scholarly journals Eradication of Canine Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in a Murine Xenograft Model with CD47 Blockade and Anti-CD20

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 1072-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kipp Weiskopf ◽  
Katie L. Anderson ◽  
Daisuke Ito ◽  
Peter J. Schnorr ◽  
Hirotaka Tomiyasu ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 4377
Author(s):  
Soo Jin Kim ◽  
U Ji Kim ◽  
Hae Yong Yoo ◽  
Yong June Choi ◽  
Keon Wook Kang

Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) and double-expressor lymphoma (DEL) are aggressive forms of lymphoma that require better treatments to improve patient outcomes. CKD-581 is a new histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that exhibited a better safety profile in clinical trials compared to other HDAC inhibitors. Here, we demonstrate that CKD-581 inhibited the class I–II HDAC family via histone H3 and tubulin acetylation. CKD-581 treatment also up-regulated the phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX, DNA double-strand break marker), and reduced levels of MYC and anti-apoptotic proteins such as BCL-2, BCL-6, BCL-XL, and MCL-1 in DH/DE-diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines. Ultimately, CKD-581 also induced apoptosis via poly(ADP ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) cleavage. In a DLBCL SCID mouse xenograft model, CKD-581 exhibited anti-cancer effects comparable with those of rituximab (CD20 mAb). Our findings suggest that CKD-581 could be a good candidate for the treatment of DLBCL.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (24) ◽  
pp. 5103-5110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pfreundschuh

AbstractEnormous progress has been made in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mostly due to the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. More than 50% of elderly DLBCL patients can be expected to be cured by modern immunochemotherapy. The standard chemotherapy partner of rituximab is the CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen. Elderly patients need particular attention and thorough evaluation if they are suited for the standard treatment or if they are candidates for palliative treatment. Rigorous supportive care including anti-infectious prophylaxis and growth factor support are mandatory. Whether there is still a role of additive radiotherapy in the R-CHOP era is under debate. While further intensification of chemotherapy might hardly be feasible in elderly patients, dose and schedule of rituximab appear to be optimizable. Patients failing after R-CHOP are a particular challenge as are frail patients who are not fit enough for R-CHOP. Further progress can be expected from novel antibodies and small molecules that interfere with signal transduction pathways essential for the survival of the lymphoma cell. To achieve this goal, prospective trials with large numbers of patients are necessary for which the continuous commitment of patients and physicians is indispensable.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3655-3655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Philippe Solal-Celigny ◽  
Corinne Haioun ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3655 Obinutuzumab (GA101) is a type II glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and direct cell death activity but lower complement-dependent cytotoxicity compared with type I anti-CD20 antibodies such as rituximab and ofatumumab. GA101 is in clinical development for the treatment of lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The Phase I/II study BO20999 has evaluated the efficacy and safety of GA101 monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (aNHL). Here, we report updated Phase II results including progression-free survival (PFS) and best overall response (BOR). Patients (n = 40) were randomized to receive GA101 (D1, D8 and D22, then 3-weekly for total of 9 infusions) at either a high dose (1,600 mg on D1 and D8, then 800 mg thereafter; 1,600/800 mg cohort; n = 19), or a flat low dose of 400 mg (400/400 mg cohort; n = 21). Baseline patient characteristics were similar for both cohorts (Table 1). The median observation time for all patients was 9.5 months (0.3–26.1 months). BOR rates are given in Table 2, with 8/25 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients (32%) and 4/15 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients (27%) responding to GA101. Among the patients with rituximab-refractory disease, a response was observed in 1/13 patients (7.7%) and 4/12 patients (33.3%) treated in the 400/400 mg and 1,600/800 mg cohorts, respectively. Of these, 4 patients (1,600/800 mg cohort) had a response duration > 6 months, with 2 patients having an ongoing response (response duration: 9.8, 16.5+, 19.5 and 20.0+ months). Median PFS for patients with DLBCL (Figure 1) was 1.9 months (range: 0.3–15.7 months) for the 400/400 mg cohort and 2.7 months (range: 0.2–22.3) months) for the 1,600/800 mg cohort (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.30–1.66). For the DLBCL subgroup, response duration was 3.1, 3.1+, 5.8, 16.5+ and 19.5 months for the 5 responders in the 1,600/800 mg cohort, compared with 6.3, 8.6 and 9.8 months for the 3 responders in the 400/400 mg cohort. Individual response data indicated that 2 MCL patients had an ongoing response for ≥ 20 months (20.0 and 20.4 months). GA101 was well tolerated in both cohorts. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs; all grades) were the most common adverse event (AE), occurring in 81% of patients in the 400/400 mg cohort and 68% of patients in the 1600/800 mg cohort. Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in >5% of patients across both cohorts included IRRs (10%), tumor lysis syndrome (10%), cardiac failure (not treatment-related; 10%), anemia (14%) and thrombocytopenia (14%) in the 400/400 mg cohort and IRRs (5%) and anemia (5%) in the 1,600/800 mg cohort.Table 1.Baseline patient characteristicsCharacteristic400/400 mg (n = 21)1,600/800 mg (n = 19)All (n = 40)Median age, years (range)70 (43–80)72 (22–85)71 (22–85)Histology, nDLBCL101525MCL11415Median number of prior treatments, n (range)4 (1–17)3 (1–6)3 (1–17)Previous rituximab, n211940Rituximab refractory*, n131225Prior stem cell transplant, n268DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma.*Rituximab refractory defined as patients who had a response of < 6 months or who failed to respond to a rituximab-containing regimen (rituximab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy) at any point during their treatment history.Table 2.Best overall response according to diagnosis and cohortDLBCLMCLResponse, n (%)400/400 mg (n = 10)1,600/800 mg (n = 15)400/400 mg (n = 11)1,600/800 mg (n = 4)Complete response (CR)0 (0.0)3 (20.0)2 (18.2)0 (0.0)CR unconfirmed1 (10.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)Partial response2 (20.0)2 (13.3)0 (0.0)2 (50.0)Stable disease1 (10.0)1 (6.7)3 (27.3)0 (0.0)Progressive disease5 (50.0)9 (60.0)6 (54.5)2 (50.0)No response assessment1 (10.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma.Figure 1.Progression-free survival for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomaFigure 1. Progression-free survival for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma In conclusion, GA101 shows encouraging single-agent efficacy in these heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory aNHL (DLBCL or MCL). A Phase III trial of rituximab plus CHOP vs GA101 plus CHOP in first-line DLBCL has recently started. Disclosures: Morschhauser: Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cartron:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; LFB: Honoraria. Milpied:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wenger:Roche: Employment. Wassner-Fritsch:Roche: Employment. Asikanius:Roche: Employment. Salles:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuying Cui ◽  
Hui Xu ◽  
Yu Yang ◽  
Dongmei Zhao ◽  
Yu Wen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Huge amounts of gene-sequencing data have been used to guide fundamental researches. The study combined bioinformatics tools with basic study to analyze the pathological mechanisms of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Methods: A LncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network of diffuse large B cell lymphoma was constructed by GTEx combined with TCGA database analysis. qPCR was used to detect the expression of LINC00963 and miR-320a in DLBCL cell lines. The proteins levels of UPR sensors, GRP78, p-IRE1α, IRE1α, active ATF6, ATF4 and XBP1, were assessed through Western blot, along with apoptosis markers (Bcl-2, Bax, caspase 3) and autophagy indicators (Beclin1, LC3II, LC3I and p62) after LINC00963 overexpression or miR-320a overexpression in vitro. Additionally, the expression of LC3 was analyzed through immunofluorescence (IF) assay. Results: Evaluation of SUDHL4 cell showed marked up-regulation of key elements of the UPR (GRP78, p-IRE1α, spliced XBP-1(XBP-1(s))), apoptosis (Bax, cleaved caspase 3) and autophagy (Beclin1, LC3II) after LINC00963 overexpression in vitro, whereas miR-320a mimic reversed the effects. Besides, LINC00963 targeted miR-320a while miR-320a bound to the 3’UTR of XBP1. The work also found that LINC00963 overexpression resulted in significant tumor growth delay in a xenograft model of DLBCL. Conclusion: Mechanistically, LINC00963 / miR-320a regulated XBP1-apoptosis pathway and autophagy, making this pathway an attractive therapeutic target for selective targeting. The data presented here are the first to comprehensively survey the mechanism of LINC00963 / miR-320a/XBP1 in DLBCL.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Maciej Szydlowski ◽  
Filip Garbicz ◽  
Ewa Jabłońska ◽  
Patryk Górniak ◽  
Beata Pyrzynska ◽  
...  

R-CHOP immunochemotherapy remains standard frontline therapy for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, this therapy is ineffective in approximately 1/3 of patients, underscoring the need for better treatment modalities. Targeting DLBCL oncogenic drivers is a promising strategy to improve the treatment efficacy and outcome. Although MYC transcription factor is one of the key oncogenes in DLBCL development, direct MYC targeting strategies have been largely ineffective, highlighting the need for other, indirect approaches. For example, MYC expression is stabilized by PIM serine-threonine kinases, indicating that PIM inhibition might be a rational approach to indirectly target MYC. In this study, we assessed the PIM-MYC relationship and the consequences of PIM inhibition in DLBCL. We first evaluated the expression of PIM1-3 and MYC proteins in 57 DLBCL diagnostic sections by immunohistochemistry. In this series, 70.17% of specimens were positive for at least one PIM isoform and 84.22% cases were MYC-positive. 100% of cases with high MYC expression (MYC present in ≥30% of the cells, n=35) were PIM-positive, whereas 86,36% of cases with undetectable or low MYC expression (MYC detected in ≤20% of cells, n= 22) were PIM-negative (Fisher's exact test, p&lt;0.0001). Since the coexpression of MYC and PIMs highlights the functional link between these proteins in DLBCLs, we evaluated the expression of PIM kinases in cell lines following siRNA-mediated MYC knockdown or treatment with MYC-MAX dimerization inhibitor, 10058F4. The genetic or chemical MYC inhibition markedly decreased PIM1-3 expression in six GCB and ABC cell lines. Likewise, knockdown of all three PIM isoforms decreased MYC levels, attenuated proliferation and induced apoptosis. Similarly, PIM blockade with SEL24/MEN1703, a novel pan-PIM/FLT3 inhibitor tested currently in clinical trial in AML patients and exhibiting favorable safety profile, decreased the expression of multiple MYC-dependent genes. To assess the MYC role in PIM inhibitor-mediated toxicity, we generated DHL4 cells expressing degradation-resistant MYC_T58A mutant. MYC_T58A expression partially protected cells from PIM inhibitor-induced proliferation arrest and apoptosis, indicating that the inhibitor's toxicity is at least partially mediated by MYC depletion. The MS4A1 gene, encoding CD20 surface antigen and rituximab target, is regulated by an upstream promoter containing potential MYC-binding sites (E-boxes). MYC association to these regions was confirmed in chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. As expected, in SEL24/MEN1703-treated cells, MYC occupancy at the MS4A1 promoter markedly decreased. To determine the consequences of MYC binding to the MS4A1 promoter, we assessed CD20 levels in a lymphoblastoid cell line carrying tetracycline-regulated (tet-off) MYC. MYC repression markedly elevated transcript and surface CD20 levels in a time-dependent manner, reaching 17.3-fold (transcript) and 3.82-fold (surface) inductions at 96 h. Consistently, the pan-PIM inhibitor decreased MYC expression in DHL4 and RAJI cells and resulted in increased surface CD20 levels up to 3.72-fold of baseline. In cells expressing the MYC_T58A mutant, PIM inhibition did not increase CD20 level, indicating that PIM kinases modulate CD20 surface expression via MYC. Importantly, PIM inhibitors increased CD20 levels also in primary, patient-derived DLBCL cells. These data suggest that indirect MYC targeting via PIM inhibition would lead to increased rituximab activity. Indeed, in PIM inhibitor-treated DHL4 and RAJI cells, rituximab triggered higher complement-dependent toxicity. Likewise, PIM inhibitor potentiated rituximab-dependent uptake of DHL4 and DHL6 cells by human monocyte-derived macrophages in antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis assay. Taken together, we characterize a PIM-MYC regulatory circuit promoting DLBCL growth and resistance to anti-CD20 antibody. We also demonstrate that PIM inhibition exhibits pleiotropic effects that combine direct cytotoxicity with increased surface CD20 levels and increased susceptibility to anti-CD20 antibody-based therapies. Study supported by Foundation for Polish Science (POIR.04.04.00-00-5C84/17-00), Polish National Science Centre (2016/22/M/NZ5/00668 and 2017/26/D/NZ5/00561) and Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland (iONCO) grants. Disclosures Golas: Ryvu Therapeutics: Current Employment. Green:KDAc Therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company. Tomirotti:Menarini Ricerche: Current Employment. Brzózka:Ryvu Therapeutics: Current Employment. Juszczynski:Ryvu Therapeutics: Other: member of advisory board.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document