scholarly journals Effect of the PIVO Device on the Procedure of Phlebotomy from Peripheral IV Catheters

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Suzanne Adams ◽  
Bridget Toroni ◽  
Meenal Lele
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Blood Sample ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Routine Blood ◽  
Current Guidelines ◽  
Difficult Venous Access

Short peripheral catheters (SPC) are an existing conduit into many patients’ veins and line draws from SPC are a desired method of routine blood collection especially in difficult venous access patients. The PIVO device facilitates blood collection through SPC and is being used clinically in a number of hospitals. This study aimed to determine the appropriate wait time following a flush and the minimum waste volume required to obtain an undiluted blood sample when using the PIVO device and how that differed from current guidelines from SPC line draws. A clinical study was conducted examining the analyte results of samples drawn with PIVO through a SPC at varying wait times following a saline flush. Both an initial waste volume and a postwaste sample were compared to a venipuncture control. The resulting samples showed no saline dilution as measured by sodium and creatinine results at all studied wait times. These findings suggest that blood collections using the PIVO device can produce a clinically valid sample with a 30-second wait following a SPC flush and no waste volume prior to sample collection.

scholarly journals Innovative Strategies for Decreasing Blood Collection Wait Times for Patients in Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e784-e791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayabel Mengistu ◽  
Dina Ray ◽  
Passion Lockett ◽  
Vivian Dorsey ◽  
Ron A. Phipps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Early Phase ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Turnover Time ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Blood Collection

Purpose: Long wait times are a primary source of dissatisfaction among patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials. We hypothesized that an automated patient check-in system with readily available display for increasing awareness of waiting intervals would improve patient flow and use of our rooms, with decreased turnover time and increased throughput. Methods: We recorded in-room wait times for patients seen in our clinic and observed the logistics involved in the blood collection process to delineate causes for delays. We then implemented a three-step strategy to alleviate the causes of these delays: (1) changing the collection of materials and the review of faxed orders, (2) improving our LabTracker automated database system that included wait time calculators and real-time information regarding patient status, and (3) streamlining lower complexity appointments. Results: After our intervention, we observed a 19% decrease in mean wait times and a 30% decrease in wait times among patients waiting the longest (95th percentile). We also observed an increase in staff productivity during this process. Modifications in LabTracker provided the biggest reduction in mean wait times (17%). Conclusion: We observed a significant decrease in mean wait times after implementing our intervention. This decrease led to increased staff productivity and cost savings. Once wait times became a measurable metric, we were able to identify causes for delays and improve our operations, which can be performed in any patient care facility.

scholarly journals Comparison of knowledge, attitude and practices in routine blood and urine collection among final year laboratory technician students, nursing students and house surgeons

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3559
Author(s):  
Johns John ◽  
Kavitarati Dharwadkar ◽  
Jini M. P.
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Urine Collection ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Routine Blood ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Student’S T

Background: Laboratory services are the backbone of the modern health care sector. In spite of rapid advances in laboratory science, it is still susceptible to various manual and systemic errors. Pre-analytical phase includes specimen collection, storage, separation and transport. Errors in this phase are majorly due to human mistakes and the majority of these errors are preventable. Laboratory technicians and nursing staff from in-patient care are most commonly and directly involved in sample collection. There are many studies done using them as study population. However, the role of physician in sample collection techniques is often ignored. Ideally a doctor should also be aware of the sample collection techniques and anticipate possible lab errors due to pre-analytical error.Methods: A quantitative cross sectional comparative study with 60 participants comprising 20 each from house surgeons, final year lab technicians and nursing students in a tertiary care hospital. A pre-tested, self-administered and validated questionnaire was used to assess knowledge, attitude and practices in routine blood and urine collection with total 27 questions. Statistical analysis: ANOVA, student’s t- test and qualitative analysis was done.Results: In the area of sample collection techniques house surgeons lacked the required knowledge compared to nursing and lab technician students and it was also reflected in sample collection practices.Conclusions: Based on the study, we strongly opine to train MBBS students in routine blood collection techniques and sensitize them to pre analytical errors which will help in reducing lab reporting errors.

scholarly journals Predicting Patient Wait Times in the Phlebotomy Unit

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Dilek Orbatu ◽  
Oktay Yıldırım ◽  
Eminullah Yaşar ◽  
Ali Rıza Şişman ◽  
Süleyman Sevinç
Keyword(s):  
Waiting Time ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Time Prediction ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Patient Will ◽  
Patient Waiting Time

Patients frequently complain of long waiting times in phlebotomy units. Patients try to predict how long they will stay in the phlebotomy unit according to the number of patients in front of them. If it is not known how fast the queue is progressing, it is not possible to predict how long a patient will wait. The number of prior patients who will come to the phlebotomy unit is another important factor that changes the waiting time prediction. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system that predicts patient waiting time in the phlebotomy unit. The system can predict the waiting time with high accuracy by considering all the variables that may affect the waiting time. In this study, the blood collection performance of phlebotomists, the duration of the phlebotomy in front of the patient, and the number of prior patients who could come to the phlebotomy unit was determined as the main parameters affecting the waiting time. For two months, actual wait times and predicted wait times were compared. The wait time for 95 percent of the patients was predicted with a variance of ± 2 minutes. An AI-based system helps patients make predictions with high accuracy, and patient satisfaction can be increased.

scholarly journals Time to Endoscopy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Analysis of Wait-Times

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renée M. Janssen ◽  
Oliver Takach ◽  
Estello Nap-Hill ◽  
Robert A. Enns
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Office Visit ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Endoscopic Examination ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Current Guidelines

Objective. The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Wait Time Consensus Group recommends that patients with symptoms associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) should have an endoscopic examination within 2 months. However, in a recent survey of Canadian gastroenterologists, wait-times for endoscopy were considerably longer than the current guidelines recommend. The purpose of this study was to evaluate wait-times for colonoscopy in patients who were subsequently found to have CRC through the Division of Gastroenterology at St. Paul’s Hospital (SPH).Methods. This study was a retrospective chart review of outpatients seen for consultation and endoscopy ultimately diagnosed with CRC. Subjects were identified through the SPH pathology database for the inclusion period 2010 through 2013. Data collected included wait-times, subject characteristics, cancer characteristics, and outcomes.Results. 246 subjects met inclusion criteria for this study. The mean wait-time from primary care referral to first office visit was 63 days; the mean wait-time to first endoscopy was 94 days. Patients with symptoms waited a mean of 86 days to first endoscopy, considerably longer than the national recommended guideline of 60 days. There was no apparent effect of length of wait-time on node positivity or presence of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis.Conclusion. Wait-times for outpatient consultation and endoscopic evaluation at the St. Paul’s Hospital Division of Gastroenterology exceed current guidelines.

Lower Volume Peripheral Blood Sample Collection: Key Considerations for Nurses - Roundtable Discussion

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh Ann Bowe-Geddes
Keyword(s):  
Blood Sample ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
The United States ◽  
Peripheral Blood Sample ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Group Of Seven ◽  
Clinical Case Study ◽  
Lower Volume

Abstract A group of seven nurses from a range of laboratory and hospital settings across the United States were invited to present opinions and clinical case study examples that reflect the key considerations in peripheral blood sample collection involving lower volume samples and patients affected by difficult venous access (DVA). Panelists were asked to review and compare prevailing standard operating procedures (SOPs) in sample collection and challenges in efforts to expand the use of lower volume sample collection and processing. The discussion identified achievable goals to improve standard of care in lower volume blood sample collection and the treatment of DVA patients.

Acceptability of external jugular venepuncture for patients with liver disease and difficult venous access

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. S27-S34
Author(s):  
Sinead Sheils ◽  
Susan Mason ◽  
Janice Gullick
Keyword(s):  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Multiple Perspectives ◽  
Research Reporting ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Individualized Care ◽  
Audit Data ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Difficult Venous Access

Background: Difficult venous access (DVA) is common in liver patients requiring blood collection using traditional peripheral approaches. This study aimed to understand the experience of DVA for liver patients and the acceptability of peripheral venepuncture versus external jugular venepuncture (EJV). A secondary aim was to explore the impact of EJV on local resource utilization. Methods: Semistructured interviews with liver outpatients with DVA (n = 10) requiring venepuncture were firstly themed inductively. We then deductively applied the acceptability framework of Sekhon et al. as a further analytic lens. Audit data from DVA encounters (n = 24) allowed analysis of issues from multiple perspectives. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research reporting checklist guides this report. Results: Peripheral venepuncture had poor prospective, concurrent, and retrospective acceptability, requiring significant mental and physical preparation. Fear, stigma, pain and distress, poor continuity of care, and poor effectiveness led to service disengagement. While EJV caused initial trepidation, it had high concurrent and retrospective acceptability. The significant improvement in patient experience was corroborated by audit data for both procedure duration (5 versus 15 minutes) and first attempt success (100 versus 28.5%) for EJV versus peripheral venepuncture, respectively. While EJV required a recumbent position, it required less staff. Conclusions: EJV is highly acceptable to patients, using less time and staff resources. EJV protocols and staff training should be considered where DVA presentations are common. Individualized care plans and careful care coordination could divert DVA patients needing venepuncture to services that use EJV preferentially. HIGHLIGHTS Peripheral venepuncture results in fear, stigma, pain, & distress for those with DVA. This poor acceptability of traditional venepuncture leads to service disengagement. External jugular venepuncture is highly acceptable & improves resource utilization.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of the Torq Zero Delay Centrifuge System for Decentralized Blood Collection and Stabilization

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1019
Author(s):  
Kyungjin Hong ◽  
Gabriella Iacovetti ◽  
Ali Rahimian ◽  
Sean Hong ◽  
Jon Epperson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rapid Separation ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Collection Device ◽  
Precision Study ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Blood Specimens

Blood sample collection and rapid separation—critical preanalytical steps in clinical chemistry—can be challenging in decentralized collection settings. To address this gap, the Torq™ zero delay centrifuge system includes a lightweight, hand-portable centrifuge (ZDrive™) and a disc-shaped blood collection device (ZDisc™) enabling immediate sample centrifugation at the point of collection. Here, we report results from clinical validation studies comparing performance of the Torq System with a conventional plasma separation tube (PST). Blood specimens from 134 subjects were collected and processed across three independent sites to compare ZDisc and PST performance in the assessment of 14 analytes (K, Na, Cl, Ca, BUN, creatinine, AST, ALT, ALP, total bilirubin, albumin, total protein, cholesterol, and triglycerides). A 31-subject precision study was performed to evaluate reproducibility of plasma test results from ZDiscs, and plasma quality was assessed by measuring hemolysis and blood cells from 10 subject specimens. The ZDisc successfully collected and processed samples from 134 subjects. ZDisc results agreed with reference PSTs for all 14 analytes with mean % biases well below clinically significant levels. Results were reproducible across different operators and ZDisc production lots, and plasma blood cell counts and hemolysis levels fell well below clinical acceptance thresholds. ZDiscs produce plasma samples equivalent to reference PSTs. Results support the suitability of the Torq System for remotely collecting and processing blood samples in decentralized settings.

An ultrasound-based technique in the management of totally implantable venous access devices with persistent withdrawal occlusion

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110232
Author(s):  
Sonia D’Arrigo ◽  
Maria Giuseppina Annetta ◽  
Mauro Pittiruti
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Safe Method ◽  
Central Venous Port ◽  
Catheter Malfunction ◽  
Bubble Test ◽  
Current Guidelines ◽  
Venous Access Devices

Persistent withdrawal occlusion is a specific catheter malfunction characterized by inability to withdraw blood through the device while infusion is maintained. The main causes are fibroblastic sleeve and tip malposition (associated or not to venous thrombosis around the tip). All current guidelines recommend infusing vesicant/antiblastic drugs through a central venous port only after assessment of blood return. In PWO, blood return is impossible. We have recently started to assess the intravascular position of the tip and the delivery of the infusion in the proximity of the cavo-atrial junction utilizing transthoracic/subxiphoid ultrasound with the ‘bubble test’. We found that this is an easy, real-time, accurate and safe method for verifying the possibility of using a port for chemotherapy even in the absence of blood return, as it occurs with persistent withdrawal occlusion.

scholarly journals Online Ratings of Primary Care Physicians: Comparison of Gender, Training, and Specialty

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110077
Author(s):  
Daliah Wachs ◽  
Victoria Lorah ◽  
Allison Boynton ◽  
Amanda Hertzler ◽  
Brandon Nichols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Female Physicians ◽  
Online Ratings ◽  
And Gender

The purpose of this study was to explore patient perceptions of primary care providers and their offices relative to their physician’s philosophy (medical degree [MD] vs doctorate in osteopathic medicine [DO]), specialty (internal medicine vs family medicine), US region, and gender (male vs female). Using the Healthgrades website, the average satisfaction rating for the physician, office parameters, and wait time were collected and analyzed for 1267 physicians. We found female doctors tended to have lower ratings in the Midwest, and staff friendliness of female physicians were rated lower in the northwest. In the northeast, male and female MDs were rated more highly than DOs. Wait times varied regionally, with northeast and northwest regions having the shortest wait times. Overall satisfaction was generally high for most physicians. Regional differences in perception of a physician based on gender or degree may have roots in local culture, including proximity to a DO school, comfort with female physicians, and expectations for waiting times.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document