scholarly journals Combination of HAI-FUDR and Systemic Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Dose Finding Single Center Study

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 300-309
Author(s):  
Heike Pietge ◽  
Patricia Sánchez-Velázquez ◽  
Dilara Akhoundova ◽  
Alexander Siebenhüner ◽  
Thomas Winder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Tract Infections

Background: Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma has a poor prognosis and treatment options are limited. Combined systemic and intrahepatic chemotherapy may improve local control and enable downsizing. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous gemcitabine combined with intravenous cisplatin and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with floxuridine (FUDR) in patients with unresectable intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: Twelve patients were treated within a 3 + 3 dose escalation algorithm with 600, 800, or 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and predefined doses of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, q21, for 4 cycles, and FUDR 0.2 mg/kg on days 1–14 as continuous HAI, q28, for 3 cycles. Safety and toxicity as well as resectability rates after 3 months and preliminary survival data are reported. Results: The determined MTD for gemcitabine was 800 mg/m2. Dose limiting toxicities were neutropenic fever and biliary tract infections. In total, 27% of the patients showed partial remission and 73% stable disease. Although none of the patients achieved resectability after 3 months, the 3-year overall survival rate was 33%, median overall survival 23.9 months (range 1–49), and median progression-free survival 10.1 months (range 2–40). Conclusions: Intravenous gemcitabine/cisplatin plus HAI-FUDR is feasible and appears effective for disease control. Larger prospective studies evaluating this triplet combination are warranted.

Downstaging of unresectable intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocellular carcinoma by selective intra-arterial floxuridine and systemic cisplatin and gemcitabine. A dose finding single center phase IIa study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 478-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Pietge
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Palliative Systemic Chemotherapy

478 Background: Patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinomas (CCC) have a poor prognosis even if palliative systemic chemotherapy is offered. A combined approach of systemic and intrahepatic chemotherapy may improve local control rates and allow downstaging. The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of systemic intravenous gemcitabine in combination with intravenous cisplatin and hepatic arterial infusion with floxuridine in patients with unresectable intrahepatic or hilar CCC. Safety, toxicity, response rates and resectability rates after 3 months of combination treatment are reported. Methods: 12 patients were treated within a 3+3 dose escalation algorithm with 600, 800 or 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and a fixed dose of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 systemic chemotherapy on day 1, 8 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles and floxuridine 0,2 mg/kg on day 1-14 continous hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy every 4 weeks for 3 cycles. PET/CT and/or CT scan was performed after 12 weeks. Results: The MTD of gemcitabine was 800 mg/m2 in this setting. Dose-limiting toxicities were recurrent biliary tract infections (n = 1) and neutropenic fever (n = 1). Response rates were: 27% partial remission and 73% stable disease. Although none of the patients achieved resectability after 3 months, 3-year-overall survival (OS) was 33%, median OS 21,9 months (1-49) and median progression-free survival 10,5 months (2-40). Conclusions: Combination of systemic gemcitabine and cisplatin plus intraarterial floxuridine is feasible and appears effective in disease control, but achievement of resectability seems challenging. Randomized trials comparing this combination to gemcitabine/cisplatin alone are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01692704.

scholarly journals Assessment of the results and the haematologic side effects of the 3D conformal and the IMRT/ARC therapies delivered during the craniospinal irradiation of childhood tumors, in a follow-up period of 5 years

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Lőcsei ◽  
Róbert Farkas ◽  
Kornélia Borbásné Farkas ◽  
Klára Sebestyén ◽  
Zsolt Sebestyén ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Craniospinal Irradiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Childhood Tumors

Abstract Objectives The craniospinal irradiation (CSI) of childhood tumors with Rapidarc technique is a new way of treatment. Our objective was to compare the acute haematologic toxicity pattern during 3D conformal radiotherapy with the application of the novel techniques. Materials and methods Data from patients treated between 2007 and 2014 has been collected and seven patients were identified in each of both treatment groups. The acute blood toxicity results were obtained, after establishing a general linear model, by using the SPSS software. Furthermore, the dose exposure of the organs-at-risk has been compared. Patients have been followed-up for a minimum of five years, then progression-free survival and overall survival data were assessed. Results After the assessment of the laboratory parameters of the two groups, it may be concluded that no significant differences were detected in terms of the mean dose exposures of the normal tissues or the acute hematological side-effects during the IMRT/ARC and the 3D conformal treatment. Laboratory parameters significantly decreased compared to the baseline values during the treatment weeks. Nevertheless, no significant differences were detected between the two groups. No remarkable differences were confirmed between the two groups regarding the five-year progression-free survival and overall survival, and no signs of serious irradiation organ toxicity were observed during the follow-up period in either of the groups. Conclusion Rapidarc technique can be used safely even for the treatment of childhood tumors, as the extent of normal tissue dose exposures and that of acute hematological side effects is not higher.

Metastatic and unresectable biliary tract tumors: A single-center retrospective review.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14733-e14733
Author(s):  
Maria Vieito ◽  
Nieves Martinez Lago ◽  
Santiago Aguin Losada ◽  
Rafael Lopez ◽  
Sonia Candamio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Electronic ◽  
Oncology Unit

e14733 Background: Biliary tract tumours are rare and often poor prognosis cancers that comprise cholangiocarcinomas, ampullary tumours and gallbladder cancers. Methods: Medical Electronic Records for patients diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2010 and treated at a medical oncology unit were reviewed, and clinical and epidemiological data for patients were retrieved. Results: We have found 28 patients with a distribution with a clear majority of men (60%), with a median age of 66 years (range 45-80).Patients were mostly metastatic (85%) at diagnosis and the majority of patients had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (60%) as diagnosis and debuted with large intrahepatic masses and metastatic disease.Those with tumours arising outside the liver (40%) had obstructive jaundice (28%) or cholangitis (26%) at diagnosis and needed in most cases biliary stenting (33%).Six patients had PS2 at diagnosis and received gemcitabine monotherapy. Only one patient remaining progression free at 6 months and none of them received treatment at progression, the mean PFS was of 5.3 months and the OS was of 8.3 months.Of 22 patients with good performance status, 12 of them with a mean age of 60 years received polychemotherapy with GEMOX or CDDP-gem with PFS of 7. 3 months and OS of 12. 3 months.The other 10 patients (with a mean age of 65 years) received gemcitabine as monotherapy with a PFS of 7. 9 months and a OS of 11. 4 months.Eight patients were treated with second line therapy with no responses and a mean of PFS of 2 months, OS was not superior to patients who did not receive second line treatment. Conclusion: Our patients with biliary tract tumours had a mean progression free survival of 8.2 months and a mean overall survival of 12.3 months with 5 patients remaining progression free more than 20 months after beginning treatment. This survival data are compatible with those reported in recent clinical trials although we did not find improvements in survival with polychemotherapy and second line therapies. Conclusions: Taken as a whole our patients with biliary tract tumours had a mean progression free survival of 8.2 months and a mean overall survival of 12.3 months with 5 patients remaining progression free more than 20 months after beginning treatment.

A retrospective study of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) FUDR/Dex and mitomycin C (MMC) for chemotherapy refractory unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 432-432
Author(s):  
Gustavo Dos Santos Fernandes ◽  
Nancy E. Kemeny ◽  
Haley Hauser ◽  
James J. Harding ◽  
Thomas Boerner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Genomic Alteration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Localized Disease ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs

432 Background: ICC are aggressive tumors with approximately 6,000 cases a year in US. The 5-year survival rate is less than 30% even for localized disease. There is only one approved line of systemic (SYS) treatment and further treatment options are necessary. HAI chemotherapy is an option to treat liver predominant cancers. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed patients (pts) with ICC chemo refractory unresectable liver limited (LL) or liver dominant (LD) disease who received intrahepatic chemotherapy with HAI MMC. Baseline characteristics, previous lines of therapy, toxicity profile, combinations and radiographic responses were reviewed. Tumor genomic analyses were performed on samples using an on-site next generation sequencing (NGS) assay. Results: Between January 2011 and October 2018, 19 patients ICC with LL or LD disease were treated with HAI FUDR/Dex/MMC at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Disease was confined to the liver in 58% of the pts. All pts had previous chemotherapy (1-4 lines) and 14 (74%) previously had HAI FUDR/Dex. Of the 19 pts, 56% had HAI with FUDR/Dex and MMC, 43% had FUDR/Dex, MCC and SYS and 5% had HAI MMC and SYS. Seventeen patients were evaluable for response, two are being treated and will have response assessment for the meeting. Response was noted in 4 (23.5%), stable disease in 6 (35.5%) and progressive disease in 7 (41%) pts. Median overall survival from treatment was 6.1months (0.36-26). Median progression free survival was 3.65 months (0.36-9.53). Four patients had dose reductions. Common toxicity attributed to MMC was grade (G) one fatigue (32%), thrombocytopenia G1(16%) and G2 (5%). Of the 12 tumors analyzed to date the most 92% of tumors harbored at least one (0-10) genomic alteration. Common genomic alterations were ARID1 (25%), RASA1 (25%), IDH1(16.6%), NTRK (16.6%), TERT (16.6%), NRAS (16.6%), CDKN2 (16. 6%). FGFR2-FOXP1 and GTL2MEt fusions were found in one patient each. Conclusions: HAI FUDR/Dex/MMC containing regimens are active in pts with heavily pretreated refractory unresectable ICC. This strategy should be further investigated. Translational data will be presented.

Phase Ib with expansion study of olaparib plus weekly (Metronomic) carboplatin and paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saul Eugene Rivkin ◽  
James Moon ◽  
Desiree S Iriarte ◽  
Erik Bailey ◽  
Heather L Sloan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Serous Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Experienced Grade

ObjectiveOur goals were to: establish the maximum-tolerated dose of olaparib tablets combined with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with relapsed high-grade serous ovarian cancer; evaluate dose-limiting toxicities; and evaluate efficacy at the maximum tolerated dose.MethodsIn this open-label, single-arm, investigator-initiated trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01650376), patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer who failed primary platinum and taxane therapy received oral olaparib tablets twice daily days 1–3 each week combined with fixed-dose metronomic carboplatin AUC2 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks. A 3 × 3 design was used to determine the olaparib maximum tolerated dose. Combination therapy continued until disease progression, but patients with partial or complete response were transitioned to olaparib maintenance therapy. All patients were included in the analysis.ResultsThe maximum tolerated dose of olaparib tablets was 150 mg twice daily with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel. 54 women were enrolled, 14 in phase Ib and 40 in the expansion phase. The median number of prior therapeutic regimens was 3. Response included 13 complete remission (24%) and 16 partial remission (30%) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) for an overall response rate of 54% (95% CI 40% to 67%). Of 47 patients who underwent BRCA testing, 23 were BRCA mutation (BRCAm) and 24 BRCA wild type (BRCAwt). Progression-free survival for BRCAm was 12.1 months versus 4.8 for BRCAwt (p=0.0001). Median overall survival for BRCAm was 24.1 months versus 10.4 months for BRCAwt (p=0.02). 42 patients (78%) experienced grade 3–4 toxicities with combination therapy; the most common were hematologic. There were no treatment related deaths. Among 14 patients who received maintenance therapy, 7 experienced grade 1–2 non-hematologic toxicities.ConclusionsOlaparib 150 mg tablet twice daily can be safely administered in combination with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel in pre-treated relapsed ovarian cancer with 24% complete remission. BRCAm patients had statistically significant longer progression-free survival and overall survival than BRCAwt.Trial registration numberNCT01650376.

scholarly journals Relationship of Circulating Tumor Cells to Tumor Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3213-3221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Cohen ◽  
Cornelis J.A. Punt ◽  
Nicholas Iannotti ◽  
Bruce H. Saidman ◽  
Kert D. Sabbath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immunomagnetic Separation ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeAs treatment options expand for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a blood marker with a prognostic and predictive role could guide treatment. We tested the hypothesis that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC.Patients and MethodsIn a prospective multicenter study, CTCs were enumerated in the peripheral blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and after starting first-, second-, or third-line therapy. CTCs were measured using an immunomagnetic separation technique.ResultsPatients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of three or more or less than three CTCs/7.5 mL, respectively. Patients with unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs had shorter median progression-free survival (PFS; 4.5 v 7.9 months; P = .0002) and overall survival (OS; 9.4 v 18.5 months; P < .0001). Differences persisted at 1 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 20 weeks after therapy. Conversion of baseline unfavorable CTCs to favorable at 3 to 5 weeks was associated with significantly longer PFS and OS compared with patients with unfavorable CTCs at both time points (PFS, 6.2 v 1.6 months; P = .02; OS, 11.0 v 3.7 months; P = .0002). Among nonprogressing patients, favorable compared with unfavorable CTCs within 1 month of imaging was associated with longer survival (18.8 v 7.1 months; P < .0001). Baseline and follow-up CTC levels remained strong predictors of PFS and OS after adjustment for clinically significant factors.ConclusionThe number of CTCs before and during treatment is an independent predictor of PFS and OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. CTCs provide prognostic information in addition to that of imaging studies.

scholarly journals RADT-26. LASER INTERSTITIAL THERMAL THERAPY FOR RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: POOLED ANALYSES OF AVAILABLE LITERATURE

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii187-ii187
Author(s):  
Amanda Munoz Casabella ◽  
Masum Rahman ◽  
Mohammed Alvi ◽  
Desmond Brown
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Yttrium Aluminum Garnet ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Thermal Therapy ◽  
Fe Model ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy

Abstract INTRODUCTION Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) is a novel treatment modality that has been used for an array of intracranial pathology. In the current manuscript, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize all available literature to date, on outcomes of patients with recurrent GBM (r-GBM) undergoing LITT, pooling together quantitatively the overall survival and progression-free survival data. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed to retrieve all studies investigating overall survival, post-procedure survival, and progression-free survival outcomes of patients with r-GBM undergoing LITT. All statistics were pooled together by the meta-analysis of the mean using a weighted random-effects (RE) or fixed-effect (FE) model. RESULTS Eleven studies were included in the final cohort, representing a total of 134 patients with rGBM. The pooled mean age of the cohort at the time of recurrence diagnosis was found to be 56.7 ± 4.56 while 41% of the cohort were females. For the delivery of LITT, two studies utilized neodymium-yttrium aluminum-garnet laser (Neodp-YAG Laser), three studies utilized the Visualase system, five studies utilized the Neuroblate system, and one study used both the Neuroblate and the Visualase system. A total of eight studies with 107 patients had available data for overall median survival. The pooled overall survival was found to be 18.6 months (95%CI 16.2-21.1). A total of six studies with 93 patients had available data for post-LITT survival. The pooled post-LITT survival was found to be 10.1 months (95%CI 8.8-11.6). A total of eight studies with 119 patients had available data for progression-free survival. The pooled progression-free survival was found to be 6 months (95%CI 5.3-6.7). CONCLUSION LITT is a novel minimally invasive procedure which, when used with optimal adjuvant therapy, may confer survival benefit for patients with r-GBM.

scholarly journals Dynamic expression of 11 miRNAs in 83 consecutive primary and corresponding recurrent glioblastoma: correlation to treatment, time to recurrence, overall survival and MGMT methylation status

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bostjan Matos ◽  
Emanuela Bostjancic ◽  
Alenka Matjasic ◽  
Mara Popovic ◽  
Damjan Glavac
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Recurrent Tumor ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and the most malignant glioma subtype. Among numerous genetic alterations, miRNAs contribute to pathogenesis of GBM and it is suggested that also to GBM recurrence and resistance to therapy. Based on publications, we have selected 11 miRNAs and analyzed their expression in GBM. We hypothesized that selected miRNAs are differentially expressed and involved in primary as well as in recurrent GBM, that show significant expressional differences when different treatment options are in question, and that are related to certain patients and tumor characteristics. Patients and methods Paraffin embedded tissues, obtained from primary and corresponding recurrent tumor from 83 patients with primary GBM were used. Eleven miRNAs (miR-7, miR-9, miR-15b, miR-21, miR-26b, miR-124a, miR-199a, let-7a, let-7b, let-7d, and let-7f) were selected for qPCR expression analysis. For patients who received temozolamide (TMZ) as chemotherapeutic drug, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status was defined using the methyl-specific PCR. Results There was a significant change in expression of miR-7, miR-9, miR-21, miR-26b, mirR-124a, miR-199a and let-7f in recurrent tumor compared to the primary. In recurrent tumor, miR-15b, let-7d and let-7f significantly changed comparing both treatment options. We also observed difference in progression free survival between patients that received radiotherapy and patients that received radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and longer survival for patients who received chemotherapy after second surgery compared to not treated patients. miR-26b showed correlation to progression free survival and let-7f to overall survival. We did not find any expression difference between the tumors with and without methylated MGMT. Conclusions Our data suggest that analyzed miRNAs may not only contribute to pathogenesis of primary GBM, but also to tumor progression and its recurrence. Moreover, expression of certain miRNAs appears to be therapy-dependent and as such they might serve as additional biomarker for recurrence prediction and potentially predict a therapy-resistance.

OP136 Clinical Benefit Of Oncological Therapies At The Time Of Approval

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Nicole Grössmann ◽  
Claudia Wild
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Marketing Authorization ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Horizon Scanning

INTRODUCTION:In the last decade an increasing number of high-priced, new cancer treatments received marketing authorization in Europe. What is actually known about the clinical benefit of those therapies at the time of approval needs to be elucidated in order to inform decisions about the use and reimbursement of these novel treatment options. Thus, the aim of the current analysis was to systematically investigate oncological therapies approved between January 2009 and April 2016. We extracted, as well as quantified the level of knowledge of the clinical benefit at the time of marketing authorization.METHODS:To assess the benefit of new interventions as well as expanded indications, we extracted the median gain of the two study endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Information is based on approval documents provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and assessments from the Austrian Horizon Scanning programme (HSO). We included all cancer therapies approved in Europe between 1 January 2009 and 15 April 2016.RESULTS:Cancer drugs for 134 new indications approved since 2009 were identified. In the case of thirty-seven indications (27 percent), no data was available for PFS or for OS. A positive difference in median overall survival was reached by seventy-six licensed indications (55.5 percent); twenty-two (16 percent) of them showed a difference of more than three months. Regarding the study endpoint progression-free survival, an improvement was shown in ninety indications (65.2 percent).CONCLUSIONS:Scarce knowledge regarding the clinical benefit of anti-cancer therapies is available at the time of approval. In addition, the survival benefit of the approved indications is less than three months in the majority of approved therapies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document