Cytological Diagnoses of Adenocarcinoma in situ of the Cervix: Common Misdiagnoses

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
Shuxia Li ◽  
Dan Tian ◽  
Ying Li

Objective: In routine screening, glandular lesions have high false-negative and false-positive rates. Our study sought to improve the cytological diagnoses and differentiation of glandular lesions. Study Design: A total of 24 cytology slides were retrospectively reviewed. Among these slides, 15 were confirmed via histology to have varying amounts of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) components. The other 9 cytology slides exhibited AIS mimics that had been originally considered to be AIS or atypical glandular cells (AGCs) and were selected for differentiation from AIS. Results: Overall, 12 of the 15 cytological slides exhibited significant atypical glandular features that met the criteria for AIS. However, the original cytological diagnoses included 2 cases of AIS, 3 AGCs-favor neoplasia (AGC-FN), 2 AGCs, 1 case that was not otherwise specified (AGC-NOS), 1 NILM (negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy), 3 HSILs (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions), and 2 ASC-Hs (atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL). The latter 9 cytological slides were subsequently histologically confirmed to be 2 metaplasias, 2 reactive lesions, 1 decidual change, 3 serous adenocarcinomas, and 1 SCNEC (small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma). Conclusion: Cytological screening will be valuable for identifying glandular lesions as effectively as squamous lesions if the doubly high false rates can be decreased.

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Komatsu ◽  
Tetsuro Oishi ◽  
Daiken Osaku ◽  
Mayumi Sawada ◽  
Akiko Kudoh ◽  
...  

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing for managing women with atypical glandular cells (AGC) and to explore the distribution of hrHPV genotypes. Methods: We analyzed cytologic and histopathologic diagnoses in patients referred to our institution due to AGC or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). All patients underwent hrHPV testing and genotyping, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse [CIN2+/adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)+] were calculated. Results: Among 41 cases previously diagnosed with AGC, 22 (53%) were classified as CIN2+ (2 squamous cell carcinomas), whereas only 2 were AIS or adenocarcinoma. Twenty-seven (65.8%) cases in the AGC group were hrHPV positive. The most frequent genotypes in both the ASC-US and AGC groups were HPV16 and HPV52. The PPV of hrHPV testing for CIN2+/AIS+ was significantly higher in the AGC than in the ASC-US group (74.1 vs. 35.0%; p = 0.0005). The NPV for CIN2+/AIS+ was significantly lower in the AGC than in the ASC-US group (74.4 vs. 100%; p = 0.0441). Conclusion: In patients with AGC, both glandular and squamous lesions must be monitored. hrHPV testing is useful for detecting CIN2+/AIS+ in AGC.


2004 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 618-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain ◽  
Silvia Helena Rabelo-Santos ◽  
Luis Otávio Sarian ◽  
Luiz Carlos Zeferino ◽  
Eliane Regina de Oliveira Zambeli ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Renshaw ◽  
Dina R. Mody ◽  
Richard L. Lozano ◽  
Emily E. Volk ◽  
Molly K. Walsh ◽  
...  

Abstract Context.—Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix is a recently recognized interpretation in the Bethesda 2001 system. Although specific morphologic criteria have been published, recognizing this entity is still difficult. Objective.—To compare pathologists' ability to correctly identify and categorize adenocarcinoma in situ with their ability to identify and categorize adenocarcinoma, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and squamous cell carcinoma. Design.—Pathologists' reviews in the 2001 and 2002 College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology Program, an interlaboratory comparison program for gynecologic cytology, were examined. Cases were usually reviewed by multiple pathologists. False-negative rates, the percentage of reviews with exact agreement with reference interpretations, and the percentage of cases in which all reviews were in exact agreement with the reference interpretation for adenocarcinoma in situ, adenocarcinoma, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and squamous cell carcinoma were compared. Results.—A total of 213 reviews of cases categorized as adenocarcinoma in situ were compared with 2821 reviews of adenocarcinoma, 7535 reviews of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and 1886 reviews of squamous cell carcinoma. The false-negative rate for adenocarcinoma in situ (11.7%) was significantly higher than that for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (4.6%, P < .001) and squamous cell carcinoma (3.3%, P < .001) but not for adenocarcinoma (8.9%, P = .16). Of all the reviews of adenocarcinoma in situ cases, 46.5% were interpreted specifically as adenocarcinoma in situ, compared to 72.2% of reviews of adenocarcinoma, 73.2% of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and 75.1% of squamous cell carcinoma. No individual case of adenocarcinoma in situ was always specifically recognized as adenocarcinoma in situ; 26.5% of cases of adenocarcinoma were specifically recognized as such in all reviews. Findings were similar with and without the inclusion of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/carcinoma, not otherwise specified, as an acceptable review interpretation for cases of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Conclusion.—These data from expert-referenced and biopsy-proven cases suggest that adenocarcinoma in situ is not as easily recognized or categorized as other serious diagnoses.


CytoJournal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye ◽  
Mette Kristin Pedersen ◽  
Bente Ekeberg ◽  
Merete E. Johansen Williams ◽  
Torill Sauer ◽  
...  

Background: The Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Program recommends screening every 3 years for women between 25 and 69 years of age. There is a large difference in the percentage of unsatisfactory samples between laboratories that use different brands of liquid-based cytology. We wished to examine if inadequate ThinPrep samples could be satisfactory by processing them with the SurePath protocol. Materials and Methods: A total of 187 inadequate ThinPrep specimens from the Department of Clinical Pathology at University Hospital of North Norway were sent to Akershus University Hospital for conversion to SurePath medium. Ninety-one (48.7%) were processed through the automated “gynecologic” application for cervix cytology samples, and 96 (51.3%) were processed with the “nongynecological” automatic program. Results: Out of 187 samples that had been unsatisfactory by ThinPrep, 93 (49.7%) were satisfactory after being converted to SurePath. The rate of satisfactory cytology was 36.6% and 62.5% for samples run through the “gynecology” program and “nongynecology” program, respectively. Of the 93 samples that became satisfactory after conversion from ThinPrep to SurePath, 80 (86.0%) were screened as normal while 13 samples (14.0%) were given an abnormal diagnosis, which included 5 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 5 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 2 atypical glandular cells not otherwise specified, and 1 atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. A total of 2.1% (4/187) of the women got a diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or higher at a later follow-up. Conclusions: Converting cytology samples from ThinPrep to SurePath processing can reduce the number of unsatisfactory samples. The samples should be run through the “nongynecology” program to ensure an adequate number of cells.


2008 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen S. Raab ◽  
Bruce A. Jones ◽  
Rhona Souers ◽  
Joseph A. Tworek

Abstract Context.—The use of Papanicolaou (Pap) test cytologic-histologic correlation in quality improvement activities is not well studied. Objective.—To determine if continuous monitoring of correlation data improves performance. Design.—Participants in the College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks program (213 laboratories) self-reported the number of Pap test–histologic biopsy correlation discrepancies every quarter for up to 8 years. A mixed linear model determined if the length of participation in the Q-Tracks program was associated with improved performance. Main outcome measures were predictive value of a positive Pap test, Pap test sensitivity, sampling sensitivity, and proportion of positive histologic diagnoses following a Pap test diagnosis of atypical squamous cells or atypical glandular cells. Results.—Institutions evaluated 287 570 paired Pap test– histologic correlation specimens and found 98 424 (34.2%) true-positive Pap test correlations, 19 006 (6.6%) false-positive Pap test correlations, and 6575 (2.3%) false-negative Pap test correlations. The mean predictive value of a positive Pap test, sensitivity, screening and interpretive sensitivity, sampling sensitivity, and proportion of positive histologic diagnoses following a Pap test diagnosis of atypical squamous or glandular cells were 83.6%, 93.7%, 99.2%, 94.2%, 60.3%, and 38.8%, respectively. Longer participation was significantly associated with a higher predictive value of a positive Pap test (P = .01), higher Pap test sensitivity (P = .002), higher Pap test sampling sensitivity (P = .03), and higher proportion of positive histologic diagnoses for a Pap test diagnosis of atypical squamous cells (P < .001). Conclusions.—Long-term monitoring of cytologic-histologic correlation is associated with improvement in cytologic-histologic correlation performance.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Helena Rabelo-Santos ◽  
Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain ◽  
Luísa Lina Villa ◽  
Maria Cecília Costa ◽  
Luis Otávio Zanatta Sarian ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document