scholarly journals Physiological clustering of visual channels in the mouse retina

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1516-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Farrow ◽  
Richard H. Masland
Keyword(s):  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Specific Aspect ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Cluster Solution ◽  
Physiological Basis ◽  
Response Characteristics

Anatomy predicts that mammalian retinas should have in excess of 12 physiological channels, each encoding a specific aspect of the visual scene. Although several channels have been correlated with morphological cell types, the number of morphological types generally exceeds the known physiological types. Here, we attempted to sort the ganglion cells of the mouse retina purely on a physiological basis. The null hypothesis was that the outputs of the ganglion cells form a continuum or should be divided into only a few types. We recorded the spiking output of 471 retinal ganglion cells on a multielectrode array while presenting 4 classes of visual stimuli. Five parameters were chosen to describe each cell's response characteristics, including relative amplitude of the ON and OFF responses, response latency, response transience, direction selectivity, and the receptive field surround. We compared the results of four clustering routines and judged the results using the relevant validation indices. The optimal partition was the 12-cluster solution of the Fuzzy Gustafson-Kessel algorithm. This classification contained three visual channels that carried predominately OFF responses, six that carried ON responses, and three that carried both ON and OFF information. They differed in other parameters as well. Other evidence suggests that the true number of cell types in the mouse retina may be somewhat larger than 12, and a definitive typology will probably require broader stimulus sets and characterization of more response parameters. Nonetheless, the present results do allow us to reject the null hypothesis: it appears that in addition to well-known cell types (such as the ON-OFF direction selectivity cells) numerous other cell classes can be identified in the mouse retina based solely on their responses to a standard set of simple visual stimuli.

scholarly journals Formation of retinal direction-selective circuitry initiated by starburst amacrine cell homotypic contact

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A Ray ◽  
Suva Roy ◽  
Christopher Kozlowski ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Jon Cafaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Surface Protein ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Developing Neurons

A common strategy by which developing neurons locate their synaptic partners is through projections to circuit-specific neuropil sublayers. Once established, sublayers serve as a substrate for selective synapse formation, but how sublayers arise during neurodevelopment remains unknown. Here, we identify the earliest events that initiate formation of the direction-selective circuit in the inner plexiform layer of mouse retina. We demonstrate that radially migrating newborn starburst amacrine cells establish homotypic contacts on arrival at the inner retina. These contacts, mediated by the cell-surface protein MEGF10, trigger neuropil innervation resulting in generation of two sublayers comprising starburst-cell dendrites. This dendritic scaffold then recruits projections from circuit partners. Abolishing MEGF10-mediated contacts profoundly delays and ultimately disrupts sublayer formation, leading to broader direction tuning and weaker direction-selectivity in retinal ganglion cells. Our findings reveal a mechanism by which differentiating neurons transition from migratory to mature morphology, and highlight this mechanism’s importance in forming circuit-specific sublayers.

scholarly journals Dendro-somatic synaptic inputs to ganglion cells violate receptive field and connectivity rules in the mammalian retina

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miloslav Sedlacek ◽  
William Grimes ◽  
Morgan Musgrove ◽  
Amurta Nath ◽  
Hua Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Dendritic Arbors

In retinal neurons, morphology strongly influences visual response features. Ganglion cell (GC) dendrites ramify in distinct strata of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) so that GCs responding to light increments (ON) or decrements (OFF) receive appropriate excitatory inputs. This vertical stratification prescribes response polarity and ensures consistent connectivity between cell types, whereas the lateral extent of GC dendritic arbors typically dictates receptive field (RF) size. Here, we identify circuitry in mouse retina that contradicts these conventions. A2 amacrine cells are interneurons understood to mediate 'cross-over' inhibition by relaying excitatory input from the ON layer to inhibitory outputs in the OFF layer. Ultrastructural and physiological analyses show, however, that some A2s deliver powerful inhibition to OFF GC somas and proximal dendrites in the ON layer, rendering their inhibitory RFs smaller than their dendritic arbors. This OFF pathway, avoiding entirely the OFF region of the IPL, challenges several tenets of retinal circuitry.

scholarly journals Receptive field properties of bipolar cell axon terminals in direction-selective sublaminas of the mouse retina

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1950-1962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minggang Chen ◽  
Seunghoon Lee ◽  
Silvia J. H. Park ◽  
Loren L. Looger ◽  
Z. Jimmy Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Patch Clamp Recording ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells

Retinal bipolar cells (BCs) transmit visual signals in parallel channels from the outer to the inner retina, where they provide glutamatergic inputs to specific networks of amacrine and ganglion cells. Intricate network computation at BC axon terminals has been proposed as a mechanism for complex network computation, such as direction selectivity, but direct knowledge of the receptive field property and the synaptic connectivity of the axon terminals of various BC types is required in order to understand the role of axonal computation by BCs. The present study tested the essential assumptions of the presynaptic model of direction selectivity at axon terminals of three functionally distinct BC types that ramify in the direction-selective strata of the mouse retina. Results from two-photon Ca2+ imaging, optogenetic stimulation, and dual patch-clamp recording demonstrated that 1) CB5 cells do not receive fast GABAergic synaptic feedback from starburst amacrine cells (SACs); 2) light-evoked and spontaneous Ca2+ responses are well coordinated among various local regions of CB5 axon terminals; 3) CB5 axon terminals are not directionally selective; 4) CB5 cells consist of two novel functional subtypes with distinct receptive field structures; 5) CB7 cells provide direct excitatory synaptic inputs to, but receive no direct GABAergic synaptic feedback from, SACs; and 6) CB7 axon terminals are not directionally selective, either. These findings help to simplify models of direction selectivity by ruling out complex computation at BC terminals. They also show that CB5 comprises two functional subclasses of BCs.

scholarly journals Genetic access to functionally distinct ganglion cell types in the Somatostatin-IRES-Cre mouse retina

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Fransen ◽  
Bart G. Borghuis
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Visual Image ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Mouse Line ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Transgenic Mouse Line ◽  
Inhibitory Circuits ◽  
Distinct Cell

AbstractRetinal ganglion cells (GCs) are a functionally diverse neuron population that encodes and transmits distinct representations of the visual image on the retina to target nuclei in the brain. Independent studies of visually-evoked responses, cell morphology, and gene expression each suggest that GCs in mouse may comprise as many as forty distinct cell types. To date, only a subset of these types have been characterized in detail, and for most genetic access is still lacking. Thus, the majority of identified GC types remains inaccessible for targeted electrophysiology and functional imaging, precluding efficient studies of their response properties, and the cell-intrinsic mechanisms and presynaptic circuits that generate these properties. Here we show that an existing mouse line that is commonly used for studies of cortical inhibitory circuits – Somatostatin-IRES-Cre (Sst-Cre), consistently labels an understudied subset of four GC types with distinct visual responses. We characterized these types both anatomically and functionally using Cre-dependent reporter mouse lines and confocal fluorescence imaging, calcium imaging, and whole-cell electrophysiology. We show that one of the labeled GC types is suppressed by luminance contrast, while another matches a recently described orientation-selective GC type. Our results give new information about these two identified GC types, and establish the utility of the Sst-Cre transgenic mouse line for studies of recently identified GC circuits in the mouse retina.

scholarly journals Computational and Molecular Properties of Starburst Amacrine Cell Synapses Differ With Postsynaptic Cell Type

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Pottackal ◽  
Joshua H. Singer ◽  
Jonathan B. Demb
Keyword(s):  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Presynaptic Neuron ◽  
Postsynaptic Cell ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cell

A presynaptic neuron can increase its computational capacity by transmitting functionally distinct signals to each of its postsynaptic cell types. To determine whether such computational specialization occurs over fine spatial scales within a neurite arbor, we investigated computation at output synapses of the starburst amacrine cell (SAC), a critical component of the classical direction-selective (DS) circuit in the retina. The SAC is a non-spiking interneuron that co-releases GABA and acetylcholine and forms closely spaced (<5 μm) inhibitory synapses onto two postsynaptic cell types: DS ganglion cells (DSGCs) and neighboring SACs. During dynamic optogenetic stimulation of SACs in mouse retina, whole-cell recordings of inhibitory postsynaptic currents revealed that GABAergic synapses onto DSGCs exhibit stronger low-pass filtering than those onto neighboring SACs. Computational analyses suggest that this filtering difference can be explained primarily by presynaptic properties, rather than those of the postsynaptic cells per se. Consistent with functionally diverse SAC presynapses, blockade of N-type voltage-gated calcium channels abolished GABAergic currents in SACs but only moderately reduced GABAergic and cholinergic currents in DSGCs. These results jointly demonstrate how specialization of synaptic outputs could enhance parallel processing in a compact interneuron over fine spatial scales. Moreover, the distinct transmission kinetics of GABAergic SAC synapses are poised to support the functional diversity of inhibition within DS circuitry.

scholarly journals Formation of retinal direction-selective circuitry initiated by starburst amacrine cell homotypic contact

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Ray ◽  
Suva Roy ◽  
Christopher Kozlowski ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Jon Cafaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Surface Protein ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Developing Neurons

Impact statementSelective synapse formation in a retinal motion-sensitive circuit is orchestrated by starburst amacrine cells, which use homotypic interactions to initiate formation of a dendritic scaffold that recruits projections from circuit partners.SUMMARYA common strategy by which developing neurons locate their synaptic partners is through projections to circuit-specific neuropil sublayers. Once established, sublayers serve as a substrate for selective synapse formation, but how sublayers arise during neurodevelopment remains unknown. Here we identify the earliest events that initiate formation of the direction-selective circuit in the inner plexiform layer of mouse retina. We demonstrate that radially-migrating newborn starburst amacrine cells establish homotypic contacts on arrival at the inner retina. These contacts, mediated by the cell-surface protein MEGF10, trigger neuropil innervation resulting in generation of two sublayers comprising starburst-cell dendrites. This dendritic scaffold then recruits projections from circuit partners. Abolishing MEGF10-mediated contacts profoundly delays and ultimately disrupts sublayer formation, leading to broader direction tuning and weaker direction-selectivity in retinal ganglion cells. Our findings reveal a mechanism by which differentiating neurons transition from migratory to mature morphology, and highlight this mechanism’s importance in forming circuit-specific sublayers.

Functional Organization of Ganglion Cells in the Salamander Retina

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 2277-2292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronen Segev ◽  
Jason Puchalla ◽  
Michael J. Berry
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Functional Organization ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Clustering Algorithms ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Response Characteristics

Recently, we reported a novel technique for recording all of the ganglion cells in a retinal patch and showed that their receptive fields cover visual space roughly 60 times over in the tiger salamander. Here, we carry this analysis further and divide the population of ganglion cells into functional classes using quantitative clustering algorithms that combine several response characteristics. Using only the receptive field to classify ganglion cells revealed six cell types, in agreement with anatomical studies. Adding other response measures served to blur the distinctions between these cell types rather than resolve further classes. Only the biphasic off type had receptive fields that tiled the retina. Even when we attempted to split these classes more finely, ganglion cells with almost identical functional properties were found to have strongly overlapping spatial receptive fields. A territorial spatial organization, where ganglion cell receptive fields tend to avoid those of other cells of the same type, was only found for the biphasic off cell. We further studied the functional segregation of the ganglion cell population by computing the amount of visual information shared between pairs of cells under natural movie stimulation. This analysis revealed an extensive mixing of visual information among cells of different functional type. Together, our results indicate that the salamander retina uses a population code in which every point in visual space is represented by multiple neurons with subtly different visual sensitivities.

scholarly journals In-depth transcriptomic analysis of human retina reveals molecular mechanisms underlying diabetic retinopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kolja Becker ◽  
Holger Klein ◽  
Eric Simon ◽  
Coralie Viollet ◽  
Christian Haslinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Disease Stages ◽  
Post Transcriptional Regulation

AbstractDiabetic Retinopathy (DR) is among the major global causes for vision loss. With the rise in diabetes prevalence, an increase in DR incidence is expected. Current understanding of both the molecular etiology and pathways involved in the initiation and progression of DR is limited. Via RNA-Sequencing, we analyzed mRNA and miRNA expression profiles of 80 human post-mortem retinal samples from 43 patients diagnosed with various stages of DR. We found differentially expressed transcripts to be predominantly associated with late stage DR and pathways such as hippo and gap junction signaling. A multivariate regression model identified transcripts with progressive changes throughout disease stages, which in turn displayed significant overlap with sphingolipid and cGMP–PKG signaling. Combined analysis of miRNA and mRNA expression further uncovered disease-relevant miRNA/mRNA associations as potential mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation. Finally, integrating human retinal single cell RNA-Sequencing data revealed a continuous loss of retinal ganglion cells, and Müller cell mediated changes in histidine and β-alanine signaling. While previously considered primarily a vascular disease, attention in DR has shifted to additional mechanisms and cell-types. Our findings offer an unprecedented and unbiased insight into molecular pathways and cell-specific changes in the development of DR, and provide potential avenues for future therapeutic intervention.

scholarly journals Spatial receptive field properties of rat retinal ganglion cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
WALTER F. HEINE ◽  
CHRISTOPHER L. PASSAGLIA
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
X And Y Cells ◽  
Y Cells

AbstractThe rat is a popular animal model for vision research, yet there is little quantitative information about the physiological properties of the cells that provide its brain with visual input, the retinal ganglion cells. It is not clear whether rats even possess the full complement of ganglion cell types found in other mammals. Since such information is important for evaluating rodent models of visual disease and elucidating the function of homologous and heterologous cells in different animals, we recorded from rat ganglion cells in vivo and systematically measured their spatial receptive field (RF) properties using spot, annulus, and grating patterns. Most of the recorded cells bore likeness to cat X and Y cells, exhibiting brisk responses, center-surround RFs, and linear or nonlinear spatial summation. The others resembled various types of mammalian W cell, including local-edge-detector cells, suppressed-by-contrast cells, and an unusual type with an ON–OFF surround. They generally exhibited sluggish responses, larger RFs, and lower responsiveness. The peak responsivity of brisk-nonlinear (Y-type) cells was around twice that of brisk-linear (X-type) cells and several fold that of sluggish cells. The RF size of brisk-linear and brisk-nonlinear cells was indistinguishable, with average center and surround diameters of 5.6 ± 1.3 and 26.4 ± 11.3 deg, respectively. In contrast, the center diameter of recorded sluggish cells averaged 12.8 ± 7.9 deg. The homogeneous RF size of rat brisk cells is unlike that of cat X and Y cells, and its implication regarding the putative roles of these two ganglion cell types in visual signaling is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document