scholarly journals The Impact of Statins before High-Risk CABG on Postoperative Multiple Organ Function

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jiayang Wang ◽  
Wen Yuan ◽  
Kui Zhang ◽  
Nan Liu ◽  
Dong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
Multiorgan Dysfunction ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background. The purpose of this cohort study was to investigate the independent relationship between preoperative statin therapy (PST) and postoperative severe multiorgan failure, measured by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) maximum greater than 11, in high-risk patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods. The present study is a perspective, single-center, cohort analysis enrolling high-risk patients undergoing CABG from Jan 1, 2018, to Dec 31, 2018, in Beijing Anzhen hospital. Results. Among a total of 880 high-risk patients undergoing isolated CABG included in this study, 503 (57.2%) experienced statin therapy before CABG. The SOFA maximum was significantly lower in the PST group compared with the control group (7.8 ± 3.0 v 9.2 ± 3.4, P<0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated the incidence of the severe multiorgan dysfunction, measured by SOFA maximum ≥11, was dramatically reduced in the PST group (OR, 0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.92, P=0.013). Furthermore, preoperative statin therapy (PST) might be associated with a decreased risk of postoperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events and acute kidney injury, but an increased risk of postoperative hepatic inadequacy. Conclusion. SOFA maximum was significantly lower in the PST group compared with the control group and the incidence of the severe multiorgan dysfunction was dramatically reduced in the PST group. The findings of this study might shed new light on questions of positive or negative effects of PST on multiple organ function after high-risk CABG, so as to ultimately improve high-risk patient in-hospital outcomes from CABG.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of icosapent ethyl in hypertriglyceridaemia: a recap

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_J) ◽  
pp. J21-J33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus G Parhofer ◽  
M John Chapman ◽  
Børge G Nordestgaard
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Icosapent Ethyl ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Remnant Cholesterol ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Although low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering is effective in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention, considerable ‘lipid-associated’ residual risk remains, particularly in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridaemia (2–10 mmol/L; 176–880 mg/dL). Triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins carry both TGs and cholesterol (remnant-cholesterol). At TG levels &gt;5 mmol/L (440 mg/dL) vs. &lt;1 mmol/L (88 mg/dL) or remnant-cholesterol &gt;2.3 mmol/L (89 mg/dL) vs. &lt;0.5 mmol/L (19 mg/dL), risk is ∼1.5-fold elevated for aortic stenosis, 2-fold for all-cause mortality, 3-fold for ischaemic stroke, 5-fold for myocardial infarction (MI), and 10-fold for acute pancreatitis. Furthermore, Mendelian randomization studies indicate that elevated TG-rich lipoproteins are causally related to increased risk of ASCVD and even all-cause mortality. While genetic and epidemiological data strongly indicate that TG-rich lipoproteins are causally linked to ASCVD, intervention data are ambiguous. Fibrates, niacin and low-dose omega-3 fatty acids have all been used in outcome trials, but have failed to demonstrate clear benefit in combination with statins. Whether the lack of additional benefit relates to methodological issues or true failure is indeterminate. Importantly, a recent intervention trial evaluating a high dose of eicosapentaenoic-acid showed clear benefit. Thus, REDUCE-IT evaluated the effect of icosapent ethyl (4 g/day) on cardiovascular outcomes in 8179 high-risk patients with moderate TG elevation on statin therapy. Over a median duration of 4.9 years, the relative risk for the primary endpoint (composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina) was reduced by 25% (absolute risk 17.2% vs. 22.0%; P &lt; 0.0001; number needed to treat 21). High-dose icosapent ethyl intervention therefore confers substantial cardiovascular benefit in high-risk patients with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia on statin therapy.

scholarly journals Audio-guided self-hypnosis for reduction of claustrophobia during MR imaging: results of an observational 2-group study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriane E. Napp ◽  
Torsten Diekhoff ◽  
Olf Stoiber ◽  
Judith Enders ◽  
Gerd Diederichs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Waiting Room ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
And Coping

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the influence of audio-guided self-hypnosis on claustrophobia in a high-risk cohort undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Methods In this prospective observational 2-group study, 55 patients (69% female, mean age 53.6 ± 13.9) used self-hypnosis directly before imaging. Claustrophobia included premature termination, sedation, and coping actions. The claustrophobia questionnaire (CLQ) was completed before self-hypnosis and after MR imaging. Results were compared to a control cohort of 89 patients examined on the same open MR scanner using logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Furthermore, patients were asked about their preferences for future imaging. Results There was significantly fewer claustrophobia in the self-hypnosis group (16%; 9/55), compared with the control group (43%; 38/89; odds ratio .14; p = .001). Self-hypnosis patients also needed less sedation (2% vs 16%; 1/55 vs 14/89; odds ratio .1; p = .008) and non-sedation coping actions (13% vs 28%; 7/55 vs 25/89; odds ratio .3; p = .02). Self-hypnosis did not influence the CLQ results measured before and after MR imaging (p = .79). Self-hypnosis reduced the frequency of claustrophobia in the subgroup of patients above an established CLQ cut-off of .33 from 47% (37/78) to 18% (9/49; p = .002). In the subgroup below the CLQ cut-off of 0.33, there were no significant differences (0% vs 9%, 0/6 vs 1/11; p = 1.0). Most patients (67%; 35/52) preferred self-hypnosis for future MR examinations. Conclusions Self-hypnosis reduced claustrophobia in high-risk patients undergoing imaging in an open MR scanner and might reduce the need for sedation and non-sedation coping actions. Key Points • Forty percent of the patients at high risk for claustrophobia may also experience a claustrophobic event in an open MR scanner. • Self-hypnosis while listening to an audio in the waiting room before the examination may reduce claustrophobic events in over 50% of patients with high risk for claustrophobia. • Self-hypnosis may also reduce the need for sedation and other time-consuming non-sedation coping actions and is preferred by high-risk patients for future examinations.

Abstract 14782: Sex Comparisons in Anticoagulation Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation in a Large Rural Healthcare System

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Macaela N Rudeck ◽  
Catherine P Benziger
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Atrial Flutter ◽  
Electronic Medical Record System ◽  
Record System ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Occlusion Device ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Medical Record System ◽  
Risk Patients

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter lead to increased risk of thromboembolism (TE). The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is used to determine the risk of TE. Objective: We aim to evaluate the anticoagulation use across CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores calculated using a validated automatic calculator. Methods: An AF registry was created for patients with AF or atrial flutter who had seen a primary care or cardiology provider within the past 2 years (5/28/2018-5/28/2020). An automatic CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc calculator was integrated into the electronic medical record system at Essentia Health on 10/1/2019. High-risk of TE was defined as a score of ≥3 for females and a score of ≥2 for males. AF registry included demographics, anticoagulation prescription, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and ATRIA bleed score, contraindications, and presence of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion device. Results: A total of 10992 patients with AF or atrial flutter were included in the registry (74.8 ±11.8 years, 41.7% female). A total of 6703 (61.0%) had a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score calculated (mean score 3.9 ± 1.5). Mean ATRIA bleed score was 3.0 ± 2.0. Within these patients, 90.7% of males and 93.0% of females were at high-risk of TE. Of these high-risk patients, anticoagulation use was 82.7% for females and 83.5% for males and increased with increasing score (p<0.01 for males, p<0.01 for females) (Figure 1). Overall, 36.9% were prescribed NOAC, 47.0% warfarin, and 0.8% heparin. There was no sex difference in the prescription of NOAC (37.7% male vs. 35.9% female, p=0.1). Fewer than 1% had WATCHMAN LAA device (0.3% male vs. 0.4% female, p=0.5). Conclusion: Four out of 5 patients at increased risk of TE are prescribed an anticoagulant. Interventions to improve anticoagulation use in high-risk patients are needed. Figure 1. Anticoagulation prescription use in atrial fibrillation patients by CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and sex between 5/28/2018-5/28/2020 at Essentia Health (N=6703).

Improving harm reduction with a naloxone intervention in primary care to prescribe and educate a support person

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-113
Author(s):  
Julienne K. Kirk, PharmD, CDE, BCPS ◽  
Matthew Q. Tran, PharmD ◽  
Samantha Pelc, PharmD ◽  
Katherine G. Moore, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Quality Improvement Intervention ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Naloxone Administration ◽  
Support Person ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Patients

Objective: To determine whether a pharmacist-led intervention would increase the number of naloxone prescriptions and naloxone administration education in a primary care family medicine setting.Design: Prospective quality improvement intervention in an academic family medicine clinic.Methods: We surveyed providers about naloxone knowledge, prescribing habits, and prescribing barriers. We identified patients on chronic opioid therapy, through electronic health records for the year 2019. Overdose risk categories based upon morphine milligram equivalent doses and concomitant benzodiazepine use were used to determine patients who met criteria for naloxone. Pharmacists phoned qualified patients to discuss overdose risk and naloxone benefits. Patients who accepted naloxone prescriptions used their local pharmacy through a department-approved standing order set.Results: From the survey results, there were 47 of 54 provider responses, and the majority noted that they do not routinely prescribe naloxone in high-risk patients. The predominant barriers were lack of time during visit and naloxone administration education. The population of patients from chart review included 93 high-risk patients with a mean age of 58 years. During the time of intervention, 71 patients remained eligible for naloxone coprescribing. Of the patients contacted, 29 (40 percent) accepted the intervention prescription, and subsequently, 22 picked up their prescription from the pharmacy. Sixteen received counseling with a support person. Twelve patients had naloxone already at home, and two received counseling with a support person.Conclusion: The naloxone prescribing intervention is achievable. The results of this intervention support identifying patients at increased risk of opioid overdose and offer education of a support person for naloxone in a large academic family medicine clinic.

scholarly journals The impact of the incorporation of a feasible postoperative mortality model at the Post-Anaesthestic Care Unit (PACU) on postoperative clinical deterioration: A pragmatic trial with 5,353 patients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0257941
Author(s):  
Claudia de Souza Gutierrez ◽  
Katia Bottega ◽  
Stela Maris de Jezus Castro ◽  
Gabriela Leal Gravina ◽  
Eduardo Kohls Toralles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Deterioration ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Postoperative Death ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Death Probability ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background Practical use of risk predictive tools and the assessment of their impact on outcome reduction is still a challenge. This pragmatic study of quality improvement (QI) describes the preoperative adoption of a customised postoperative death probability model (SAMPE model) and the evaluation of the impact of a Postoperative Anaesthetic Care Unit (PACU) pathway on the clinical deterioration of high-risk surgical patients. Methods A prospective cohort of 2,533 surgical patients compared with 2,820 historical controls after the adoption of a quality improvement (QI) intervention. We carried out quick postoperative high-risk pathways at PACU when the probability of postoperative death exceeded 5%. As outcome measures, we used the number of rapid response team (RRT) calls within 7 and 30 postoperative days, in-hospital mortality, and non-planned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Results Not only did the QI succeed in the implementation of a customised risk stratification model, but it also diminished the postoperative deterioration evaluated by RRT calls on very high-risk patients within 30 postoperative days (from 23% before to 14% after the intervention, p = 0.05). We achieved no survival benefits or reduction of non-planned ICU. The small group of high-risk patients (13% of the total) accounted for the highest proportion of RRT calls and postoperative death. Conclusion Employing a risk predictive tool to guide immediate postoperative care may influence postoperative deterioration. It encouraged the design of pragmatic trials focused on feasible, low-technology, and long-term interventions that can be adapted to diverse health systems, especially those that demand more accurate decision making and ask for full engagement in the control of postoperative morbi-mortality.

scholarly journals Are infants born to high-risk patients with grand multiparity at increased risk of adverse outcomes?

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S304
Author(s):  
Olivia Recabo ◽  
Alexander J. Gould ◽  
Phinnara Has ◽  
Nina K. Ayala ◽  
Martha B. Kole-White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Grand Multiparity ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract 2471: Contemporary Results of Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients in the Context of Emerging Percutaneous Approaches

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Voisine ◽  
Siamak Mohammadi ◽  
Josep Rodés-Cabau ◽  
Patrick Mathieu ◽  
Jean Perron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Perioperative Mortality ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Parsonnet Score

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (AVR) is emerging as an alternative therapeutic approach for high-risk surgical patients, but criteria for patient selection are not clearly established. We sought to evaluate the perioperative and mid-term outcomes in a contemporary cohort of high-risk patients undergoing isolated AVR. Between 1997 and 2006, 855 consecutive patients underwent isolated AVR at our institution. High-risk patients (n=162, 19%) were defined by a preoperative Parsonnet score ≥ 30 or Euroscore ≥ 9. The remaining 693 patients (81%) composed the control group for comparison of perioperative mortality and mid-term freedom from all-cause and cardiac-related mortality. Mean follow up was 2.9±2.1 years. Perioperative mortality was 8.6% in the high-risk and 2.9% in the control group (p=0.0007), lower than that predicted by both scores (p<0.05). Freedom from all-cause mortality at 1 and 5 years were 94% and 82% for the control group and 87% and 65% for high-risk patients (p<0.0001). Freedom from cardiac-related mortality was also higher in the control (96% at 1 year, 91% at 5 years) than the high-risk (89% and 82%, p=0.0003) group. When considering patients who survived the 3-month perioperative period (537 in control, 114 in high-risk group), freedom from all-cause mortality was still higher in the former group at 1 and 5 years (99% vs 99% and 85% vs 75%, respectively, p=0.005), but freedom from cardiac-related mortality was not different (99% vs 100% and 94% vs 92%, respectively, p=0.3). By multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure, emergent procedures and reoperations were identified as independent predictors of mortality in high-risk patients. Contemporary perioperative mortality for isolated AVR in high-risk patients is lower than predicted by the Parsonnet score and Euroscore. Five-year survival in these patients is acceptable, and survivors of the operation experience the same cardiac-related survival benefit as those with standard perioperative risk. The perioperative survival benefit of percutaneous approaches for high-risk patients undergoing AVR remains to be demonstrated and, if present, should be weighed against mid-term outcome benefits of conventional surgical AVR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document