scholarly journals 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S187-S187
Author(s):  
Lucy S Tompkins ◽  
Alexandra Madison ◽  
Tammy Schaffner ◽  
Jenny Tran ◽  
Pablito Ang
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Standard Methods ◽  
Candida Sp ◽  
Initial Specimen ◽  
Skin Flora

Abstract Background Blood samples obtained via traditional venipuncture can become contaminated by superficial and deeply embedded skin flora. We evaluated the hospital-wide use of an initial-specimen diversion device (ISDD) designed to shunt these microorganisms away from the culture bottle to reduce blood culture contamination (BCC) and sequelae: false-positive central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), repeat blood culture draws, inappropriate antibiotic usage, increased patient length-of-stay and misdiagnosis. The study aimed to show the proportion of blood cultures containing contaminants drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD versus those drawn using traditional methods. Nursing staff continued to use traditional methods to draw blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) and from inpatients. Methods Over a four-month trial at Stanford Health Care (SHC), 4,462 blood cultures were drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD (Steripath Gen2, Magnolia Medical Technologies) in the ED and from inpatients; 922 blood cultures were obtained by phlebotomy staff using standard methods. Additionally, 1,413 blood cultures were drawn by nursing staff using standard methods. The number of matched sets (2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic] plus 2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic], with total volume 40 ml) obtained through traditional methods and by the ISDD were recorded. Contaminants were defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). In addition, sets in which 1 out of 4 bottles contained vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) or Candida sp. were also recorded, even though these are not considered contaminants by the NHSN. Results Of 4,462 blood cultures obtained using the ISDD there were zero contaminants found (BCC rate 0%) versus 29 contaminated sets using traditional methods (BCC rate 3.15%). Twenty-eight contaminants were observed from nursing staff blood culture draws (BCC rate 1.98%). Zero false-positive CLABSIs were associated with use of the ISDD for the trial period. No matched sets containing 1 of 4 bottles with VRE or Candida sp. were observed. Table Stanford Health Care blood culture collection methods and contamination events (March 15, 2019 - July 21, 2019) Conclusion The trial results encourage adoption of the ISDD as standard practice for blood culture at SHC. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals A Sterile Collection Bundle Intervention Reduces the Recovery of Bacteria from Neonatal Blood Culture

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linze F. Hamilton ◽  
Helen E. Gillett ◽  
Adam Smith-Collins ◽  
Jonathan W. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Before And After

Background: In neonatal intensive care, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species can be both blood culture contaminants and pathogens. False-positive cultures can result in clinical uncertainty and unnecessary antibiotic use. Objective: This study sought to assess whether a sterile blood culture collection bundle would reduce the incidence of false-positive blood cultures in a regional neonatal intensive care unit. Method: Clinical data was collected from all infants who had blood cultures taken before and after the introduction of the sterile blood culture collection bundle intervention. This intervention required 2% chlorhexidine and full sterile precautions for blood culture collection. False-positive blood culture rates (presence of skin commensals and ≥3 clinical infection signs) were compared before and after the intervention. The number of days of unnecessary antibiotics associated with false-positive blood cultures was also analysed. Results: In the pre-intervention group (PRE) 197 cultures were taken from 161 babies. In the post-intervention group (POST) 170 cultures from 133 babies were acquired. Baseline demographics were similar in both groups. The rate of false-positive cultures in the PRE group versus the POST group was 9/197 (4.6%) compared to 1/170 (0.6%) (p < 0.05). Unnecessary antibiotic exposure was reduced in the PRE group in comparison to the POST group (27 vs. 0 days, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Implementation of sterile blood culture collection intervention reduced the number of false-positive results. This has potential benefit in reducing unnecessary antibiotic use.

scholarly journals Baseline Study for Improving Diagnostic Stewardship at Secondary Health Care Facilities in Nigeria

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abiodun Egwuenu ◽  
Adaora Ejikeme ◽  
Sara Tomczyk ◽  
Anja Von-Laer ◽  
Olaniyi Ayobami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Case Finding ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Suspected Sepsis ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Secondary Health Care

Abstract BackgroundBlood culture diagnostics are a critical tool for sepsis management and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. A baseline study was conducted to assess existing sepsis case finding, blood culture diagnostics and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) at secondary health care facilities to inform the development of diagnostic stewardship improvement strategies in Nigeria.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 25 public secondary health care facilities in Abuja, FCT and Lagos State in Nigeria to evaluate the capacity for pathogen identification and AST. Following this, data were prospectively extracted on all patients with suspected sepsis from electronic medical records at two facilities in Abuja from October 2020 to May 2021 to further assess practices concerning sepsis case-finding, clinical examination findings, samples requested, and laboratory test results. Data were descriptively analysed, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with blood culture requests among suspected sepsis patients.ResultsIn the online survey, 32% (8/25) of facilities reported performing routine blood cultures. Only one had access to a clinical microbiologist, and 28% (7/25) and 4% (1/25) used standard bacterial organisms for quality control of media and quality control strains for AST, respectively. At the two facilities where data abstraction was performed, 7.1% (2924/41066) of patients were found to have suspected sepsis. A majority of the suspected sepsis patients came from the paediatrics department and were outpatients, and the median age was two years. Most did not have vital signs and major foci of infection documented. Blood cultures were only requested for 2.7% (80/2924) of patients, of which twelve were positive for bacteria, mainly Staphylococcus aureus. No clinical breakpoints were used for AST. Inpatients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:7.5, 95% CI:4.6 – 12.3) and patients from the urban health care facility (aOR:16.9, 95% CI:8.1 – 41.4) were significantly more likely to have a blood culture requested.ConclusionLow blood culture utilisation remains a key challenge in Nigeria. This has implications for patient care. AMR surveillance and antibiotics use. Diagnostic stewardship strategies should focus on improving access to clinical microbiology expertise, practical guidance on sepsis case finding and improving blood culture utilisation and diagnostics.

scholarly journals Evaluation of an Initial Specimen Diversion Device (ISDD) on Rates of Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Blake Buzard ◽  
Patrick Evans ◽  
Todd Schroeder
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Contamination Rate ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Initial Specimen ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Blood cultures are the gold standard for identifying bloodstream infections. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends a blood culture contamination rate of <3%. Contamination can lead to misdiagnosis, increased length of stay and hospital costs, unnecessary testing and antibiotic use. These reasons led to the development of initial specimen diversion devices (ISDD). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of an initial specimen diversion device on rates of blood culture contamination in the emergency department.  Methods: This was a retrospective, multi-site study including patients who had blood cultures drawn in an emergency department. February 2018 to April 2018, when an ISDD was not utilized, was compared with June 2019 to August 2019, a period where an ISDD was being used. The primary outcome was total blood culture contamination. Secondary outcomes were total hospital cost, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, vancomycin days of use, vancomycin serum concentrations obtained, and repeat blood cultures obtained.  Results: A statistically significant difference was found in blood culture contamination rates in the Pre-ISDD group vs the ISDD group (7.47% vs 2.59%, p<0.001). None of the secondary endpoints showed a statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Implementation of an ISDD reduces blood culture contamination in a statistically significant manner. However, we were unable to capture any statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes.

scholarly journals 81. Reducing Unnecessary Blood Cultures Through Diagnostic Stewardship

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S157-S157
Author(s):  
Sujeet Govindan ◽  
Luke Strnad
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Candida Sp ◽  
Daily Frequency ◽  
Oregon Health

Abstract Background At our institution, we learned the frequency of blood cultures was sometimes being changed from “Once” to “Daily” without a defined number of days. We hypothesized this led to unnecessary blood cultures being performed. Methods Over a 3 month period from 12/6/2019-3/6/2020, we retrospectively evaluated the charts of patients who had a blood culture frequency changed to “Daily”. We evaluated if there was an initial positive blood culture within 48 hours of the “Daily” order being placed and the number of positive, negative, or “contaminant” sets of cultures drawn with the order. Contaminant blood cultures were defined as a contaminant species, present only once in the repeat cultures, and not present in initial positive cultures. Results 95 unique orders were placed with 406 sets of cultures drawn from 89 adults. ~20% of the time (17 orders) the order was placed without an initial positive blood culture. This led to 62 sets of cultures being drawn, only 1 of which came back positive. 78/95 orders had an initial positive blood culture. The most common initial organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (SA) (38), Candida sp (10), Enterobacterales sp (10), and coagulase negative staphylococci (7). 43/78 (55%) orders with an initial positive set had positive repeat cultures. SA (26) and Candida sp (8) were most common to have positive repeats. Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) were found in 5 of the orders and contaminant species were found in 4 of the orders. 54% of the patients who had a “Daily” order placed did not have positive repeat cultures. The majority of the cultures were drawn from Surgical (40 orders) and Medical (35 orders) services. Assuming that SA and Candida sp require 48 hours of negative blood cultures to document clearance and other species require 24 hours, it was estimated that 51% of the cultures drawn using the "Daily" frequency were unnecessary. Cost savings over a year of removing the "Daily" frequency would be ~&14,000. Data from "Daily" blood culture orders drawn at Oregon Health & Science University from 12/6/2019-3/6/2020 Conclusion Unnecessary blood cultures are drawn when the frequency of blood cultures is changed to "Daily". Repeat blood cultures had the greatest utility in bloodstream infections due to SA or Candida sp, and with CLABSI where the line is still in place. These results led to a stewardship intervention to change blood culture ordering at our institution. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 660. Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Blood Culture Contamination Rates and Quality Improvement Processes

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S432-S432
Author(s):  
Alexander G Hosse
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Contamination Rate ◽  
Culture Collections ◽  
Total Blood ◽  
Primary Driver ◽  
Inpatient Units

Abstract Background Blood cultures are the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections and a vital part of the work-up in systemic infections. However, contamination of blood cultures represents a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system with increased hospital length of stay, unnecessary antibiotics, and financial cost. The data discussed here offer insight into blood culture contamination rates before and through the COVID-19 pandemic at a community hospital and the processes that were affected by the pandemic. Methods Blood culture contaminations were determined by using the number of sets of blood cultures with growth and the presence of an organism from the National Healthcare Safety Network's (NHSN) commensal organism. Contamination rates were evaluated by status as a standard unit or a COVID-19 isolation unit in either the emergency department (ED) or inpatient floor units. The identified four groups had different processes for drawing blood cultures, particularly in terms of training of staff in use of diversion devices. The electronic medical record was used to track contaminations and the use of diversion devices in the different units. Results The inpatient COVID units were consistently elevated above the other units and the institutional contaminant goal of 2.25%, ranging from 9.6% to 13.3% from 4/2020-9/2020. Those units were the primary driver of the increase in overall contamination rates. COVID ED nursing staff (that had previously undergone training in the use of diversion devices) used diversion devices to draw 51 of 133 (38.3%) cultures compared to only 15 of 84 (17.9%) on the COVID inpatient units. Figure 1. Comparison of contamination rates in the ED vs the inpatient units from all campuses from September 2019 through September 2020. The blue line represents the hospital goal of 2.25% contamination rate. Solid lines represent total contamination rates including COVID isolation units whereas dotted lines represent units excluding COVID isolation units. Figure 2. Comparison of the non-COVID vs COVID isolation units in the emergency department and inpatient units. The red line represents the hospital goal of less than 2.25% for blood culture contamination rate. Table of Contaminants vs. Total Collected Blood Cultures in Each Unit by Month Figure 3. Raw data from Figure 2. Total blood culture contaminations from each unit by month compared to total blood culture collections from each unit by month. Conclusion Evaluation revealed that nursing staff with less training in blood culture collection, particularly the use of diversion devices, were the primary staff collecting blood cultures in the inpatient COVID units. The difference in training is felt to be the primary driver of the increase in contaminants in the inpatient COVID units. The marked increase in contaminations highlights the difficulties of maintaining quality control processes during an evolving pandemic and the importance of ongoing efforts to improve the quality of care. These findings demonstrate the importance of training and routine use of procedures to reduce contaminations even during. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Standardization of direct susceptibility test for blood cultures

1979 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-350
Author(s):  
D Fay ◽  
J E Oldfather
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Standardized Test ◽  
Culture Broth ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Insufficient Data ◽  
Direct Test ◽  
Standard Methods ◽  
Susceptibility Tests

Insufficient data are available to establish the reliability of direct disk diffusion susceptibility tests performed utilizing positive blood culture broth as inoculum. When Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used, 0.03 ml of turbid overnight blood culture broth was found to produce zone diameters closely approximating the size of diameters obtained by a standardized method. Results of direct (0.03 ml of inoculum) and standardized susceptibility tests were then compared for 116 positive blood cultures (1,069 individual disk comparisons). There were 1,011 test agreements (94.6%). There were also 48 (4.5%) minor discrepancies (change between sensitive and intermediate or between intermediate and resistant) and 10 (0.9%) major discrepancies (change between sensitive and resistant). The major discrepancies were randomly distributed among several organisms and antibiotics. Discrepancies occurred most frequently in the more clinically acceptable direction; i.e., in 79.3% the direct test indicted greater resistance than the standardized test. These data establish that 0.03 ml of turbid overnight blood culture broth produces results which compare closely to those obtained with standard methods, and in practice yield direct susceptibility results with a clinically acceptable level of reliability.

Implementation of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Promote Compliance with a Chlorhexidine Gluconate Protocol

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Theory Of Planned Behavior ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Planned Behavior ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Blood Cultures

Abstract Introduction: Blood cultures are critical values for identifying the source of an infection in patients seeking medical treatment for an acute illness. False-positive cultures can negatively influence patient care when physicians use inaccurate information to prescribe treatment. Inaccurate prescribed treatment negatively influences the quality of patient care related to prolonged medical treatment and hospital stay and unnecessary repetition of diagnostic tests. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to determine if blood culture contamination rates would be decreased if improved availability of CHG products was provided in all emergency department patient care areas would reduce the contamination rates of blood cultures. Methodology: The Theory of Planned Behavior provided the theoretical framework for this descriptive correlational project to examine barriers to following the procedural guidelines to cleanse venipuncture sites with a chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) product before venipuncture Alcohol preparation pads were removed from the emergency department and a CHG product packaged similar to the alcohol preparation pads was placed in the department procedure trays and bedside carts. Results: During the first 2 weeks of the pilot project, blood culture contamination rates were reduced from 4.5% to 1.5%. The following month, rates remained low at 1.9%. Conclusion: Placement of CHG products at the bedside will improve patient safety and quality of care by reducing the incidence of inaccurate diagnosis and treatment based on false-positive blood cultures.

scholarly journals Blood Culture Contamination in a Community Hospital- less than 2% is achievable

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S127-S127
Author(s):  
R Bedi ◽  
J Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Proper Order ◽  
Multiple Devices ◽  
American Society

Abstract Introduction/Objective Blood cultures are commonly obtained to evaluate the presence of bacteria or fungal infection in a patient’s bloodstream. The presence of living microorganisms circulating in the bloodstream is of substantial prognostic and diagnostic importance. A positive blood culture indicates a reason for the patient’s illness and provides the etiological agent for antimicrobial therapy. Collection of blood culture is an exact process that requires time, the proper order of draw, and following of correct protocol. The busy Emergency department that requires multiple demands for nurse’s time, turnover of staff, rushing from one task to another can result in the improper collection and false-positive blood cultures. The national benchmark is set at 3% by the American Society of Clinical Microbiology (ASM) and The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). False-positive blood culture results in increased length of stay and unnecessary antimicrobial therapy, resulting in an increased cost burden to the hospital of about $5000 per patient. Methods/Case Report At our 150-bed community hospital, 26 beds Emergency Department, we have come a long way in reduction of our blood culture contamination rates from upwards of 4% to less than 2%, far lower than the national benchmark. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) NA Conclusion There are multiple devices available from various manufacturers claiming to reduce blood culture contamination. These devices do reduce blood culture (BC) contamination but at an added cost of the device. The rate of BC can be reduced and less than 3% is achievable by materials available in the laboratory. We have achieved this by providing training to every new staff by demonstration and direct observation, providing everything required for collection in a kit, using proper technique, the inclusion of diversion method that involves the aseptic collection of a clear tube before collecting blood cultures, and following up monthly on any false positive blood cultures.

scholarly journals Reducing blood culture contamination using an initial specimen diversion device

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic S. Zimmerman ◽  
Marc V. Assous ◽  
Shoshana Zevin ◽  
Yonit Wiener-Well
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
True Positive ◽  
Standard Methods ◽  
Initial Specimen ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Concomitant Reduction ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization ◽  
Microbiological Laboratory

AbstractFalse positive blood cultures result from contamination, consuming microbiological laboratory resources and causing unnecessary antibiotic treatment and lengthened hospitalizations. Skin sterilization has been shown to reduce contamination; however, bacteria do not only colonize the surface of human skin, but are also found in deeper tissues, requiring additional techniques to reduce contamination. An initial specimen diversion device diverts the initial 1-2 ml of blood so as to remove any potentially contaminated skin plug, thus potentially further reducing culture contamination. The device has been associated with a reduction in culture contamination over short study periods in certain populations. However, more study is needed to understand whether the effect continues over longer periods of time and in hospitalized patients. Thus, in this prospective, controlled pragmatic study, cultures were obtained from hospitalized patients using the initial specimen diversion device, with cultures taken using standard methods serving as control. In total, 671 blood cultures were obtained: 207 cultures were taken using an initial specimen diversion device, with 2 (1.0%) contaminated cultures and 464 cultures were taken without the device, with 24 (5.2%) contaminated cultures (p < 0.008). No significant difference was shown in the rate of true positive cultures. Thus, use of a diversion device was associated with reduced culture contamination in hospitalized patients over a six month period without concomitant reduction in true positive cultures. This intervention may result in a reduction in costs, antibiotic use and duration of hospitalization.

scholarly journals ‘’Evaluation of Flora Bacteria Grown in Blood Cultures: Are They Etiologic Agent of Infection or Only Contaminants?’’

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-292
Author(s):  
Filiz Orak ◽  
Hulusi Guven ◽  
Selma Ates ◽  
Adem Doganer ◽  
Filiz Alkan Baylan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
White Blood Cell ◽  
Microbial Growth ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Infectious Agents ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Skin Flora

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to determine whether the flora bacteria growing in blood cultures were infectious agents or only contaminants, for this purpose the hemogram parameters and other demographic characteristics of the patients were evaluated. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 11.579 blood culture results using the BacT/ALERT® microbial detection system. The skin flora bacteria was detected in the blood cultures during one year and the rates of infectious agents among these bacteria were investigated retrospectively. The blood culture results, which were accepted as true bacteremia and contamination were compared in terms of positive blood culture flask count and inflammation markers (white blood cell count, neutrophil ratio, lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein levels). Results: The total number of blood culture test was 11.579. Out of this number, 8205 (70.87%) was free of microbial growth and there was 3374 (29.13%) with microbial growth. 2609 (77.3%) of the positive cultures represented skin flora bacteria, 2510 (96.2%) of them were coagulase negative staphylococci. Only 50 (1.9%) of the flora bacteria were considered as infectious agents in terms of clinical and laboratory findings in addition to culture. A statistically significant correlation was found between true bacteremia and white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (C-RP) levels (p <0.05). Conclusion: Peripheral blood collection instead of catheter and using special phlebotomy teams should be taken into consideration in order to reduce contamination rates precautions such as adequate skin preparation, preparation of blood culture bottles and using single needle instead of double needle. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.20(2) 2021 p.288-292

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document