scholarly journals Discovery of Urinary Proteomic Signature for Differential Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yinghua Zhao ◽  
Lianying Yang ◽  
Changqing Sun ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Yangzhige He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Urine Samples ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Discovery Dataset ◽  
Leave One Out ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdomens, but the confident preoperative diagnosis is still a challenge. In order to profile noninvasive urinary biomarkers that could discriminate acute appendicitis from other acute abdomens, we carried out mass spectrometric experiments on urine samples from patients with different acute abdomens and evaluated diagnostic potential of urinary proteins with various machine-learning models. Firstly, outlier protein pools of acute appendicitis and controls were constructed using the discovery dataset (32 acute appendicitis and 41 control acute abdomens) against a reference set of 495 normal urine samples. Ten outlier proteins were then selected by feature selection algorithm and were applied in construction of machine-learning models using naïve Bayes, support vector machine, and random forest algorithms. The models were assessed in the discovery dataset by leave-one-out cross validation and were verified in the validation dataset (16 acute appendicitis and 45 control acute abdomens). Among the three models, random forest model achieved the best performance: the accuracy was 84.9% in the leave-one-out cross validation of discovery dataset and 83.6% (sensitivity: 81.2%, specificity: 84.4%) in the validation dataset. In conclusion, we developed a 10-protein diagnostic panel by the random forest model that was able to distinguish acute appendicitis from confusable acute abdomens with high specificity, which indicated the clinical application potential of noninvasive urinary markers in disease diagnosis.

Document Preprocessing with TF-IDF to Improve the Polarity Classification Performance of Unstructured Sentiment Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 235-242
Author(s):  
Farrikh Alzami ◽  
Erika Devi Udayanti ◽  
Dwi Puji Prabowo ◽  
Rama Aria Megantara
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Feature Extraction ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Classification Performance ◽  
Document Preparation ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Polarity Classification ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Sentiment analysis in terms of polarity classification is very important in everyday life, with the existence of polarity, many people can find out whether the respected document has positive or negative sentiment so that it can help in choosing and making decisions. Sentiment analysis usually done manually. Therefore, an automatic sentiment analysis classification process is needed. However, it is rare to find studies that discuss extraction features and which learning models are suitable for unstructured sentiment analysis types with the Amazon food review case. This research explores some extraction features such as Word Bags, TF-IDF, Word2Vector, as well as a combination of TF-IDF and Word2Vector with several machine learning models such as Random Forest, SVM, KNN and Naïve Bayes to find out a combination of feature extraction and learning models that can help add variety to the analysis of polarity sentiments. By assisting with document preparation such as html tags and punctuation and special characters, using snowball stemming, TF-IDF results obtained with SVM are suitable for obtaining a polarity classification in unstructured sentiment analysis for the case of Amazon food review with a performance result of 87,3 percent.

scholarly journals Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Compressed Sward Height in Walloon Pastures Based on Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Meteorological Data Using Multiple Data Transformations

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 408
Author(s):  
Charles Nickmilder ◽  
Anthony Tedde ◽  
Isabelle Dufrasne ◽  
Françoise Lessire ◽  
Bernard Tychon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Data Transformations ◽  
Independent Validation ◽  
Sward Height ◽  
Machine Learning Models ◽  
Sentinel 2

Accurate information about the available standing biomass on pastures is critical for the adequate management of grazing and its promotion to farmers. In this paper, machine learning models are developed to predict available biomass expressed as compressed sward height (CSH) from readily accessible meteorological, optical (Sentinel-2) and radar satellite data (Sentinel-1). This study assumed that combining heterogeneous data sources, data transformations and machine learning methods would improve the robustness and the accuracy of the developed models. A total of 72,795 records of CSH with a spatial positioning, collected in 2018 and 2019, were used and aggregated according to a pixel-like pattern. The resulting dataset was split into a training one with 11,625 pixellated records and an independent validation one with 4952 pixellated records. The models were trained with a 19-fold cross-validation. A wide range of performances was observed (with mean root mean square error (RMSE) of cross-validation ranging from 22.84 mm of CSH to infinite-like values), and the four best-performing models were a cubist, a glmnet, a neural network and a random forest. These models had an RMSE of independent validation lower than 20 mm of CSH at the pixel-level. To simulate the behavior of the model in a decision support system, performances at the paddock level were also studied. These were computed according to two scenarios: either the predictions were made at a sub-parcel level and then aggregated, or the data were aggregated at the parcel level and the predictions were made for these aggregated data. The results obtained in this study were more accurate than those found in the literature concerning pasture budgeting and grassland biomass evaluation. The training of the 124 models resulting from the described framework was part of the realization of a decision support system to help farmers in their daily decision making.

scholarly journals Comparison of Resampling Algorithms to Address Class Imbalance when Developing Machine Learning Models to Predict Foodborne Pathogen Presence in Agricultural Water

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lowell Weller ◽  
Tanzy M. T. Love ◽  
Martin Wiedmann
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Predictive Models ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Agricultural Water ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Safety Hazards ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Resampling Method ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Recent studies have shown that predictive models can supplement or provide alternatives to E. coli-testing for assessing the potential presence of food safety hazards in water used for produce production. However, these studies used balanced training data and focused on enteric pathogens. As such, research is needed to determine 1) if predictive models can be used to assess Listeria contamination of agricultural water, and 2) how resampling (to deal with imbalanced data) affects performance of these models. To address these knowledge gaps, this study developed models that predict nonpathogenic Listeria spp. (excluding L. monocytogenes) and L. monocytogenes presence in agricultural water using various combinations of learner (e.g., random forest, regression), feature type, and resampling method (none, oversampling, SMOTE). Four feature types were used in model training: microbial, physicochemical, spatial, and weather. “Full models” were trained using all four feature types, while “nested models” used between one and three types. In total, 45 full (15 learners*3 resampling approaches) and 108 nested (5 learners*9 feature sets*3 resampling approaches) models were trained per outcome. Model performance was compared against baseline models where E. coli concentration was the sole predictor. Overall, the machine learning models outperformed the baseline E. coli models, with random forests outperforming models built using other learners (e.g., rule-based learners). Resampling produced more accurate models than not resampling, with SMOTE models outperforming, on average, oversampling models. Regardless of resampling method, spatial and physicochemical water quality features drove accurate predictions for the nonpathogenic Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes models, respectively. Overall, these findings 1) illustrate the need for alternatives to existing E. coli-based monitoring programs for assessing agricultural water for the presence of potential food safety hazards, and 2) suggest that predictive models may be one such alternative. Moreover, these findings provide a conceptual framework for how such models can be developed in the future with the ultimate aim of developing models that can be integrated into on-farm risk management programs. For example, future studies should consider using random forest learners, SMOTE resampling, and spatial features to develop models to predict the presence of foodborne pathogens, such as L. monocytogenes, in agricultural water when the training data is imbalanced.

scholarly journals Three machine learning models for the 2019 Solubility Challenge

ADMET & DMPK ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Challenge Test ◽  
Wisdom Of Crowds ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
The Third ◽  
Aqueous Solubilities ◽  
Machine Learning Models ◽  
Better Than

<p class="ADMETabstracttext">We describe three machine learning models submitted to the 2019 Solubility Challenge. All are founded on tree-like classifiers, with one model being based on Random Forest and another on the related Extra Trees algorithm. The third model is a consensus predictor combining the former two with a Bagging classifier. We call this consensus classifier Vox Machinarum, and here discuss how it benefits from the Wisdom of Crowds. On the first 2019 Solubility Challenge test set of 100 low-variance intrinsic aqueous solubilities, Extra Trees is our best classifier. One the other, a high-variance set of 32 molecules, we find that Vox Machinarum and Random Forest both perform a little better than Extra Trees, and almost equally to one another. We also compare the gold standard solubilities from the 2019 Solubility Challenge with a set of literature-based solubilities for most of the same compounds.</p>

scholarly journals CPT Data Interpretation Employing Different Machine Learning Techniques

Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Stefan Rauter ◽  
Franz Tschuchnigg
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Grain Size ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Classification Model ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Cone Penetration ◽  
Tip Resistance ◽  
Machine Learning Models

The classification of soils into categories with a similar range of properties is a fundamental geotechnical engineering procedure. At present, this classification is based on various types of cost- and time-intensive laboratory and/or in situ tests. These soil investigations are essential for each individual construction site and have to be performed prior to the design of a project. Since Machine Learning could play a key role in reducing the costs and time needed for a suitable site investigation program, the basic ability of Machine Learning models to classify soils from Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) is evaluated. To find an appropriate classification model, 24 different Machine Learning models, based on three different algorithms, are built and trained on a dataset consisting of 1339 CPT. The applied algorithms are a Support Vector Machine, an Artificial Neural Network and a Random Forest. As input features, different combinations of direct cone penetration test data (tip resistance qc, sleeve friction fs, friction ratio Rf, depth d), combined with “defined”, thus, not directly measured data (total vertical stresses σv, effective vertical stresses σ’v and hydrostatic pore pressure u0), are used. Standard soil classes based on grain size distributions and soil classes based on soil behavior types according to Robertson are applied as targets. The different models are compared with respect to their prediction performance and the required learning time. The best results for all targets were obtained with models using a Random Forest classifier. For the soil classes based on grain size distribution, an accuracy of about 75%, and for soil classes according to Robertson, an accuracy of about 97–99%, was reached.

scholarly journals Diagnosis of Problems in Truck Ore Transport Operations in Underground Mines Using Various Machine Learning Models and Data Collected by Internet of Things Systems

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1128
Author(s):  
Sebeom Park ◽  
Dahee Jung ◽  
Hoang Nguyen ◽  
Yosoon Choi
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Internet Of Things ◽  
Production Management ◽  
Classification And Regression Tree ◽  
Underground Mines ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
K Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Machine Learning Models

This study proposes a method for diagnosing problems in truck ore transport operations in underground mines using four machine learning models (i.e., Gaussian naïve Bayes (GNB), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), and classification and regression tree (CART)) and data collected by an Internet of Things system. A limestone underground mine with an applied mine production management system (using a tablet computer and Bluetooth beacon) is selected as the research area, and log data related to the truck travel time are collected. The machine learning models are trained and verified using the collected data, and grid search through 5-fold cross-validation is performed to improve the prediction accuracy of the models. The accuracy of CART is highest when the parameters leaf and split are set to 1 and 4, respectively (94.1%). In the validation of the machine learning models performed using the validation dataset (1500), the accuracy of the CART was 94.6%, and the precision and recall were 93.5% and 95.7%, respectively. In addition, it is confirmed that the F1 score reaches values as high as 94.6%. Through field application and analysis, it is confirmed that the proposed CART model can be utilized as a tool for monitoring and diagnosing the status of truck ore transport operations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document