Abstract P2-09-08: Universal BRCA testing and family outreach for women with triple negative breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Emborgo ◽  
KI Muse ◽  
E Bednar ◽  
HD Oakley ◽  
J Litton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Brca Testing

scholarly journals BRCA Detection Rate in an Italian Cohort of Luminal Early-Onset and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients without Family History: When Biology Overcomes Genealogy

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Toss ◽  
Eleonora Molinaro ◽  
Marta Venturelli ◽  
Federica Domati ◽  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Brca Testing ◽  
Brca Genetic Testing

NCCN Guidelines recommend BRCA genetic testing in individuals with a probability >5% of being a carrier. Nonetheless, the cost-effectiveness of testing individuals with no tumor family history is still debated, especially when BRCA testing is offered by the national health service. Our analysis evaluated the rate of BRCA pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variants in 159 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients diagnosed ≤60 years, and 109 luminal-like breast cancer (BC) patients diagnosed ≤35 without breast and/or ovarian family histories. In TNBC patients, BRCA mutation prevalence was 22.6% (21.4% BRCA1). Mutation prevalence was 64.2% ≤30 years, 31.8% in patients aged 31–40, 16.1% for those aged 41–50 and 7.9% in 51–60 s. A total of 40% of patients with estrogen receptors (ER) 1–9% were BRCA1 carriers. BRCA detection rate in early-onset BCs was 6.4% (4.6% BRCA2). Mutation prevalence was 0% between 0–25 years, 9% between 26–30 years and 6% between 31–35 years. In conclusion, BRCA testing is recommended in TNBC patients diagnosed ≤60 years, regardless of family cancer history or histotype, and by using immunohistochemical staining <10% for both ER and/PR. In luminal-like early-onset BC, a lower BRCA detection rate was observed, suggesting a role for other predisposing genes along with BRCA genetic testing.

Are patients with triple-negative breast cancer screened for BRCA mutations according to NCCN guidelines?

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Staci Aubry ◽  
Lindsay Floch Petersen ◽  
Kelly Burgess ◽  
Ruta D. Rao ◽  
Katherine Kopkash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
African American ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Brca Testing ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Primary Payer ◽  
Cancer Network

7 Background: Ten to 25 percent of patients diagnosed with breast cancer have triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined as tumors negative for estrogen, progesterone, and Her2-neu receptors. TNBC is more aggressive than receptor positive cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends BRCA genetic testing for women less than age 60 when diagnosed with TNBC. Methods: The Commission on Cancer registry tumor database was queried for TNBC from 2006 to 2013. Patient demographics were analyzed. Data regarding pathologic details and BRCA testing was collected. Analyses using the Fisher's exact test were conducted. Results: TNBC tumors were identified in the database (n = 173). Sixty-one percent (105/173) of patients were less than 60 years of age, therefore BRCA testing was indicated. Fifteen patients were BRCA positive. Eighty-three percent (87/105) of patients underwent BRCA testing. Seventeen percent (18/105) of patients did not receive BRCA testing that should have under the current guidelines. Patients that did not undergo recommended BRCA testing were more likely to be greater than or equal to 55 years of age (p = 0.002), African-American (p = 0.001), have Medicaid listed as a primary payer (p = 0.021), and have American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) stage 3 disease (p = 0.014). Conclusions: Risk factors for not completing BRCA testing include older age, African-American race, Medicaid insurance status, and stage 3 disease. Health provider awareness of this opportunity for improvement is important to decrease these health disparities. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Prospective Evaluation of Universal BRCA Testing for Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha S Emborgo ◽  
Donika Saporito ◽  
Kimberly I Muse ◽  
Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera ◽  
Jennifer K Litton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Brca Testing ◽  
Clinical Genetic ◽  
Large Rearrangement ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Network

Abstract Background Limited published literature exists on women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) diagnosed over the age of 60 years with breast cancer gene (BRCA) pathogenic variants. Our study determined whether the rate of BRCA pathogenic variants in a prospective cohort of TNBC patients outside the definition of current clinical genetic testing (GT) guidelines warrants a change in recommendations. Methods A prospective study of 395 women with TNBC underwent genetic counseling and 380 (96.2%) underwent clinical BRCA GT regardless of age of diagnosis beginning January 2014 to October 2015 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. TNBC patients older than 60 years who did not meet clinical GT guidelines had comprehensive sequencing and large rearrangement GT as part of the research protocol. Results Fifty-one of 380 (13.4%) women with TNBC who underwent clinical BRCA GT were BRCA positive. Of the 86 patients diagnosed at age over 60 years and underwent GT, only two (2.3%) were positive for BRCA. These two patients would have met clinical testing criteria due to family or ancestral history. Conclusions Our study does not support universal BRCA testing for TNBC patients diagnosed older than 60 years as their only risk factor for a BRCA pathogenic variant. Both of the positive BRCA patients older than 60 years identified would have met current National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for testing. Therefore, our study demonstrates that the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines provide sufficient criteria for identifying BRCA pathogenic variants in women with TNBC at 60 years or younger.

Identification of new therapeutic leads for triple negative breast cancer subtypes

Planta Medica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Robles ◽  
L Du ◽  
S Cai ◽  
RH Cichewicz ◽  
SL Mooberry
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Therapeutic Leads

Immediate and long-term results of the first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. Final analysis of randomized study

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
S.A. Lyalkin ◽  
◽  
L.A. Syvak ◽  
N.O. Verevkina ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Group 1

The objective: was to evaluate the efficacy of the first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Materials and methods. Open randomized study was performed including 122 patients with metastatic TNBC. The efficacy and safety of the first line chemotherapy of regimens АТ (n=59) – group 1, patients received doxorubicine 60 мг/м2 and paclitaxel 175 мг/м2 and ТР (n=63) – group 2, patients received paclitaxel 175 мг/м2 and carboplatin AUC 5 were evaluated. Results. The median duration of response was 9.5 months (4.5–13.25 months) in patients received AT regimen and 8.5 months (4.7–12.25 months), in TP regimen; no statistically significant differences were observed, р=0.836. The median progression free survival was 7 months (95% CI 5–26 months) in group 1 and 7.5 months (95% CI 6–35 months) in group 2, p=0.85. Both chemotherapy regimens (AT and TP) had mild or moderate toxicity profiles (grade 1 or 2 in most patients). No significant difference in gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia was higher in patients of group 2 (TP regimen): 42.8% versus 27% (р<0.05). Conclusions. Both regimens of chemotherapy (AT and TP) are appropriate to use in the first line setting in patients with metastatic TNBC. Key words: metastatic triple negative breast cancer, chemotherapy, progression free survival, chemotherapy toxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document