Functional properties of afferent fibers supplying reproductive and other pelvic organs in pelvic nerve of female rat

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Berkley ◽  
H. Hotta ◽  
A. Robbins ◽  
Y. Sato
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Reproductive Organs ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Female Rat ◽  
Pelvic Nerve ◽  
Pelvic Organs ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Electrophysiological techniques were used to characterize responses of afferent fibers in pelvic nerve of adult, virgin female rats to mechanical or chemical stimulation of internal reproductive organs and to mechanical stimulation of other pelvic organs. 2. In an in vivo barbiturate-anesthetized preparation, pelvic nerve afferent fibers responded to a wide variety of mechanical stimulation applied to restricted regions of the vaginal canal, caudal uterus (body and cervix), bladder, ureter, colon, or anus. 3. Single-fiber mechanoreceptive fields were invariably confined to a single organ. Notably, responses could be evoked not only by gentle stimulation of the unit's receptive field directly on the organ itself, but also by stimulating the field indirectly with intense stimulation through the appropriate part of a contiguous organ. This innervation feature is consistent with the separability of pelvic organ functions under innocuous conditions but their confusion under noxious ones. 4. Receptive fields on the reproductive organs extended from the caudal edge of the vagina to the uterine body (including the cervix) but were most often located in the fornix (vaginocervical junction). Most units had no or low levels of spontaneous activity. Their responses to mechanical stimuli were usually slowly or moderately adapting and time-locked to the stimulus. 5. Fibers with vaginal receptive fields (including the fornix) responded best either to vaginal distension with a balloon or, more often, to a probe moving along the internal vaginal surface in a direction toward the cervix. They were observed most frequently during the proestrus stage of the rat's estrous cycle. These fibers, therefore, seem particularly suited for relaying information about stimuli that occur during mating. 6. Fibers with receptive fields on the uterine cervix and body responded best to static pressure and were observed less frequently than those with vaginal fields, regardless of estrous stage. They were, however, sensitized by hypoxia. In addition, irritation of the uterus increased the probability of observing them. These fibers, therefore, may exert their primary function during reproductive conditions different from those of virgin rats, such as parturition. 7. Response activity of most of the mechanoreceptive afferent fibers supplying reproductive organs increased as the stimulus intensity increased into the noxious range; i.e., into a range in which the stimulus momentarily produced ischemia at the stimulus site. In addition, in an in vitro preparation, pelvic nerve fibers responded in a dose-dependent manner to injections through the uterine artery of bradykinin (BRAD) as well as to other algesic chemicals, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and KCl.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Responses of primate spinothalamic tract neurons to electrical stimulation of hindlimb peripheral nerves

1975 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Foreman ◽  
A. E. Applebaum ◽  
J. E. Beall ◽  
D. L. Trevino ◽  
W. D. Willis
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Antidromic Activation ◽  
Lumbosacral Spinal Cord ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Stimulation Of

The responses of spinothalamic tract neurons were studied by extra- and intracellular recordings from the lumbosacral spinal cord in anesthetized rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). The neurons were identified by antidromic activation from the contralateral diencephalon. They were then classified by the mildest form of mechanical stimulation applied to the ipsilateral hindlimb. The effects of electrical stimulation of the nerve(s) supplying the receptive field were investigated. Graded electrical stimulation revealed that the threshold responses of spinothalamic tract neurons excited by weak mechanical stimuli occurred when the largest afferent fibers were activated. On the other hand, neurons that required intense mechanical stimulation for their excitation tended to have higher thresholds to electrical stimulation. Some spinothalamic tract cells were shown to receive monosynaptic excitatory connections from peripheral nerve fibers, although polysynaptic connections may generally be more important. An input from unmyelinated afferent fibers was demonstrated. It is concluded the primate spinothalamic tract neurons receive a rich convergent input from a variety of cutaneous receptors. The experiments provide some evidence for the most likely types of receptors.

Functional differences between afferent fibers in the hypogastric and pelvic nerves innervating female reproductive organs in the rat

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 533-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Berkley ◽  
A. Robbins ◽  
Y. Sato
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Reproductive Tract ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Pelvic Nerve ◽  
Hypogastric Nerve ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Pelvic Nerves ◽  
Different Parts ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The uterus, cervix, and vaginal canal are innervated by afferent fibers in the hypogastric and pelvic nerves. Four studies compared the innervation territory and sensitivity to peripheral stimuli of the two sets of fibers in adult virgin rats. 2. Innervation territory was studied anatomically by injecting different fluorescent dyes into different parts of the reproductive, lower urinary, and lower digestive tracts and examining retrogradely labeled neurons in dorsal root ganglia. It was also studied electrophysiologically in anesthetized rats by summing potentials evoked in branches of the two nerves by electrical stimulation of different parts of the reproductive tract. 3. In both studies sensory innervation of the reproductive tract shifted from the pelvic to the hypogastric nerve (i.e., shifted entry into the spinal cord from the L6-S1 to the T13-L3 dorsal root ganglia, respectively) as the dye or stimulating electrode shifted from the vaginal entrance to the uterine horns, with fibers from both nerves densely innervating the cervix region (i.e., entering the spinal cord through both sets of ganglia). The anatomic results suggested that the regions innervated by fibers in one nerve might also be innervated by a small component of normally quiescent fibers in the other nerve. 4. Response sensitivity was studied electrophysiologically by simultaneously recording multiunit activity in branches of the hypogastric and pelvic nerves in two ways. First, in intact, anesthetized rats, activity was recorded during mechanical stimulation of the reproductive tract (distension of the vagina and uterus, probing the cervix). Second, in an in vitro organ preparation of the uterus and vagina, activity was recorded during chemical stimulation through the uterine artery with bradykinin, serotonin, NaCN, CO2, and KCl. 5. Pelvic nerve fibers were markedly more sensitive than hypogastric nerve fibers to uterine and cervical mechanostimulation. Similarly, pelvic nerve fibers were more likely to respond or responded more vigorously than hypogastric nerve fibers to all chemical stimuli (except KCl). 6. These results provide strong evidence that afferent fibers in the pelvic and hypogastric nerves of nulliparous adult rats subserve different functions in reproduction and sensation. Pelvic nerve fibers seem closely tied to sensory and behavioral processes associated with mating and conception, whereas hypogastric fibers seem closely tied to pregnancy and nociception, with fibers in both nerves serving functions during parturition.

Neuronal responses to stimulation of the cervix, uterus, colon, and skin in the rat spinal cord

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 545-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Berkley ◽  
C. H. Hubscher ◽  
P. D. Wall
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Reproductive Tract ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cervix Uterus ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Hind Limbs ◽  
Vaginal Canal ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Previous studies in the rat have shown that the hypogastric nerve conveys input from the cervix and uterus mainly to the T13-L3 segments of the spinal cord, whereas the pelvic nerve conveys input from the cervix and vaginal canal mainly to the L6-S2 segments. 2. To study the effects of this input, the dorsal horns of the T13-L1, L6-S2, and L4-L5 segments in 13 decerebrate, T10-spinalized, unanesthetized, and paralyzed adult female rats in estrus were searched for neurons responsive to gentle mechanical stimulation of the cervix. The 87 neurons found were then further tested for their responses to gentle mechanical stimulation of the skin and to distension of both uterine horns, distension of the colon, and shearing stimulation of the colon and vaginal canal. 3. Neurons responsive to cervix stimulation, primarily by excitation, were readily found in the ventral part of the dorsal horn in T13-L1 and throughout the dorsal horn in L6-S2. Cervix-responsive neurons were less readily found throughout the dorsal horn in L4-L5, where 25% were inhibited by the stimulation. All but one neuron had cutaneous receptive fields. 4. The 30 cervix-responsive neurons in T13-L1 had large bilateral cutaneous receptive fields covering the perineum and hind-limbs. Most (76%) also responded, primarily by excitation, to uterine distension, as well as to colonic stimulation (59%). More than half were activated by both types of stimulation. 5. The 33 cervix-responsive neurons in L6-S2 had cutaneous receptive fields in the same regions as those in T13-L1, but generally smaller, particularly for neurons in the dorsal part of the dorsal horn, many of whose receptive fields were confined to the perineum. The L6-S2 neurons also exhibited less convergent input from other visceral structures, particularly the uterus. Fewer neurons (42%) responded to uterine distension, mostly by being inhibited, whereas about the same proportion (51%) responded with excitation to colonic stimulation. Only 24% responded to both uterus and colon. 6. All 24 cervix-responsive neurons in medial L4-L5 had small cutaneous receptive fields on the toes, and the neurons received less convergent input from other visceral structures (25% from the uterus, 33% from the colon, 13% from both). 7. These results indicate the presence of an extensive system of neurons throughout the caudal spinal cord of the rat, concentrated in separated thoracolumbar and lumbosacral segments, that is concerned with input from the reproductive tract.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

T2-T5 spinothalamic neurons projecting to medial thalamus with viscerosomatic input

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. Ammons ◽  
M. N. Girardot ◽  
R. D. Foreman
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cell Group ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Medial Thalamus ◽  
Dorsal Nucleus ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
C Fiber ◽  
Antidromic Responses ◽  
Alpha Chloralose ◽  
Stimulation Of

Spinothalamic tract neurons projecting to medial thalamus (M-STT cells), ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPL) of the thalamus (L-STT cells), or both thalamic regions (LM-STT cells) were studied in 19 monkeys anesthetized with alpha-chloralose. Twenty-seven M-STT cells were antidromically activated from nucleus centralis lateralis, nucleus centrum medianum, or the medial dorsal nucleus. Stimulation of VPL elicited antidromic responses from 22 cells and 13 cells were activated from both VPL and medial thalamus. Antidromic conduction velocities of M-STT cells were significantly slower than those of L-STT or LM-STT cells. M-STT cells were located in laminae I, IV, V, and VII with greater numbers found in the deepest laminae. L-STT cells were located mostly in lamina IV, whereas most LM-STT cells were found in lamina V. Twenty-four of 27 M-STT cells, all L-STT cells, and all LM-STT cells received input from both cardiopulmonary sympathetic and somatic afferent fibers. WDR cells were most common among the L-STT and LM-STT groups, whereas HT cells were the most common class in the M-STT cell group. Excitatory receptive fields of M-STT cells were large, and often bilateral. Receptive fields of L-STT cells were simple and never bilateral. Receptive fields of LM-STT cells could be similar to M-STT or L-STT cells. Thirty-three percent of the M-STT cells, 37% of the L-STT cells, and 62% of the LM-STT cells had inhibitory receptive fields. Inhibition was elicited most often by a noxious pinch of the hindlimbs. Sixteen of 23 (70%) M-STT cells received C-fiber cardiopulmonary sympathetic input in addition to A-delta-fiber input. The other 7 cells received only A-delta-fiber input. Only 45% of the L-STT cells and 38% of the LM-STT cells received both A-delta- and C-fiber inputs. The maximum number of spikes elicited by A-delta-input was related to segmental locations for L-STT cells with greatest responses in T2 and lesser responses in more caudal segments; however, no such trend was apparent for M-STT cells or for responses to C-fiber input for either group. Electrical stimulation of the left thoracic vagus nerve inhibited 7 of 18 M-STT cells, 10 of 16 L-STT cells, and 6 of 12 LM-STT cells. These results are the first description of visceral input to cells projecting to medial thalamus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mechanical sensitivity of group III and IV afferents from posterior articular nerve in normal and inflamed cat knee

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Grigg ◽  
H. G. Schaible ◽  
R. F. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Sciatic Nerve ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Conduction Velocity ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Mechanical Sensitivity ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Stimulation Of

Recordings were performed from sciatic nerve or dorsal root filaments in 28 cats to study single group III (conduction velocity 2.5-20 m/s) and group IV (conduction velocity less than 2.5 m/s) units supplying the knee joint via the posterior articular nerve (PAN). In seven of these cats the knee joint had been inflamed artificially. Recordings from sciatic nerve filaments revealed responses to local mechanical stimulation of the joint in only 3 of 41 group IV units and in 12 of 18 group III units from the normal joint. In the inflamed joint 14 of 36 group IV units and 24 of 36 group III units were excited with local mechanical stimulation. In recordings from dorsal root filaments (normal joint) 4 of 11 group IV units and 7 of 13 group III units were activated by stimulating the joint locally. In the normal joint four group IV units (recorded from dorsal root filaments) responded only to rotations against the resistance of the tissue, whereas the majority of the fibers did not respond even to forceful movements. Group III units with local mechanosensitivity in the normal joint reacted strongly or weakly to movements in the working range of the joint or only to movements against resistance of the tissue. In the inflamed joint, group IV fibers (recorded in sciatic nerve filaments) with detectable receptive fields responded strongly to gentle movements or only to movements against resistance of tissue. Some did not react to movements. Group III units reacted strongly or weakly to gentle movements or only to movements against resistance of the tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Laryngeal and tracheobronchial cough in anesthetized dogs

1994 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 2672-2679 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tatar ◽  
G. Sant′Ambrogio ◽  
F. B. Sant′Ambrogio
Keyword(s):  
Citric Acid ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Esophageal Pressure ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Anesthetized Dogs ◽  
Conduction Cooling ◽  
Chemical Stimuli ◽  
Alpha Chloralose ◽  
Tracheal Bifurcation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Tussigenic sensitivity of laryngeal and tracheobronchial regions to mechanical and chemical stimuli was compared in 22 urethan-alpha-chloralose-anesthetized dogs. In addition, the contribution of myelinated and unmyelinated vagal fibers in mediating laryngeal and tracheobronchial cough was investigated. The intensity of cough was evaluated from changes in esophageal pressure. Whereas all mechanical stimulations and citric acid inhalations into tracheobronchial region elicited cough, only 56.7% of mechanical stimulation and 33.3% of citric acid challenges to larynx were effective. The intensity of tracheobronchial cough was significantly higher than that of laryngeal cough. When mechanical stimulation was conducted under visual control (bronchofiberscope), cough elicitability was found to be higher from tracheal bifurcation and main stem bronchi (62.5–87.5%) than from any laryngeal structure (0–42.9%). During partial block of vagal conduction (cooling to 6 degrees C), mechanical and citric acid tracheobronchial stimulations failed to elicit cough and mechanical laryngeal stimulation was effective only in 1 of 10 dogs. Intensity of cough was strongly decreased when mechanical stimulation followed capsaicin administration into trachea (0.3 ml; 100 micrograms/ml) or intravenously (10 micrograms/kg). We conclude that, in anesthetized dogs, stimulation of tracheobronchial region is more effective and prompt in eliciting cough than stimulation of larynx, myelinated vagal afferent fibers play an important role in mediating mechanically and citric acid-induced tracheobronchial cough and mechanically induced laryngeal cough, and stimulation of tracheobronchial and pulmonary capsaicin-sensitive receptors strongly inhibits mechanically induced cough.

Responses of neurons in and near the thalamic ventrobasal complex of the rat to stimulation of uterus, cervix, vagina, colon, and skin

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 557-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Berkley ◽  
G. Guilbaud ◽  
J. M. Benoist ◽  
M. Gautron
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Caudal Part ◽  
Response Characteristics ◽  
The Core ◽  
Ventrobasal Complex ◽  
Gentle Pressure ◽  
Somatic Receptive Fields ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Previous studies in the rat and other species have shown that neurons in and near the ventrobasal complex (VB) can be activated by various visceral as well as somatic stimuli. 2. This study examined the responses of 84 single neurons in and near the rostral 2/3 of VB in 19 adult female rats in estrus to mechanical stimulation of the skin (brush, pressure, noxious pinch) and 4 different visceral stimuli, as follows: distension of both uterine horns, mechanical probing of the vagina, gentle pressure against the cervix, and distension of the colon. The rats were studied while under moderate gaseous anesthesia (33% O2-67% N2O + 0.5% halothane) and paralyzed (pancuronium bromide). 3. Of 77 neurons tested with both somatic and visceral stimuli, 70 were responsive to one type and/or the other. Responses to somatic stimuli were immediate with brief afterdischarges to the pinch stimuli. In contrast, responses to visceral stimuli were delayed an average of 9 s with long afterdischarges averaging 2 min. Most viscerally responsive neurons (74%) had somatic receptive fields, often (44%) to noxious pinch. 4. Of the 70 responsive neurons, 43 (61%) responded to 1 or more of the 4 visceral stimuli, primarily with excitation. Most of these 43 neurons (71%) were responsive to uterine distension, whereas fewer responded to stimulation of the cervix (45%), vagina (29%), or colon (34%). 5. Viscerally responsive neurons were preferentially located in regions bordering or near VB. Only 6 of 22 neurons within the core of VB (27%) responded to visceral stimuli, in contrast with 37 of 48 neurons bordering or near VB (77%). 6. The six viscerally responsive neurons within VB all had somatic receptive fields located primarily on the caudal part of the body and were responsive to only one or two of the four visceral stimuli, usually the uterus. The 37 viscerally responsive neurons bordering or near VB were of 3 types. Neurons of the first type (n = 15) were scattered throughout the areas bordering VB and responded to both somatic and visceral stimuli much like VB neurons, except that they showed more visceral convergence. Neurons of the second type (n = 11) were concentrated at the rostral and dorsal borders of VB and responded only to visceral stimuli, mainly the uterus. Neurons of the third type (n = 11) were concentrated ventrally and had very complex, long-lasting and history-dependent response characteristics to both visceral and somatic stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Estrous cycle variation of afferent fibers supplying reproductive organs in the female rat

1992 ◽  
Vol 596 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 353-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Robins ◽  
Karen J. Berkley ◽  
Yuko Sato
Keyword(s):  
Estrous Cycle ◽  
Reproductive Organs ◽  
Female Rat ◽  
Cycle Variation ◽  
Afferent Fibers

COMPARISON OF FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE AND LUTEINIZING HORMONE SECRETION AFTER ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE PREOPTIC PART OF THE HYPOTHALAMUS IN FEMALE RATS ANAESTHETIZED WITH ETHYL CARBAMATE OR SODIUM PENTOBARBITONE

1978 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. DYER ◽  
M. B. TER HAAR ◽  
LINDA C. MAYES
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone ◽  
Follicle Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Control Process ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Female Rat ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Secretion ◽  
Stimulation Of ◽  
Stimulating Hormone

A.R.C. Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge, CB2 4AT (Received 17 January 1978) For over 30 years, the method by which the brain regulates the secretion of gonadotrophic hormones has been studied by electrical stimulation of those parts of the central nervous system thought to be implicated in the control process. Much of the work has been performed on the female rat. In this species, anaesthetic doses of sodium pentobarbitone, administered immediately before the pro-oestrous 'critical period', block the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) for 24 h. The same treatment also reduces the early phase of the pro-oestrous secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; Daane & Parlow, 1971). Electrical stimulation of the preoptic part of the hypothalamus can overcome this blocking effect and analysis of the optimum parameters required to restore normal secretion of gonadotrophins may give some insight into the endogenous process (e.g. Everett, 1965; Fink & Aiyer, 1974;

Electrophysiological characteristics of primate spinothalamic neurons with renal and somatic inputs

1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. Ammons
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
High Threshold ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Renal Nerve ◽  
C Fibers ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Renal Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Somatic Receptive Fields ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons in the T10-L3 segments were studied for responses to renal and somatic stimuli. A total of 90 neurons was studied in 25 alpha-chloralose anesthetized monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). All neurons were antidromically activated from the ventral posterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus. 2. Sixty-two cells were excited by renal nerve stimulation and six inhibited. Probability of locating cells with renal input was greatest in T11-L1. Cells were located in laminae I and IV-VII; however, most were located in laminae V-VII. Antidromic latencies averaged 4.61 +/- 0.32 (SE) ms, whereas antidromic conduction velocities averaged 43.23 +/- 9.03 m/s. 3. Cells with excitatory renal input received A delta input only (36 cells) or A delta- and C-fiber inputs (26 cells). Stimulation of A delta renal afferent fibers evoked bursts of 1-10 spikes/stimulus [mean 3.6 +/- 0.9 spikes/stimulus] with onset latencies of 10.7 +/- 0.5 ms. Stimulation of C-fibers evoked 1.3 +/- 0.5 spikes/stimulus with onset latencies of 61.7 +/- 11.1 ms. Magnitude of responses to A delta-fiber stimulation was greatest in T12 and decreased both rostrally and caudally. Inhibitory responses to renal nerve stimulation required activation of renal C-fibers. 4. All cells that responded to stimulation of renal afferent fibers received convergent inputs from somatic structures. Forty-four cells were classified as wide dynamic range, 10 were high threshold, 12 were high-threshold cells with inhibitory input from hair, 2 were deep, and 2 were low threshold. Somatic receptive fields were large and located on the flank and abdomen and/or the upper hindlimb. Fourteen cells had inhibitory receptive fields located on the contralateral hindlimb or one of the forearms. 5. It is concluded that T11-L1 STT cells in the monkey respond reliably to renal nerve stimulation. Thoracolumbar STT cells may thus play a role in pain that results from renal disease. The locations of the somatic receptive fields of the cells suggest that they are responsible for the referral of renal pain to the flank and abdomen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document