The Effects of Selenium on Bone Health: From Element to Therapeutics

Osteoporosis, characterized by low bone mass and a disruption of bone microarchitecture, is traditionally treated using drugs or lifestyle modifications. Recently, several preclinical and clinical studies have investigated the effects of selenium on bone health, although the results are controversial. Selenium, an important trace element, is required for selenoprotein synthesis and acts crucially for proper growth and skeletal development. However, the intake of an optimum amount of selenium is critical, as both selenium deficiency and toxicity are hazardous for health. In this review, we have systematically analyzed the existing literature in this field to determine whether dietary or serum selenium concentrations are associated with bone health. In addition, the mode of administration of selenium as a supplement for treating bone disease is important. We have also highlighted the importance of using green-synthesized selenium nanoparticles as therapeutics for bone disease. Novel nanobiotechnology will be a bridgehead for clinical applications of trace elements and natural products.

The effect of low-intensity whole-body vibration with or without high-intensity resistance and impact training on risk factors for proximal femur fragility fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: study protocol for the VIBMOR randomized controlled trial

Background The prevailing medical opinion is that medication is the primary (some might argue, only) effective intervention for osteoporosis. It is nevertheless recognized that osteoporosis medications are not universally effective, tolerated, or acceptable to patients. Mechanical loading, such as vibration and exercise, can also be osteogenic but the degree, relative efficacy, and combined effect is unknown. The purpose of the VIBMOR trial is to determine the efficacy of low-intensity whole-body vibration (LIV), bone-targeted, high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT), or the combination of LIV and HiRIT on risk factors for hip fracture in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis. Methods Postmenopausal women with low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the proximal femur and/or lumbar spine, with or without a history of fragility fracture, and either on or off osteoporosis medications will be recruited. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to one of four trial arms for 9 months: LIV, HiRIT, LIV + HiRIT, or control (low-intensity, home-based exercise). Allocation will be block-randomized, stratified by use of osteoporosis medications. Testing will be performed at three time points: baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1; 9 months), and 1 year thereafter (T2; 21 months) to examine detraining effects. The primary outcome measure will be total hip aBMD determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Secondary outcomes will include aBMD at other regions, anthropometrics, and other indices of bone strength, body composition, physical function, kyphosis, muscle strength and power, balance, falls, and intervention compliance. Exploratory outcomes include bone turnover markers, pelvic floor health, quality of life, physical activity enjoyment, adverse events, and fracture. An economic evaluation will also be conducted. Discussion No previous studies have compared the effect of LIV alone or in combination with bone-targeted HiRIT (with or without osteoporosis medications) on risk factors for hip fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Should either, both, or combined mechanical interventions be safe and efficacious, alternative therapeutic avenues will be available to individuals at elevated risk of fragility fracture who are unresponsive to or unwilling or unable to take osteoporosis medications. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www. anzctr.org.au) (Trial number ANZCTR12615000848505, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 368962); date of registration 14/08/2015 (prospectively registered). Universal Trial Number: U1111-1172-3652.

Bone Health in Children With Risk Factors for Low Bone Mass

Purpose: To describe clinical and biological characteristics of pediatric patients with at least one risk factor (RF) for low bone mass for chronological age (LBMca)/childhood osteoporosis (cOP) and to assess its influence on bone mineral density (BMD).Methods: Patients between 2 and 20 years of age with at least 1 RF were recruited. Daily calcium intake, number of previous fractures and other RFs and their distribution among different groups were assessed. Spine and whole body DXA and vertebral morphometry were performed.Results: 103 patients were included. Mean age was 9.8 years old. 52.4% were female. Of the RFs, 84.5% presented insufficient calcium intake, 38.8% were receiving or had received corticosteroids, 31.1% were receiving other treatments with osteotoxic potential, 13.6% led a sedentary lifestyle, 12.6% presented history of fractures, and up to 8.1% had hypovitaminosis D. 38% of the cohort had 2 RFs, 31% had 3 RFs, 15% had 4 RFs, and 12% associated 5 or more RFs. 10.5% met LBMca criteria and 4.8% met cOP criteria. 73% of vertebral BMD was justified by age and hypovitaminosis D (positive effect), and male sex and Hispanic ethnicity (negative effect). 82% of total body less head BMD was justified by age (positive effect), and Hispanic ethnicity and sedentary lifestyle (negative effect).Conclusions: Pediatric populations with risk of LBM/cOP have 2 or more risk factors. Up to 10.5% of children with RFs present LBM and 4.8% have an unknown cOP. RFs related to changes in BMD are age, sex, sedentary lifestyle, ethnicity, and hypovitaminosis D.

A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Self Instructional Module on Knowledge Regarding Prevention of Osteoporosis Among the Middle Aged Women in Selected Hospital, Bangalore

Bone is living, growing tissue. It is made mostly of collagen, a protein that provides a soft framework, and calcium phosphate, a mineral that adds strength and hardens the framework. This combination of collagen and calcium makes bone both flexible and strong, which in turn helps bone to withstand stress.1 More than 99 percent of the body’s calcium is contained in the bones and teeth. The remaining 1 percent is found in the blood. Throughout one’s lifetime, old bone is removed (resorption) and new bone is added to the skeleton (formation). During childhood and teenage years, new bone is added faster than old bone is removed. As a result, bones become larger, heavier, and denser. Bone formation outpaces resorption until peak bone mass (maximum bone density and strength) is reached around age 30. After that time, bone resorption slowly begins to exceed bone formation. For women, bone loss is fastest in the first few years after menopause, and it continues into the postmenopausal years. Osteoporosis, or porous bone, is a disease characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility and an increased risk of fractures of the hip, spine, and wrist. Osteoporosis is more likely to develop if you did not reach optimal peak bone mass during your bone-building years. Women are at a greater risk than men, especially women who are thin or have a small frame, as are those of advanced age. Women who are postmenopausal, including those who have had early or surgically induced menopause, or abnormal or absence of menstrual periods, are at greater risk. Cigarette smoking, eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa or bulimia, low amounts of calcium in the diet, heavy alcohol consumption, inactive lifestyle, and use of certain medications, such as corticosteroids and anticonvulsants, are also risk factors for osteoporopsis.2 The underlying mechanism in all cases of osteoporosis is an imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation. In normal bone, matrix remodeling of bone is constant; up to 10% of all bone mass may be undergoing remodeling at any point in time. The process takes place in bone multicellular units (BMUs) as first described by Frost & Thomas in 1963. Osteoclasts are assisted by transcription factor PU.1 to degrade the bone matrix, while osteoblasts rebuild the bone matrix. Low bone mass density can then occur when osteoclasts are degrading the bone matrix faster than the osteoblasts are rebuilding the bone. The three main mechanisms by which osteoporosis develops are an inadequate peak bone mass (the skeleton develops insufficient mass and strength during growth), excessive bone resorption, and inadequate formation of new bone during remodeling. An interplay of these three mechanisms underlies the development of fragile bone tissue. Hormonal factors strongly determine the rate of bone resorption; lack of estrogen (e.g. as a result of menopause) increases bone resorption, as well as decreasing the deposition of new bone that normally takes place in weight-bearing bones.this leads to weakening and softening of bones the bones become soft and it will prone to get fracture or collapse.

Recombinant Unique Cartilage Matrix-associated Protein Potentiates Osteogenic Differentiation and Mineralization of MC3T3-E1 Cells

Objective: The relative balance of osteoblasts in bone formation and osteoclasts in bone resorption is crucial for maintaining bone health. With age, this balance between osteoblasts and osteoclasts is broken, resulting in bone loss. Anabolic drugs are continuously being developed to counteract this low bone mass. Recombinant proteins are used as biotherapeutics due to being relatively easy to produce on a large scale and are cost-effective through various expression systems. This study aimed to develop a recombinant protein that would positively impact osteoblast differentiation and mineralized nodule formation using unique cartilage matrix-associated protein (UCMA). Methods: A recombinant glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-UCMA fusion protein was generated in an E.coli system, and purified by affinity chromatography. MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells and Osterix (Osx)-knockdown stable cells were cultured for 14 days to investigate osteoblast differentiation and nodule formation in the presence of the recombinant GST-UCMA protein. The differentiated cells were assessed by alizarin red S staining and quantitative PCR of the osteoblast differentiation marker osteocalcin. In addition, cell viability in the presence of the recombinant GST-UCMA protein was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and cell adhesion assay. Results: The isolation of both purified recombinant GST-only and GST-UCMA proteins were confirmed at 26 kDa and 34 kDa, respectively, by Coomassie staining and western blot analysis. Neither dose-dependent nor time-dependent presence of recombinant GSTUCMA affected MC3T3-E1 cell viability. However, MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion to the recombinant GST-UCMA protein increased dose-dependently. Osteoblast differentiation and nodule formation were promoted in both MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells and Osxknockdown stable cells when cultured in the presence of recombinant GST-UCMA protein. Conclusion: A recombinant GST-UCMA protein induces osteogenic differentiation and mineralization, suggesting its potential use as an anabolic drug to increase low bone mass in osteoporotic patients.

P013 Serum osteoprotegerin and RANKL in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and their correlation with bone mineral density

Background Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic arthropathy of childhood and is associated with low bone mass, and may hasten the onset of osteoporosis later in life1. Bone loss occurs because of an imbalance between osteoclasts-activating factors like receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) and its inhibitor osteoprotegerin (OPG) 2. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the preferred method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in children and to identify and follow individuals at risk for fracture 3. The objective is the Evaluation of serum levels of osteoprotegerin and RANKL and their correlation with BMD in JIA patients. Methods Forty JIA patients (according to the revised classification criteria of ILAR) and 40 healthy children individually matched for age, sex and race were included in this study. Children excluded from the study were those with primary and secondary causes of osteoporosis (such as chronic illness). All patients were assessed clinically by: age, sex, body mass index, type of JIA, disease duration and disease activity (by Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score; JADAS 10). The functional disability was assessed by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). Blood samples were collected from JIA patients and healthy controls to determine serum levels of OPG and RANKL by ELISA. DXA scans were done using GE Healthcare Lunar DPX, Madison, Wisconsin. Bone mineral density of the L1-L4 lumbar spine and total body less head (TBLH) was evaluated in g/cm2 and expressed as Z score for age, sex according to the reference data given for this equipment. Results The study included 40 patients (25 females) with a mean age of 11.14 years and median disease duration of 2.5 years. As regard JIA type, 45% of patients were oligoarticular, 32.5% were polyarticular, and 22.5% were systemic JIA. Median JADAS 10 was 13.95. Patients (especially polyarticular JIA) had significantly higher serum RANKL levels and lower serum OPG and OPG/RANKL ratio when compared with controls (with p-value <0.001, 0.032 and <0.001 respectively). A diagnosis of low BMD (BMD Z-score ≤ -2) was given in 25% of patients (15% polyarticular and 10% systemic) by DXA of lumbar spine, and 20% (10% polyarticular and 10% systemic) by DXA of TBLH. On the other hand, no patient was given a diagnosis of osteoporosis (BMD Z-score ≤ -2 and a significant fracture history). Low BMD at lumbar spine and TBLH was negatively correlated with serum RANKL while positively correlated with OPG/RANKL ratio. Moreover, low BMD at lumbar spine was positively correlated with serum OPG level Conclusion High RANKL and low OPG levels appear to be associated with low bone mass in JIA patients. Patients with JIA (especially polyarticular and systemic subtype) are at increased risk of low bone mineral mass. Disclosure of Interests None declared