Metastatic and unresectable biliary tract tumors: A single-center retrospective review.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14733-e14733
Author(s):  
Maria Vieito ◽  
Nieves Martinez Lago ◽  
Santiago Aguin Losada ◽  
Rafael Lopez ◽  
Sonia Candamio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Electronic ◽  
Oncology Unit

e14733 Background: Biliary tract tumours are rare and often poor prognosis cancers that comprise cholangiocarcinomas, ampullary tumours and gallbladder cancers. Methods: Medical Electronic Records for patients diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2010 and treated at a medical oncology unit were reviewed, and clinical and epidemiological data for patients were retrieved. Results: We have found 28 patients with a distribution with a clear majority of men (60%), with a median age of 66 years (range 45-80).Patients were mostly metastatic (85%) at diagnosis and the majority of patients had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (60%) as diagnosis and debuted with large intrahepatic masses and metastatic disease.Those with tumours arising outside the liver (40%) had obstructive jaundice (28%) or cholangitis (26%) at diagnosis and needed in most cases biliary stenting (33%).Six patients had PS2 at diagnosis and received gemcitabine monotherapy. Only one patient remaining progression free at 6 months and none of them received treatment at progression, the mean PFS was of 5.3 months and the OS was of 8.3 months.Of 22 patients with good performance status, 12 of them with a mean age of 60 years received polychemotherapy with GEMOX or CDDP-gem with PFS of 7. 3 months and OS of 12. 3 months.The other 10 patients (with a mean age of 65 years) received gemcitabine as monotherapy with a PFS of 7. 9 months and a OS of 11. 4 months.Eight patients were treated with second line therapy with no responses and a mean of PFS of 2 months, OS was not superior to patients who did not receive second line treatment. Conclusion: Our patients with biliary tract tumours had a mean progression free survival of 8.2 months and a mean overall survival of 12.3 months with 5 patients remaining progression free more than 20 months after beginning treatment. This survival data are compatible with those reported in recent clinical trials although we did not find improvements in survival with polychemotherapy and second line therapies. Conclusions: Taken as a whole our patients with biliary tract tumours had a mean progression free survival of 8.2 months and a mean overall survival of 12.3 months with 5 patients remaining progression free more than 20 months after beginning treatment.

Case review for ramucirumab as a single agent in our hospital.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 52-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Murahashi ◽  
Daisuke Takahari
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Free Survival

52 Background: Ramucirumab is approved in the USA, EU, and Japan as second-line treatment in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This agent is often used with paclitaxel, but we can use it as a single agent in second-line treatment. Because REGARD trial has shown that Ramucirumab as a single agent prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival. However, this trial doesn’t include Japanese patients, and we have no trial concerning the efficacy of Ramucirumab as third or later-line treatment up to date. We reviewed retrospectively the efficacy and safety of Ramucirumab as a single agent in our hospital. Methods: We investigated 12 cases from June (when Ramucirumab has been approved) to September. Results: The median age was 61 years old, 6 male and 6 female patients. Performance status (0/1/2) = (1/10/1) cases. (second/third/fourth or later)-lines = (4/4/4) cases. Metastatic sites are lymph node, liver, lung, bone, and peritoneum. 7 patients had gastrectomy and 5 patients of them received adjuvant chemotherapy. Response rate is 50%, median progressive-free survival is 51 days, and median overall survival is 13 months. Some patients experienced grade 1or 2 adverse events: fatigue, loss of appetite, diarrhea, and hypertension. Conclusions: We cannot say that single agent administration of Ramucirumab demonstrates good response, some patients kept stable disease in this regimen. Ramucirumab as a single agent can be an option of treatments after paclitaxel fails or when it is difficult to administrate it.

Efficacy and prognostic significance of triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin and irinotecan based chemotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: An observational multicenter study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15586-e15586
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alghamdi ◽  
Shouki Bazarbashi ◽  
Elsamany Shereef ◽  
Mervat Mahrous ◽  
Omar Al shaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

e15586 Background: In Saudi Arabia, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increased over the past few years. The optimal treatment beyond the second line is not fully understood. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and disease outcomes of triflurodine/tipiracil in Saudi patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) has not been studied yet. Our study is a real-life practice evaluation of the efficacy of triflurodine/tipiracil in patients with refractory mCRC. Moreover, the prognosis and the prognostic significance of the different clinical variables have been analyzed. Methods: A retrospective, multi-centers ( 5 centers representative of Saudi Arabia )observational study in patients with mCRC who have received triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin & Irinotecan-based chemotherapy between December 2018-December 2020.We aimed to assess the response to triflurodine/tipiracil, to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS ), the overall survival (OS), and the associated factors of prognostic significance. Results:The data of 100 patients with refractory mCRC who has received triflurodine/tipiracil have been analyzed. The mean age was 55.2 +11.8 years. Forty-two patients were (42%) females and 58 (58%) were male patients. Sigmoid was the most common primary site of cancer in 35 (35%) patients, followed by rectum 29 (29%). Peritoneal metastasis was present in 17 (23.3%) patients ,liver in 51(56.6%) and lung in 39 (50.7%). Metastatic sites were ≥ 2 in 45 (45%) patients. Metastatic lesions were ≥ 5 in 65 (65%) patients. Xelox chemotherapy regimen was the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy which represents 43%, while Folfiri or Xeliri combination was the most used second line in 57 (60%). For the third line, Folfox or Xelox was used in 81 (83.5%) patients. The fourth line was given to 49 (67.1%). For first-line biological agents, Cetuximab was used most frequently 31 (46.3%).Evaluation of the response to treatment with triflurodine/tipiracil revealed one patient (1%) with a complete response,3 patients (3%) with partial response, 28 (28%) patients with stable disease, and 66 (66%) showed progressive disease. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5 months ( 3.839 - 6.161) and the median overall survival was 12 months (9.732-14.268). The log-rank analysis showed that the baseline neutrophils ≤ 75 % ( P-value= 0.0092) and low hemoglobin level (P-value= 0.0245) were strongly associated with a higher survival. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, the neutrophil count ≤ 75 % was the only independent predictor for survival. Conclusions: Trifluridine/tipiracil is effective in patients with refractory mCRC. The low neutrophil count might predict a better overall survival.

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4%, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6%, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2%, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

Prognostic factors of ado-trastuzumab emtansine treatment in patients with metastatic HER-2 positive breast cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522092408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz Tataroglu Ozyukseler ◽  
Mustafa Basak ◽  
Seval Ay ◽  
Aygül Koseoglu ◽  
Serdar Arıcı ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Trastuzumab Emtansine ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Cancer Antigen ◽  
Free Survival

Background Ado-trastuzumab emtansine is an antibody-drug conjugate that combines the cytotoxic activity of emtansine with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted antitumor features of trastuzumab. Objective We conducted a study of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine. By evaluating progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rates, we aimed to find prognostic factors of trastuzumab emtansine treatment. Methods Our study is a single-center, retrospective, observational study. We have clinical data from 78 patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine for metastatic breast cancer, from May 2016 through May 2019, at Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar Education and Research Hospital, Medical Oncology Department. Our objective is to assess the survival and response rates in trastuzumab emtansine-treated individuals and the factors associated with survival. The factors we analyzed were cancer antigen 15-3 sensitivity, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status, presence or absence of visceral metastases, presence or absence of cranial metastases, and treatment-associated thrombocytopenia. Results Among 78 patients, median progression-free survival was 7.8 months, and overall survival was 21.1 months. Twenty of the patients had an objective tumor response. The results showed that trastuzumab emtansine was tolerable with a manageable safety profile and consistent with the results of the previous literature. Mostly seen adverse events were anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and increased levels of alkaline phosphatase. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status = 2 had worse progression-free survival and overall survival compared to ones with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status < 2; progression-free survival and overall survival are worse in cancer antigen 15-3-sensitive breast cancer patients. According to our findings, treatment-associated thrombocytopenia was a significant prognostic factor for survival. Patients with thrombocytopenia had 12 months progression-free survival, whereas patients without thrombocytopenia had only 4.1 months progression-free survival. In like manner, overall survival was much better in the thrombocytopenia-experienced patients as 29.5 versus 11.8 months. Conclusions Trastuzumab emtansine prolongs progression-free survival and overall survival with a manageable safety profile. Thrombocytopenia, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status, and cancer antigen 15-3 are correlated with progression-free survival and/or overall survival.

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC). Methods We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n = 66; SCRT group: n = 18). Results The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups. Conclusions This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

Patient Outcomes with Proteosome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma at an English District General Hospital

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5745-5745
Author(s):  
Anil Vaikunth Kamat ◽  
Tariq Shafi ◽  
Raphael A. Ezekwesili
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Second Primary Malignancies

Abstract Bortezomib is a targeted proteosome inhibitor licensed & approved for in multiple myeloma both as first line and in relapsed setting. This is a retrospective non experimental cross sectional quantitative comparative group study using clinical case notes, laboratory & pharmacy records for patients treated with Bortezomib in 2011 & 2012. Outcomes studied included remission status, adverse events, progression free survival and overall survival at follow up. The study also looked at the comparative responses of cohort of patients administered Bortezomib through intravenous & subcutaneous route. The cohort consisted of 33 patients, 21 male, 11 female, median age 71 years, first line 10 patients, second line 23 , median number of cycles in 2011 & 2012 – first line 3 & 8 , second line 5 & 4, respectively. In 2011, 8 received intravenous treatment, 9 were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous route whilst all patients from 2012 received subcutaneous Bortezomib. The most frequently used regimen was Bortezomib Dexamethasone ( VD). The overall response rate ( ORR >/= Minor Response) was: First line 70% (7/10) ; Second line 47.8% ( 11/23); median PFS ( Figure 1) 6 months ( First line: 7 months ; Second line : 6 months) and median overall survival ( Figure 2) at follow up: 9 months ; 39.4 % ( 13/33) First line 8.5 months, Second line 11 months. Subcutaneous Bortezomib was equivalent to intravenous Bortezomib in terms of efficacy & tolerance. Of 33 patients, there were 12 dose reductions. Adverse events reported included: peripheral Neuropathy - grade 3 - 6% ( all grades 27.3%); Diarrhoea - grade 3 - 3% (all grades 6%); Nausea / Vomiting - grade 3 - 3% ( all grades 6%) and Second Primary Malignancies - 12% ( 4 of 33). Mortality at follow up was 20 patients from cohort of 33 ; causes included disease progression in 11, second primary malignancy with disease progression in 4, COPD 2, Systemic Amyloidosis 2, Tuberculosis 1 , Multiple co morbidities 1 and Asthma with mechanical failure in single patient. Second primary malignancies ( 4/33) included Prostate carcinoma ( 1), Renal Cell Carcinoma (1), Neuroendocrine tumour ( 1 ) and Unknown Primary in single patient. Beyond second line treatment, majority (14 of 23 patients; 60.9 %) did not have further active treatment. These data indicate that patient outcomes were modest compared to published data from VISTA and APEX trials. Majority of patients did not have further active treatment beyond second line which suggests the most effective treatment strategy should be used upfront as patients may not be fit to have further lines of therapy despite availability of recently introduced novel targeted agents. A higher percentage of second primary malignancies were noticed in this cohort which should be an area of further clinical research. Figure 1: Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2:. Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A prospective study of carboplatin-etoposide in docetaxel-pretreated patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC): Clinical activity and correlation with neuroendocrine features

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5151-5151
Author(s):  
Y. Loriot ◽  
C. Massard ◽  
A. Plantade ◽  
B. Escudier ◽  
A. Chauchereau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

5151 Background: There is currently no standard of care for patients (pts) with HRPC and disease progression after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Platin compounds have demonstrated activity in this setting and in vitro evidence of synergy between carboplatin and etoposide has previously been reported. A significant proportion of advanced HRPC exhibit neuroendocrine features but there are limited data on whether these patients should be treated differently or not. Methods: Pts with HRPC who experienced failure after first-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy were prospectively treated with carboplatin (AUC 5 day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 day 1 to 3), repeated every 3 weeks as second-line chemotherapy. The response rate (defined as a serum PSA decline of = 50%), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using consensus criteria (Bubley JCO 1999). Pain relief was evaluated using a visual analogic scale. Serum chromogranin A and neurone specific enolase (NSE) levels were measured at baseline. Toxicity was evaluated according to NCI criteria. Results: Forty-one HRPC pts, previously treated with docetaxel with (n=24) or without (n=17) estramustine, prospectively received carboplatin-etoposide as second-line chemotherapy. A PSA response was obtained in 9 pts (22%). Pain relief was achieved in 18 pts (45%). Median progression-free survival was 9 weeks and median overall survival was 19 months. Toxicity included grade 3–4 anemia in 25% and febrile neutropenia in 2%. Biological neuroendocrine features (e.g. elevated baseline serum chromogranin A and NSE) were not associated with response or PFS. The response rate was 18% and 31% in pts with normal and elevated baseline chromogranin A, respectively. Conclusions: The carboplatin-etoposide regimen is active and well-tolerated as second-line chemotherapy after docetaxel-based chemotherapy in HRPC patients. Activity was detected in both tumors with and without neuroendocrine features. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Multicenter randomized phase II study of weekly docetaxel alone versus weekly docetaxel plus oxaliplatin as a second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Preliminary response and safety results.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14570-e14570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
Young Rok Do ◽  
Keon Uk Park ◽  
Hun-Mo Ryoo ◽  
Sung Hwa Bae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Weekly Docetaxel ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e14570 Background: Gastric cancer is a frequent malignancy with worldwide estimated incidence of 990,000 cases, representing 7.8% of all cancers in 2008. There are limited data suggesting a benefit for doublet second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: The eligibility criteria were patients 1) with prior exposure to cisplatin based chemotherapy and advanced or recurrent stomach cancer 2) with pathologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma, 3) with an ECOG performance status 0 to 2, 4) with measurable lesions. Each treatment cycle was consisted of docetaxel 36 mg/m2 in docetaxel mono therapy group and docetaxel 36 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 in docetaxel/oxaliplatin doublet therapy group on days 1, 8. The primary end point of this study was response rate, and secondary end points included toxicity, progression free and overall survival. Results: Fifty two patients were enrolled; median age was 63 years; male (n=42) and female (n=10); docetaxel mono therapy (n=27) and docetaxel/oxalliplatin doublet therapy (n=25). The median number of cycles administered was 2.5 (range,1-9). Fourty eight patients were assessable for efficacy. Four partial responses, 7 stable diseases in mono therapy group (RR; 4/27, 14.8%) and 1 complete remission, 4 partial responses, 13 stable diseases in double therapy group (RR; 5/25, 20.0%) were confirmed (p=0.198). Median progression free survival was 1.97 months in the mono therapy group and 4.93 months in doublet therapy group (p=0.007). Median overall survival was 11.57 months in the mono therapy group and 8.13 months in doublet therapy group (p=0.650). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 11 of 52 patients; G3 pain were in 2 patients and G3 pneumonia was in 1 patient in mono group, G3/4 neutropenia were 5 patients in the combination group, G3 nausea, vomiting, general weakness was 1 patient each group in combination group. Conclusions: Weekly docetaxel/oxaliplatin doublet therapy showed superior progression free survival to monotherapy group as second line therapy in cisplatin pretreated advanced gastric cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document