scholarly journals Pounding between Adjacent Frame Structures under Earthquake Excitation Based on Transfer Matrix Method of Multibody Systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Jianguo Ding ◽  
Hui Zhuang ◽  
Yu Chang ◽  
Peng Chen ◽  
...  

In this paper, the case of two adjacent frame structures is studied by establishing a mechanical model based on the transfer matrix method of multibody system (MS-TMM). The transfer matrices of the related elements and total transfer equation are deduced, combining with the Hertz-damp mode. The pounding process of two adjacent frame structures is calculated by compiling the relevant MATLAB program during severe ground motions. The results of the study indicate that the maximum error of the peak pounding forces and the peak displacements at the top of the frame structure obtained by the MS-TMM and ANSYS are 6.22% and 9.86%, respectively. Comparing the calculation time by ANSYS and MS-TMM, it shows that the computation efficiency increases obviously by using the MS-TMM. The pounding mainly occurs at the top of the short structure; meanwhile, multiple pounding at the same time may occur when the separation gap is small. The parametric investigation has led to the conclusion that the pounding force, the number of poundings, the moment of pounding, and the structural displacement are sensitive to the change of the seismic peak acceleration and the separation gap size.

2014 ◽  
Vol 1065-1069 ◽  
pp. 1026-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Ying Zhang ◽  
Ming Tao Li

Based on the double member model of wall-frame structure and the corresponding transfer matrix method, the concept of frequent impedance of rigid foundation is introduced so that SSI can be taken into account. This method is more convenient and efficient compared to finite element method because of fewer structural parameters and faster calculation speed. Necessary structure parameters include 7 parameters of each storey, geometry size and total mass of foundation and elastic parameters of site soil. Totally 39 examples were calculated for 13 values of foundation mass and 3 kinds of soil, which are compared to the result of fix bottom model of upper structure. Results show that SSI does not always deduce a decrease of seismic response. Sometimes SSI may increases structural displacement evidently. The simplified method would provide structure designers an efficient tool to understand seismic behavior of wall-frame structures with various foundation and site soil.


2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Arai ◽  
Shoichi Kuroda ◽  
Kiyohiro Ito

Abstract Pipe systems have been widely used in industrial plants such as power stations. In these systems, the displacement and stress distributions often need to be predicted. Analytical and numerical methods, such as the finite element method (FEM), boundary element method (BEM), and frame structure method (FSM), are typically adopted to predict these distributions. The analytical methods, which can only be applied to problems with simple geometries and boundary conditions, are based on the Timoshenko beam theory. Both FEM and BEM can be applied to more complex problems, although this usually requires a stiffness matrix with a large number of degrees-of-freedom. In FSM, although the structure is modeled by a beam element, the stiffness matrix still becomes large; furthermore, the matrix size needed in FEM and BEM is also large. In this study, the transfer matrix method, which is simply referred to as TMM, is studied to effectively solve complex problems, such as a pipe structure under a small size stiffness matrix. The fundamental formula is extended to a static elastic-plastic problem. The efficiency and simplicity of this method in solving a space-curved pipe system that involves an elbow are demonstrated. The results are compared with those obtained by FEM to verify the performance of the method.


Author(s):  
Masayuki Arai ◽  
Shoichi Kuroda ◽  
Kiyohiro Ito

Abstract Pipe systems have been widely used in industrial plants such as power stations. In these systems, it is often required to predict the displacement and stress distribution. Analytical and numerical methods such as the finite element method (FEM), boundary element method (BEM), and frame structure method (FSM) are typically adopted to predict the displacement and stress distribution. The analytical methods are solved based on the Timoshenko beam theory, but the problem that can be solved is limited to simple geometry under simple boundary conditions. Both FEM and BEM can be applied to more complicated problems, although this usually involves a large number of degrees of freedom in a stiffness matrix. The structure is modeled by a beam element in FSM. However, the stiffness matrix still becomes large, as does the matrix size constructed in FEM and BEM. In this study, the transfer matrix method (TMM) is studied to effectively solve complicated problems such as a pipe structure under a small size of the stiffness matrix. The fundamental formula is extended to apply to an elastic-plastic problem. The efficiency and simplicity of this method is demonstrated to solve a space-curved pipe system that involves elbows. The results are compared with those obtained by FEM to verify this method.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 614208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianguo Ding ◽  
Wei Zhuang ◽  
Pingxin Wang

Portal frame structures are widely used in industrial building design but unfortunately are often damaged during an earthquake. As a result, a study on the seismic response of this type of structure is important to both human safety and future building designs. Traditionally, finite element methods such as the ANSYS and MIDAS have been used as the primary methods of computing the response of such a structure during an earthquake; however, these methods yield low calculation efficiencies. In this paper, the mechanical model of a single-story portal frame structure with two spans is constructed based on the transfer matrix method of multibody system (MS-TMM); both the transfer matrix of the components in the model and the total transfer matrix equation of the structure are derived, and the corresponding MATLAB program is compiled to determine the natural period and seismic response of the structure. The results show that the results based on the MS-TMM are similar to those obtained by ANSYS, but the calculation time of the MS-TMM method is only 1/20 of that of the ANSYS method. Additionally, it is shown that the MS-TMM method greatly increases the calculation efficiency while maintaining accuracy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document