scholarly journals Establishing Standards for Studying Renal Function in Mice through Measurements of Body Size-Adjusted Creatinine and Urea Levels

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wellington Francisco Rodrigues ◽  
Camila Botelho Miguel ◽  
Marcelo Henrique Napimoga ◽  
Carlo Jose Freire Oliveira ◽  
Javier Emilio Lazo-Chica
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
The Body ◽  
Urea Concentration ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Average Factor

Strategies for obtaining reliable results are increasingly implemented in order to reduce errors in the analysis of human and veterinary samples; however, further data are required for murine samples. Here, we determined an average factor from the murine body surface area for the calculation of biochemical renal parameters, assessed the effects of storage and freeze-thawing of C57BL/6 mouse samples on plasmatic and urinary urea, and evaluated the effects of using two different urea-measurement techniques. After obtaining 24 h urine samples, blood was collected, and body weight and length were established. The samples were evaluated after collection or stored at −20°C and −70°C. At different time points (0, 4, and 90 days), these samples were thawed, the creatinine and/or urea concentrations were analyzed, and samples were restored at these temperatures for further measurements. We show that creatinine clearance measurements should be adjusted according to the body surface area, which was calculated based on the weight and length of the animal. Repeated freeze-thawing cycles negatively affected the urea concentration; the urea concentration was more reproducible when using the modified Berthelot reaction rather than the ultraviolet method. Our findings will facilitate standardization and optimization of methodology as well as understanding of renal and other biochemical data obtained from mice.

Simplified Procedures for Calculating Drug Dosage from Body Weight in Infancy and Childhood

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-506
Author(s):  
ANTHONY J. GLAZKO
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Drug Dosage ◽  
The Body ◽  
Infancy And Childhood ◽  
Adult Dose ◽  
Fixed Power ◽  
Simplified Procedures

The primary purpose of this communication is to describe some rather simple procedures for calculating pediatric doses when they are proportional to a fixed power of body weight. It is generally recognized that dose requirements per unit of body weight are usually higher for children than for adults. Consequently the total dose is not directly prportional to the body weight, but appears to be more nearly proportional to the body surface area. This requires preliminary estimation of the body surface area with the assistance of various charts and tables, following which the dose can be calculated by simple proportion when the adult dose is known.

Simple Rule for Converting Body Weight to Body Surface

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 954-954
Author(s):  
Norman A. Harvey
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
The Body ◽  
Simple Rule ◽  
Slide Rule ◽  
Small Children ◽  
Pocket Calculator ◽  
Decimal Fraction

The body surface area (BSA) in square meters is commonly used to determine daily body water and electrolyte needs. Most pediatric fluid and electrolyte problems are calculated in patients under 70 lb in body weight (1.004 sq m). To arrive at the proper decimal fraction of the BSA for infants and small children one needs a slide rule, nomogram or pocket calculator, all of which have a way of never being handy when needed. The standard formula (see below) may be used but this is a bother.

Pharmacokinetic Considerations in Amputees

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002094265
Author(s):  
Fawzy Elbarbry ◽  
Van Nguyen ◽  
Marina Kawaguchi-Suzuki
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Dose Adjustment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Key Terms ◽  
Different Levels

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to review the currently available assessment tools for measuring renal function, body weight, and body surface area in the amputee population. Methods: PubMed and Web of Science were searched using the following key terms: amputation, dose adjustment, and estimation of body weight. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded from the search. Results: Despite the increasing prevalence of amputations, there is little literature available that discusses its impact on the patient and how these physiological changes can affect pharmacokinetics. Very little information is available to guide dose adjustment in this patient population. This article discusses several factors to consider when determining optimum dosing regimens in patients with different levels of amputations. Conclusion: This article will evaluate the applicability of methods mentioned in existing literature for measuring changes in renal function, body weight, and body surface area in amputees.

The use of Body Surface Index as a Better Clinical Health indicators Compare to Body Mass Index and Body Surface Area for Clinical Application

2018 ◽  
pp. 131-136
Author(s):  
Shirazu I. ◽  
Theophilus. A. Sackey ◽  
Elvis K. Tiburu ◽  
Mensah Y. B. ◽  
Forson A.
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Clinical Application ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Health Indicators ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Parameters ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Individual Body

The relationship between body height and body weight has been described by using various terms. Notable among them is the body mass index, body surface area, body shape index and body surface index. In clinical setting the first descriptive parameter is the BMI scale, which provides information about whether an individual body weight is proportionate to the body height. Since the development of BMI, two other body parameters have been developed in an attempt to determine the relationship between body height and weight. These are the body surface area (BSA) and body surface index (BSI). Generally, these body parameters are described as clinical health indicators that described how healthy an individual body response to the other internal organs. The aim of the study is to discuss the use of BSI as a better clinical health indicator for preclinical assessment of body-organ/tissue relationship. Hence organ health condition as against other body composition. In addition the study is `also to determine the best body parameter the best predict other parameters for clinical application. The model parameters are presented as; modeled height and weight; modelled BSI and BSA, BSI and BMI and modeled BSA and BMI. The models are presented as clinical application software for comfortable working process and designed as GUI and CAD for use in clinical application.

Correlation between the Minimal Cross-Sectional Area of the Nasal Cavity and Body Surface Area: Preliminary Results in Normal Patients

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Jurlina ◽  
Ranko Mladina ◽  
Krsto Dawidowsky ◽  
Davor Ivanković ◽  
Zeljko Bumber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Anterior Part ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Objective Evaluation ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
The Body ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional

Nasal symptoms often are inconsistent with rhinoscopic findings. However, the proper diagnosis and treatment of nasal pathology requires an objective evaluation of the narrow segments of the anterior part of the nasal cavities (minimal cross-sectional area [MCSA]). The problem is that the value of MCSA is not a unique parameter for the entire population, but rather it is a distinctive value for particular subject (or smaller groups of subjects). Consequently, there is a need for MCSA values to be standardized in a simple way that facilitates the comparison of results and the selection of our treatment regimens. We examined a group of 157 healthy subjects with normal nasal function. A statistically significant correlation was found between the body surface area and MCSA at the level of the nasal isthmus and the head of the inferior turbinate. The age of subjects was not found a statistically significant predictor for the value of MCSA. The results show that the expected value of MCSA can be calculated for every subject based on anthropometric data of height and weight.

New formula for predicting standard liver and spleen volumes in Chinese adults

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Longbao Yang ◽  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Xinxing Tantai ◽  
Cailan Xiao ◽  
Caifeng Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Liver Volume ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Chinese Adults ◽  
Volume Formula

Abstract BACKGROUNDThe liver volume and spleen volum are useful index for cirrhosis patients with esphageal varices. But the calculation of the volume is time-consuming and boring. To solve the problem, we successfully established the liver and spleen volume formula using the body surface area. We compared the liver volume formula with other four formulas, which be proved with highest accuracy and lowest error. Until now, except for the new spleen volume formula in the research, there are few reports about it.AIMTo obtain a reference range of morphological indices, and to establish a formula to accurately predict the standard liver and spleen volumes in Chinese adults.METHODSComputed tomography was used to calculate the estimated total liver volume and spleen volume of 305 Chinese adults without any diseases which could influence the volumes of these two organs. Gender, age, body height, body weight, body surface area and body mass index were determined. Correlation analysis and step-wise multiple linear regression analysis were performed to evaluate the impact of each parameter on the liver and spleen volumes, and then a formula to predict the liver and spleen volumes was established. Finally, the results obtained with the new liver volume formula with existing formulas in a validation group were compared.RESULTSThe average liver and spleen volume values were 1043.18 ± 244.60 cm3 and 175.07 ± 88.15 cm3, respectively. Age, body height, body weight, body surface area and body mass index were significantly correlated with liver and spleen volume. Body surface area showed the strongest correlation with liver volume and spleen volume( p<0.005 and p<0.001). Based on these results, new formulas to calculate the standard liver volume and standard spleen volume were established.CONCLUSIONSCompared the new liver volume formula with the existing formula, it is found that the new liver volume is more accurate. And the accuracy of the spleen volume formula is acceptable. Core tip: To solve the problem of time-consuming and boring in calculating the liver and spleen volume, we successfully established the liver and spleen volume formula can be used in Chinese adult. Though there are some reports about the liver volume, but it is different in spleen volume. The liver volume and spleen volume radio is an useful index to predict the esophageal varices and bleeding risk for cirrhosis patients. Only liver volume formula is not enough, the finding of the spleen volume is very meaningful.

Efficacy of body weight vs body surface area-based prednisolone regimen in nephrotic syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 622-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswanath Basu ◽  
Suman Bhattacharyya ◽  
Shilpita Barua ◽  
Abhisek Naskar ◽  
Birendranath Roy
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Nephrotic Syndrome ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface

Estimation of body surface area of extremely obese human subjects

1960 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 781-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett R. Tucker ◽  
James K. Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
The Body ◽  
Du Bois ◽  
Linear Formula ◽  
Total Body ◽  
Obese Human

The body surface areas of one normal and four extremely obese human subjects have been estimated by three methods: a) direct measurement by a method similar to that which Du Bois described; b) calculation from the Du Bois height-weight formula; and c) calculation from the Du Bois linear formula. The values for the total body surface area of the obese subjects calculated from the height-weight formula varied up to 11% below those that were directly measured. The values for the total body surface area obtained with the linear formula ranged between 13% and 20% above the direct measurements, this being almost entirely due to discrepancies in the trunk and in the thigh estimations. It has been concluded that estimation of the body surface area oxf extremely obese subjects by the Du Bois height-weight formula is satisfactory when considered in relation to the accuracy of the physiologic measurements with which it is generally used. Because of the unusual body form the Du Bois linear formula has been found unsatisfactory for this group. Submitted on March 1, 1960

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document