scholarly journals “Divide and conquer”: assessing energy expenditure following physical activity type classification

2012 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 932-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto G. Bonomi ◽  
Guy Plasqui
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Divide And Conquer ◽  
Activity Type ◽  
Type Classification

scholarly journals Employing Machine Learning to Estimate Hallmark Measures of Physical Activities from Wrist-worn Devices Across Age Groups

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoun T. Mardini ◽  
Chen Bai ◽  
Amal A. Wanigatunga ◽  
Santiago Saldana ◽  
Ramon Casanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Physical Activities ◽  
Accelerometer Data ◽  
Activity Type ◽  
Physical Activity Intensity ◽  
Activity Intensity ◽  
Score Range

Wrist-worn fitness trackers and smartwatches are proliferating with an incessant attention towards health tracking. Given the growing popularity of wrist-worn devices across all age groups, a rigorous evaluation for recognizing hallmark measures of physical activities and estimating energy expenditure is needed to compare their accuracy across the lifespan. The goal of the study was to build machine learning models to recognize physical activity type (sedentary, locomotion, and lifestyle) and intensity (low, light, and moderate), identify individual physical activities, and estimate energy expenditure. The primary aim of this study was to build and compare models for different age groups: young [20-50 years], middle (50-70 years], and old (70-89 years]. Participants (n = 253, 62% women, aged 20-89 years old) performed a battery of 33 daily activities in a standardized laboratory setting while wearing a portable metabolic unit to measure energy expenditure that was used to gauge metabolic intensity. Tri-axial accelerometer collected data at 80-100 Hz from the right wrist that was processed for 49 features. Results from random forests algorithm were quite accurate in recognizing physical activity type, the F1-Score range across age groups was: sedentary [0.955 – 0.973], locomotion [0.942 – 0.964], and lifestyle [0.913 – 0.949]. Recognizing physical activity intensity resulted in lower performance, the F1-Score range across age groups was: sedentary [0.919 – 0.947], light [0.813 – 0.828], and moderate [0.846 – 0.875]. The root mean square error range was [0.835 – 1.009] for the estimation of energy expenditure. The F1-Score range for recognizing individual physical activities was [0.263 – 0.784]. Performances were relatively similar and the accelerometer data features were ranked similarly between age groups. In conclusion, data features derived from wrist worn accelerometers lead to high-moderate accuracy estimating physical activity type, intensity and energy expenditure and are robust to potential age-differences.

scholarly journals Improving assessment of daily energy expenditure by identifying types of physical activity with a single accelerometer

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 655-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Bonomi ◽  
G. Plasqui ◽  
A. H. C. Goris ◽  
K. R. Westerterp
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Classification Tree ◽  
The Body ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Activity Type ◽  
Tree Model ◽  
Classification Tree Model ◽  
Activity Types

Accelerometers are often used to quantify the acceleration of the body in arbitrary units (counts) to measure physical activity (PA) and to estimate energy expenditure. The present study investigated whether the identification of types of PA with one accelerometer could improve the estimation of energy expenditure compared with activity counts. Total energy expenditure (TEE) of 15 subjects was measured with the use of double-labeled water. The physical activity level (PAL) was derived by dividing TEE by sleeping metabolic rate. Simultaneously, PA was measured with one accelerometer. Accelerometer output was processed to calculate activity counts per day (ACD) and to determine the daily duration of six types of common activities identified with a classification tree model. A daily metabolic value (METD) was calculated as mean of the MET compendium value of each activity type weighed by the daily duration. TEE was predicted by ACD and body weight and by ACD and fat-free mass, with a standard error of estimate (SEE) of 1.47 MJ/day, and 1.2 MJ/day, respectively. The replacement in these models of ACD with METD increased the explained variation in TEE by 9%, decreasing SEE by 0.14 MJ/day and 0.18 MJ/day, respectively. The correlation between PAL and METD ( R2 = 51%) was higher than that between PAL and ACD ( R2 = 46%). We conclude that identification of activity types combined with MET intensity values improves the assessment of energy expenditure compared with activity counts. Future studies could develop models to objectively assess activity type and intensity to further increase accuracy of the energy expenditure estimation.

Validity of the Apple iPhone®/iPod Touch® as an Accelerometer-Based Physical Activity Monitor: A Proof-of-Concept Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meaghan Nolan ◽  
J. Ross Mitchell ◽  
Patricia K. Doyle-Baker
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Activity Type ◽  
Free Living ◽  
Ipod Touch ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Metabolic Cart ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Accuracy Speed

Background:The popularity of smartphones has led researchers to ask if they can replace traditional tools for assessing free-living physical activity. Our purpose was to establish proof-of-concept that a smartphone could record acceleration during physical activity, and those data could be modeled to predict activity type (walking or running), speed (km·h−1), and energy expenditure (METs).Methods:An application to record and e-mail accelerations was developed for the Apple iPhone®/iPod Touch®. Twentyfive healthy adults performed treadmill walking (4.0 km·h−1 to 7.2 km·h−1) and running (8.1 km·h−1 to 11.3 km·h−1) wearing the device. Criterion energy expenditure measurements were collected via metabolic cart.Results:Activity type was classified with 99% accuracy. Speed was predicted with a bias of 0.02 km·h−1 (SEE: 0.57 km·h−1) for walking, –0.03 km·h−1 (SEE: 1.02 km·h−1) for running. Energy expenditure was predicted with a bias of 0.35 METs (SEE: 0.75 METs) for walking, –0.43 METs (SEE: 1.24 METs) for running.Conclusion:Our results suggest that an iPhone/iPod Touch can predict aspects of locomotion with accuracy similar to other accelerometer-based tools. Future studies may leverage this and the additional features of smartphones to improve data collection and compliance.

Energy expenditure and physical activity in patients with anorexia nervosa

2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
U Elbelt ◽  
V Haas ◽  
T Hofmann ◽  
S Jeran ◽  
H Pietz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Energy Expenditure

The Effect of Sensor Placement and Number on Physical Activity Recognition and Energy Expenditure Estimation (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anis Davoudi ◽  
Mamoun T. Mardini ◽  
Dave Nelson ◽  
Fahd Albinali ◽  
Sanjay Ranka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Recognition Accuracy ◽  
Body Position ◽  
Computer Work ◽  
Accelerometer Data ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Lifestyle Activities

BACKGROUND Research shows the feasibility of human activity recognition using Wearable accelerometer devices. Different studies have used varying number and placement for data collection using the sensors. OBJECTIVE To compare accuracy performance between multiple and variable placement of accelerometer devices in categorizing the type of physical activity and corresponding energy expenditure in older adults. METHODS Participants (n=93, 72.2±7.1 yrs) completed a total of 32 activities of daily life in a laboratory setting. Activities were classified as sedentary vs. non-sedentary, locomotion vs. non-locomotion, and lifestyle vs. non-lifestyle activities (e.g. leisure walk vs. computer work). A portable metabolic unit was worn during each activity to measure metabolic equivalents (METs). Accelerometers were placed on five different body positions: wrist, hip, ankle, upper arm, and thigh. Accelerometer data from each body position and combinations of positions were used in developing Random Forest models to assess activity category recognition accuracy and MET estimation. RESULTS Model performance for both MET estimation and activity category recognition strengthened with additional accelerometer devices. However, a single accelerometer on the ankle, upper arm, hip, thigh, or wrist had only a 0.03 to 0.09 MET increase in prediction error as compared to wearing all five devices. Balanced accuracy showed similar trends with slight decreases in balanced accuracy for detection of locomotion (0-0.01 METs), sedentary (0.13-0.05 METs) and lifestyle activities (0.08-0.04 METs) compared to all five placements. The accuracy of recognizing activity categories increased with additional placements (0.15-0.29). Notably, the hip was the best single body position for MET estimation and activity category recognition. CONCLUSIONS Additional accelerometer devices only slightly enhance activity recognition accuracy and MET estimation in older adults. However, given the extra burden of wearing additional devices, single accelerometers with appropriate placement appear to be sufficient for estimating energy expenditure and activity category recognition in older adults.

scholarly journals Estimating Physical Activity Energy Expenditure Using an Ensemble Model-Based Patch-Type Sensor Module

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 861
Author(s):  
Kyeung Ho Kang ◽  
Mingu Kang ◽  
Siho Shin ◽  
Jaehyo Jung ◽  
Meina Li
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Ensemble Model ◽  
Direct Calorimetry ◽  
Patch Type ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Squared Error ◽  
Sensor Module

Chronic diseases, such as coronary artery disease and diabetes, are caused by inadequate physical activity and are the leading cause of increasing mortality and morbidity rates. Direct calorimetry by calorie production and indirect calorimetry by energy expenditure (EE) has been regarded as the best method for estimating the physical activity and EE. However, this method is inconvenient, owing to the use of an oxygen respiration measurement mask. In this study, we propose a model that estimates physical activity EE using an ensemble model that combines artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms using the data acquired from patch-type sensors. The proposed ensemble model achieved an accuracy of more than 92% (Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 0.1893, R2 = 0.91, Mean Squared Error (MSE) = 0.014213, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) = 0.14020) by testing various structures through repeated experiments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document