Abstract PO-052: A multisystem approach doubles the number of patients referred for genetic testing and diagnosed with Lynch syndrome with equally success among ethnic/racial groups

Author(s):  
Vinit Singh ◽  
Amanda Ganzak ◽  
Peter Gershkovich ◽  
Joanna Gibson ◽  
Rosa M. Xicola ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 525-525
Author(s):  
Grainne O'Kane ◽  
Delia Flannery ◽  
Katrina O'Connor ◽  
Carmel Nolan ◽  
Michael P. Farrell ◽  
...  

525 Background: Lynch Syndrome (LS) accounts for approximately 3% of all colorectal cancers (CRC) and is caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Increasing literature supports routine screening for LS using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect loss of MMR protein expression on tumour samples. We evaluated genetic clinic referrals and consequent LS diagnoses at our institution pre and post the adoption of universal screening. Methods: Reflex immunohistochemistry (rIHC) on all colorectal adenocarcinomas was implemented in November 2008. Prior to this IHC was performed at the pathologist’s discretion or upon request. Tumour specimens reviewed from November 2004 to October 2008 (pre rIHC) and from November 2008 to October 2012 (post rIHC) were evaluated and patients with evidence of MMR deficiency (MMR-D) were identified. The number of genetic referrals and number of patients with confirmed LS were determined. Results: During an 8-year period, 1,131 pathology specimens were reviewed in 1,103 patients (Table). Completion of IHC increased from 19% to 75% post implementation of rIHC. Ninety-two percent of incomplete samples in the post rIHC period (133/145) had insufficient tumour material for analysis. In patients with available IHC, 18/96 (20%) in the pre rIHC era were MMR-D of which 44% were referred to genetics, resulting in the diagnosis of LS in 4 patients. In the post rIHC era 30/429 (7%) of patients had evidence of MMR-D of which 20% were referred for genetic testing resulting in the detection of 3 LS patients. Conclusions: Universal testing for MMR protein expression is difficult to achieve, and does not necessarily result in increased genetic testing or Lynch Syndrome diagnosis. Systematic work-up of test results is essential once mismatch repair evaluation is initiated. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme C. Black ◽  
◽  
Panagiotis Sergouniotis ◽  
Andrea Sodi ◽  
Bart P. Leroy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rare Eye Diseases (RED) are the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness for children and young adults in Europe. This heterogeneous group of conditions includes over 900 disorders ranging from relatively prevalent disorders such as retinitis pigmentosa to very rare entities such as developmental eye anomalies. A significant number of patients with RED have an underlying genetic etiology. One of the aims of the European Reference Network for Rare Eye Diseases (ERN–EYE) is to facilitate improvement in diagnosis of RED in European member states. Main body Technological advances have allowed genetic and genomic testing for RED. The outcome of genetic testing allows better understanding of the condition and allows reproductive and therapeutic options. The increase of the number of clinical trials for RED has provided urgency for genetic testing in RED. A survey of countries participating in ERN-EYE demonstrated that the majority are able to access some forms of genomic testing. However, there is significant variability, particularly regarding testing as part of clinical service. Some countries have a well-delineated rare disease pathway and have a national plan for rare diseases combined or not with a national plan for genomics in medicine. In other countries, there is a well-established organization of genetic centres that offer reimbursed genomic testing of RED and other rare diseases. Clinicians often rely upon research-funded laboratories or private companies. Notably, some member states rely on cross-border testing by way of an academic research project. Consequently, many clinicians are either unable to access testing or are confronted with long turnaround times. Overall, while the cost of sequencing has dropped, the cumulative cost of a genomic testing service for populations remains considerable. Importantly, the majority of countries reported healthcare budgets that limit testing. Short conclusion Despite technological advances, critical gaps in genomic testing remain in Europe, especially in smaller countries where no formal genomic testing pathways exist. Even within larger countries, the existing arrangements are insufficient to meet the demand and to ensure access. ERN-EYE promotes access to genetic testing in RED and emphasizes the clinical need and relevance of genetic testing in RED.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Al-Moujahed ◽  
Aarushi Kumar ◽  
Teja Chemudupati ◽  
Stephen H. Tsang ◽  
Vinit B. Mahajan

AbstractInherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are visually debilitating conditions that affect families worldwide. They require extensive clinical testing, examination, and patient and family counseling, which are frequently accomplished over single-day extended clinic visits. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has limited the number of patients and staff allowed in clinics, leading to interruptions in care. We therefore developed telehealth management protocols for complete or hybrid virtual visits. The three main components of our telegenetics approach included reviewing the diagnostic tests results remotely, in-person or virtual video visits with a retina specialist, and virtual genetic testing using saliva kits. During the first 5 months of the program, telegenetic care was provided for 80 patients, including 3 international patients, and a spectrum of retinal dystrophies were diagnosed and managed. In conclusion, telegenetic virtual visits ensure continuity of care while reducing patient and provider exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and may continue and expand into other medical genetic conditions long after the pandemic.


2017 ◽  
Vol Volume10 ◽  
pp. 49-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anya Prince ◽  
Jean Cadigan ◽  
Gail Henderson ◽  
James Evans ◽  
Michael Adams ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Majumder ◽  
Christi J. Guerrini ◽  
Amy L. McGuire

Although the explosive growth of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing has moderated, a substantial number of patients are choosing to undergo genetic testing outside the purview of their regular healthcare providers. Further, many industry leaders have been expanding reports to cover many more genes, as well as partnering with employers and others to expand access. This review addresses continuing concerns about DTC genetic testing quality, psychosocial impact, integration with medical practice, effects on the healthcare system, and privacy, as well as emerging concerns about third-party interpretation services and non-health-related uses such as investigative genetic genealogy. It concludes with an examination of two possible futures for DTC genetic testing: merger with traditional modes of healthcare delivery or continuation as a parallel system for patient-driven generation of health-relevant information. Each possibility is associated with distinctive questions related to value and risk. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 72 is January 27, 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 544-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Yurgelun ◽  
Rowena Mercado ◽  
Margery Rosenblatt ◽  
Monica Dandapani ◽  
Wendy Kohlmann ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Esplen ◽  
N Stuckless ◽  
S Gallinger ◽  
M Aronson ◽  
H Rothenmund ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document