scholarly journals Reduction in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Is Associated with a Short-Term Reduction in Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density T Score

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-350
Author(s):  
Kamonwan Tangvoraphonkchai ◽  
Andrew Davenport

Introduction: Increased vascular stiffness is a risk factor for mortality. We wished to determine whether changes in vascular stiffness are associated with changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in peritoneal dialysis patients. Methods: We measured vascular stiffness by aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) and BMD by dual electron absorptiometry (DXA) scanning and compared T scores to compensate for differences in patient ages and gender. Results: Twenty-four patients had repeat aPWV measurements and DXA scans, median 12.4 months apart. aPWV decreased in 15 and increased in 9. As there were more women in the group with an increase in aPWV, we used gender-adjusted DXA T scores Total body T scores fell in both groups, but median T scores remained positive for those with an increase in aPWV, whereas negative T scores on both scans for those with a decrease in or stable aPWV. Lumbar spine T scores fell in those with a reduction in aPWV (–1.6 [–2.4 to 0.6] to –2.1 [–2.4 to 0.3], p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant decrease in those with an increase in aPWV (–0.5 [–1.1 to 0.15] to –0.7 [–1.7 to 0.6]). There were no changes in femoral neck T scores. Conclusions: Our study reinforces the hypothesis of a link between bone disease and vascular disease in dialysis patients. Lumbar spine DXA includes imaging of the aorta and will include aortic calcification, and as such a reduction in lumbar spine T score without a change in femoral neck T score suggests a reduction in aortic calcification. Although our study requires additional confirmation, our data would suggest that changes in aPWV could be used as a surrogate for changes in vascular calcification in the investigation of interventions designed to reduce vascular calcification.

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 833.2-834
Author(s):  
S. Garcia ◽  
B. M. Fernandes ◽  
M. Rato ◽  
F. Oliveira Pinheiro ◽  
D. Fonseca ◽  
...  

Background:Teriparatide has been shown to increase spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) and to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. (1) It is currently not clear whether the effect of teriparatide is dependent on the baseline risk of fracture or osteoporosis (OP) type, a finding that could have an impact on our therapeutic decision.Objectives:Investigate if there is a relationship between teriparatide effect in BMD and baseline 10-year fracture probability, assessed using FRAX®, in primary and secondary OP patients.Methods:This is a longitudinal, retrospective study including consecutive patients with the diagnosis of OP treated with teriparatide for 24 months, with a ten-year follow-up period, at our rheumatology department. Demographic, clinical, laboratorial, BMD and occurrence of fracture data were collected. The 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture was estimated using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) v 4.1 with the Portuguese population reference. Statistical analysis was performed using the software SPSS 23.0. Correlations between continuous variables were evaluated with spearman coefficient. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Eighty patients (88.8% female, median age 65.00 (59; 75)) were included. Forty-nine patients (61.3%) has secondary OP, mainly of cortisonic etiology (61.2%, n=30). Before treatment, median lumbar spine BMD was 0.870 [0.767, 0.964] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.60 (-3.30, -1.90); median total femur BMD was 0.742 [0.667, 0.863] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.10 (-2.80, -1.30); median femoral neck BMD was 0.671 [0.611, 0.787] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.50 [-3.20, -1.85]. Regarding fracture risk, median FRAX-based 10-year major fracture risk (with BMD) at baseline was 16% [10.0; 23], and median hip fracture risk was 7.2% [3.4; 13.8].The median variation of BMD, after finishing teriparatide treatment, in the spine was 0.107 [0.029; 0.228]; median BMD variation in total femur was 0.013 [-0.013; 0.068] and median BMD femoral neck was 0.046 [-0.002; 0.109]. We observed a numerically superior effect, albeit without any statistical significance, of teriparatide on bone mineral density gain in secondary OP (versus primary OP) at lumbar spine, total femur and femoral neck.Most patients continued anti-osteoporotic treatment with a bisphosphonate (81.2%, n=65) and, during follow-up, 17 patients had an incident fracture (8 hip fractures and 6 vertebral fractures), median of 5 [1.75, 8.25] years after ending teriparatide.We found a discrete correlation between FRAX-based hip fracture probability and the variation of bone mineral density in total femur (Spearman’s coefficient 0.248, p = 0.04). There was no correlation between FRAX-based major fracture probability and and the variation of bone mineral density in the spine or femur. When we separately analyze the relationship between the variation in total hip BMD and the FRAX-based fracture risk, depending on whether it is a secondary or primary OP, we find that the correlation is stronger and only remains in secondary OP (Spearman’s coefficient 0.348, p = 0.03).Conclusion:Our data suggest that teriparatide could be an important weapon in the treatment of secondary cause OP, particularly cortisonic, and in patients at high fracture risk, although further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.References:[1]Kendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Greenspan SL, Zikan V, Bagur A, Malouf-Sierra J, Lakatos P, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Body JJ, Geusens P, Möricke R, López-Romero P. Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):230-240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072199626
Author(s):  
Young Hwan Park ◽  
Hyun Woo Cho ◽  
Jung Woo Choi ◽  
Hak Jun Kim

Background: The association between ankle fractures in elderly patients and low bone mineral density (BMD) has recently been recognized, but the effect of BMD on the postoperative outcome of these fractures is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of BMD on the postoperative outcome of ankle fractures in elderly patients to evaluate the need for BMD screening. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients aged 65 years or older who had ankle fractures and underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to assess BMD after surgical treatment of the fracture. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) grading scale score, and quality of fracture reduction. The correlation between the BMD and the outcome measures at 12 months after surgery was analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The mean absolute value of BMD was 0.6 ± 0.1 g/cm2 (T-score, –1.5 ± 1.2) at the femoral neck and 0.8 ± 0.2 g/cm2 (T-score, –1.2 ± 1.5) at the lumbar spine. Osteoporosis was present in 33% of female patients and in 11% of male patients. At 12 months after surgery, the OMAS was 70 ± 17 and the VAS score for pain was 18 ± 17. Of the patients, 20, 21, 5, 1, and 1 had K&L grades of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. None of the clinical and radiographic outcome measures were correlated with the BMD values of the patients. Conclusion: The postoperative outcome of the ankle fractures in elderly patients at 12 months after surgery showed no correlation with femoral neck or lumbar spine BMD at the time of fracture. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.


This study aimed to examine the age-specific individual discrepancy between lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) and femoral neck (FN) BMD in Japanese women and to compare the significantly different characteristics between the two bone sites. We found a higher prevalence rate of discordance between the two BMD T-score sites, and many patients had a lower LS BMD T-score than FN BMD T-score. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because our findings suggest that physicians should assess BMD more carefully in women who have a low body weight or body mass index and parental hip fracture history. For these patients, it is necessary to measure both the LS and FN BMD T-scores for calculating the fracture risk.


Author(s):  
Shanshan Xue ◽  
Yuzheng Zhang ◽  
Wenjing Qiao ◽  
Qianqian Zhao ◽  
Dingjie Guo ◽  
...  

Abstract Context Bone mineral density (BMD) T-score reference may be updated when the peak BMD of the population is unclear and may need to be updated. Objective To update BMD T-score references using the peak BMD from the most recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting The NHANES 2005-2014. Participants Non-Hispanic white females between the ages 10-40 years (N=1549) were our target population to estimate peak BMD (SD). Individuals aged≥50 years (N=5523) were used to compare the percentages of osteoporosis and low bone mass based on existing and updated BMD T-score references. Main Outcome Measurements: BMD data within the age at attainment of peak BMD±5 years were used to calculate updated BMD T-score references. Results The updated average of BMD (SD) for diagnosing osteoporosis at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 0.888 g/cm 2 (0.121 g/cm 2) and 1.065 g/cm 2 (0.122 g/cm 2), respectively. The percentages of individuals with osteoporosis at the femoral neck and low bone mass at the femoral neck and lumbar spine based on the updated BMD T-score references were higher than the percentages of people designated with these outcomes under the existing guidelines (P&lt;0.001). However, we observed the opposite pattern for lumbar spine osteoporosis (P&lt;0.001). Conclusions We calculated new BMD T-score references at the femoral neck and lumbar spine. We found significant differences in the percentages of individuals classified as having osteoporosis and low bone mass between the updated and existing BMD T-score references.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4989-4989
Author(s):  
Tamara Berno ◽  
Kenneth Boucher ◽  
Fenghuang Zhan ◽  
Guido J. Tricot ◽  
Benjamin Mughal ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4989 Background: Bone disease is present at diagnosis in almost all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and can impact substantially on patient morbidity and quality of life. Decreased bone mineral density is also observed not only in MM but also in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). The pathogenesis of bone disease in MM is complex. The activity of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has been linked to increased bone formation and osteoblastic activation. Evidence from the available clinical data indicates that bortezomib has a positive impact on bone health in MM and demonstrates a bone anabolic effect. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively 53 patients with MM and 16 with MGUS who have completed bone density at least at diagnosis. 21 patients have completed two bone density (3 MGUS and 18 MM). The bone density was obtained in all patients at baseline and in 16 patients repeated after bortezomib treatement with a median time of bortezomib exposure of 6 months. We analyzed T-score values at lumbar spine and at femoral neck. Results: With a median age of 66 years, 41 male and 28 female were analyzed. At baseline the mean lumbar spine T-score of all subjects and of 16 MM treated with bortezomib was -0.50 and -0.76 respectively. At baseline the mean femoral neck T-score for all subjects and for 16 MM treated with Bortezomib was -1.56 and -1.31 respectively. The baseline mean lumbar spine T-score for MGUS and MM was -0.71 and -0.43 respectively. The baseline mean femoral neck T-score of MGUS and MM was -1.61 and -1.54 respectively. In the group of 16 patients treated with Bortezomib we observed from baseline a change in lumbar bone mineral density T-score of 0.36 and at femoral neck bone density T-score of 0.25. Conclusion: These data show that patients treated with proteasome inhibitor showed moderate increment in bone mineral density at lumbar spine and at femoral neck. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
Alark Devkota Rajouria ◽  
Madur Dev Bhattarai ◽  
Manil Ratna Bajracharya ◽  
Buddha Bahadur Karki

Background: The aim of the study was to establish the correlation quantitative ultrasound (QUS) between and dual-energy X-ray absorp­tiometry (DEXA) and to assess the ability of QUS as a screening tool for osteoporosis. Methods: The study was conducted on 115 patients. All the patients underwent QUS of radius using Sunlight MiniOmni bone sonometer and DEXA screening for measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine, total left & femoral neck and radius. Results: Significant correlations were observed between QUS and DEXA T score. Conclusions: QUS is a sensitive screening tool to detect changes in the bone mass and risk of osteoporosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 835.1-835
Author(s):  
Z. Batalov ◽  
M. Nikolov ◽  
N. Nikolov

Background:Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry (REMS) is an innovative radiation-free approach for the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) at axial sites. The principle of this technology is based on the analysis of native raw unfiltered ultrasound signals, the so called radiofrequency ultrasound signals, acquired during an echographic scan of the lumbar spine and/or femoral neck. [1]. A previous published study showed a high degree of correlation between the T-score values provided by the two techniques-REMS and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for both lumbar spine and femoral neck [2]. REMS software outputs information about BMD (g/cm2), T-scores, Z-scores [standard deviations (SD)], percentage of body fat and basal metabolic rate [BMR (kcal/daily)] [3].Objectives:The aim of the current study is to investigate the multivariate significant risk factors for reduced BMD through REMS technology.Methods:In this study, a total of 273 women with mean age 62 years (yrs.) ± 12 yrs. (range 25-88 yrs.) underwent REMS assessments. Subjects were divided into two groups after acquiring information about the spinal T-scores: 1st group with T-scores ≥-1 SD and 2nd group with T-scores <-1 SD. Age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), basal metabolic rate (BMR), body fat and menopausal status were the risk factors included in the multivariate statistical analyses. Binary logistic regression was used to assess which are the significant risk factors for T-score <-1 SD. Youden’s indices were calculated for selecting the cut-off points for each risk factor.Results:273 women had mean weight of 70.5 kg. ± 15.7 kg. (range 39.4-127 kg.), mean height 157.1 cm. ± 8.8 cm. (range 100-182 cm.) and mean body mass index (BMI) 28.6 kg/cm2 ± 6.1 kg/cm2 (range 14.9-47.5 kg/cm2). The mean body fat of the subjects was 37.8% ± 8.8% (range 9-52%) and the mean BMR was 1274.01 kcal/daily ± 163.17 kcal/daily (range 929.7-1908.4 kcal/daily). 260 women (95.2%) were attributed to postmenopausal. Age (p=0.000), BMI (p=0.015), menopause (p=0.006) and BMR (p=0.000) were the multivariate significant risk factors for T-score <-1 SD. Odds ratio for the risk factor age was 1.16, so each added year of the women’s age increased the risk for T-score <-1 SD by 1.16%. Women over the age of 65 yrs. showed the highest risk for spinal T-score <-1 SD. The odds ratio of the menopause as a risk factor for spinal T-score <-1 SD was 9.54, so postmenopausal women showed about 9.5 times higher risk of T-score <-1 SD of the lumbar spine than women who still have their period. The increase of BMI by one kg/cm2 decreased the probability of spinal T-score <-1 SD by 0.15% and the increase of BMR by one kcal/daily decreased this probability by 0.02%. Women with BMI above 28.63 kg/cm2 and those with BMR >1331.75 kcal/daily were unlikely to develop spinal T-score <-1 SD.Conclusion:In the current study, multivariate regression analysis was used to develop a specific REMS-based risk prediction model for spinal BMD, corresponding to T-score <-1 SD. Postmenopausal women over age of 65 yrs. with BMI lower than 28.63 kg/cm2 and BMR <1331.75 kcal/daily were at the highest risk for T-score <-1 SD of the lumbar spine.References:[1]Pisani P, Renna MD, Conversano F, Casciaro E, Muratore M, et al. (2013) Screening and early diagnosis of osteoporosis through X-ray and ultrasound-based techniques. World J Radiol 5(11): 398-410.[2]Kirilov N. Analysis of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry images using computer vision methods. (2020) Trakia Journal of Sciences, Vol. 18, Suppl. 1, pp 114-117.[3]Kirilova E, Kirilov N, Popov I, Vladeva S. (2019) Bone mineral density of lumbar spine and femoral neck assessed by novel echographic approach-Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS). Clin. Cases Miner. Bone Metab., 16 (1), pp. 14-17.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document