scholarly journals Macular choroidal thickness: evaluation of variability among measurements and assessment of predictive value of glaucomatous visual field damage

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Marenco ◽  
Federico Rissotto ◽  
Andrea Palamini ◽  
Carlo Alberto Cutolo ◽  
Giulia Agosto ◽  
...  

Introduction: To investigate the relationship between the choroidal circulation and glaucoma, assessing macular choroidal thickness (MCT) as a predictive value of glaucomatous visual field damage. Methods: Twenty primary open-angle glaucoma patients were recruited. Patients underwent two SS-OCTs scans: one with DRI OCT (Topcon) and the other with PLEX Elite 9000 (Zeiss). Standard OCT parameters were acquired by DRI OCT, while MCT was manually measured in 5 points on Plex ELITE 9000 images. The relationship among MCT, standard OCT parameters and visual field indices were evaluated. Pearson’s r correlation was calculated to evaluate these relationships. Reproducibility of measurements was analyzed. Results: MCT measurements showed a good intra- and inter-observer repeatability. A negative correlation appeared between MCT and body mass index (BMI) (r = -0.518, p=0.023). Mean deviation showed a statistically significant correlation with MCT measured at sub-foveal and at 1000 µm nasally (r = 0.50, p=0.03 and r = 0.52, p=0.023). A correlation was found between the two MCT (Zeiss vs Topcon) measurements and between MCT and peripapillary choroidal thickness (r = 0.944 and r = 0.740, p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: A good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was found. MCT showed a weak predictive value of glaucomatous visual field damage. A significant correlation was found between MCT and BMI.

1999 ◽  
Vol 77 (S229) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
Angelo Macrì ◽  
Maurizio Rolando ◽  
Guido Corallo ◽  
Michele Iester ◽  
Giuseppe Verrastro ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Ramm ◽  
Susanne Jentsch ◽  
Sven Peters ◽  
Lydia Sauer ◽  
Regine Augsten ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-315980
Author(s):  
Golnoush Mahmoudinezhad ◽  
Mark Lin ◽  
Alessandro Rabiolo ◽  
Esteban Morales ◽  
Pradtana Hirunpatravong ◽  
...  

BackgroundTo evaluate the relationship between the presence of an acquired pit of the optic nerve (APON) and the rate of visual field (VF) decay in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).MethodsConsecutive patients with POAG were screened for APON by three glaucoma specialists. A control group of POAG eyes without APON were matched with the APON group for factors such as age, gender, baseline intraocular pressure and baseline mean deviation (MD). The pointwise rate of change (PRC) was used for pointwise comparisons between the two groups. MD rate, Visual Field Index (VFI) rate and Glaucoma Rate Index (GRI) were used for global rate comparisons. We compared the proportions of eyes progressing in the groups with event-based guided progression analysis (GPA), MD, VFI and GRI criteria.ResultsMean (SD) PRC was faster in the APON group −1.00 (±2.57) %/year compared with the control group −0.25 (±2.19) %/year; p<0.001. MD rate (−0.22 (±0.27) dB/year vs 0.03 (±0.41) dB/year; p=0.009), VFI rate (−0.81 (±0.86) %/year vs −0.05 (±1.0) %/year; p=0.04) and GRI (−12.27 (±16.27) vs -3.75 (±10.6); p=0.052) were all faster in the APON group compared with controls. The proportion of progressing eyes with GPA, MD, VFI and GRI was not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.1).ConclusionsThe presence of APON in patients with POAG is associated with focal, fast rates of VF decay. Identification of patients with APON should alert clinicians to the possibility of a fast rate of functional progression and to consider appropriately aggressive treatment of their glaucoma.


Author(s):  
Anh Van Thi Bui ◽  
Thom Thi Vu ◽  
Tung Thanh Hoang

Background: Clinically, there are many systems of visual field staging parallel exist. The agreement between glaucoma function and appearance is still uncertain. This study was to compare visual field staging classifications (as function staging) with disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS as appearance staging) in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).Methods: Cross-section study on 55 patients (90 eyes) examined and treated in Vietnam National Institute of Ophthalmology from 9/2016 – 9/2017. The MD (mean deviation), PSD (pattern standard deviation), VFI (visual field index) indexes were recorded and were used to classify glaucoma staging according to categories of eGSS (enhance glaucoma severity staging), mGSS (modified glaucoma severity staging), HPA (Hoddaps – Palmela – Adersons), AGIS (advance glaucoma intervention study) and DDLS. Using SPSS 16.0 software, statistically significance was tested with proper tests as Chi – square test, Fisher exact test, Kappa (to assess the agreement - disagreement), Spearman Rank (to assess the level of correlation).Results: Mean visual field indexes were -11.49 dB (MD), 5.85 dB (PSD), 74.2% (VFI). Compared to the DDLS, all systems had slight agreement (K < 0.2). The disagreement percentage was highest in eGSS (70%) then followed by mGSS (50%) and HPA (48.9%). In terms of definitive diagnosis, HPA and mGSS showed a substantial agreement (K > 0.6) with AGIS which is higher than that between eGSS and AGIS (retrospectively 0.773 and 0.75 vs 0.399) with p < 0.001. In terms of staging detection, the agreement between HPA &mGSS and AGIS was substantial (K > 0.6) while that between eGSS and AGIS was fair (K < 0.4).Conclusion: mGSS and HPA tend to show the stronger agreement with standard classifications than eGSS. mGSS should be used in clinical practice and research.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong Lin ◽  
Xiafei Pan ◽  
Xing Wang ◽  
Cong Ye ◽  
Shaodan Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To investigate the association between lateral decubitus sleeping position (LDSP) and asymmetric visual field (VF) loss and progression in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. Methods: This was a prospective, cohort study. Sixty-eight POAG (53 normal tension glaucoma, NTG) patients with asymmetric VF loss were included from the Wenzhou Glaucoma Screening Program (WGSP) and followed up. A questionnaire was used to determine the LDSP. Asymmetric VF loss was defined as at least 2-dB difference in mean deviation (MD) between the 2 eyes at baseline. According to these values, the better eye and worse eye were defined. The number of those preferring the worse eye LDSP versus the better eye LDSP was compared. The number of progressive eyes with LDSP and fellow eyes of LDSP were also compared. Results: Forty-five (66.2%) POAG and 34 (64.2%) NTG patients preferred the LDSP. Of these, 24 (53.3%, p=0.66) and 16 (47.1%, p=0.73) preferred the worse eye LDSP, respectively. Twenty-six eyes of the 45 POAG patients with both asymmetric VF loss and LDSP were judged as progression until the last follow-up (24.7 ± 9.5 months). Among which, there were 12 (46.2%) eyes with LDSP and 14 (53.8%) fellow eyes of LDSP (p=0.70). Conclusions: Approximately two thirds of the POAG/NTG patients preferred the LDSP. However, we could not draw the conclusion that lateral decubitus sleeping position is associated with asymmetric VF loss or glaucoma progression. Keywords: primary open-angle glaucoma; normal tension glaucoma; preferred sleeping position; asymmetric visual field defect


2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 1418-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro A Jammal ◽  
Bruna G Ferreira ◽  
Camila S Zangalli ◽  
Jayme R Vianna ◽  
Atalie C Thompson ◽  
...  

AimsTo evaluate contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with advanced glaucomatous visual field damage, and to compare two clinical CS tests.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional test–retest study. Twenty-eight patients with open-angle glaucoma, visual acuity (VA) better than 20/40 and visual field mean deviation (MD) worse than −15 dB were enrolled. Patients underwent VA, visual field and CS testing with the Pelli-Robson (PR) chart and the Freiburg Visual Acuity and Contrast Test (FrACT). Retest measurements were obtained within 1 week to 1 month.ResultsMedian (IQR) age and MD were 61.5 (55.5 to 69.2) years and −27.7 (−29.7 to −22.7) dB, respectively. Median (IQR) VA was 0.08 logarithm minimum angle of resolution (0.02 to 0.16), corresponding to 20/25 (20/20 to 20/30). Median (IQR) CS was 1.35 (1.11 to 1.51) log units with the PR chart and 1.39 (1.24 to 1.64) log units with FrACT. VA explained less than 40% of the variance in CS (adjusted R2=0.36). CS estimates of both tests were closely related (rho=0.88, p=0.001), but CS was 0.09 log units higher with FrACT compared with the PR chart, and the 95% repeatability intervals (Bland-Altman) were 46% tighter with the PR chart.ConclusionsDespite near-normal VA, almost all patients showed moderate to profound deficits in CS. CS measurement provides additional information on central visual function in patients with advanced glaucoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document