scholarly journals Prolonged Weaning: S2k Guideline Published by the German Respiratory Society

Respiration ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-102
Author(s):  
Bernd Schönhofer ◽  
Jens Geiseler ◽  
Dominic Dellweg ◽  
Hans Fuchs ◽  
Onnen Moerer ◽  
...  

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an essential part of modern intensive care medicine. MV is performed in patients with severe respiratory failure caused by respiratory muscle insufficiency and/or lung parenchymal disease; that is, when other treatments such as medication, oxygen administration, secretion management, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or nasal high-flow therapy have failed. MV is required for maintaining gas exchange and allows more time to curatively treat the underlying cause of respiratory failure. In the majority of ventilated patients, liberation or “weaning” from MV is routine, without the occurrence of any major problems. However, approximately 20% of patients require ongoing MV, despite amelioration of the conditions that precipitated the need for it in the first place. Approximately 40–50% of the time spent on MV is required to liberate the patient from the ventilator, a process called “weaning”. In addition to acute respiratory failure, numerous factors can influence the duration and success rate of the weaning process; these include age, comorbidities, and conditions and complications acquired during the ICU stay. According to international consensus, “prolonged weaning” is defined as the weaning process in patients who have failed at least 3 weaning attempts, or require more than 7 days of weaning after the first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Given that prolonged weaning is a complex process, an interdisciplinary approach is essential for it to be successful. In specialised weaning centres, approximately 50% of patients with initial weaning failure can be liberated from MV after prolonged weaning. However, the heterogeneity of patients undergoing prolonged weaning precludes the direct comparison of individual centres. Patients with persistent weaning failure either die during the weaning process, or are discharged back to their home or to a long-term care facility with ongoing MV. Urged by the growing importance of prolonged weaning, this Sk2 Guideline was first published in 2014 as an initiative of the German Respiratory Society (DGP), in conjunction with other scientific societies involved in prolonged weaning. The emergence of new research, clinical study findings and registry data, as well as the accumulation of experience in daily practice, have made the revision of this guideline necessary. The following topics are dealt with in the present guideline: Definitions, epidemiology, weaning categories, underlying pathophysiology, prevention of prolonged weaning, treatment strategies in prolonged weaning, the weaning unit, discharge from hospital on MV, and recommendations for end-of-life decisions. Special emphasis was placed on the following themes: (1) A new classification of patient sub-groups in prolonged weaning. (2) Important aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation and neurorehabilitation in prolonged weaning. (3) Infrastructure and process organisation in the care of patients in prolonged weaning based on a continuous treatment concept. (4) Changes in therapeutic goals and communication with relatives. Aspects of paediatric weaning are addressed separately within individual chapters. The main aim of the revised guideline was to summarize both current evidence and expert-based knowledge on the topic of “prolonged weaning”, and to use this information as a foundation for formulating recommendations related to “prolonged weaning”, not only in acute medicine but also in the field of chronic intensive care medicine. The following professionals served as important addressees for this guideline: intensivists, pulmonary medicine specialists, anaesthesiologists, internists, cardiologists, surgeons, neurologists, paediatricians, geriatricians, palliative care clinicians, rehabilitation physicians, intensive/chronic care nurses, physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, speech therapists, medical service of health insurance, and associated ventilator manufacturers.

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Andrews ◽  
Elie Azoulay ◽  
Massimo Antonelli ◽  
Laurent Brochard ◽  
Christian Brun-Buisson ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K. Warren ◽  
Anand Nitin ◽  
Cheri Hill ◽  
Victoria J. Fraser ◽  
Marin H. Kollef

AbstractObjective:To determine the occurrence of co-colonization or co-infection with VRE and MRSA among medical patients requiring intensive care.Design:Prospective, single-center, observational study.Setting:A 19-bed medical ICU in an urban teaching hospital.Patients:Adult patients requiring at least 48 hours of intensive care and having at least one culture performed for microbiologie evaluation.Results:Eight hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients were evaluated. Of these patients, 402 (45.8%) did not have microbiologie evidence of colonization or infection with either VRE or MRSA 355 (40.4%) were colonized or infected with VRE, 38 (4.3%) were colonized or infected with MRSA, and 83 (9.5%) had co-colonization or co-infection with VRE and MRSA. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that increasing age, hospitalization during the preceding 6 months, and admission to a long-term-care facility were independently associated with colonization or infection due to VRE and co-colonization or co-infection with VRE and MRSA. The distributions of positive culture sites for VRE (stool, 86.7%; blood, 6.5%; urine, 4.8%; soft tissue or wound, 2.0%) and for MRSA (respiratory secretions, 34.1%; blood, 32.6%; urine, 17.1%; soft tissue or wound, 16.2%) were statistically different (P< .001).Conclusions:Co-colonization or co-infection with VRE and MRSA is common among medical patients requiring intensive care. The recent emergence of vancomycin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusand the presence of a patient population co-colonized or co-infected with VRE and MRSA support the need for aggressive infection control measures in the ICU.


2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Andrews ◽  
Elie Azoulay ◽  
Massimo Antonelli ◽  
Laurent Brochard ◽  
Christian Brun-Buisson ◽  
...  

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Dres ◽  
Boris Jung ◽  
Nicolas Molinari ◽  
Federico Manna ◽  
Bruno-Pierre Dubé ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) and ICU-acquired diaphragm dysfunction (ICU-DD) occur frequently in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients. It is unknown whether they have different risk factors and different impacts on outcome. This study was designed to (1) describe the respective risk factors associated with ICU-AW and severe ICU-DD and (2) evaluate the respective impact of ICU-AW and severe ICU-DD on outcome. Methods Post hoc analysis of two prospective cohort studies conducted in two ICUs. In patients mechanically ventilated for at least 24 h undergoing a first spontaneous breathing trial, severe ICU-DD was defined as diaphragm twitch pressure < 7 cmH2O and ICU-AW was defined as Medical Research Council Score < 48. Results One hundred sixteen patients were assessed. Factors independently associated with severe ICU-DD were age, longer duration of MV, and exposure to sufentanil, and those factors associated with ICU-AW were longer duration of MV and exposure to norepinephrine. Severe ICU-DD (OR 3.56, p = 0.008), but not ICU-AW, was independently associated with weaning failure (59%). ICU-AW (OR 4.30, p = 0.033), but not severe ICU-DD, was associated with ICU mortality. Weaning failure and mortality rate were higher in patients with both severe ICU-DD and ICU-AW (86% and 39%, respectively) than in patients with either severe ICU-DD (64% and 0%) or ICU-AW (63% and 13%). Conclusion Severe ICU-DD and ICU-AW have different risk factors and different impacts on weaning failure and mortality. The impact of the combination of ICU-DD and ICU-AW is more pronounced than their individual impact.


Intensive care medicine 294 Mechanical ventilation 295 Intensive care medicine is the branch of medicine that deals with acute organ failure requiring invasive supportive therapies. It involves patient care in many settings, and the more general term ‘critical care’ is often preferred. Very often several organs are failing at the same time. Drugs and mechanical support are now available for multiple organ systems, the oldest of which is mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure....


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document