Family history of breast cancer is associated with elevated risk of prostate cancer: evidence for shared genetic risks

Introduction: Although breast and prostate cancers arise in different organs and are more frequent in the opposite sex, multiple studies have reported an association between their family history. Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism data, based on distant relatives, has revealed a small positive genetic correlation between these cancers explained by common variants. The estimate of genetic correlation based on close relatives reveals the extent to which shared genetic risks are explained by both common and rare variants. This estimate is unknown for breast and prostate cancer. Method: We estimated the relative risks, heritability, and genetic correlation of breast cancer and prostate cancer, based on the Minnesota Breast and Prostate Cancer Study, a family study of 141 families ascertained for breast cancer. Results: Heritability of breast cancer was 0.34 (95% credible interval: 0.23-0.49) and 0.65 (95% credible interval: 0.36-0.97) for prostate cancer, and the genetic correlation was 0.23. In terms of odds ratios, these values correspond to a 1.3 times higher odds of breast cancer among probands, given that the brother has prostate cancer. Conclusion: This study shows the inherent relation between prostate cancer and breast cancer; an incident of one in a family increases the risk of developing the other. The large difference between estimates of genetic correlation from distant and close relatives, if replicated, suggests that rare variants contribute to the shared genetic risk of breast and prostate cancer. However, the difference could steam from genotype-by-family effects shared between the two types of cancers.

Download Full-text

CBP/p300: Critical Co-Activators for Nuclear Steroid Hormone Receptors and Emerging Therapeutic Targets in Prostate and Breast Cancers

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13122872 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (12) ◽

pp. 2872

Author(s):

Aaron R. Waddell ◽

Haojie Huang ◽

Daiqing Liao

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Tumor Growth ◽

Signaling Pathways ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Hormone Receptors ◽

Steroid Hormone Receptors ◽

Breast Cancers ◽

Creb Binding Protein ◽

Breast And Prostate Cancer

The CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 are two paralogous lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) that were discovered in the 1980s–1990s. Since their discovery, CBP/p300 have emerged as important regulatory proteins due to their ability to acetylate histone and non-histone proteins to modulate transcription. Work in the last 20 years has firmly established CBP/p300 as critical regulators for nuclear hormone signaling pathways, which drive tumor growth in several cancer types. Indeed, CBP/p300 are critical co-activators for the androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling in prostate and breast cancer, respectively. The AR and ER are stimulated by sex hormones and function as transcription factors to regulate genes involved in cell cycle progression, metabolism, and other cellular functions that contribute to oncogenesis. Recent structural studies of the AR/p300 and ER/p300 complexes have provided critical insights into the mechanism by which p300 interacts with and activates AR- and ER-mediated transcription. Breast and prostate cancer rank the first and forth respectively in cancer diagnoses worldwide and effective treatments are urgently needed. Recent efforts have identified specific and potent CBP/p300 inhibitors that target the acetyltransferase activity and the acetytllysine-binding bromodomain (BD) of CBP/p300. These compounds inhibit AR signaling and tumor growth in prostate cancer. CBP/p300 inhibitors may also be applicable for treating breast and other hormone-dependent cancers. Here we provide an in-depth account of the critical roles of CBP/p300 in regulating the AR and ER signaling pathways and discuss the potential of CBP/p300 inhibitors for treating prostate and breast cancer.

Download Full-text

Lack of Association between Common Polymorphisms in Selenoprotein P Gene and Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer, Breast Cancer, and Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2021/6525449 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2021 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Hanjiang Xu ◽

Fan Mo ◽

Jun Zhou ◽

Zongyao Hao ◽

Xianguo Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Cancer Susceptibility ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Selenoprotein P ◽

Tumor Type ◽

Cancer Breast ◽

P Gene ◽

Breast And Prostate Cancer

Background and Objective. Selenoprotein P (SEPP1) is the major selenoprotein in plasma. Previous studies have demonstrated that SEPP1 expression was reduced in human prostate and colon tumors. Nowadays, studies concerning SEPP1 gene polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility have been extensively investigated, whereas results from these studies remain debatable rather than conclusive. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the association between two common polymorphisms (rs3877899 and rs7579) in SEPP1 and cancer susceptibility. Method. We search the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Wanfang (China) databases (up to December 1, 2020) to identify all eligible publications. The pooled odds ratio (OR) correspondence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to evaluate the associations. Results. Finally, nine eligible studies with 7,157 cases and 6,440 controls and five studies with 2,278 cases and 2,821 controls were enrolled in rs3877899 and rs7579 polymorphisms, individually. However, a null significant association was detected between the two polymorphisms in SEPP1 and susceptibility to colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer in all comparison models. Subsequently, subgroup analysis based on tumor type, no significant association was identified for prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer. In addition, when the stratification analyses were conducted by the source of control, HWE status, and ethnicity, yet no significant association was found. Conclusions. The current meta-analysis shows that SEPP1 rs3877899 and rs7579 polymorphisms may not be associated with susceptibility to colon cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer, and further well-designed studies with a larger sample size are warranted to validate our findings.

Download Full-text

First-degree family history of breast cancer is associated with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-019-6055-9 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Zheng-Ju Ren ◽

De-Hong Cao ◽

Qin Zhang ◽

Peng-Wei Ren ◽

Liang-Ren Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Family History ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Prostate Cancer Risk ◽

History Of

Download Full-text

Measurement of DKK1 and FRP in breast and prostate cancer patients with bone metastases: Impact of zoledronic acid (ZA)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.19659 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 19659-19659

Author(s):

T. Helsten ◽

M. Corr ◽

J. E. Mortimer

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Bone Metastases ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Post Treatment ◽

Bone Homeostasis ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase ◽

Osteoblast Activity ◽

Breast And Prostate Cancer

19659 Background: Bone metastases produce an imbalance in osteoblast and osteoclast activity. While metastases from prostate cancer are osteoblastic, metastases from breast cancer may be osteolytic, osteoblastic or mixed. The wnt/frizzled pathway is involved in maturation of osteoblasts and in adult bone homeostasis. We explored the wnt antagonists dickkopf (DKK1) and frizzled related protein (FRP) as potential biomarkers in bone metastasis after ZA treatment. Methods: This is a pilot cohort study in bisphosphonate naive breast and prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Cancer therapy was not specified. Patients received 2 monthly doses of ZA 4 mg IV. Pre- and post-treatment (day 60) sera were collected for measurement of FRP and DKK1, along with IL-6, calcium, creatinine and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP, a marker of osteoblast activity). Primary endpoint: mean change in FRP and DKK1; Secondary endpoints: correlation of biomarkers with each other and comparison of breast vs. prostate cancer patients. Biomarkers were measured using standard ELISA assays. Statistics: comparison of means = student t-test, correlation coefficients = Pearson. Results: Mature data from 14 patients are reported here, 9 with breast and 5 with prostate cancer. Mean age = 61 years (range 42–89). Two breast cancer patients were premenopausal. One prostate and 3 breast cancer patients received chemotherapy; all others were treated hormonally. After ZA, calcium decreased in all patients (p = 0.09). BAP decreased in all but 1 breast and 1 prostate cancer patient (mean decrease 20.0, p = 0.16). IL-6 was undetectable in most patients. FRP decreased in all but 4 patients (mean decrease 6.2, p = 0.13). There was no discernable pattern for DKK1. Pre-treatment DKK1 correlated with FRP (p = 0.01, r2 = 0.39), but there was no correlation post-treatment. Post-treatment DKK1 correlated with both serum calcium (p = 0.04, r2 = 0.49) and BAP (p = 0.005, r2 = 0.65). There was no difference between breast and prostate cancer patients. Conclusions: It is feasible to measure DKK1 and FRP in patients with malignant bone disease. Treatment with ZA has measurable effects upon these and other serum markers. Further studies with more patients are needed to evaluate their potential as biomarkers. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

DNA repair germline pathogenic mutation associations with treatment duration and family history in prostate cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.245 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 245-245

Author(s):

James Vu ◽

Marcus Marie Moses ◽

Lahiru Ranasinghe ◽

Patrick Cotogno ◽

Charlotte Manogue ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Dna Repair ◽

Family History ◽

Treatment Outcomes ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Pathogenic Mutation ◽

Germline Mutations ◽

Cancer Type ◽

History Of

245 Background: Germline mutation testing for metastatic prostate cancer patients creates a potential opportunity to personalize targeted therapies to improve treatment outcomes. The goal of this study was to characterize cancer family history, and evaluate treatment outcomes, in mCRPC patients with DNA repair pathogenic germline alterations. Methods: A retrospective study of metastatic PCa patients at Tulane Cancer Center identified 246 patients undergoing germline testing using panels (30-80 genes) (Color.com or Inviate.com). Clinical annotations included family history, life-extending treatments, and treatment duration. Statistical analyses including chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank Sum. Results: In the 246 patients tested for germline mutations, 27 patients (11.0%) had ≥1 DNA repair germline pathogenic mutation (BRCA2 = 11, BRCA1 = 3, CHEK2 = 5, ATM = 3, NBN = 1, PMS2 = 2, MSH2 = 1, PALB2 = 1) while 219 patients (89.0%) possessed no pathogenic mutation in these genes. Patients with a DNA repair pathogenic mutation were more likely to have > 2 family members affected by cancer, regardless of cancer type or degree of relationship (p = 0.04). In the DNA repair population, 5 pathogenic patients had no family history of cancer (18.5%, n = 5). Patients were more likely to have a germline alteration if they had 1 or more first degree relatives affected with breast cancer (p = 0.00001). Median lines of life-extending treatments to date between the pathogenic and non-pathogenic population were equal at 2. There were no significant differences in treatment duration for abiraterone (p = 0.49), enzalutamide (p = 0.99), docetaxel (p = 0.28), cabazitaxel (p = 0.53), carboplatin+docetaxel (p = 0.41), or radium-223 (p = 0.59) between the two groups. Conclusions: In this study, DNA repair pathogenic germline mutations did not affect treatment durations or lines of therapy but these studies are underpowered. The relationship between a family history of breast cancer and a DNA repair pathogenic mutation has not previously been reported.

Download Full-text

Comparison of germline mutations in African American and Caucasian men with metastatic prostate cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.5568 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 5568-5568

Author(s):

Elisa Marie Ledet ◽

Ellen Jaeger ◽

Whitley Hatton ◽

Marcus W. Moses ◽

Alexandra Sokolova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Dna Repair ◽

African American ◽

Family History ◽

Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽

Germline Mutations ◽

Dna Repair Genes ◽

Brca Mutations ◽

Repair Genes

5568 Background: The relevance of germline mutations in metastatic prostate cancer is well established; however, comparison of germline genetics in African American (AA) versus Caucasian (CA) men with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is limited. Methods: Germline data from self-identified AA and CA metastatic PCa patients (pts) were collected from 5 academic cancer centers. Various commercial cancer-specific germline testing panels were used to evaluate 12-86 genes. Pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) mutations, and variants of unknown significance (VUS), were reported according to ACMG guidelines. Self-reported family history (FH) was annotated for 99% of pts. Statistical analyses included Chi-squared and Fischer’s exact tests. Results: A total of 821 metastatic PCa pts were assessed: 152 AAs and 669 CAs. For P/LP alterations, AAs had a frequency of 11.2% (17/152) as compared to a frequency of 14.6% (98/669) in CAs (p = 0.302). AA pts were more likely to have a VUS than CA pts, 61% vs 43% respectively (OR = 2.09, 95%CI [1.45, 2.99], p < 0.001). BRCA mutations were similar between races, but AA were more likely to have a BRCA1 P/LP alteration (OR = 6.00, 95% CI [1.33, 27.09], p = 0.025). AA pts were less likely to have a P/LP alteration in a non-BRCA gene (OR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.15, 0.80], p = 0.013). Among DNA repair genes, there were no significant difference between AA and CA pts (p = 0.574); however, there was a trend toward AA pts having fewer P/LP alteration in a non-BRCA DNA repair genes (OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.06, 1.08], p = 0.071). In pts with >1 first degree relative (FDR) with ovarian cancer, P/LP germline alterations were more likely in CAs (OR = 2.33, 95% CI [1.05, 5.17], p = 0.043); but there were no significant differences in AAs (p = 0.098). Those with >2 FDRs with PCa were more likely to have a P/LP change in CAs (OR = 2.32, 95% CI [1.04, 5.15], p = 0.043), but there were no difference in AAs (p = 0.700). In pts with ≥2 FDRs with breast cancer, P/LP germline alterations were more likely in both AAs (OR = 9.36, 95% CI [1.72, 50.84], p = 0.019) and CAs (OR = 3.92, 95% CI [1.79, 8.59], p = 0.001). Conclusions: We did not observe a difference in the overall frequency of germline P/LP alterations between AA and CA men with metastatic PCa but VUSs were more common in AA men. These AA men have an overall frequency of BRCA mutations similar to CA men; however, BRCA1 mutations were more prevalent in these AAs. Non-BRCA P/LP mutations are significantly less frequent in AA pts. A positive family history of >2 FDRs with breast cancer was associated with P/LP alterations in both AA and CA pts.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of prescribing practices of denosumab and zoledronic acid in breast and prostate cancer patients at University of Chicago Medicine.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e24144 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e24144-e24144

Author(s):

Heng Yang ◽

Randall W Knoebel ◽

Sandeep Parsad ◽

Emma Carroll ◽

Walter Michael Stadler

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Zoledronic Acid ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Adherence Rate ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Castration Resistant ◽

Breast And Prostate Cancer

e24144 Background: Zoledronic acid (ZA) and denosumab are both bone-modifying agents (BMAs) approved for use in patients with bone metastases with breast or prostate cancer as well as patients who are receiving aromatase inhibitors (breast cancer) or androgen deprivation therapy (prostate cancer). There are various frequencies of administration, doses, and duration of these agents depending on indication and extent of disease. Currently there is data to show that ZA can be given every 3 months in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer, however, there is no data that clearly indicates that denosumab every 3 months is non-inferior to every 28 days. This study aimed to analyze current prescribing patterns of ZA and denosumab in metastatic breast cancer and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients at The University of Chicago Medicine (UCM). Methods: This was a retrospective study of 80 patients who received at least one dose of ZA or denosumab between July 1st 2018 to June 30th 2019 from UCM outpatient oncology clinic for the purpose of treating metastatic breast cancer or metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer in conjunction with standard antineoplastic therapy. All included patients must have bone metastases. Patients were divided into four groups by disease state (breast or prostate cancer) and BMA agent (ZA or denosumab). The primary outcome was BMA therapy adherence rate, which was defined by those who received greater than or equal to 80% of appropriately scheduled doses. Descriptive statistics were used for skeletal-related events (SREs) and BMA associated adverse effects. Results: Patients who received ZA achieved higher adherence rates (100% breast, 86% prostate) compared to patients that received denosumab (63% breast, 23% prostate). The most common reason for the lower adherence rate in denosumab groups was scheduling convenience. During the study period, there were 3, 0, 2 and 5 patients had SREs in the above four groups respectively. The predominant adverse event across all groups was hypocalcemia and two patients with prostate cancer on denosumab developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. The cost analysis showed using ZA as primary BMA agent might save up to 2.5 million dollars per year at UCM. Conclusions: The use ofZA was associated with higher adherence rates compared to denosumab. Implementing a pharmacy driven protocol for ZA use for patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer may improve BMA regimen adherence rates and significantly reduce costs.

Download Full-text