Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Therapeutic Options in Resectable and Advanced/Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Indirect Comparison

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Aditi Kharat ◽  
Madeline Brendle ◽  
Anindit Chhibber ◽  
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk ◽  
Joseph Biskupiak
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Comparative Safety ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Indirect Comparisons

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (gem-nab/P), and gemcitabine-capecitabine (gem-cap) demonstrated superiority over gemcitabine monotherapy for pancreatic cancer (PC). It is still unclear which chemotherapy regimen is the most optimal. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review (SR) and indirect comparison to compare safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX versus gem-nab/P and gem-cap in PC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An SR was conducted in several databases from inception to November 2020. RCTs investigating resectable or advanced PC were included. Primary outcomes including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS)/relapse-free survival (RFS), and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were pooled using a random effects model. Indirect comparisons were done to compare FOLFIRINOX versus gem-cap and gem-nab/P. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran’s Q test and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nine studies were identified involving 6,564 patients. Indirect comparisons showed FOLFIRINOX had significantly better OS (resectable: HR 0.78 [0.61–0.99]; advanced: HR 0.71 [0.60–0.85]) and RFS/DFS/PFS (resectable: HR 0.67 [0.55–0.82]; advanced: HR 0.65 [0.57–0.74]) compared to gem-cap as well as OS (resectable: HR 0.78 [0.61–1.00]; advanced: HR 0.73 [0.54–0.98]) and DFS/PFS (resectable: HR 0.66 [0.53–0.82]; advanced: HR 0.64 [0.49–0.83]) compared to gem-nab/P. FOLFIRINOX increased grade 3/4 AE risk compared to gem-cap and gem-nab/P. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> FOLFIRINOX is associated with significant survival benefits compared to gem-nab/P and gem-cap. However, it is important to consider the increased grade 3/4 AE risk associated with FOLFIRINOX.

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis

Chemotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kotone Hayuka ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽  
Akitsu Murakami ◽  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Takamasa Nishiuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

scholarly journals Real-world comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591985036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Guido Giordano ◽  
George Kim ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

Background: No clinical trial has directly compared nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (nab-P/G) with FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer (mPC or aPC). We conducted a systematic review of real-world studies comparing these regimens in the first-line setting. Methods: Embase and MEDLINE databases through 22 January 2019, and Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium 2019 abstracts were searched for real-world, retrospective studies comparing first-line nab-P/G versus FOLFIRINOX in mPC or aPC that met specific parameters. Studies with radiotherapy were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Of 818 records initially identified, 35 were duplicates and 749 did not meet the eligibility criteria, mostly because they were either not comparative ( n = 356) or not first line ( n = 245). The remaining 34 studies (21 mPC; 13 aPC) assessed >6915 patients who received nab-P/G or FOLFIRINOX. In the studies identified, the median overall survival (OS) reached 14.4 and 15.9 months with nab-P/G and FOLFIRINOX, respectively, and median progression-free survival reached 8.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. Safety data were reported in 14 studies (2205 patients), including 8 single-institutional studies. In most single-institutional studies that reported safety data, rates were higher with FOLFIRINOX versus nab-P/G for grade 3/4 neutropenia (five of six studies) and febrile neutropenia (all three studies), while rates of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy were higher with nab-P/G in four of seven studies. Conclusions: Although FOLFIRINOX was associated with slightly longer median OS in more studies, the differences, when available, were not statistically significant. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted. Toxicity profile differences represent key considerations for treatment decisions.

Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib in Advanced Osteosarcoma With Metastases After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanqing Li ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Lei Song ◽  
Qiuchi Ai ◽  
shuai zhang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Multimodal Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Common Drug ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Abstract To study and observe the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma with metastases. We retrospectively studied patients with advanced osteosarcoma and metastases who received anlotinib treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to April 2020. All patients had received standard multimodal therapies, before taking anlotinib. Therapeutic doses of anlotinib were 12 mg for adults and 10 mg for children and adolescents once a day for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by a week of withdrawal. This 3-week cycle of treatment was continued until the tumor progressed rapidly or the patients failed to tolerate the side effects. Adverse drug reactions were recorded, and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated based on progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The median PFS was 9.81 ± 0.9 months, and the 6-month and 10-month PFS rates were 73.3% and 33.3%, respectively. The median OS was 11.43 ± 0.58 months. No patients achieved complete response. After 6 months of treatment, the DCR and ORR were 80% and 13.3%, respectively. No drug-related deaths or Grade 4 adverse events occurred in the patients. Five patients (33.3%) had Grade 3 adverse events. The most common drug-related adverse events were hand-food syndrome, fatigue, high blood pressure, anorexia, and pneumothorax. Anlotinib had a certain curative effect on patients with advanced osteosarcoma and metastases after failure of standard treatment. The adverse events were mostly tolerable or relieved after treatment.

Phase II study of biweekly administration of CPT-11 and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15150-e15150
Author(s):  
Ryoji Takada ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
Nobuko Ishida ◽  
Takuo Yamai ◽  
Nobuyasu Fukutake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

e15150 Background: The current standard therapies for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Japan are the single-agent Gemcitabine (Gem) or S-1 and Gem plus erlotinib. Irinotecan (CPT-11) is one of the promising drugs for Gem-refractory PC pts. Both Irinotecan and Gem have shown activity against these diseases with different mechanisms and are non-cross-resistant with each other. Japanese pts have the different metabolism with Irinotecan rather than pts in western countries. Methods: The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CPT-11 and Gem in Japanese pancreatic cancer pts. Patients with MPC and PS 0-2 were enrolled in this phase II trial. CPT-11, 100mg/m (2), was administered in 90 min. and Gem, 1000mg/m (2), was administered in 30 min. soon after CPT-11 on day1. Chemotherapy was repeated biweekly. Results: From May 2002 to May 2006 40 pts, with median age of 62 (40-74) years, were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate (RR) was 15% with disease control rate of 50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (range: 1.0-15.0 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (range: 3.0-24.0 months). Grade 3/4 anemia, leucopenia occurred in 26.3, 5.2% of pts. The most common non-hematologic toxities were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and anorexia. Grade 3 diarrhea and nausea occurred in 10.5% of pts. Conclusions: The combination chemotherapy with Gem and CPT-11 showed favorable RR as expected and the treatment was manageable in Japanese pts with MPC. We plan to evaluate this combination chemotherapy for MPC pts after progression of FOLFIRINOX in near the future. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009963.

scholarly journals Association between neutropenia and survival to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Monica Ramello ◽  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Toxicity Criteria

Abstract Neutropenia is a common side effect associated with nab-paclitaxel gemcitabine (Nab-Gem) therapy. We retrospectively investigated the association between neutropenia induced by first-line Nab-Gem and survival in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma patients. Metastatic pancreatic patients treated with first-line Nab-Gem were included in this retrospective analysis. Neutropenia was categorized using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria scale. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. 115 patients were analyzed. Median PFS was 7 months (95% CI 5–8) for patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 6 months (95% CI 5–6) for patients with grade < 3 neutropenia [p = 0.08; hazard ratio (HR 0.68)]. Median OS was 13 months (95% CI 10–18) for patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 10 months (95% CI 8–13) for patients with grade < 3 neutropenia (p = 0.04; HR 0.44). In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia showed a statistically significant association with OS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.09–0.86; p = 0.05). Nab-Gem-induced neutropenia is associated with longer survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

scholarly journals Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Dose-Response ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 155932582093129
Author(s):  
Qinfen Xie ◽  
Lidong Wang ◽  
Shusen Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Albumin Ratio ◽  
Reactive Protein

Background: This meta-analysis explored the correlation between the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) and survival outcomes and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched through October 17, 2019. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the association between CAR and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in pancreatic cancer. Results: The meta-analysis included 11 studies comprising 2271 patients. The pooled results showed that a high CAR was predictive of worse OS (HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.65-2.06, P < .001), PFS (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.27-1.85, P < .001), and DFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.30-2.41, P < .001). An elevated CAR was also associated with male sex (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.10-1.74, P = .006). Conclusion: Elevated pretreatment CAR effectively predicts inferior survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer and may be a powerful prognostic indicator for these patients.

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis of docetaxel perioperative chemotherapy regimens in gastric and esophagogastric tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior ◽  
Vanessa Montes Santos ◽  
Diogo Diniz Gomes Bugano ◽  
Elivane da Silva Victor ◽  
Edna Terezinha Rother ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Dose Ranging ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

Abstract FLOT regimen became the standard perioperative treatment in several centers around the world for esophagogastric tumors despite concerns about toxicity. In addition, FLOT has never been compared with other docetaxel-based regimens. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science including prospective or retrospective studies of docetaxel based perioperative regimen in gastric and esophagogastric tumors. Data regarding chemotherapy regimens, efficacy and toxicity were extracted. Outcomes were compared using a random effects model. Of 548 abstracts, 16 were considered eligible. Comparing the studies with meta-analysis we can see that the regimens are similar in terms of pathological complete response, resection rate, progression free survival and overall survival in one year, without significant heterogeneity. The meta-regression of docetaxel dose failed to show any association with dose ranging between 120–450 mg/m². Regarding the toxicity of the regimens it is noted that the regimens are quite toxic (up to 50–70% of grade 3–4 neutropenia). The results of this meta-analysis with a combined sample size of more than 1,000 patients suggest that docetaxel perioperative regimens are equivalent in outcomes. Prospective trials addressing modified regimens should be performed to provide less toxic strategies and be applicable to all patients.

Second-line pemetrexed–oxaliplatin combination for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15597-e15597
Author(s):  
M. Mazzer ◽  
E. Zanon ◽  
L. Foltran ◽  
F. De Pauli ◽  
G. Cardellino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Full Sample ◽  
Ca 19.9 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Α Level ◽  
Vitamin B12 Supplementation

e15597 Background: Few regimens showed efficacy in advanced pancreatic cancer patients (pts) who had failed a first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. However, there is growing evidence suggesting that second-line treatment may provide further disease control in selected pts. Both pemetrexed and oxaliplatin demonstrated activity in this setting, and their combination resulted safe and tolerable.Methods: Pancreatic cancer pts with advanced disease, PS>60, age>18 years, who progressed after a gemcitabine-based therapy were enrolled in a phase II trial, and treated with pemetrexed 500 mg/mq followed by oxaliplatin 120 mg/mq, day 1 every 3 weeks, together with adequate oral folinic acid and intramuscular vitamin B12 supplementation. Accordingly to the Simon Minimax two-stage study design, an accrual of 31 patients was planned, with a minimum response rate considered of interest of 25%, α level 0.10 and β level 0.10. Results: To date, 16 patients have been treated. Of them, 12 progressed during or shortly after gemcitabine (13) or gemcitabine-cisplatin combination (3), with a median time to progression of 186 days. 62 cycles were delivered, with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range 2–8). Overall, the regimen was well tolerated: most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate sensory neurotoxicity and gastrointestinal disturbances. We reported grade 3 anemia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 fatigue in 1 patient each. Three among the treated patients died within 30 days from last delivered cycle due to progressive disease. Confirmed partial (3) or minor responses (6) were observed in 9 out of 15 evaluable pts, with a median decrease in the Ca 19.9 value of 43% among those who responded. Median progression-free survival was 99 days. At the time of analysis, 3 out of 16 patients are still on treatment.Conclusions: The preliminary results suggest that second-line pemetrexed-oxaliplatin combination is well tolerated and reasonably active, and allow the continuation of the study until the full sample of 31 pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase Ib trial of IPI-926, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Anthony Richards ◽  
Joe Stephenson ◽  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Carlos Becerra ◽  
John Turner Hamm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

213 Background: IPI-926 is a novel, natural product-derived small molecule that targets the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway by inhibiting smoothened. In preclinical models of pancreatic cancer, repressing activation of the Hh pathway diminishes tumor-associated desmoplasia and improves chemotherapy delivery. Methods: This is the final report of the Phase 1b portion of a Phase 1b/2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of IPI-926 plus gemcitabine. Eligible patients (pts) with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer and ECOG status 0-1 were administered oral IPI-926 daily (QD) for 28-day cycles, in 3 to 6 pt dose cohorts. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) was administered IV weekly for 3 weeks with 1 week off. DLTs were evaluated during Cycle 1. Results: 16 pts (median age 69 years; range 58-86) were enrolled at IPI-926 doses of 110, 130 or 160 mg QD (single agent MTD). Pts received a median of 5 cycles (1-13). Two pts remain on trial. No IPI-926-related serious AEs have been observed. One DLT of Grade 3 AST increase was observed (130 mg dose cohort) and was asymptomatic; it resolved with dose interruption, and did not recur with dose reduction. The most common AEs occurring were fatigue (75% total, 6% ≥ Grade 3), thrombocytopenia (63%, 25%), anemia (56%, 13%), nausea (50%, 0%), diarrhea (44%, 0%), vomiting (44%, 0%), peripheral edema (44%, 0%), pyrexia (44%, 0%), and AST increase (44%, 13%). Dose reductions of IPI-926 occurred in 3 (19%) pts. Dose reductions of gemcitabine occurred in 11 (69%) pts, primarily for thrombocytopenia (9 pts). One pt (6%) discontinued due to an AE (microangiopathic hemolytic anemia). Five (31%) radiographic partial responses were observed (1/3 at 110 mg, 2/6 at 130 mg, 2/7 at 160 mg). Median progression-free survival is > 7 months. 74% of pts were alive 6 months after study entry. Conclusions: IPI-926 plus gemcitabine is well tolerated in pts with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer, with evidence of activity and no unexpected toxicity. Complete Phase 1b data, including final overall survival, will be presented. Clinical evaluation of this combination continues in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 portion of the trial.

A phase II study of cetuximab-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies, with or without surgery, in patients with locally very advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16050-e16050
Author(s):  
Pei-Jen Lou ◽  
Chun-Ta Liao ◽  
Cheng-Ping Wang ◽  
Shiang-Fu Huang ◽  
Shin-June Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Sequential Regimen ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Weekly Cycles

e16050 Background: The purpose is to evaluate the efficacy of sequential regimen using cetuximab-based doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgery, if tumors resectable, and adjuvant cetuximab-based chemoradiotherapy in locally very advanced OSCC patients. Methods: Patients with T4a/b or N2b/c or N3 OSCC were enrolled to determine the response rate of cetuximab, cisplatin, and 5-FU neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading, followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly x 6 weeks) was combined with 2 3-weekly cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2 x 3 days) as neo-adjuvant. Patients whose tumors became operable after neoadjuvant underwent radical surgery followed by adjuvant weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m2), cisplatin (30 mg/m2) and XRT (up to 70 Gy). Patients whose tumors remained inoperable after neoadjuvant received weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m2), cisplatin (30 mg/m2) and XRT (up to 70 Gy). Results: 33 patients were enrolled from Dec. 2009 to Jan. 2011. Average age was 47.3 years. 51.5% had primary lesion in buccal mucosa and 21.2% on tongue. 66.7% and 27.2% had T4b or T4a disease respectively, while 72.7% had N2b/N2c/N3 disease. 28/33 completed treatment course. On ITT analysis, 39.4% (13/33) had partial response and 48.5% (16/33) had stable disease after neoadjuvant. 42.4% (14/33) underwent radical surgery after neoadjuvant, while another 9% (3/33) underwent surgery after bio-chemoradiation. The 1 year disease free survival (resected group), progression free survival (ITT group), and overall survival (ITT group) were 48.8%, 73.2%, and 51.7% respectively. The most common grade 3/ 4 adverse event in neo-adjuvant phase was vomiting (16.1%), while mucositis (75%) and dermatitis (42.8%) accounted for major grade 3/ 4 adverse events during bio-chemoradiation. Conclusions: Cetuximab based sequential regimen was efficacious and well tolerated in improving treatment outcomes in locally very advanced OSCC patients with manageable side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document