scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of Low Volume Prilocaine and Alkalinized Prilocaine for the Regional Intravenous Anesthesia Technique in Hand and Wrist Surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ozlem Kapusuz ◽  
Guldeniz Argun ◽  
Murat Arikan ◽  
Guray Toğral ◽  
Aysun Basarir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Intravenous Anesthesia ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Tourniquet Pain ◽  
Patients Satisfaction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anesthesia Technique ◽  
Low Volume

Aim. Comparing the effectivity of prilocaine and prilocaine alkalinized with 8.4% NaHCO3in terms of sensory and motor block onset and termination durations in RIVA technique considering patients’ satisfaction and tolerance with application of tourniquet undergoing hand-wrist surgery.Materials and Methods. 64 patients were randomised into two groups. First group (Group P) was administered prilocaine and second group (Group PN) was administered prilocaine + %8.4 NaHCO3. Sensory and motor block onset and termination times and onset of tourniquet pain were recorded.Results. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of onset and termination of sensory block and the onset of motor block. The duration of the motor block was longer in Group PN than in Group P(P<0.05). Tourniquet pain was more intense in Group P(P=0.036). In Group PN, the use of additional drugs was recorded at a lower rate and patients’ satisfaction was higher than Group P.Conclusion. In the present study, it was established that alkalinization of prilocaine had no effect on the duration of sensory block and it prolonged the duration of motor block, increased patients’ satisfaction, and decreased tourniquet pain. It is our suggestion that future studies should be carried out on the issue by using different volumes.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant to Lignocaine for Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia for Upper Limb Surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 840-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Narang ◽  
J. S. Dali ◽  
M. Agarwal ◽  
R. Garg
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Magnesium Sulphate ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Tourniquet Pain ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia

Several additives have been combined with local anaesthetics for intravenous regional anaesthesia to improve block quality, analgesia and to decrease tourniquet pain. Magnesium sulphate is one potential additive. This prospective, randomised, double-blinded study was conducted in 30 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing upper limb surgery under tourniquet. In group L, patients received intravenous regional anaesthesia with lignocaine alone (9 ml of 2% lignocaine diluted with normal saline to total volume of 36 ml). Patients in group M received intravenous regional anaesthesia with lignocaine plus magnesium sulphate (6 ml of 25% magnesium sulphate plus 9 ml of 2% lignocaine diluted with normal saline to total volume of 36 ml). Assessment was by observing the response to injection of drug; sensory and motor block and tourniquet pain. The mean time of onset of sensory block was 12.40 and 3.47 minutes in groups L and M respectively (P <0.001). The average times of onset of motor block in groups L and M were 17 and six minutes respectively (P <0.001). Of the patients in group M, 66.7% reported moderate to severe pain while the drug was being injected, compared to 20% in group L (P=0.011). There was a statistically significant difference in visual analogue scale for tourniquet pain at 10 and 30 minutes after tourniquet inflation (lower in group M). These findings indicate that magnesium sulphate added as an adjuvant to lignocaine hastens the onset of sensory and motor block and decreases tourniquet pain. However, there is increased incidence of transient pain on injection if magnesium sulphate is added.

scholarly journals Bupivacaine 0.5% vs. levobupivacaine 0.5% for epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heena D. Pahuja ◽  
Megha P. Tajne ◽  
Anjali R. Bhure ◽  
Savita M. Chauhan
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Epidural Anaesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Epidural Block ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Mean Time

Background: Levobupivacaine has been purported to be as efficacious as Bupivacaine for epidural anaesthesia in recent literature.Methods: With the intent to study the same in caesarean section cases in our set up, we observed various intra- and post-operative variables in two groups (Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine) of 60 healthy parturients. Sixty parturients for elective caesarean section were allocated randomly to receive epidural block with 10-20 ml of either 0.5% Levobupivacaine with Fentanyl 25µg or 0.5% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl 25µg to reach T6 level.Results: Mean total volume in Bupivacaine group was 15.23ml and in Levobupivacaine group was 12.76 ml. The difference was statistically significant. There was significant difference between the groups in the sensory block. The onset of analgesia was earlier in Levobupivacaine group. Mean time was 6.20 minutes in Bupivacaine group and 4.36 minutes in Levobupivacaine group. The duration of motor block was significantly short in Levobupivacaine group. Mean Time for recovery from motor block in Bupivacaine group was 2.5 hours and in Levobupivacaine group 1.5 hours. Mean time to achieve T6 height was earlier in Levobupivacaine group i.e. 16.46 minutes in Bupivacaine group and 13.26 minutes in Levobupivacaine group. Duration of postoperative analgesia was similar. There was no significant difference in neonatal outcome.Conclusions: Levobupivacaine was found to fare better than Bupivacaine in the studied intra and post-operative parameters and is hence recommended over racemic Bupivacaine for epidural block in patients undergoing elective cesarean section.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Low Dose Levobupivacaine (0.1%) for Axillary Plexus Block using Multiple Nerve Stimulation

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 850-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Zhao ◽  
Y.-W. Wang ◽  
H. Chen ◽  
Z. Zhang ◽  
X.-M. You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Brachial Plexus Blockade ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Higher Doses

The purpose of this study was to investigate if low doses of levobupivacaine (0.1%) produce complete sensory blockade in preoperative axillary brachial plexus block and to compare the effect of different doses of levobupivacaine on sensory and motor blockade. A total of 110 patients scheduled for elective forearm or hand surgery were randomly allocated to receive 36 ml or 72 ml of levobupivacaine 0.1% or 36 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25%. In each group, volumes were equally distributed in the four nerve territories. In all patients, the sensory and motor block was assessed at five, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after the placement of axillary block. Complete sensory block was obtained in 94.4% of patients receiving 36 ml of levobupivacaine 0.1%, 92.1% of those receiving 72 ml of levobupivacaine 0.1%, and 97.1% of those receiving 36 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25%. There was no significant difference either in the onset of the sensory and motor block or duration of the sensory and motor block. This study demonstrates that 36 ml of levobupivacaine 0.1% (36 mg) is as effective as higher doses and volumes in axillary brachial plexus blockade.

scholarly journals Comparison between isobaric levobupivacaine 0.5% and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia in lower limb surgeries and lower abdominal surgeries in adult patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Preeti Parashar ◽  
Anisha Singh ◽  
Manoj Kumar Sharma ◽  
Dipak L. Raval
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Time

 Background: The aim of our study was to compare sensory and motor block characteristics and hemodynamic changes following intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) and isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) in elective lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries.Methods: 60 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, ASA grade I or II scheduled for elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries were randomized into two groups, group B (n=30) and group L (n=30) and received either 3 ml of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine or isobaric levobupivacaine intrathecally.Results: The mean time of onset of sensory block at shin of tibia in both the groups was comparable i.e. levobupivacaine (1.19±0.2 minutes) and bupivacaine (1.1+0.2 minutes). The mean time for total duration of sensory block was 211.1±8.2 minutes in group L, while 193.13±13.7 minutes in group B. Time for total duration of motor block in group L was 198.76±8.428 minutes and in group B was 182.6±13.989 minutes. Statistically significant difference was observed in total duration of sensory and motor block in both levobupivaciane and bupivacaine group (p<0.0001). Patients in group L were hemodynamically more stable with significantly less decrease in pulse rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure as compared to group B.Conclusions: We observed that 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine provided better hemodynamic stability, longer duration of sensory and motor block as compared to bupivacaine. 

scholarly journals Comparison of Racemic Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine; combined with low dose Fentanyl, through Intrathecal Route for Transurethral Resection of Prostate

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Debalpana Chandra ◽  
Subir Kumar Brahma
Keyword(s):  
Transurethral Resection ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Racemic Mixture ◽  
Transurethral Resection Of Prostate ◽  
Complete Regression ◽  
Central Nervous System Toxicity ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and Objectives:  Bupivacaine is available as a racemic mixture of dextro and levobupivacaine. Many studies show that dextrobupivacaine has greater cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity than levobupivacaine. The objectives of the present study were to compare the effects of racemic Bupivacaine + Fentanyl and Levobupivacaine + Fentanyl on the complete regression of motor block, onset time to reach T10 level sensory block, duration of T10 level sensory block, onset time of motor block, duration of sensory block.Materials and Method: The study was conducted in 100 patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate operation, who received either 1.75 ml Bupivacaine (0.5%) + 25 µg Fentanyl (Gr A) or 1.75 ml Levobupivacaine (0.5%) + 25 µg Fentanyl (Gr B) intrathecally.Results: Time to complete regression of motor block, onset time toT10 level sensory block were significantly prolonged in Gr A compared to Gr B. The onset time of motor block was significantly shorter in Gr A compared to Gr B. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in respect to the duration of T10 level sensory block, duration of sensory block.Conclusion: Intrathecal Levobupivacaine + Fentanyl used in the present study can be considered as a suitable alternative to Bupivacaine + Fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia in elective TURP surgery.

Comparative study of (0.5%) levobupivacaine and (0.75%) ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block by lateral approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 2426
Author(s):  
Jitesh Kumar ◽  
. Sweta ◽  
Kumari Kanak Lata ◽  
B. K. Prasad ◽  
V. K. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: As compared to general anaesthesia, brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery gives fewer side effects and better postoperative analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 0.5% levobupivacaine and compare it with 0.75% ropivacaine.Methods: For this prospective randomized, controlled study, 60 patients of both sexes of ASA grade 1 and 2 were enrolled and divided into two groups and supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed by lateral approach using 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine. The onset of sensory and motor block, duration of sensory and motor block and analgesia and possible adverse events were recorded.Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the onset of sensory block in both groups. Onset of motor block was significantly faster in levobupivacaine group (P<0.05). Duration of sensory block, motor block and analgesia was significantly longer in levobupivacaine group (P<0.05).Conclusions: 0.5% levobupivacaine is better alternative to 0.75% ropivacaine in brachial plexus block in term of early onset of sensory block and long duration of analgesia.

scholarly journals A Comparative Evaluation of Dexamethasone and Tramadol as Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Supraclavicular Block

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-102
Author(s):  
Rangit Priyakar Pandey ◽  
Richa Chandra
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
The Difference ◽  
American Society ◽  
Supraclavicular Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare dexamethasone and tramadol as adjuvant to levobupivacaine in supraclavicular block. Subjects and Methods: The present study was conducted on 50 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II. Patients were divided in to two groups of 25 each. In group I, 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine hydrochloride plus 2 ml tramadol (100 mg) was used. In group II, 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine hydrochloride plus 2 ml dexamethasone (8 mg) was used. Visual Analogue Scale was used. The onset of sensory and motor block was evaluated.Results: The mean onset of sensory block in group I was 5.41 minutes and in group II was 3.86 minutes, motor onset was 9.12 minutes in group I and 7.25 minutes in group II, duration of sensory block in group I was 12.14 hours and in group II was 15.34 hours, duration of motor block in group I was 14.34 hours and I group II was 16.23 hours, duration of analgesia in group I was 16.1 hour and in group II was 18.4 hours. The difference was significant difference (P<0.05). The mean VAS score in group II was better as compared to group I (P <0.05). Conclusion:Authors found that dexamethasone is a better adjuvant than tramadol when added to levobupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effect of Lidocaine Adding Dexketoprofen and Paracetamol in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Akdogan ◽  
Ahmet Eroglu
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Hemodynamic Effects ◽  
Intravenous Anesthesia ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Dexketoprofen Trometamol ◽  
Analgesia Requirement ◽  
Group D

Objective.Comparison of dexketoprofen and paracetamol added to the lidocaine in Regional Intravenous Anesthesia in terms of hemodynamic effects, motor and sensorial block onset times, intraoperative VAS values, and analgesia requirements.Method.The files of 73 patients between 18 and 65 years old in the ASA I-II risk group who underwent hand and forearm surgery were analyzed and 60 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group D (n=20), 3 mg/kg 2% lidocaine and 50 mg/2 mL dexketoprofen trometamol; Group P (n=20), 3 mg/kg 2% lidocaine and 3 mg/kg paracetamol; Group K (n=20), 3 mg/kg 2% lidocaine. Demographic data, motor and sensorial block times, heart rate, mean blood pressure, VAS values, and intraoperative and postoperative analgesia requirements were recorded.Results.Sensorial and motor block onset durations of Group K were significantly longer than other groups. Motor block termination duration was found to be significantly longer in Group D than in Group K. VAS values of Group K were found higher than other groups. There was no significant difference in VAS values between Group D and Group P. Analgesia requirement was found to be significantly more in Group K than in Group P. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of heart rates and mean arterial pressures.Conclusion.We concluded that the addition of 3 mg/kg paracetamol and 50 mg dexketoprofen to lidocaine as adjuvant in Regional Intravenous Anesthesia applied for hand and/or forearm surgery created a significant difference clinically.

scholarly journals Peri- and Postanalgesic Properties of Lidokain, Lornoxicam, and Nitroglycerine Combination at Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biricik Melis Cakmak ◽  
Gokhan Cakmak ◽  
Elif Akpek ◽  
Gulnaz Arslan ◽  
Mehmet Sukru Sahin
Keyword(s):  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
The Other ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Tourniquet Pain ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Vas Scores

Background.This study was conducted to compare and evaluate the effect of adding lornoxicam or nitroglycerine as adjuncts to lidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA).Methods.60 patients were randomly separated into three groups, lidocaine group (group L), lidocaine + lornoxicam group (group LL), and lidocaine + lornoxicam + transdermal nitroglycerine group (group LL-N). Hemodynamic parameters, sensory and motor blocks onset, and recovery times were recorded. Analgesic consumption for tourniquet pain and postoperative period were recorded.Results.Sensory block onset times and motor block onset times were shorter in the LL-N and LL groups compared with L group. Sensory block recovery time and motor block recovery time were prolonged in the LL and LL-N groups compared with group L. The amount of fentanyl required for tourniquet pain was less in group LL and group LL-N when compared with group L. VAS scores of tourniquet pain were higher in group L compared with the other study groups. Postoperative VAS scores were higher for the first 4 hours in group L compared with the other study groups.Conclusion.The adjuvant drugs (lornoxicam or TNG) when added to lidocaine in IVRA were effective in improving the overall quality of anesthesia, reducing tourniquet pain, increasing tourniquet tolerance, and improving the postoperative analgesia.

scholarly journals The Effects on Sensorial Block, Motor Block, and Haemodynamics of Levobupivacaine at Different Temperatures Applied in the Subarachnoid Space

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Bahittin Nazli ◽  
Huseyin Oguzalp ◽  
Eyup Horasanli ◽  
Mehmet Gamli ◽  
Beyazit Dikmen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Temperatures ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Transurethral Prostate Resection

Aim. To evaluate the effects of 0.5% levobupivacaine at 37°C preheated from room temperature, on sensorial block, motor block, and haemodynamics in patients undergoing transurethral prostate resection (TUR-P).Material and Method. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: Group I patients were injected with 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine solution which had been kept at room temperature for at least 24 hours and Group II patients were injected with 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine solution which had been kept at 37°C for at least 24 hours. The patients were examined in terms of sensorial block, motor block, haemodynamic profile, and incidence of side effects.Results. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of demographic data. The time to reachT10sensory block and the time of starting motor block were found to be significantly shorter in Group II . The duration of sensory block overT10andT6, the duration ofL1regression, the duration of the sensory block, and the regression time of the motor blocks from 3 to 2 were found to be longer in Group II.Conclusion. The use of 0.5% levobupivacaine spinal anaesthesia heated to 37°C accelerated the start of sensory and motor block.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document