scholarly journals A Sterile Collection Bundle Intervention Reduces the Recovery of Bacteria from Neonatal Blood Culture

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linze F. Hamilton ◽  
Helen E. Gillett ◽  
Adam Smith-Collins ◽  
Jonathan W. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Before And After

Background: In neonatal intensive care, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species can be both blood culture contaminants and pathogens. False-positive cultures can result in clinical uncertainty and unnecessary antibiotic use. Objective: This study sought to assess whether a sterile blood culture collection bundle would reduce the incidence of false-positive blood cultures in a regional neonatal intensive care unit. Method: Clinical data was collected from all infants who had blood cultures taken before and after the introduction of the sterile blood culture collection bundle intervention. This intervention required 2% chlorhexidine and full sterile precautions for blood culture collection. False-positive blood culture rates (presence of skin commensals and ≥3 clinical infection signs) were compared before and after the intervention. The number of days of unnecessary antibiotics associated with false-positive blood cultures was also analysed. Results: In the pre-intervention group (PRE) 197 cultures were taken from 161 babies. In the post-intervention group (POST) 170 cultures from 133 babies were acquired. Baseline demographics were similar in both groups. The rate of false-positive cultures in the PRE group versus the POST group was 9/197 (4.6%) compared to 1/170 (0.6%) (p < 0.05). Unnecessary antibiotic exposure was reduced in the PRE group in comparison to the POST group (27 vs. 0 days, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Implementation of sterile blood culture collection intervention reduced the number of false-positive results. This has potential benefit in reducing unnecessary antibiotic use.

PRESCRIBING AND MONITORING OF GENTAMICIN IN NEONATES

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (9) ◽  
pp. e2.65-e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Staton
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Drug Level ◽  
Neonatal Infection ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Before And After ◽  
National Patient ◽  
Trough Levels ◽  
Selection Of

AimTo evaluate the implementation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline1 with regards to the prescribing, exposure and therapeutic drug level monitoring of gentamicin in early onset neonatal infection.MethodA selection of drug charts for babies who were prescribed gentamicin within 72 hrs of birth were reviewed. The number of doses of gentamicin administered, C-reactive protein (CRP) results, blood culture results and gentamicin trough levels were recorded. A new gentamicin prescription chart was developed based on the NICE clinical guideline1 and the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) alert2 on the safer use of gentamicin for neonates, and was launched on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). A number of months after the new gentamicin prescription chart was introduced, and had therefore had time to become embedded into practice, a selection of babies' drug charts were reviewed and the same information as previously was documented. The information obtained before and after the introduction of the new gentamicin prescription chart was compared.ResultsPrior to the new gentamicin prescription chart 16 prescriptions for gentamicin were reviewed, and in total 47 doses of gentamicin were administered. Blood cultures were negative after five days in all 16 patients. In total 9 gentamicin trough levels were taken with only one level being >2 mg/L. Following the introduction of the new prescription chart another 16 prescriptions for gentamicin were reviewed, and in total 38 doses of gentamicin were administered. Again blood cultures were negative after five days in all 16 patients. In total 14 gentamicin trough levels were taken with two levels being >2 mg/L. Prior to the new gentamicin prescription chart 50% of babies received more than one dose of gentamicin despite having two CRP results <10. This is compared to 31% of babies following the introduction of the new gentamicin prescription chart.ConclusionIt can be concluded that the new gentamicin prescription chart has resulted in a reduction in the exposure of babies to gentamicin, as all babies now have it administered at 36 hourly intervals. There has also been an increase in blood monitoring of trough gentamicin levels, as they are now taken prior to the second dose rather than the third dose. Therefore the new gentamicin prescription chart is safer as toxic levels are identified sooner, which reduces the risk of babies suffering adverse effects.Since the introduction of the new gentamicin prescription chart 31% of babies received more than the necessary number of gentamicin doses, as dictated by the CRP results and blood culture result at 36 hrs. This is a learning point which will be highlighted to the medical and nursing staff on NICU.

scholarly journals 265. Blood culture results pre- and post- antimicrobial administration in the Medicine Intensive Care Unit: a retrospective study in South Bronx

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S131-S132
Author(s):  
Chia-Yu Chiu ◽  
Amara Sarwal ◽  
Addi Feinstein
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Culture Result ◽  
Blood Culture Result ◽  
South Bronx ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background It is intuitive that obtaining blood cultures prior to administering antibiotics can increase the likelihood of a positive blood culture result. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Hour-1 bundle stipulates that obtaining a blood culture and administering antibiotics within 1 hour is a critical determinant of survival. However, the diagnostic sensitivity shortly after antibiotic administration remains unknown. In clinical practice, some health care providers delay antibiotic administration in order to first obtain a blood culture. Methods Adult patients (&gt; 18 years of age) admitted to the Medicine Intensive Care Unit in Lincoln Medical Center, located in South Bronx, New York City, from 09/2019 to 12/2019. Patients needed to have at least one blood culture obtained within 12 hours of admission and have received intravenous antibiotics during the admission to the Medicine Intensive Care Unit. Results Of 327 patients screened, 196 met enrolment criteria and 253 sets of blood cultures underwent analysis. Blood cultures grew bacteria in 21.8% of pre-antimicrobial group whereas 26.9% in post-antimicrobial group (p=0.37). 25.9% of patients received antibiotics within 1 hour before blood culture sampling, while 34.0% of patients received antibiotics &gt;1 hour prior to obtaining blood culture. Blood culture results positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci were more prevalent in the pre-antimicrobial group. Table 1. Patient Characteristics Table 2. Number of blood cultures obtained and blood culture result Table 3. Initial antimicrobial agent and 30-day mortality Conclusion In the sequence of blood culture and antibiotic administration, there is no 30-day survival difference in pre-antimicrobial group and post-antimicrobial group (p=0.15), as long as both received antibiotics within 12 hours of coming to the hospital. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were higher in the pre-antimicrobial group which may indicate that the health care provider hastily obtained the blood culture in a non-sterile manner. Antibiotic administration should not be delayed because of pending blood culture collection. In addition, given that more than 70% of patients were ultimately found to have negative blood cultures, it would be useful to develop practical tools to identify low-risk patients that can be treated without obtaining blood culture, as the blood culture would not be likely to provide diagnostic information. Figure 1: Hours Before and After IV Antibiotic Started Figure 2: Distribution of Blood Culture Before and After IV Antibiotics Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Blood cultures and antibiotic use in a neonatal intensive care unit

1992 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie McDonald ◽  
Anne Moloney ◽  
T. A. Clarke ◽  
T. G. Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Blood Cultures

scholarly journals 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S187-S187
Author(s):  
Lucy S Tompkins ◽  
Alexandra Madison ◽  
Tammy Schaffner ◽  
Jenny Tran ◽  
Pablito Ang
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Standard Methods ◽  
Candida Sp ◽  
Initial Specimen ◽  
Skin Flora

Abstract Background Blood samples obtained via traditional venipuncture can become contaminated by superficial and deeply embedded skin flora. We evaluated the hospital-wide use of an initial-specimen diversion device (ISDD) designed to shunt these microorganisms away from the culture bottle to reduce blood culture contamination (BCC) and sequelae: false-positive central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), repeat blood culture draws, inappropriate antibiotic usage, increased patient length-of-stay and misdiagnosis. The study aimed to show the proportion of blood cultures containing contaminants drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD versus those drawn using traditional methods. Nursing staff continued to use traditional methods to draw blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) and from inpatients. Methods Over a four-month trial at Stanford Health Care (SHC), 4,462 blood cultures were drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD (Steripath Gen2, Magnolia Medical Technologies) in the ED and from inpatients; 922 blood cultures were obtained by phlebotomy staff using standard methods. Additionally, 1,413 blood cultures were drawn by nursing staff using standard methods. The number of matched sets (2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic] plus 2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic], with total volume 40 ml) obtained through traditional methods and by the ISDD were recorded. Contaminants were defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). In addition, sets in which 1 out of 4 bottles contained vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) or Candida sp. were also recorded, even though these are not considered contaminants by the NHSN. Results Of 4,462 blood cultures obtained using the ISDD there were zero contaminants found (BCC rate 0%) versus 29 contaminated sets using traditional methods (BCC rate 3.15%). Twenty-eight contaminants were observed from nursing staff blood culture draws (BCC rate 1.98%). Zero false-positive CLABSIs were associated with use of the ISDD for the trial period. No matched sets containing 1 of 4 bottles with VRE or Candida sp. were observed. Table Stanford Health Care blood culture collection methods and contamination events (March 15, 2019 - July 21, 2019) Conclusion The trial results encourage adoption of the ISDD as standard practice for blood culture at SHC. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

An In-Service Educational Package Improves Alarm Management in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU): Before and After Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 097321792110512
Author(s):  
Suryaprakash Hedda ◽  
Shashidhar A. ◽  
Saudamini Nesargi ◽  
Kalyan Chakravarthy Balla ◽  
Prashantha Y. N. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Response Time ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Alarm Management ◽  
Educational Package ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Before And After Study

Background: Monitoring in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) largely relies on equipment which have a number of alarms that are often quite loud. This creates a noisy environment, and moreover leads to desensitization of health-care personnel, whereby potentially important alarms may also be ignored. The objective was to evaluate the effect of an educational package on alarm management (the number of alarms, response to alarms, and appropriateness of settings). Methods: A before and after study was conducted at a tertiary neonatal care center in a teaching hospital in India involving all health-care professionals (HCP) working in the high dependency unit. The intervention consisted of demo lectures about working of alarms and bedside demonstrations of customizing alarm limits. A pre- and postintervention questionnaire was also administered to assess knowledge and attitude toward alarms. The outcomes were the number and type of alarms, response time, appropriateness of HCP response, and appropriateness of alarm limits as observed across a 24-h period which were compared before and after the intervention. Findings: The intervention resulted in a significant decrease in the number of alarms (11.6-9.6/h). The number of times where appropriate alarm settings were used improved from 24.3% to 67.1% ( P < .001). The response time to alarm did not change significantly (225 s vs 200 s); however, the appropriate response to alarms improved significantly from 15.6% to 68.8%. Conclusion: A simple structured intervention can improve the appropriate management of alarms. Application to Practice: Customizing alarm limits and nursing education reduce the alarm burden in NICUs

Staphylococcus epidermidis Bacteremia in Neonates: Further Observations and the Occurrence of Focal Infection

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 832-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J. Noel ◽  
Paul J. Edelson
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
New York ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Staphylococcus Epidermidis ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Focal Infection ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Vascular Catheters

The frequency and clinical significance of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from blood cultures of neonates collected during a 17-month period in The New York Hospital neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were reviewed. Twenty-three episodes of clinically significant S epidermidis bacteremia were detected using the criteria of isolation from 3/3 blood culture bottles from a single culture, or isolation from two or more blood cultures taken at different times, or simultaneous isolation from blood and fluid, pus or vascular catheter. Of these 23 episodes of S epidermidis bacteremia, ten were associated with colonized vascular catheters, and four episodes occurred in infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Focal S epidermidis infection occurred in ten episodes, and persistent bacteremia occurred frequently in this setting. S epidermidis was the most frequent cause of bacteremia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit during the period reviewed. Of the isolates determined to be clinically significant, 74% were resistant to methicillin and cephalothin and 91% were resistant to gentamicin. All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin. In addition to removing vascular catheters suspected of being colonized and searching for potential sites of focal infection, an antibiotic regimen that includes vancomycin should be initiated once significant S epidermidis bacteremia has been recognized in the neonate.

scholarly journals Importance of physiotherapy/nursing multidisciplinary integration about update newborn position in the neonatal intensive care unit

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa da Silva Neves Moreira Arakaki ◽  
Alana Monteiro de Oliveira ◽  
Trícia Bogossian ◽  
Viviane Saraiva de Almeida ◽  
Gustavo Dias da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Body Position ◽  
Effective Care ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clinical Stability

AbstractIntroduction The high-risk newborns may require long periods of hospitalization until they reach clinical stability for hospital discharge. Avoiding babies to be in only one body position may be an effective way to cause respiratory and neuro-psycho-motor benefits, comfort and preventing pressure ulcers.Objectives This study investigated the impact of physiotherapy/nursing integration in update on body positioning of the newborn in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Methods A questionnaire was administered to nurses and nursing technicians of the neonatal unit of Maternity School of UFRJ and nurses of the Advanced Course in Neonatal Nursing from the same institution. Two classes were taught by the physical therapist of the sector and the questions answered before and after these lessons. It was also a brief characterization of professional participants of the study. We used the Student's t test to compare the correct answers before (PRE) and after (POST) the classes, considering p < 0.05.Results There was a significant increase in the degree of knowledge of nurses and nursing technicians when compared the responses before (nurses: 68.8%; technicians: 70.1%) and after classes (nurses: 78.4 %; technicians: 88.9%). The nurses were less than five years of graduated (45%) and little time of professional experience in neonatology (60%). Forty-seven percent of technicians had less than five years of training and 82% had less than 10 years of experience.Conclusion The use of training by the nursing staff was significant, showing the importance of multidisciplinary approach and the integration of knowledge in the search for a humanized and effective care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document