The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Trauma Team Leader Paradigm at a Tertiary Trauma Center: 10-Year Experience

Background. To illustrate the impact of the implementation of a multidisciplinary TTL program in 2005 on the mortality of trauma patients in a level 1 trauma center as well as admission rates and length of stay. Methods. Retrospective observational study of all trauma patients included in the provincial trauma database at the Montreal General Hospital between 1998 and 2015. The primary outcome studied was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes studied were hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) rates of admission and hospital and ICU length of stay. Results. 24,107 patients were included. We observed a statistically significant reduction in mortality of 1.25% or a relative reduction of 16% (p value = 0.0058; rate ratio 0.844 (95% CI 0.747–0.952)). ICU admissions were also significantly reduced where we observed a statistically significant absolute reduction of 4.46% or a relative reduction of 14% (p value = 8.38 × 10−7; rate ratio 0.859 (95% CI 0.808–0.912)). The ICU length of stay was increased by 0.91 days or 19.03% (p value = 0.016 (95% CI 0.167–1.655)). There was no observed change in overall length of stay (13.97 days pre-TTL and 12.91 post-TTL (p value = 0.13; estimate −1.053 (95% CI −2.424–0.318))). Conclusions. This article suggests that multidisciplinary TTL model may be beneficial in the care of trauma patients. Further subgroup analysis may help determine which patients could benefit more.

Download Full-text

668 Early Enteral Nutrition in Geriatric Burn Patients: Is There a Benefit?

Journal of Burn Care & Research ◽

10.1093/jbcr/iraa024.284 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S179-S179

Author(s):

Lourdes Castanon ◽

Kamil Hanna ◽

Samer Asmar ◽

Michael F Ditillo ◽

Lynn Gries ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Enteral Nutrition ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Early Enteral Nutrition ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Burn Patients ◽

Burn Care ◽

Icu Length Of Stay ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction Nutrition is a critical component of acute burn care and wound healing. There is no consensus over the appropriate timing of initiating enteral nutrition (EN) in geriatric burn patients. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of early EN on outcomes in geriatric burn patients. We hypothesized that early EN is associated with improved outcomes. Methods We performed a 2-year (2015–2016) analysis of the ACS-TQIP and included all older adult (age ≥65years) burn patients who received EN. Patients were stratified into two groups based on timing of initiation of EN: Early-EN (< 24 hrs) vs. Late-EN (≥ 24 hrs). We performed propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) to control for possible confounding variables including demographics, comorbidities, injury parameters, height and body weight. Outcome measures were in-hospital; complications, hospital and ICU length of stay, and mortality. Results A total of 593,818 trauma patients were analyzed, of which 447 patients were matched (Early-EN: 159 vs Late-EN: 318). Mean age was 44±22, 75% were males, and median ISS was 29 [26–36] and mean total body burn surface area (TBSA) was 15±5%. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age (p=0.99), gender (p=0.60), race (p=0.91), ISS (p=0.43), GCS (p=0.85), TBSA (p=0.51), height (p=0.71), and weight (p=0.61). Overall, the complications rate was 40%, median hospital LOS was 25 [15–36] days, median ICU LOS was 15 [8–26] days and mortality rate was 16%. Patients in the early ED group had significantly lower rate of complications and mortality Table 1. At the same time, patients in the early group had lower hospital length of stay (23[12–36] vs. 26[16–38], p=0.013) and ICU length of stay (12[8–24] vs. 16[8–26], p=0.025). Conclusions In our propensity matched cohort of geriatric burn patients, early EN was associated with improvement in outcomes. The cumulative benefits observed may warrant incorporating early EN as part of intensive care protocols. Applicability of Research to Practice Geriatric patients are a special subset of the population that require additional considerations. Our research highlights the impact of early enteral nutrition on different in hospital outcomes. This is an area of constant debate, our study shows that early enteral nutrition in geriatric burn patients is associated with improved outcome. We found this applicable in most of our patients and thus it might warrant further incorporation in ICU burn protocols.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of non-COVID-19 critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift ◽

10.1007/s00508-021-01857-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Răzvan Bologheanu ◽

Mathias Maleczek ◽

Daniel Laxar ◽

Oliver Kimberger

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Medical Specialty ◽

Routine Care ◽

Treatment Pathways ◽

Icu Length Of Stay ◽

Matched Study ◽

The Impact

Summary Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupts routine care and alters treatment pathways in every medical specialty, including intensive care medicine, which has been at the core of the pandemic response. The impact of the pandemic is inevitably not limited to patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and their outcomes; however, the impact of COVID-19 on intensive care has not yet been analyzed. Methods The objective of this propensity score-matched study was to compare the clinical outcomes of non-COVID-19 critically ill patients with the outcomes of prepandemic patients. Critically ill, non-COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the first wave of the pandemic were matched with patients admitted in the previous year. Mortality, length of stay, and rate of readmission were compared between the two groups after matching. Results A total of 211 critically ill SARS-CoV‑2 negative patients admitted between 13 March 2020 and 16 May 2020 were matched to 211 controls, selected from a matching pool of 1421 eligible patients admitted to the ICU in 2019. After matching, the outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups: ICU mortality was 5.2% in 2019 and 8.5% in 2020, p = 0.248, while intrahospital mortality was 10.9% in 2019 and 14.2% in 2020, p = 0.378. The median ICU length of stay was similar in 2019: 4 days (IQR 2–6) compared to 2020: 4 days (IQR 2–7), p = 0.196. The rate of ICU readmission was 15.6% in 2019 and 10.9% in 2020, p = 0.344. Conclusion In this retrospective single center study, mortality, ICU length of stay, and rate of ICU readmission did not differ significantly between patients admitted to the ICU during the implementation of hospital-wide COVID-19 contingency planning and patients admitted to the ICU before the pandemic.

Download Full-text

Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

Journal of Hospital Administration ◽

10.5430/jha.v4n5p1 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 (5) ◽

pp. 1 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Erin Powers Kinney ◽

Kamal Gursahani ◽

Eric Armbrecht ◽

Preeti Dalawari

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Center ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Hospital Capacity ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

Download Full-text

LO89: Factors associated with delay in trauma team activation and impact on patient outcomes

CJEM ◽

10.1017/cem.2017.151 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 19 (S1) ◽

pp. S58-S59

Author(s):

R. Connolly ◽

M. Woo ◽

J. Lampron ◽

J.J. Perry

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Team ◽

Operative Management ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Early Group ◽

Emergency Physicians ◽

Trauma Team Activation ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Delayed Group

Introduction: Trauma code activation is initiated by emergency physicians using physiologic and anatomic criteria, mechanism of injury and patient demographic factors in conjunction with data obtained from emergency medical service personnel. This enables rapid definitive treatment of trauma patients. Our objective was to identify factors associated with delayed trauma team activation. Methods: We conducted a health records review to supplement data from a regional trauma center database. We assessed consecutive cases from the trauma database from January 2008 to March 2014 including all cases in which a trauma code was activated by an emergency physician. We defined a delay in trauma code activation as a time greater than 30 minutes from time to arrival to trauma team activation. Data were collected in Microsoft Excel and analyzed in Statistical Analysis System (SAS). We conducted univariate analysis for factors potentially influencing trauma team activation and we subsequently used multiple logistic regression analysis models for delayed activation in relation to mortality, length of stay and time to operative management. Results: 1020 patients were screened from which 174 patients were excluded, as they were seen directly by the trauma team. 846 patients were included for our analysis. 4.1% (35/846) of trauma codes were activated after 30 minutes. Mean age was 40.8 years in the early group versus 49.2 in the delayed group p=0.01. There was no significant difference in type of injury, injury severity or time from injury between the two groups. Patients were over 70 years in 7.6% in the early activation group vs 17.1% in the delayed group (p=0.04). 77.7% of the early group were male vs 71.4% in the delayed group (p=0.39). There was no significant difference in mortality (15.2% vs 11.4% p=0.10), median length of stay (10 days in both groups p=0.94) or median time to operative management (331 minutes vs 277 minutes p=0.52). Conclusion: Delayed activation is linked with increasing age with no clear link with increased mortality. Given the severe injuries in the delayed cohort which required activation of the trauma team further emphasis on the older trauma patient and interventions to recognize this vulnerable population should be made. When assessing elderly trauma patients emergency physicians should have a low threshold to activate trauma teams.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Using Echinacea as a Complementary Modality on ICU Length of Stay and Mortality in Intubated and Ventillated Patient

The Medical Journal of Cairo University ◽

10.21608/mjcu.2020.93981 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 88 (3) ◽

pp. 217-224

Author(s):

JEHAN A. EL-KHOLY, M.D.; IMAN A. FOUAD, M.D. ◽

AKRAM S. EL-ADAWY, M.D.; HEBA F. SHAFEI, M.D. ◽

MONA S. ALLAM, M.Sc.*

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Icu Length Of Stay ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

The Impact of Selenium Supplementation on Trauma Patients—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu14020342 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

pp. 342

Author(s):

Jen-Fu Huang ◽

Chih-Po Hsu ◽

Chun-Hsiang Ouyang ◽

Chi-Tung Cheng ◽

Chia-Cheng Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Infectious Complications ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Positive Effects ◽

Standard Difference ◽

The Impact

This study aimed to assess current evidence regarding the effect of selenium (Se) supplementation on the prognosis in patients sustaining trauma. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched with the following terms: “trace element”, “selenium”, “copper”, “zinc”, “injury”, and “trauma”. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that Se supplementation was associated with a lower mortality rate (OR 0.733, 95% CI: 0.586, 0.918, p = 0.007; heterogeneity, I2 = 0%). Regarding the incidence of infectious complications, there was no statistically significant benefit after analyzing the four studies (OR 0.942, 95% CI: 0.695, 1.277, p = 0.702; heterogeneity, I2 = 14.343%). The patients with Se supplementation had a reduced ICU length of stay (standard difference in means (SMD): −0.324, 95% CI: −0.382, −0.265, p < 0.001; heterogeneity, I2 = 0%) and lesser hospital length of stay (SMD: −0.243, 95% CI: −0.474, −0.012, p < 0.001; heterogeneity, I2 = 45.496%). Se supplementation after trauma confers positive effects in decreasing the mortality and length of ICU and hospital stay.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of the Effect of Prehospital Application of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Acute Respiratory Distress

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine ◽

10.1017/s1049023x00007731 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 25 (1) ◽

pp. 87-91 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

G. Scott Warner

Keyword(s):

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽

Data Collection ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Respiratory Distress ◽

Airway Pressure ◽

Positive Airway Pressure ◽

Prehospital Setting ◽

Rural Setting ◽

Icu Length Of Stay ◽

The Impact

AbstractObjective:The impact of the use of mask continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on patients with acute respiratory distress in the prehospital, rural setting has not been defined. The goal was to test the use of CPAP using the Respironics® WhisperFlow® CPAP in patients presenting with acute respiratory distress. This was a collaborative evaluation of CPAP involving a rural EMS agency and the regional medical center. Patient outcomes including the overall rate of intubation-both in the field and in the emergency department (ED), and length of stay in the hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were tracked.Methods:The study was an eight-month, crossover, observational, non-blinded study.Results:During the four months of baseline data collection, 7.9% of patients presenting with respiratory distress were intubated within the first 48 hours of care. Their average ICU length of stay was 8.0 days. During the four months of data collection when CPAP was available in the prehospital setting, intubation was not required for any patients in the field or in the ED. Admissions to the ICU decreased. Those patients admitted to the ICU, the average ICU length of stay deceased to 4.3 days.Conclusions:The use of the CPAP in the prehospital setting is beneficial for patients in acute respiratory distress.

Download Full-text

The Triage of Older Adults with Physiologic Markers of Serious Injury Using a State-Wide Prehospital Plan

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine ◽

10.1017/s1049023x19004825 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 34 (05) ◽

pp. 497-505

Author(s):

Matthew H. Meyers ◽

Trent L. Wei ◽

Julianne M. Cyr ◽

Thomas M. Hunold ◽

Frances S. Shofer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Trauma Center ◽

Medical Information ◽

Geriatric Trauma ◽

Medical Information System ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Glascow Coma Scale ◽

Serious Injury ◽

Gcs Score ◽

The Impact

AbstractIntroduction:In January of 2010, North Carolina (NC) USA implemented state-wide Trauma Triage Destination Plans (TTDPs) to provide standardized guidelines for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) decision making. No study exists to evaluate whether triage behavior has changed for geriatric trauma patients.Hypothesis/Problem:The impact of the NC TTDPs was investigated on EMS triage of geriatric trauma patients meeting physiologic criteria of serious injury, primarily based on whether these patients were transported to a trauma center.Methods:This is a retrospective cohort study of geriatric trauma patients transported by EMS from March 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 (pre-TTDP) and March 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 (post-TTDP) meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) age 50 years or older; (2) transported to a hospital by NC EMS; (3) experienced an injury; and (4) meeting one or more of the NC TTDP’s physiologic criteria for trauma (n = 5,345). Data were obtained from the Prehospital Medical Information System (PreMIS). Data collected included proportions of patients transported to a trauma center categorized by specific physiologic criteria, age category, and distance from a trauma center.Results:The proportion of patients transported to a trauma center pre-TTDP (24.4% [95% CI 22.7%-26.1%]; n = 604) was similar to the proportion post-TTDP (24.4% [95% CI 22.9%-26.0%]; n = 700). For patients meeting specific physiologic triage criteria, the proportions of patients transported to a trauma center were also similar pre- and post-TTDP: systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (22.5% versus 23.5%); respiratory rate <10 or >29 (23.2% versus 22.6%); and Glascow Coma Scale (GCS) score <13 (26.0% versus 26.4%). Patients aged 80 years or older were less likely to be transported to a trauma center than younger patients in both the pre- and post-TTDP periods.Conclusions:State-wide implementation of a TTDP had no discernible effect on the proportion of patients 50 years and older transported to a trauma center. Under-triage remained common and became increasingly prevalent among the oldest adults. Research to understand the uptake of guidelines and protocols into EMS practice is critical to improving care for older adults in the prehospital environment.

Download Full-text

The Impact of In-house Attending Surgeon Supervision on the Rates of Preventable and Potentially Preventable Complications and Death at the Start of the New Academic Year

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481307901113 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 79 (11) ◽

pp. 1134-1139 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Kenji Inaba ◽

Adam Hauch ◽

Bernardino C. Branco ◽

Stephen Cohn ◽

Pedro G. R. Teixeira ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Los Angeles ◽

Trauma Center ◽

Medical Center ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

University Of Southern California ◽

Academic Level ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Level I ◽

The Impact ◽

Academic Year

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of in-house attending surgeon supervision on the rate of preventable deaths (PD) and complications (PC) at the beginning of the academic year. All trauma patients admitted to the Los Angeles County 1 University of Southern California Medical Center over an 8-year period ending in December 2009 were reviewed. Morbidity and mortality reports were used to extract all PD/PC. Patients admitted in the first 2 months (July/ August) of the academic year were compared with those admitted at the end of the year (May/June) for two distinct time periods: 2002 to 2006 (before in-house attending surgeon supervision) and 2007 to 2009 (after 24-hour/day in-house attending surgeon supervision). During 2002 to 2006, patients admitted at the beginning of the year had significantly higher rates of PC (1.1% for July/ August vs 0.6% for May/June; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 3.2; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mortality (6.5% for July/August vs 4.6% for May/ June; adjusted OR, 1.1; 95% CI,0.8 to 1.5; P = 0.179). During 2007 to 2009, after institution of 24-hour/day in-house attending surgeon supervision of fellows and housestaff, there was no significant difference in the rates of PC (0.7% for July/August vs 0.6% for May/June; OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = 0.870) or PD (4.6% for July/August vs 3.7% for May/June; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.7; P = 0.250) seen at the beginning of the academic year. At an academic Level I trauma center, the institution of 24-hour/day in-house attending surgeon supervision significantly reduced the spike of preventable complications previously seen at the beginning of the academic year.

Download Full-text

An Objective Study of the Impact of the Electronic Medical Record on Outcomes in Trauma Patients

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481207801134 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 78 (11) ◽

pp. 1249-1254 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul J. Schenarts ◽

Claudia E. Goettler ◽

Michael A. White ◽

Brett H. Waibel

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Medical Record ◽

Electronic Medical Record ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Unit Length ◽

Traumatic Injury ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Delay In Diagnosis ◽

The Impact

It is commonly believed that the electronic medical record (EMR) will improve patient outcomes. However, there is scant published literature to support this claim and no studies in any surgical population. Our hypothesis was that the EMR would not improve objective outcome measures in patients with traumatic injury. Prospectively collected data from our university-based Level I trauma center was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, injury severity as well as outcomes and complications data were compared for all patients admitted over a 20-month period before introduction of the EMR and a 20-month period after full, hospital-wide use of the EMR. Implementation of the EMR was associated with a decreased hospital length of stay, P = 0.02; intensive care unit length of stay, P = 0.001; ventilator days, P = 0.002; acute respiratory distress syndrome, P = 0.006, pneumonia, P = 0.008; myocardial infarction, P = 0.001; line infection, P = 0.03; septicemia, P = 0.000; renal failure, P = 0.000; drug complication, P = 0.001; and delay in diagnosis, P = 0.04. There was no difference in mortality, unexpected cardiac arrest, missed injury, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, or late urinary tract infection. This is the first study to investigate the impact of the EMR in surgical patients. Although there was an improvement in some complications, the overall impact was inconsistent.

Download Full-text