEPi increased from 0.14 ± 0.06 (SD) kPa in the upright position to 0.41 ± 0.11 kPa in the supine position ( P < 0.05) and decreased to 0.20 ± 0.08 kPa in the right lateral position ( P < 0.05, compared with supine), whereas, in CS, PEEPi was significantly smaller (<0.05 kPa) in each position. In OS, mean Pdi in each position was significantly larger compared with CS. Mean Pdi increased from 1.02 ± 0.32 kPa in the upright position to 1.26 ± 0.17 kPa in the supine position (not significant) and decreased to 1.06 ± 0.26 kPa in the right lateral position ( P < 0.05, compared with supine), whereas there were no significant changes in CS. We conclude that in OS 1) tidal breathing can be affected by EFL and PEEPi; 2) EFL and PEEPi are promoted by the supine posture; and 3) the increased diaphragmatic load in the supine position is, in part, related to PEEPi.

Modeling expiratory flow from excised tracheal tube laws

1999 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 1973-1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai Aljuri ◽  
Lutz Freitag ◽  
José G. Venegas
Keyword(s):  
Static Pressure ◽  
Pressure Recovery ◽  
High Frequency Ventilation ◽  
Flow Limitation ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Expiratory Flow Limitation ◽  
Elastic Tubes ◽  
Viscous Losses ◽  
Forced Expiratory Flow ◽  
Expiratory Flow

Flow limitation during forced exhalation and gas trapping during high-frequency ventilation are affected by upstream viscous losses and by the relationship between transmural pressure (Ptm) and cross-sectional area ( A tr) of the airways, i.e., tube law (TL). Our objective was to test the validity of a simple lumped-parameter model of expiratory flow limitation, including the measured TL, static pressure recovery, and upstream viscous losses. To accomplish this objective, we assessed the TLs of various excised animal tracheae in controlled conditions of quasi-static (no flow) and steady forced expiratory flow. A tr was measured from digitized images of inner tracheal walls delineated by transillumination at an axial location defining the minimal area during forced expiratory flow. Tracheal TLs followed closely the exponential form proposed by Shapiro (A. H. Shapiro. J. Biomech. Eng. 99: 126–147, 1977) for elastic tubes: Ptm = K p[( A tr/ A tr0)− n − 1], where A tr0 is A tr at Ptm = 0 and K p is a parametric factor related to the stiffness of the tube wall. Using these TLs, we found that the simple model of expiratory flow limitation described well the experimental data. Independent of upstream resistance, all tracheae with an exponent n < 2 experienced flow limitation, whereas a trachea with n > 2 did not. Upstream viscous losses, as expected, reduced maximal expiratory flow. The TL measured under steady-flow conditions was stiffer than that measured under expiratory no-flow conditions, only if a significant static pressure recovery from the choke point to atmosphere was assumed in the measurement.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics of COPD patients with tidal expiratory flow limitation

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 1503-1506 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Dean ◽  
Umme Kolsum ◽  
Paul Hitchen ◽  
Vanadana Gupta ◽  
Dave Singh
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Flow Limitation ◽  
Expiratory Flow Limitation ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Expiratory Flow

Expiratory flow limitation during exercise in prepubescent boys and girls: prevalence and implications

2010 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 1267-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Swain ◽  
Sara K. Rosenkranz ◽  
Bethany Beckman ◽  
Craig A. Harms
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Lean Body Mass ◽  
Lung Volume ◽  
Arterial Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Flow Limitation ◽  
Expiratory Flow Limitation ◽  
Expiratory Flow

The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence and implications of expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during exercise in boys and girls. Forty healthy, prepubescent boys (B; n = 20) and girls (G; n = 20) were tested. Subjects completed pulmonary function tests and an incremental cycle maximal oxygen uptake (V̇o2max) test. EFL was recorded at the end of each exercise stage using the % tidal volume overlap method. Ventilatory and metabolic data were recorded throughout exercise. Arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) was determined via pulse oximetry. Body composition was determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. There were no differences ( P > 0.05) in height, weight, or body composition between boys and girls. At rest, boys had significantly higher lung volumes (total lung capacity, B = 2.6 ± 0.5 liters, G = 2.1 ± 0.5 liters) and peak expiratory flow rates (B = 3.6 ± 0.6 l/s; G = 1.6 ± 0.3 l/s). Boys also had significantly higher V̇o2max (B = 46.9 ± 5.9 ml·kg lean body mass−1·min−1, G = 41.7 ± 6.6 ml·kg lean body mass−1·min−1) and maximal ventilation (B = 49.8 ± 8.8 l/min, G = 41.2 ± 8.3 l/min) compared with girls. There were no sex differences ( P > 0.05) at V̇o2max in VE /Vco2, end-tidal Pco2, heart rate, respiratory exchange ratio, or SpO2. The prevalence (B = 19/20 vs. G = 18/20) and severity (B = 58 ± 7% vs. G = 43 ± 8% tidal volume) of EFL was not significantly different in boys compared with girls at V̇o2max. A significant relationship existed between % EFL at V̇o2max and the change in end-expiratory lung volume from rest to maximal exercise in boys ( r = 0.77) and girls ( r = 0.75). In summary, our data suggests that EFL is highly and equally prevalent in prepubescent boys and girls during heavy exercise, which led to an increased end-expiratory lung volume but not to decreases in arterial oxygen saturation.

Influence of airway geometry on expiratory flow limitation and density dependence

1983 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Knudson ◽  
Robert C. Schroter ◽  
Dwyn E. Knudson ◽  
Stuart Sugihara
Keyword(s):  
Density Dependence ◽  
Flow Limitation ◽  
Expiratory Flow Limitation ◽  
Expiratory Flow

scholarly journals Maximal Oxygen Uptake Validation in Children With Expiratory Flow Limitation

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Robben ◽  
David C. Poole ◽  
Craig A. Harms
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Uptake ◽  
Maximal Oxygen Uptake ◽  
Constant Load ◽  
Work Rate ◽  
Flow Limitation ◽  
Expiratory Flow Limitation ◽  
Test Protocol ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Rate Relationship ◽  
Expiratory Flow

A two-test protocol (incremental/ramp (IWT) + supramaximal constant-load (CWR)) to affirm max and obviate reliance on secondary criteria has only been validated in highly fit children. In girls (n = 15) and boys (n = 12) with a wide range of VO2max (17–47 ml/kg/min), we hypothesized that this procedure would evince a VO2-WR plateau and unambiguous VO2max even in the presence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL). A plateau in the VO2-work rate relationship occurred in 75% of subjects irrespective of EFL There was a range in RER at max exercise for girls (0.97–1.14; mean 1.06 ± 0.04) and boys (0.98−1.09; mean 1.03 ± 0.03) such that 3/15 girls and 2/12 boys did not achieve the criterion RER. Moreover, in girls with RER > 1.0 it would have been possible to achieve this criterion at 78% VO2max. Boys achieved 92% VO2max at RER = 1.0. This was true also for HRmax where 8/15 girls’ and 6/12 boys’ VO2max would have been rejected based on HRmax being < 90% of age-predicted HRmax. In those who achieved the HRmax criterion, it represented a VO2 of 86% (girls) and 87% (boys) VO2max. We conclude that this two-test protocol confirms VO2max in children across a threefold range of VO2max irrespective of EFL and circumvents reliance on secondary criteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document