Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: Benefits for the Fetal Surgery Patient

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Mario Patino ◽  
Thien-Duy Tran ◽  
Teniola Shittu ◽  
Margaret Owens-Stuberfield ◽  
Marcie Meador ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Respiratory Complications ◽  
Traditional Group ◽  
Traditional Management ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Oxygen Requirements ◽  
Eras Protocol

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The fetoscopic approach to the prenatal closure of a neural tube defect (NTD) may offer similar advantages to the newborn compared to prenatal open closure of a NTD, with a reduction in maternal risks. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been applied to different surgical procedures with documented advantages. We modified the perioperative care of patients undergoing in utero repair of myelomeningocele with the goal of enhancing the recovery. A retrospective study comparing traditional management to the ERAS protocol was conducted. <b><i>Aims:</i></b> Primary aim was to evaluate the length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to oral intake, opioid-induced side effects, and respiratory complications. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Thirty patients who underwent a mid-gestation fetoscopic closure of a NTD were included. Data analyzed include demographics, comorbidities, LOS, anatomical location of the NTD, magnesium sulfate doses and duration of administration, oxygen requirements, duration of the postoperative epidural infusion, duration of surgery and anesthesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory complications, time to oral intake, pain scores, and sedation scores. Differences between the treatment groups were compared using the independent sample <i>t</i>-test or Mann-Whitney Ʋ test. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 30 patients, 10 patients were managed according to the ERAS protocol and 20 patients according to the traditional management (1:2 ratio). The mean gestational age at the time of intervention for the traditional and ERAS groups was 24.9 ± 0.5 weeks and 24.8 ± 0.5 weeks, respectively. Compared to the traditional group, the LOS was reduced in the ERAS group to 112.5 ± 12.6 h (4.7 ± 0.5 days) from 179.7 ± 87.9 h (7.5 ± 3.7 days) (<i>p</i> = 0.012). The time to oral intake was also shorter 502.6 ± 473.4 min versus 1015.6 ± 698.2 min; <i>p</i> = 0.049. Oxygen requirements were prolonged in the traditional group (1843.7 ± 1262.6 min vs. 1051.7 ± 1078.1 min <i>p</i> = 0.052). The total duration of magnesium sulfate was longer for patients in the traditional group (2125.6 ± 727.1 min vs. 1429.5 ± 553.8 min; <i>p</i> = 0.006). No statistically significant difference in pain scores was observed between the groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Establishing an ERAS protocol for fetoscopic in utero repair of NTDs approach is feasible with the advantages of decreased postoperative LOS, reduced oxygen requirements, lower duration of magnesium sulfate infusion, and facilitation of earlier oral intake without compromising the pain scores.

Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunbo Gao ◽  
Chengshuo Wang ◽  
Guyan Wang ◽  
Xu Cui ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Self Rating ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Traditional Care ◽  
Eras Protocol

Background Although enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely applied during perioperative periods for different diseases, there are few reports of ERAS in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study therefore aimed to evaluate the benefits of ERAS protocol compared to traditional care following ESS. Methods A total of 55 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing ESS were prospectively assigned to 1 of 5 treatment groups; ERAS groups with postoperative intravenous Flubiprofen Axetil or analgesia pump, traditional care with Flubiprofen Axetil or analgesia pump (NERAS groups), or traditional care without postoperative intravenous analgesia group (control). All patients completed the Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, and Self-rating Anxiety Scale at admission and before discharge. Pain scores were recorded at 2, 6, 24, and 48 hours postsurgery and adverse reactions to analgesics were noted. Results Patients in ERAS group demonstrated significantly higher general comfort scores and lower self-rating anxiety scores compared to patients in NERAS and control groups. Compared to control patients, patients in ERAS group reported significantly lower pain scores at 6, 24, and 48 hours. Moreover, pain alleviated from 6 hours postsurgery in ERAS group compared to 48 hours in NERAS group. Patients using opioids experienced more adverse nausea events than patients using only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Conclusions The use of patient-tailored ERAS programs following ESS may help to attain higher general comfort and to alleviate perioperative anxiety compared with traditional perioperative care. Adequate postoperative analgesia with NSAIDs in ERAS protocol may alleviate pain earlier with fewer adverse reactions.

Reduction in opioid use and postoperative pain scores after elective laparotomy with implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on a gynecologic oncology service

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 935-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Rae Schwartz ◽  
Stephanie Lim ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
Lauren Cobb ◽  
Fidel Valea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eras Protocol

ObjectiveEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are designed to mitigate the physiologic stress response created by surgery, to decrease the time to resumption of daily activities, and to improve overall recovery. This study aims to investigate postoperative recovery outcomes following gynecologic surgery before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed of patients undergoing elective laparotomy at a major academic center following implementation of an ERAS protocol (11/4/2014–7/27/2016) with comparison to a historical cohort (6/23/2013–9/30/2014). The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included surgical variables, time to recovery of baseline function, opioid usage, pain scores, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher’s exact, and chi squared tests.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-three women on the ERAS protocol who underwent elective laparotomy were compared with 121 historical controls. There was no difference in length of stay between cohorts (median 4 days; P = 0.71). ERAS participants had lower intraoperative (45 vs 75 oral morphine equivalents; P < 0.0001) and postoperative (45 vs 154 oral morphine equivalents; P < 0.0001) opioid use. ERAS patients reported lower maximum pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (three vs six; P < 0.0001) and on postoperative day 1 (four vs six; P = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in complication or readmission rates.ConclusionsERAS protocol implementation was associated with decreased intraoperative and postoperative opioid use and improved pain scores without significant changes in length of stay or complication rates.

scholarly journals Oral Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 1;23 (1;1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph H. Marcotte
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Patient Controlled Analgesia ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Eras Protocol

Background: Multimodal pain management within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols is designed to decrease opioid use, promote mobilization, and decrease postoperative complications. Objectives: To evaluate the role of intravenous (IV) versus oral (PO) acetaminophen within an established ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery. Study Design: This was a retrospective observational study. Setting: This research took place within an established perioperative colorectal surgery protocol. Methods: A total of 91 consecutive elective colorectal resections performed according to an ERAS protocol using only IV acetaminophen (IV group) were compared with 84 consecutive resections performed using one dose of IV acetaminophen followed by subsequent administration of oral acetaminophen (PO group). Our multimodal pain management strategy also included transverse abdominis plane blocks, celecoxib, and ketorolac medications for both groups. Opioid requirements, maximum and average daily pain scores by the Visual Analog Scale, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results: There were no differences in maximum or average pain scores on postoperative days 0-3 or at time of discharge between IV and PO groups. Compared with the IV acetaminophen only group, the PO group received significantly more perioperative opioids through 72 hours postoperatively (68.8 oral morphine equivalents [OME] IV group vs. 93.7 OME PO group; P < 0.0001), were more likely to require opioid patient-controlled analgesia (8.9% IV group vs. 46.4% PO group; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to experience postoperative nausea and vomiting (33.0% IV group vs. 48.8% PO group; P = 0.0449). Limitations: Significant limitations include the studies’ retrospective nature and that it was performed at a single institution. Conclusions: Restriction of IV acetaminophen within an ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery was associated with increased opioid use, greater need for opioid patient-controlled analgesia, and increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. IV acetaminophen may be superior to oral acetaminophen in the early postoperative setting. Key words: Perioperative pain management, enhanced recovery after surgery, acetaminophen, multimodal pain control, nonopioid

scholarly journals Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy after trauma: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000698
Author(s):  
Vijayan Purushothaman ◽  
Pratyusha Priyadarshini ◽  
Dinesh Bagaria ◽  
Mohit Joshi ◽  
Narendra Choudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Eras Protocol

BackgroundThe role of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been established in elective operations. However, its role in emergency operations especially in trauma is under-recognized. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of ERAS program in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for trauma.MethodsIn this single-center study, patients who underwent emergency laparotomy after trauma were randomized to the ERAS protocol or conventional care. The ERAS protocol included early removal of catheters, early initiation of diet, use of postoperative prophylaxis and optimal usage of analgesia. The primary endpoint was duration of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were recovery of bowel function, pain scores, complications and readmission rate.ResultsThirty patients were enrolled in each arm. The ERAS group had significant reduction in duration of hospital stay (3.3±1.3 vs. 5.0±1.7; p<0.01). Time to remove nasogastric tube (1.1±0.1 vs. 2.2±0.9; p<0.01), urinary catheter (1.1±0.1 vs. 3.5±1.6; p<0.01), and drain (1.0±0.2 vs. 3.7±1.6; p<0.01) was shorter in the ERAS group. In ERAS group, there was earlier initiation of liquid diet (1.1±0.1 vs. 2.3±1.0; p<0.01) and solid diet (2.1±0.1 vs. 3.6±1.3; p<0.01). The usage of epidural analgesia (63% vs. 30%; p=0.01), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (93% vs. 67%; p-0.02) and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (100% vs. 70%; p<0.01) was higher in the ERAS group. There was no difference in the recovery of bowel function (2.4±1.0 vs. 2.1±0.9; p=0.15), pain scores (3.2±1.0 vs. 3.1±1.1; p=0.87), complications (27% vs. 23%; p=0.99) and readmission rates (07% vs. 10%; p=0.99) between the two groups.ConclusionERAS protocol, when implemented in patients undergoing laparotomy for trauma, has decreased duration of hospital stay with no additional complications.Level of evidenceLevel 1, randomized controlled trial, care management.Trial registration numberClinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/06/019533).

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol with Ultrasound-Guided Regional Blocks in Outpatient Plastic Surgery Patients Leads to Decreased Opioid Prescriptions and Consumption

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M Straughan ◽  
John T Lindsey ◽  
Michelle McCarthy ◽  
Davey Legendre ◽  
John T Lindsey
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
Regional Anesthetic

Abstract Background Opioids are a mainstay of pain management. To limit the use of opioids, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols implement multimodal approaches to treat postoperative pain. Objective This paper aims to be the first to assess the efficacy of an ERAS protocol inclusive of ultrasound-guided, surgeon-led regional blocks for outpatient plastic surgery patients. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing outpatient plastic surgery on an ERAS protocol was performed. These patients were compared to a well-matched group not on an ERAS protocol (pre-ERAS). Endpoints included the amounts of opioid, anti-nausea, and antispasmodic medication prescribed. ERAS patients were given a postoperative questionnaire to assess both pain levels (0-10) and opioid consumption. ERAS patients anticipated to have higher levels of pain had ultrasound-guided anesthetic blocks. Results There were 157 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 202 patients in the ERAS group. Patients in the pre-ERAS group were prescribed more opioids (332.3 vs. 100.3 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/patient; p &lt; 0.001), anti-nausea (664 vs. 16.3mg of promethazine/patient; p &lt; 0.001), and antispasmodic (401.3 vs. 31.2mg of cyclobenzaprine/patient; p &lt; 0.001) medication. Patients on the ERAS protocol consumed an average total of 22.7 MME/patient post-operatively. Average pain scores in this group peaked at 5.32 on POD1 and then decreased significantly daily. Conclusions Implementation of an ERAS protocol for outpatient plastic surgery patients with utilization of ultrasound-guided regional anesthetic blocks is feasible and efficacious. The ability to significantly decrease prescribed opioids in this unique patient population is noteworthy.

The financial impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in an academic gynecologic oncology practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary L. Gentry ◽  
Teresa K.L. Boitano ◽  
Haller J. Smith ◽  
Dustin K. Eads ◽  
John F. Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Financial Impact ◽  
Oncology Practice ◽  
Eras Protocol

scholarly journals The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1843-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J. Rogers ◽  
David Bleetman ◽  
David E. Messenger ◽  
Natasha A. Joshi ◽  
Lesley Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Protocol Compliance ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals “Enhanced recovery after surgery – ERAS in elective craniotomies-a non-randomized controlled trial”

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirudh Elayat ◽  
Sritam S. Jena ◽  
Sukdev Nayak ◽  
R. N. Sahu ◽  
Swagata Tripathy
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
High Dependency

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care bundle aimed at the early recovery of patients. Well accepted in gastric and pelvic surgeries, there is minimal evidence in neurosurgery and neurocritical care barring spinal surgeries. We wished to compare the length of intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU) stay of patients undergoing elective craniotomy for supratentorial neurosurgery: ERAS protocol versus routine care. The secondary objective was to compare the postoperative pain scores, opioid use, glycemic control, and the duration of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Methods In this pragmatic non-randomized controlled trial (CTRI/2017/07/015451), consenting adult patients scheduled for elective supratentorial intracranial tumor excision were enrolled prospectively after institutional ethical clearance and consent. Elements-of-care in the ERAS group were- Preoperative –family education, complex-carbohydrate drink, flupiritine; Intraoperative – scalp blocks, limited opioids, rigorous fluid and temperature regulation; Postoperative- flupiritine, early mobilization, removal of catheters, and initiation of feeds. Apart from these, all perioperative protocols and management strategies were similar between groups. The two groups were compared with regards to the length of ICU stay, pain scores in ICU, opioid requirement, glycemic control, and hospital stay duration. The decision for discharge from ICU and hospital, data collection, and analysis was by independent assessors blind to the patient group. Results Seventy patients were enrolled. Baseline demographics – age, sex, tumor volume, and comorbidities were comparable between the groups. The proportion of patients staying in the ICU for less than 48 h after surgery, the cumulative insulin requirement, and the episodes of VAS scores > 4 in the first 48 h after surgery was significantly less in the ERAS group – 40.6% vs. 65.7%, 0.6 (±2.5) units vs. 3.6 (±8.1) units, and one vs. ten episodes (p = 0.04, 0.001, 0.004 respectively). The total hospital stay was similar in both groups. Conclusion The study demonstrated a significant reduction in the proportion of patients requiring ICU/ HDU stay > 48 h. Better pain and glycemic control in the postoperative period may have contributed to a decreased stay. More extensive randomized studies may be designed to confirm these results. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2018/04/013247), registered retrospectively on April 2018.

Observations from Implementation of the ERAS Protocol after DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas T. Haddock ◽  
Ricardo Garza ◽  
Carolyn E. Boyle ◽  
Sumeet S. Teotia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multivariate intervention requiring the help of several departments, including anesthesia, nursing, and surgery. This study seeks to observe ERAS compliance rates and obstacles for its implementation at a single academic institution. Methods This is a retrospective study looking at patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction from January 2016 to September 2019. The ERAS protocol was implemented on select patients early 2017, with patients from 2016 acting as a control. Thirteen points from the protocol were identified and gathered from the patient's electronic medical record (EMR) to evaluate compliance. Results Two hundred and six patients were eligible for the study, with 67 on the control group. An average of 6.97 components were met in the pre-ERAS group. This number rose to 8.33 by the end of 2017. Compliance peaked with 10.53 components met at the beginning of 2019. The interventions most responsible for this increase were administration of preoperative medications, goal-oriented intraoperative fluid management, and administration of scheduled gabapentin postoperatively. The least met criterion was intraoperative ketamine goal of >0.2 mg/kg/h, with a maximum compliance rate of 8.69% of the time. Conclusion The introduction of new protocols can take over a year for full implementation. This is especially true for protocols as complex as an ERAS pathway. Even after years of consistent use, compliance gaps remain. Staff-, patient-, or resource-related issues are responsible for these discrepancies. It is important to identify these issues to address them and optimize patient outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document