scholarly journals The Course of Circulating Small Extracellular Vesicles in Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Weber ◽  
Shining Sophie Liu ◽  
Letizia Cardone ◽  
Philipp Rellecke ◽  
Stephan Urs Sixt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Extracellular Vesicles ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Cell Communication ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Interventions

In the last years, increasing efforts have been devoted to investigating the role of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) in cardiovascular diseases. These nano-sized particles (30-150 nm), secreted by different cell types, contain signalling molecules that enable participation in intercellular communication processes. In this study, we examined the course of circulating sEVs in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and correlated them with echocardiographic and standard blood parameters. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 135 patients undergoing SAVR preoperatively and at three follow-up points. Circulating sEVs were precipitated using Exoquick™ exosome isolation reagent and analyzed by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Our findings indicate that no more than 7 days after SAVR, there was a marked increase of circulating sEVs before returning to initial values after 3 months. Further, shear stress is not a trigger for the formation and release of circulating sEVs. Moreover, we pointed out a correlation between circulating sEVs and erythrocytes as well as LDH and creatinine levels in peripheral blood. Finally, all patients with a moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch as well as with an impaired left ventricular mass regression had lower levels of circulating sEVs 3 months after SAVR compared to their respective status before surgery. We conclude that in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AVS), sEVs may play an important part in mediating cell-cell communication and SAVR may have a crucial and lasting impact on their circulating levels. Besides, lower levels of sEVs portend to be associated with inferior recovery after major surgical interventions. The additional use of circulating sEVs beyond echocardiographic and laboratory parameters could have a prognostic value to estimate adverse outcomes in patients undergoing SAVR.

P909Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Aortic Stenosis and the short-term effects after intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Alfarih ◽  
C Leu ◽  
J Moon ◽  
A Hughes ◽  
P Nihoyannopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Myocardial Deformation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Compensatory Mechanisms ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most prevalent form of acquired valvular heart disease, it affects ∼2% of people aged over 75. Series of compensatory mechanisms occur, in order for LV to adapt to high pressure overload. Aortic valve replacement has been the mainstay AS treatment either surgically or percutaneously. The evaluation of myocardial strains after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) is still underexplored and there is no single study to date scouting the difference between TAVI and SAVR. Aim To assess the impact of unloading LV after TAVI and SAVR on LV remodelling. Methods In this prospective study, we have recruited 111 patients (75±11 years, 63% were females) with varying degrees of aortic stenosis. Of the 111 patients, 43 patients and 11 patients underwent TAVI and SAVR respectively between November 2017 and May 2018. Demographics, clinical and echocardiographic measurements along with speckle tracking parameters were recorded for all participants and again 4±2 weeks after intervention. Results Pre-TAVI LV-GLS mean was −10.8±3.5% and after implantation of aortic prosthesis immediate improvement of the myocardial deformation to −13.98±2.9% was observed after one month of the intervention, mean difference of −3.16% following procedure. There was an evidence of significant improvement in LV-GRS after TAVI (44.86±12.9% to 49.77±10.8%, P value= 0.047). Per contra, when comparing pre and post TAVI LV-GCS, no statistical evidence was noted. However, a difference of −2.4% in GCS following the intervention might be clinically important, but no previous evidence can support this. This is attributed to the poor reproducibility and yet not available standardisation. Table 1 Variables TAVI (n=43) SAVR (n=11) P value† Pre Post P* value Pre Post P* value GLS (%) −10.82±3.5 −13.98±2.9 <0.001 −12.75±4.3 −16.1±2 0.021 0.152 GCS (%) −30.1±8.1 −32.49±9.2 0.134 −27±9.8 −33.9±4.69 0.063 0.062 GRS (%) 44.86±12.9 49.77±10.8 0.047 36.6±13.3 44.97±4.9 0.074 0.058 Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparisons were performed using paired Student's t tests. *Pre and post intervention. †Post TAVI vs. post SAVR. Comparison done using unpaired t test of the differences. Conclusion Significant improvement was evident in myocardial deformation parameters – in particular GLS – after weeks of the intervention demonstrating a strong evidence of reversed remodelling following SAVR and TAVI.

scholarly journals P301 The prognostic value of preoperative left atrial volume after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A D Mateescu ◽  
A Calin ◽  
M Rosca ◽  
C C Beladan ◽  
R Enache ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) volume is an important cardiovascular prognostic marker. However, data regarding the prognostic value of LA volume in severe AS patients (pts) after surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are scarce. Moreover, the predictive role of LA function in AS pts after AVR has not yet been studied. Our study aimed to assess the relationship of LA volume index (LAVi) and function with outcome, in terms of mortality, in severe AS pts who underwent surgical AVR. Methods A total of 360 consecutive pts with isolated severe AS (aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2) referred to our echocardiography laboratory were prospectively screened. Two hundred and seventeen pts with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (≥50%) and in sinus rhythm were enrolled. All patients underwent a baseline comprehensive echocardiogram, including speckle tracking analysis of both LV and LA strain. Symptomatic pts (142 pts, 65%) that were subject to AVR were followed for a median period of 4 years (IQR 3-6 years). The endpoint was all-cause mortality after AVR. The last update of the survival status was obtained in January 2019. Outcome data were available in 116 severe AS pts that underwent AVR (mean age 63 ± 10 yrs, 56% men), who formed the final study population. Results Seventeen (14%) pts died during follow-up. No significant differences were found between nonsurvivors and survivors after AVR in terms of age and cardiovascular risk factors. Nonsurvivors had higher BNP plasma values (p=.04) at baseline compared with surviving pts. Survivors and nonsurvivors alike exhibited similar preoperative AS severity and LV systolic function parameters (ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding baseline valvuloarterial impedance, average E/e’ ratio, and LA longitudinal deformation parameters. Nonsurvivors had a tendency toward higher LV mass index (p=.08). Nonsurvivors had higher preoperative LA volume index (LAVi)(50 ± 12 vs. 44 ± 10 ml/m2, p=.003). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, LAVi emerged as the only independent predictor for death in our population study (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p=.02). A cut-off value for LAVi derived from ROC curve analysis was used to construct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. A value of 43 ml/m2 for LAVi predicted all-cause mortality after AVR in severe AS pts with 71% sensitivity and 54% specificity. Conclusions In our study, preoperative LAVi predicted death in severe AS pts after surgical AVR. LAVi assessment may improve preoperative risk stratification in patients with severe AS, however further larger prospective studies are needed. Abstract P301 Figure.

scholarly journals Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale as a predictor of adverse outcomes among older adults undergoing aortic valve replacement: a protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e049216
Author(s):  
Tadhg Prendiville ◽  
Aoife Leahy ◽  
Laura Quinlan ◽  
Anastasia Saleh ◽  
Elaine Shanahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale

IntroductionFrailty is associated with adverse outcomes relating to cardiac procedures. It has been proposed that frailty scoring should be included in the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. We aim to examine the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), as a predictor of adverse outcomes following aortic valve replacement.Methods and analysisProspective and retrospective cohort studies and randomised controlled trials assessing both the preoperative frailty status (as per the CFS) and incidence of adverse outcomes among older adults undergoing either surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve replacement will be included. Adverse outcomes will include mortality and periprocedural complications, as well as a composite of 30-day complications. A search will be conducted from 2005 to present using a prespecified search strategy. Studies will be screened for inclusion by two reviewers, with methodological quality assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Relative risk ratios with 95% CIs will be generated for each outcome of interest, comparing frail with non-frail groups. Data will be plotted on forest plots where applicable. The quality of the evidence will be determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this study as no primary data will be collected. We will publish the review in a peer-reviewed journal on completion.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020213757.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document