Validation of the French Versions of the Speech Handicap Index and the Phonation Handicap Index in Patients Treated for Cancer of the Oral Cavity or Oropharynx

Context: Nowadays, clinical tools are available to evaluate the functional impact of speech disorders in neurological conditions, but few are validated in oncology. Because of their location, cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract directly impact patients’ communication skills. Two questionnaires exist in French, the Speech Handicap Index (SHI) and the Phonation Handicap Index (PHI), but none are specifically validated for the head and neck cancer population. Our aim is to evaluate the validity of these 2 questionnaires in a population of patients treated for oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer. Material and Method: Eighty-seven patients treated for cancer of the oral cavity or oropharynx, and 21 controls filled in the questionnaires during a consultation or 1-day hospitalization. Validation was studied by the analysis of convergent and discriminant validity, clinical validity, criterion validity, and internal consistency. Results: The 2 questionnaires present a coherent structure in 2 distinct dimensions for the SHI, and in 3 dimensions for the PHI. Both tools discriminate patients and healthy subjects (p value <0.001, Mann-Whitney test). The comparison of the SHI and PHI scores with the “social role functioning” dimension of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 chosen as a reference shows similar performances for the 2 questionnaires (ρ > 0.42). Lastly, the internal consistency is good (Cronbach’s α > 0.71). Conclusion: In patients treated for oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer, the SHI and PHI are 2 valid and reliable tools for the self-assessment of speech disability. A limitation can be found about criterion validity, because a true gold standard does not exist at the moment. However, the reduced number of questions of the PHI, which implies a shorter completion, leads to prefer this tool over the SHI.

Download Full-text

PENGEMBANGAN SKALA LOCUS OF CONTROL

Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT ◽

10.36226/jrmb.v2i3.76 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2 (3) ◽

pp. 417-424

Author(s):

Hendryadi Hendryadi

Keyword(s):

Locus Of Control ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Short Form ◽

Employee Selection ◽

Future Research ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Control Scale ◽

Two Stages

This article aims to develop a short form of the locus of control scale. The study was conducted in two stages: a study of 66 respondents as pilot testing which aims to test content validity, structure validity, and internal consistency. Study 2 was conducted on 328 respondents used to test the validity and reliability of the scale evaluated by the PLS-SEM method (such as internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity). The analysis concludes that the 8-item locus of control scales tested have adequate validity and reliability. A short form locus of control scale was developed and validated in this study, so it can be used in future research and evaluation for HR management practitioners in employee selection Keywords: locus of control, EFA, CFA, scale construction

Download Full-text

Psychometric properties of the Motivation for Solitude Scale–Short Form in a sample of South African adolescents

South African Journal of Psychology ◽

10.1177/0081246317744391 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 49 (1) ◽

pp. 14-26

Author(s):

Esmarilda S Dankaert ◽

Tharina Guse ◽

Casper JJ van Zyl

Keyword(s):

Psychometric Properties ◽

South African ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Short Form ◽

Well Being ◽

Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽

Confirmatory Factor ◽

Best Fit

With expanding interest in the role of solitude in healthy psychological development during adolescence, there is a need for psychometrically sound solitude measures. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Motivation for Solitude Scale–Short Form by evaluating its internal consistency, factor structure, and convergent and discriminant validity using a group of South African adolescents ( n = 818). Results revealed satisfactory internal consistency for each of the two subscales, as well as good convergent and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor higher order model as providing the best fit. The Motivation for Solitude Scale–Short Form seems to be a valid measure of motivation for solitude among South African adolescents and provides an avenue for further research on the role of solitude in adolescent well-being.

Download Full-text

Translation and Validation of the Danish Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire

Global Spine Journal ◽

10.1177/2192568220947745 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 219256822094774

Author(s):

Jamal Bech Bouknaitir ◽

Leah Y. Carreon ◽

Stig Brorson ◽

Mikkel Østerheden Andersen

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Short Form ◽

Strong Association ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Floor Effect ◽

Specific Patient ◽

Danish Version ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Responsiveness To Change

Study Design: Validation study. Objectives: To translate and validate the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) into a Danish version of the disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), which assesses symptom severity, physical function, and satisfaction after surgery. Method: Translation into a Danish version of the original questionnaire by back- and forward-translating the questionnaire and finally transforming a prefinal test version into a final and cross-cultural adapted version. Validation was performed as a cohort study assessing floor-ceiling effects, internal consistency, test-retest reproducibility, criterion validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change. Results: Fifty-three patients were consecutively included in the study, 53 healthy controls were matched. Floor effect was seen in the postoperative data. Internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha was good to excellent. Substantial test-retest reproducibility was found using Cohen’s weighted kappa. The Danish ZCQ showed moderate to strong association with similar domains of Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form 36, Euro QoL 5D, visual analogue scale–leg and back. The questionnaire showed significant responsiveness to change and a significant discriminant validity between LSS patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: This study shows the Danish translation of the original ZCQ to be well understood by Danish patients. The Danish version is furthermore a reliable and valid questionnaire, which is responsive to change.

Download Full-text

Validation of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire

Multiple Sclerosis Journal ◽

10.1177/1352458507080733 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

pp. 219-230 ◽

Cited By ~ 91

Author(s):

MC Simeoni ◽

P. Auquier ◽

O. Fernandez ◽

P. Flachenecker ◽

S. Stecchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Multiple Sclerosis ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Short Form ◽

Life Questionnaire ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Quality Of Life Scale

This study aims to validate the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) International Quality of Life (MusiQoL) questionnaire, a multi-dimensional, self-administered questionnaire, available in 14 languages, as a disease-specific quality of life scale that can be applied internationally. A total of 1992 patients with different types and severities of MS from 15 countries were recruited. At baseline and day 21 ± 7, each patient completed the MusiQoL, a symptom checklist and the short-form (SF)-36 QoL questionnaire. Neurologists also collected socio-demographic, MS history and outcome data. The database was randomly divided into two subgroups and analysed according to different patient characteristics. For each model, psychometric properties were tested and the number of items was reduced by various statistical methods. Construct validity, internal consistency, reproducibility and external consistency were also tested. Nine dimensions, explaining 71% of the total variance, were isolated. Internal consistency and reproducibility were satisfactory for all the dimensions. External validity testing revealed that dimension scores correlated significantly with all SF-36 scores, but showed discriminant validity by gender, socio-economic and health status. Significant correlations were found between activity in daily life scores and clinical indices. These results demonstrate the validity and reliability of the MusiQoL as an international scale to evaluate QoL in patients with MS. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 219—230. http://msj.sagepub.com

Download Full-text

Development of a Short Form of the Treatment Evaluation Inventory for Acceptability of Psychological Interventions

Psychological Reports ◽

10.2466/pr0.94.2.475-481 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 94 (2) ◽

pp. 475-481 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

J. T. Newton ◽

P. Sturmey

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Short Form ◽

Full Scale ◽

Treatment Evaluation ◽

Psychological Interventions ◽

Scale Scores ◽

High Internal Consistency ◽

The Difference ◽

Evaluation Inventory

The Treatment Evaluation Inventory of Kazdin, French, and Sherick is a 19-item measure of the perceived acceptability of behavioural treatments. Development of two brief forms was based on data from two sources. For Study 1, data from 218 completed questionnaires were used to develop internally consistent brief scales. In Study 2 internal consistency and the validity of the brief forms were estimated for a set of 131 questionnaires. Item reduction was achieved by analysis of item-total minus item correlations. Brief forms with 3, 6, 9, and 12 items were proposed. Their internal consistency (Cronbach α) and construct validity were based on correlations of scores on each short form with the full scale scores and on comparing means of different forms. Discriminant validity was based on the difference between two groups (estimated effect size 0.7). Scores for all forms showed high internal consistency and correlated highly with total scale scores. Only the 12-item brief scale yielded mean scores similar to the full scale. The 3-item form could be used as a quick screen, and the 12-item form for more intensive purposes as it is most similar to the full-scale.

Download Full-text

Development and validation of a multi-lingual online questionnaire for surveying the COVID-19 prevention and control measures used in global workplaces

BMC Public Health ◽

10.1186/s12889-022-12500-w ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Carolyn Ingram ◽

Yanbing Chen ◽

Conor Buggy ◽

Vicky Downey ◽

Mary Archibald ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Construct Validity ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Content Validity ◽

Prevention And Control ◽

Online Survey ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Internal Consistency Reliability ◽

Criterion Validity ◽

And Control ◽

Occupational Settings

Abstract Background Despite widespread COVID-19 vaccination programs, there is an ongoing need for targeted disease prevention and control efforts in high-risk occupational settings. This study aimed to develop, pilot, and validate an instrument for surveying occupational COVID-19 infection prevention and control (IPC) measures available to workers in diverse geographic and occupational settings. Methods A 44-item online survey was developed in English and validated for face and content validity according to literature review, expert consultation, and pre-testing. The survey was translated and piloted with 890 workers from diverse industries in Canada, Ireland, Argentina, Poland, Nigeria, China, the US, and the UK. Odds ratios generated from univariable, and multivariable logistic regression assessed differences in ‘feeling protected at work’ according to gender, age, occupation, country of residence, professional role, and vaccination status. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted, and internal consistency reliability verified with Cronbach’s alpha. Hypothesis testing using two-sample t-tests verified construct validity (i.e., discriminant validity, known-groups technique), and criterion validity. Results After adjustment for occupational sector, characteristics associated with feeling protected at work included being male (AOR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.18,2.99), being over 55 (AOR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.25,3.77) and working in a managerial position (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.99,4.83). EFA revealed nine key IPC domains relating to: environmental adjustments, testing and surveillance, education, costs incurred, restricted movements, physical distancing, masking, isolation strategies, and areas for improvement. Each domain showed sufficient internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.60). Hypothesis testing revealed differences in survey responses by country and occupational sector, confirming construct validity (p < 0.001), criterion validity (p = 0.04), and discriminant validity (p < 0.001). Conclusions The online survey, developed in English to identify the COVID-19 protective measures used in diverse workplace settings, showed strong face validity, content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, and construct validity. Translations in Chinese, Spanish, French, Polish, and Hindi demonstrated adaptability of the survey for use in international working environments. The multi-lingual tool can be used by decision makers in the distribution of IPC resources, and to guide occupational safety and health (OSH) recommendations for preventing COVID-19 and future infectious disease outbreaks.

Download Full-text

An Indonesian Version of Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Short Form 19 (COHIP-SF19): Assessing Validity and Reliability

Journal of Dentistry Indonesia ◽

10.14693/jdi.v28i1.1247 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 28 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Siti L. Nuraini ◽

◽

Anton Rahardjo ◽

Diah Ayu Maharan ◽

◽

...

Keyword(s):

Oral Health ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Short Form ◽

Health Impact ◽

P Value ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Child Oral Health

Previous surveys have indicated that the majority of Indonesian children have poor oral health. However, scant information is available on children’s oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL). The purpose of this study was to assess reliability as well as discriminant and convergent validity of Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Short Form 19 (COHIP-SF 19) Indonesian version. Methods: The Indonesian version of COHIP-SF 19 was developed according to the guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation process. The instrument was tested among 529 children between 12 – 15 years old who were randomly selected from six junior high schools in Jakarta. The psychometric testing included internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity, and convergent validity. Results: Mean age of the participants was 13.3±0.9 years and 54% of the participants were female. The mean COHIP-SF 19 score was 57.8±8.8 and the median was 58 (range 27 – 75). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability was excellent for COHIP-SF 19 score with Chronbach’s alpha 0.83 and intra-class correlation coefficient 0.81. Children with active decay, untreated caries with pulpal involvement, and gingivitis had significantly lower COHIP-SF 19 scores (p-value ≤ 0.030). Correlation between COHIP-SF 19 score, subscale scores and clinical severity as well as self-rated general or oral health were very low to low (rs = 0.04 – 0.27, p-value ≤ 0.028), after adjustment for children’s age and gender. Conclusions: The Indonesian version of COHIP-SF 19 was successfully developed to be used as an OHRQoL instrument for Indonesian school-age children. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity, and convergent validity of COHIP-SF 19 Indonesian version were confirmed

Download Full-text

Hindi LupusPRO: cross cultural validation of disease specific patient reported outcome measure of lupus

Lupus ◽

10.1177/0961203319880340 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 28 (13) ◽

pp. 1534-1540 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

B Pinto ◽

M Jolly ◽

A Dhooria ◽

S Grover ◽

J M Raj ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Activity ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Emotional Health ◽

Short Form ◽

Internal Consistency Reliability ◽

Criterion Validity ◽

Specific Patient ◽

Group Validity ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Patient Reported

Background LupusPRO is a SLE specific patient reported outcomes measure developed and validated in the USA. This study aimed to validate the Hindi version of LupusPRO in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in India. Methods Disease activity and damage were assessed using SELENA–SLEDAI and SLICC/ACR damage Index respectively. Demographic and clinical features were recorded. The Hindi Version of LupusPRO and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered for assessment of quality of life. Depression, anxiety and fatigue were assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD7) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) respectively. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity (against corresponding domains of the SF-36, fatigue, depression and anxiety), criterion validity (against disease activity and damage) and known group validity were tested. Results A total of 144 (140 females) patients with SLE with a mean age of 32.48 ± 7.26 years participated in the study. The median (interquartile range) SELENA SLEDAI was 2 (5.5). The internal consistency reliability of the LupusPRO domains was >0.7 for most domains (except for lupus symptoms, lupus medication, procreation and social support).We noted good convergent validity of LupusPRO domains with corresponding domains of SF-36, pain vitality with fatigue (FSS) and emotional health domain with depression (PHQ9) and anxiety (GAD7). Criterion validity of lupus symptoms with disease activity was observed. Known group validity of the LupusPRO domains with patient reported health status was observed. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. Conclusion The Hindi LupusPRO has fair psychometric properties among Indian patients with SLE.

Download Full-text

Factor Structure, Internal Consistency and Criterion Validity of the Full-form and Short-form Versions of the Centrality of Events Scale in Young People

Applied Cognitive Psychology ◽

10.1002/acp.3369 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 31 (6) ◽

pp. 662-667

Author(s):

Santiago Galán ◽

Elena Castarlenas ◽

Mélanie Racine ◽

Elisabet Sánchez-Rodríguez ◽

Catarina Tomé-Pires ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Young People ◽

Factor Structure ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Short Form ◽

Criterion Validity ◽

Full Form

Download Full-text

Validation of the German version of the work and social adjustment scale in a sample of depressed patients

BMC Health Services Research ◽

10.1186/s12913-021-06622-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

A. Heissel ◽

J. Bollmann ◽

M. Kangas ◽

K. Abdulla ◽

M. Rapp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psychometric Properties ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Social Adjustment ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Mental Health Problems ◽

Criterion Validity ◽

German Language ◽

German Version ◽

Ceiling Effects

Abstract Background Depression is one of the key factors contributing to difficulties in one’s ability to work, and serves as one of the major reasons why employees apply for psychotherapy and receive insurance subsidization of treatments. Hence, an increasing and growing number of studies rely on workability assessment scales as their primary outcome measure. The Work and Social Assessment Scale (WSAS) has been documented as one of the most psychometrically reliable and valid tools especially developed to assess workability and social functioning in patients with mental health problems. Yet, the application of the WSAS in Germany has been limited due to the paucity of a valid questionnaire in the German language. The objective of the present study was to translate the WSAS, as a brief and easy administrable tool into German and test its psychometric properties in a sample of adults with depression. Methods Two hundred seventy-seven patients (M = 48.3 years, SD = 11.1) with mild to moderately severe depression were recruited. A multistep translation from English into the German language was performed and the factorial validity, criterion validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and floor and ceiling effects were examined. Results The confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed the one-factor structure of the WSAS. Significant correlations with the WHODAS 2–0 questionnaire, a measure of functionality, demonstrated good convergent validity. Significant correlations with depression and quality of life demonstrated good criterion validity. The WSAS also demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .89), and the absence of floor and ceiling effects indicated good sensitivity of the instrument. Conclusions The results of the present study demonstrated that the German version of the WSAS has good psychometric properties comparable to other international versions of this scale. The findings recommend a global assessment of psychosocial functioning with the sum score of the WSAS. Trial registration ISRCTN identifier: ISRCTN28972230. Date of registration June 26th 2018.

Download Full-text