scholarly journals A Unique Case of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation with More than 12 Years Overall Survival: A Case Report

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Loukas Thanos ◽  
Nikolaos Ptohis ◽  
Anastasia Pomoni ◽  
Evangelia Sotiropoulou ◽  
Mary Pomoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Local Tumor Progression ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
First Line ◽  
Unique Case ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Anticancer Treatment

The case of a 72-year-old male patient with HCC is presented in whom percutaneous RFA was used as the sole first-line anticancer treatment, since he denied having partial hepatectomy. The patient underwent RFA two more times, at 1.5 years for treating a local tumor progression at the initial ablation site and at 11 years after the first session for treating a new remote intrahepatic recurrence. He revealed a long-term survival of more than 12 years so far and still remains in excellent clinical status.

scholarly journals Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after liver resection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Mochizuki ◽  
Hisashi Nakayama ◽  
Yutaka Midorikawa ◽  
Tokio Higaki ◽  
Masamichi Moriguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Objective The effect of postoperative complications including red blood transfusion (BT) on long-term survival for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to define the relationship between postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with HCC. Methods Postoperative complications of 1251 patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC were classified, and their recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cumulative overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results Any complications occurred in 503 patients (40%). Five-year RFS and 5-year OS in the complication group were 21% and 56%, respectively, significantly lower than the respective values of 32% ( p < 0.001) and 68% ( p < 0.001) in the no-complication group (n=748). Complications related to RFS were postoperative BT [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.726, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.338–2.228, p < 0.001], pleural effusion [HR: 1.434, 95% CI: 1.200–1.713, p < 0.001] using Cox-proportional hazard model. Complications related to OS were postoperative BT [HR: 1.843, 95%CI: 1.380-2.462, p < 0.001], ascites [HR: 1.562, 95% CI: 1.066–2.290 p = 0.022], and pleural effusion [HR: 1.421, 95% CI: 1.150–1.755, p = 0.001). Conclusions Postoperative complications were factors associated with poor long-term survival. Postoperative BT and pleural effusion, were noticeable complications that were prognostic factors for both recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

scholarly journals Nomograms Predicting Long-Term Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival in Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Cui ◽  
Yaru Duan ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Hua Ye ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Clinicopathological Characteristics ◽  
Validation Group ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and develop nomograms to predict their long-term overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods Information on metastatic HCC from 2010 to 2015 was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute. The metastatic HCC patients were divided into a long-term survival (LTS) group and a short-term survival (STS) group with 1 year selected as the cut-off value. Then, we compared the demographic and clinicopathological features between the two groups. Next, all patients were randomly divided into a training group and validation group at a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify potential predictors for OS and CSS in the training group, and nomograms of OS and CSS were established. These predictive models were further validated in the validation group. Results A total of 2163 patients were included in the current study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients with characteristics including lower T stage and N stage; treatment with surgery, radiation or chemotherapy; no lung metastasis; and AFP negative status showed better survival. The concordance index (C-index) of the OS nomogram was 0.72 based on 9 variables. The C-index of the CSS nomogram was 0.71 based on 8 variables. Conclusions These nomograms may help clinicians make better treatment recommendations for metastatic HCC patients.

scholarly journals Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bogdanovic ◽  
P. Bulajic ◽  
D. Masulovic ◽  
N. Bidzic ◽  
M. Zivanovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Tace Group

AbstractTo date, it is unclear which treatment modality, liver resection (LR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the more appropriate for patients with huge (≥ 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study aim was to compare, using propensity score matching, short- and long-term outcomes of patients with huge HCC who underwent potentially curative LR or TACE. Patients with huge HCC who had been managed at the Clinical Center by curative-intent LR or by palliative TACE between November 2001 and December 2018 were retrospectively identified. The morbidity and mortality rates and overall survival were compared between the groups before and after the propensity score matching. Independent predictors of long-term survival were determined by multivariate analysis. A total of 103 patients with huge HCC were included; 68 were assigned to the LR group and 35 to the TACE group. The overall morbidity rate was higher in the LR group than in the TACE group before matching (64.7% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.012), while there was no difference after matching (60% vs. 30%, p = 0.055). The major morbidity and 30-days mortality were similar between the groups before and after matching. The LR group was associated with longer overall survival than the TACE group before matching (p = 0.032) and after matching (p = 0.023). Total bilirubin and TACE treatment were independent prognostic factors associated with long-term survival. In patients with huge HCC, liver resection provides better long-term survival than TACE and should be considered as the initial treatment whenever possible.

scholarly journals Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Caudate Lobe Using Expandable Electrodes

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 541-548
Author(s):  
Somrach Thamtorawat ◽  
Torpong Claimon ◽  
Satit Rojwatcharapibarn ◽  
Pradesh Ghirnire ◽  
Trongtum Tongdee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Caudate Lobe ◽  
Local Tumor Progression ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Rf Ablation ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
One Year

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of radiofrequency (RF) ablation using expandable electrodes in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located in the caudate lobe.Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and April 2017, 29 consecutive patients with HCC at the caudate lobe were treated with RF ablation using expandable electrodes. The electrodes were placed on the targeted tumor under combined ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) guidance for each tumor in all the patients. Out of the 29 cases, 19 (65.5%) were accessed via the left hepatic lobe. The technical success, primary efficacy, local tumor progression, secondary efficacy, overall survival, and complications were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed of the various prognostic factors for technical success, primary efficacy, and local tumor progression.Results: The technical success rate was 86.2%, primary efficacy was 89.7%, and secondary efficacy was 82.8%. The local tumor progression (LTP) rate was 12.3% at one year and 31.5% at two years. The median time of LTP was 6.9 months. The overall survival rate was 85.8% at one year and 57.1% at two years. Ten patients died during the follow-up period (mean 22.5 months; with a range of 3.6–53.2 months). A minor complication of asymptomatic biloma was found in one patient (3.5%). Small-sized tumors (≤2 cm) and Spiegel’s lobe location had significantly better treatment outcomes (p = 0.007 and 0.045, respectively).Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation using expandable electrodes is feasible and safe in treating HCCs located in the caudate lobe, especially for small-sized tumors (≤2 cm).

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Liver Surface: Technique Effectiveness and Long-Term Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381882433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Wang ◽  
Xiao-Yu Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Lu ◽  
Bo Zhai
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Microwave Ablation ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Number ◽  
Liver Surface

Background and Aims: To evaluate long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of laparoscopic microwave ablation as a first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma located at the liver surface not feasible for percutaneous ablation. Methods: 51 consecutive patients receiving laparoscopic microwave ablation in our center between January 11, 2012, and July 31, 2014, were enrolled. Technique effectiveness (complete ablation or incomplete ablation) was evaluated 1 month postprocedure. Procedure-related complications were recorded. The influences of patients’ baseline characteristics on recurrence-free survival and overall survival were analyzed after a median follow-up of 34.0 (ranging 19.0-49.0) months. Results: Complete ablation was gained in 47 (92.2%) of the 51 patients. No patients died within 30 days of microwave ablation procedure. A total of 3 (5.9%) cases of complications were observed. Tumor progression/recurrence were observed in 40 patients (78.4%). The median recurrence-free survival and median overall survival of the total cohort was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval: 7.573-14.427) and 34.0 months (95% confidence interval: 27.244-40.756), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified alanine transaminase level and tumor number as independent significant prognosticators of recurrence-free survival whereas α-fetoprotein level as significant prognosticators of overall survival. Conclusions: As a first-line treatment, laparoscopic microwave ablation provides high technique effectiveness rate and is well tolerated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma located at liver surface. Alanine transaminase and tumor number were significant predictors of recurrence-free survival, whereas α-fetoprotein level was significant predictor of overall survival. Laparoscopic microwave ablation might serve as a rational treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with tumors at the liver surface, which merits validation in future perspective studies.

scholarly journals Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao An ◽  
Wang-Zhong Li ◽  
Zhi-Mei Huang ◽  
Xiao-Ling Yu ◽  
Yu-Zhi Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Microwave Ablation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Local Tumor Progression ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
First Line

Abstract Objectives We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as first-line therapies in patients with small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods A total of 144 eligible patients with small (≤ 3 cm) single perivascular (proximity to hepatic and portal veins) HCC who underwent RFA (N = 70) or MWA (N = 74) as first-line treatment were included. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local tumor progression (LTP) rates between the two ablation modalities were compared. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce selection bias. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of hepatic vessels. Results After a median follow-up time of 38.2 months, there were no significant differences in OS (5-year OS: RFA 77.7% vs. MWA 74.6%; p = 0.600) and DFS (5-year DFS: RFA 24.7% vs. MWA 40.4%; p = 0.570). However, a significantly higher LTP rate was observed in the RFA group than the MWA group (5-year LTP: RFA 24.3% vs. MWA 8.4%; p = 0.030). IPTW-adjusted analyses revealed similar results. The treatment modality (RFA vs. MWA: HR 7.861, 95% CI 1.642–37.635, p = 0.010) was an independent prognostic factor for LTP. We observed a significant interaction effect of ablation modality and type of peritumoral vessel on LTP (p = 0.034). For patients with periportal HCC, the LTP rate was significantly higher in the RFA group than in the MWA group (p = 0.045). However, this difference was not observed in patients with perivenous HCC (p = 0.116). Conclusions In patients with a small single periportal HCC, MWA exhibited better tumor control than RFA. Key Points • Microwave ablation exhibited better local tumor control than radiofrequency ablation for small single periportal hepatocellular carcinoma. • There was a significant interaction between the treatment effect of ablation modality and type of peritumoral vessel on local tumor progression. • The type of peritumoral vessel is vital in choosing ablation modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma.

scholarly journals Nomograms Predicting Long-Term Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival in Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A SEER Population-Based Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Cui ◽  
Yaru Duan ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Hua Ye ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Validation Group ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract Background: This study aims to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and develop nomograms to predict their long-term overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods: Information on metastatic HCC from 2010 to 2015 was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute. The metastatic HCC patients were divided into a long-term survival (LTS) group and a short-term survival (STS) group with 1 year selected as the cut-off value. Then, we compared the demographic and clinicopathological features between the two groups. Next, all patients were randomly divided into a training group and validation group at a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify potential predictors for OS and CSS in the training group, and nomograms of OS and CSS were established. These predictive models were further validated in the validation group. Results: A total of 2163 patients were included in the current study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients with characteristics including lower T stage and N stage; treatment with surgery, radiation or chemotherapy; no lung metastasis; and AFP negative status showed better survival. The concordance index (C-index) of the OS nomogram was 0.72 based on 9 variables. The C-index of the CSS nomogram was 0.71 based on 8 variables.Conclusions: These nomograms may help clinicians make better treatment recommendations for metastatic HCC patients.

scholarly journals The Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Gastric Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482199743
Author(s):  
Ke Chen ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Zheling Chen
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
And Control

Background: Treatment options for advanced gastric esophageal cancer are quite limited. Chemotherapy is unavoidable at certain stages, and research on targeted therapies has mostly failed. The advent of immunotherapy has brought hope for the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and the long-term survival of patients who were diagnosed as gastric esophageal cancer and received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Method: Studies on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy of advanced gastric esophageal cancer published before February 1, 2020 were searched online. The survival (e.g. 6-month overall survival, 12-month overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR)) and adverse effects of immunotherapy were compared to that of control therapy (physician’s choice of therapy). Results: After screening 185 studies, 4 comparative cohort studies which reported the long-term survival of patients receiving immunotherapy were included. Compared to control group, the 12-month survival (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.12, P < 0.0001) and 18-month survival (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.39 to 2.81, P = 0.0001) were significantly longer in immunotherapy group. The 3-month survival rate (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.36 to 3.06, P = 0.92) and 18-month survival rate (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.98 to 2.12, P = 0.07) were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group. The ORR were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.65 to 3.66, P = 0.01). Meta-analysis pointed out that in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 sub group population, the immunotherapy could obviously benefit the patients in tumor response rates (OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.89 to 7.61, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy was superior to that of chemotherapy or palliative care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document