Abstract 2450: Mutational profiling of MLL-PTD acute myeloid leukemia

Author(s):  
Lingwen Ding ◽  
Qiaoyang Sun ◽  
Kar-Tong Tan ◽  
Wenwen Chien ◽  
Anand Mayakonda ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7068-7068
Author(s):  
Caroline E Sloan ◽  
Phyllis A. Gimotty ◽  
Anne M Boccuti ◽  
Alison Sehgal ◽  
Jianhua Zhao ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1676-1676
Author(s):  
Alice Marceau-Renaut ◽  
Nicolas Duployez ◽  
Christine Ragu ◽  
Arnaud Petit ◽  
Odile Fenneteau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a rare and genetically heterogeneous disease that constitutes 15 to 20% of childhood leukemia. Despite major treatment improvement over the past decades pediatric AML remains a challenging disease with poor outcome compared to acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL). About 50% of these patients relapse after standard intensive chemotherapy. Molecular analysis pointed out the prognostic impact of gene mutation such as FLT3-ITD, NPM1 or CEBPA; and new categories of regulators like epigenetic modifiers. More recently mutational profiling studies revealed distinct molecular subgroups with prognostic significant and stratification in adult AML. Nevertheless cytogenetic and mutational profiles are quite different between adult and pediatric AML. Extensive genomic studies have not been reported to date in pediatric AML. In this context it is of importance to identify additional genetic or molecular abnormalities to better understand leukemogenesis and also to predict outcome and serve as novel therapeutic targets. Methods. We performed a mutational analysis on diagnostic samples from patients enrolled in the French National Multicenter ELAM02 trial. 438 patients with de novo AML (except AML3) were enrolled between march 2005 and December 2011 (median age: 8,22yrs [0-18.61]; median WBC: 15.4G/l [0.4-575]; cytogenetic subgroups: CBF-AML[n=97], NK-AML [n=109], MLL-AML[n=95], MRC2 other[n=77], MRC3 [n=55], failure [n=5]). Diagnostic samples were prospectively collected and 386 of the 438 patients (88%) were studied by next-generation sequencing (Miseq, Illumina with haloplex librairy and ion Proton, thermofischer with ampliseq librairy) including 36 genes frequently reported in myeloid malignancy. Two different technologies of next generation sequencing (NGS) were used, allowing direct validation. FLT3-ITD was detected and quantified by Genescan analysis. Results. We identified 579 driver mutations involving 36 genes or regions in 386 patients (mean 1.5 per case), with at least 1 driver mutation in 291 patients (75%) and 2 or more driver mutations in 44% of samples. The number of mutation identified at diagnosis in cytogenetic subgroup is significantly lower in MLL-AML (0.44 mutation/patient; p<10-4). Mutations involving genes from the tyrosine kinase pathways (i.e RAS, FLT3, KIT, PTPN11, JAK2, MPL, CBL) were the most frequent and represent 56.3% of all aberrations. Among them N-RAS was detected in 26.4% of all cases, followed by FLT3-ITD, KIT and K-RAS in 14.8%, 12.4% and 12.2% respectively. We identified 64 driver mutations in the group of transcription factors (CEBPA, RUNX1, GATA, ETV6), 60 in the combined group of chromatin modifier (ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR) and DNA methylation (DNMT3A, IDH, TET2), 59 in the group of tumor suppressor genes (WT1, PHF6, TP53) 36 mutations in NPM1 gene, and few mutations in cohesion and spliceosome sub-groups. Identified mutations are indicated in the figure according cytogenetic subgroups. Among the 438 patients, 398 (91%) were in complete remission (CR) after two courses (induction and first consolidation), the 5-year overall survival (OS) is 71.5% [65-78] and the 5-year leukemia free survival (LFS) is 56.6% [49.7-63.5]. In univariate analysis, we found that FLT3-ITD, mutations in RUNX1, WT1 and PHF6 were associated with reduced LFS (p=0.0003 for FLT3-ITD, p=0.01 for RUNX1, p=0.02 for WT1 and p=0.025 for PHF6) and reduced OS (p=0.0003 for FLT3-ITD, p=0.0003 for RUNX1, p=0.015 for WT1 and p=0.04 for PHF6). Mutations in NPM1 is associated with an improved 5-yr LFS (p=0.014) and 5-yr OS (p=0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that FLT3-ITD, RUNX1 and PHF6 were independently associated with an adverse outcome and NPM1 with an improved outcome. Conclusions. We performed an extensive mutational study in de novo pediatric AML enrolled in the ELAM02 trial. We described the genomic landscape of 386 patients and showed the frequency of different mutations according cytogenetics. Interestingly we found mutations in genes involved in constitutional or pre-leukemic disease such as PTPN11, RUNX1, MPL or ETV6. We found that FLT3-ITD, RUNX1 and PHF6 mutations predict poor outcome although NPM1 mutations predict a better outcome. Mutational profiling reveals useful information for risk stratification and therapeutic decisions. Figure Figure. Disclosures Baruchel: Amgen: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2522-2522
Author(s):  
Catherine C. Coombs ◽  
Sean Devlin ◽  
Shweta Dixit ◽  
Abhinita Mohanty ◽  
Kristina Marie Knapp ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis, especially in the elderly for whom hypomethylating agent therapy may be the only standard treatment option. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network indicates 44% of patients with de novo AML carry mutations in genes that regulate DNA modifications, such as IDH1/2, DNMT3A, and TET2. Small retrospective series have reported differential response to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in patients with mutations in the DNA modification pathway. For example, Itzykson et al. reported an increased response rate with azacitidine in MDS and AML patients with TET2 mutations compared with those without (82% vs 45%, p = 0.007). Next, Metzeler et al. reported an increase in CR rate with decitabine therapy in patients with DNMT3A mutations as compared with those without (75% vs 34% CR, p = 0.05). Emadi et al. noted a higher response rate in AML patients with IDH1/2 mutations compared to those without (71% vs 23%, p = 0.01) in patients receiving either decitabine or azacitidine. In contrast, Dinardo et al. did not find an association between responses to HMAs in patients with IDH1/2 and DNMT3A mutations in a retrospective analysis of 68 elderly AML patients. Recent evidence demonstrates that WT1 mutations lead to loss of TET2 function, suggesting thatAML pts with WT1 mutations may also be sensitive to HMAs. These findings suggest that mutations in the TET/IDH/WT1/DNMT3A pathway might confer increased sensitivity to HMAs. We aimed to determine if there was an association between response and mutations in the DNA methylation pathway in AML patients treated with HMAs at our institution. Methods: This is a single institution, retrospective study. Of a cohort of 288 molecularly characterized AML patients, 76 patients were treated with HMAs; either alone (n= 59) or in combination with another agent (n= 17). In our cohort, 39 patients were treated with HMA in the frontline setting and 37 were treated in the relapsed/refractory setting. DNA was obtained from peripheral blood or bone marrow aspiration samples. Testing was performed using a targeted enrichment NGS assay designed with the RainDance DeepSeq system, covering clinically relevant regions in 30 genes known to be mutated in myeloid malignancies. Samples were subjected to microdroplet emulsion PCR and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq to an average depth of at least 500X. 51.3% of patients had mutational profiling at time of diagnosis, and the remainder had mutational profiling at time of relapse/refractory disease. Genes affecting DNA modification pathway (DNMT3A, IDH1/2, TET2, WT1) were analyzed as a composite (present/absent). Results: Among patients receiving HMA for AML, the mean age was 67.1 years and 68% of patients were male. Using the NCCN cytogenetic/molecular risk categories, 7/76 had "better" risk, 35/76 had "intermediate" risk, 28/76 had "poor" risk and 6/76 patients' risk status could not be determined. Four of the 76 patients had incomplete molecular data available and were excluded from analysis; therefore, the final cohort under study was 72 patients. 34/39 of the frontline HMA patients were evaluable for response and 32/37 of the relapsed/refractory patients were evaluable for response. Among the 34 patients treated with HMAs in the frontline setting, 16 had mutations affecting DNA methylation and 18 patients did not. The CR rate (CR + CRi) in patients with DNA pathway mutations was 8/18 (44%) vs. 3/16 (19%) in patients without mutations (p = 0.15). Among the patients treated with HMAs in the relapsed/refractory setting, responses were rare with only 3 patients (9.4%) achieving CR. Responses were too few to demonstrate statistical relationships. Conclusions: We noted a trend toward an improved CR rate in patients with DNA modification mutations. However, the difference was not statistically significant in this small study cohort. Given the rarity of mutations and size of published cohorts, including ours, it has been difficult to demonstrate statistically significant associations between mutations and response to HMAs. A meta-analysis of existing data may overcome barriers of small numbers in individual studies, though retrospective nature of studies and publication bias may influence these results. A prospective trial with comprehensive molecular profiling of all patients is warranted to determine true associations. Disclosures Levine: Foundation Medicine: Consultancy; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Hematology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory W. Roloff ◽  
Elizabeth A. Griffiths

AbstractMutational profiling has fundamentally changed our approach to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients with AML are routinely profiled for the presence of mutations in FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, and, more recently, TP53. In this chapter, we review the role of mutational profiling to help define disease biology in AML, particularly among patients with putatively intermediate-risk disease. We describe the body of evidence supporting the utility of mutational profiling when performed at the time of diagnosis (to identify prognostic and targetable mutations), at the time of complete remission (to assess minimal residual disease as a marker for relapse), and at the time of relapse (to identify therapeutic targets and eligibility for clinical trials). We further identify particular mutations that have been shown to affect prognosis across the established European LeukemiaNet risk categories and discuss which mutational events might be used to alter the approach to patient care at various time points during the disease course. We also review the evidence in support of molecular profiling for assessment of minimal/measurable residual disease and describe the current landscape of studies designed to validate this approach.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (20) ◽  
pp. 2451-2459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Duployez ◽  
Alice Marceau-Renaut ◽  
Nicolas Boissel ◽  
Arnaud Petit ◽  
Maxime Bucci ◽  
...  

Key Points Recurrent mutations in chromatin modifiers and cohesin were observed in t(8;21) AML, but not inv(16) AML. t(8;21) AML patients with mutations in kinase signaling plus chromatin modifiers or cohesin members had the highest risk of relapse.


Hematology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay P. Patel ◽  
Ross L. Levine

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia diagnosed in adults, and the majority of patients with AML die from relapsed disease. Although many studies over the past 4 decades have identified disease alleles in AML, recent genome-wide and candidate gene studies have identified additional recurrent somatic mutations in AML patients with biologic, clinical, and therapeutic importance. Herein we review our current understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of AML and discuss how mutational profiling can be used to refine prognostication in AML and to inform therapeutic approaches. We also review the current challenges in translating genomic studies to the clinical setting, which remains a significant challenge and an urgent priority.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document