The use of the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care device to monitor platelet function across a range of P2Y12 inhibition levels following prasugrel and clopidogrel administration

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (02) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Payne ◽  
Ying G. Li ◽  
John T. Brandt ◽  
David S. Small ◽  
Nagy A. Farid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Function ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Light Transmission ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Limited Range ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Light Transmission Aggregometry

SummaryVariability in response to antiplatelet agents has prompted the development of point-of-care (POC) technology. In this study, we compared theVerifyNowTM P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12) POC device with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in subjects switched directly from clopidogrel to prasugrel. Healthy subjects on aspirin were administered a clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose (LD) followed by a 75 mg/d maintenance dose (MD) for 10 days. Subjects were then switched to a prasugrel 60 mg LD and then 10 mg/d MD for 10 days (n=16), or to a prasugrel 10 mg/d MD for 11 days (n=19). Platelet function was measured by LTA andVN-P2Y12 at baseline and after dosing. Clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg MD treatment led to a reduction in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) from baseline. A switch from clopidogrel MD to prasugrel 60 mg LD/10 mg MD produced an immediate decrease in PRU, while a switch to prasugrel 10 mg MD resulted in a more gradual decline. Consistent with the reduction in PRU, device-reported percent inhibition increased during both clopidogrel and prasugrel regimens. Inhibition of platelet aggregation as measured by LTA showed a very similar pattern to that found with VN-P2Y12 measurement, irrespective of treatment regimens. The dynamic range of VN-P2Y12 appeared to be narrower than that of LTA. With two different thienopyridines, the VN-P2Y12 device, within a somewhat more limited range, reflected the overall magnitude of change in aggregation response determined by LTA. The determination of the clinical utility of such POC devices will require their use in clinical outcome studies.

Quantifying the Effect of Antiplatelet Therapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 676-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seema Agarwal ◽  
Margaret Coakely ◽  
Kalpana Reddy ◽  
Anne Riddell ◽  
Susan Mallett
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Platelet Function ◽  
Light Transmission ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Perioperative Bleeding ◽  
Light Transmission Aggregometry ◽  
Function Analyzer ◽  
Platelet Function Analyzer ◽  
Ischemic Events ◽  
Good Agreement

Background Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is known to confer protection against ischemic events. Increasing numbers of patients are presenting for surgery while taking these drugs. This may lead to an increase in perioperative blood loss, particularly in those who have a heightened response to the drugs. Identifying these patients preoperatively would allow us to plan appropriate management. Methods The antiplatelet effect of aspirin and/or clopidogrel was measured using two point-of-care monitors: the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100; Dade, Miami, FL) and the modified thromboelastograph (mTEG; Haemoscope Corp., Niles, IL). This was compared with optical light transmission aggregometry. Results All people taking aspirin displayed a definitive aspirin effect on aggregometry (n = 20). Ninety percent of these were identified by modified thromboelastography (n = 18). Seventy percent were identified by the platelet function analyzer (n = 14). Fifty percent of people taking clopidogrel displayed a definitive response to the drug on aggregometry. Seventy percent of these were identified on modified thromboelastography (n = 7). None were identified by the platelet function analyzer. There was good agreement between the results of the aggregometry and modified thromboelastography in clopidogrel patients (kappa = 0.81). Conclusion The search for a point-of-care monitor of platelet function has been the focus of much research. This study has shown that the modified thromboelastograph can be used for monitoring the effect of clopidogrel as well as aspirin. It potentially has a wide scope to be used for the monitoring of effectiveness of therapy as well as a possible predictor of perioperative bleeding.

scholarly journals Sensitivity of Viscoelastic Tests to Platelet Function

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Ranucci ◽  
Ekaterina Baryshnikova
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Function ◽  
Light Transmission ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Dynamic Assessment ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Protease Activated Receptors ◽  
Specific Test ◽  
Clot Strength ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors

Viscoelastic tests provide a dynamic assessment of coagulation, by exploring the time to clot formation and the clot strength. Using specific activators or inhibitors, additional factors can be explored, like the fibrinogen contribution to clot strength. Since the early days, various attempts have been done to measure platelet function with viscoelastic test. In general, the difference between the maximum clot strength and the fibrinogen contribution is considered an index of platelet contribution. However, this parameter does not clearly split platelet count from function; additionally, the extensive thrombin generation of standard activated viscoelastic tests activates platelet through the protease activated receptors, bypassing the other pathways. For this reason, standard viscoelastic tests cannot be used to assess platelet reactivity under the effects of aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors. To overcome this limitation, a specific test was developed (thromboelastography platelet mapping). This test has been compared with the gold standard of light transmission aggregometry and with other point-of-care tests, with conflicting results. In general, the use of viscoelastic tests to assess the effects of antiplatelet agents is still limited. Conversely, platelet contribution to clot strength in the setting of coagulopathic bleeding is considered an important parameter to trigger platelet transfusion or desmopressin.

Malondialdehyde Assay in the Evaluation of Aspirin Antiplatelet Effects

Pharmacology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Polzin ◽  
Lisa Dannenberg ◽  
Theresa Schneider ◽  
Betül Knoop ◽  
David Naguib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Light Transmission ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Antibody Assay ◽  
Light Transmission Aggregometry ◽  
Artery Disease

Aspirin is essential in secondary prevention of patients after myocardial infarction and with coronary artery disease. However, impaired pharmacodynamic response to aspirin is frequent (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). This leads to an enhanced prevalence of cardiovascular events and to an impaired clinical outcome. The current specific assays to evaluate aspirin antiplatelet effects are complex, time-consuming and demand for a high laboratory expertise. Therefore, we developed a potentially bedside assay based on the determination of malondialdehyde (MDA). MDA is a by-product of the thromboxane (TX) formation, which is synthesized in equimolar concentrations. In this study, we compared this MDA assay to the conventional assays in determination of pharmacodynamic aspirin response. For this, aspirin antiplatelet effects were measured in 22 healthy individuals and 63 aspirin treated patients using TX B2 formation enzyme-linked antibody assay, arachidonic acid induced light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and the new fluorometric MDA assay. In patients, MDA levels correlated well with TX formation (R = 0.81; 95% CI 0.69–0.88; p < 0.001) and LTA (R = 0.84; CI 0.74–0.91; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that the MDA assay does detect HTPR to aspirin sufficiently (area under the curve: 0.965; p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off was > 128 nmol/L (sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 91%). The new MDA assay is reliable in detecting HTPR. It is highly specific in the evaluation of antiplatelet effects by aspirin. This promising and potential bedside assay needs to be evaluated in clinical practice.

Standardization of Light Transmission Aggregometry for Diagnosis of Platelet Disorders: An Inter-Laboratory External Quality Assessment

2019 ◽  
Vol 119 (07) ◽  
pp. 1154-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Althaus ◽  
Barbara Zieger ◽  
Tamam Bakchoul ◽  
Kerstin Jurk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Function ◽  
Light Transmission ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
Platelet Function Disorders ◽  
Light Transmission Aggregometry ◽  
Laboratory Survey ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractSeveral in vitro platelet function tests are available for the diagnosis of inherited platelet function disorders. Currently, the light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is recommended as one of the first-step tests. LTA is available in most specialized hemostasis laboratories. Although the LTA is accepted as a ‘gold standard’ assay for the evaluation of platelet function, its standardization in the clinical practice is still challenging. The GTH-based THROMKID-Plus Study Group has performed an inter-laboratory trial in Germany and Austria. Five different agonists were selected according to the Scientific and Standardization Committee/International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommendations and shipped in 3 different sets (one should represent a healthy control and two should simulate platelet function disorders) to 15 specialized laboratories in Germany and Austria. Agonists were analyzed by APACT or PAP4/8 aggregometer using platelet-rich plasma from healthy donors. In addition, laboratory-internal platelet agonists were tested in platelet-rich plasma from a healthy donor. All laboratories (9 used APACT, 6 used PAP4/PAP8) showed very consistent data regarding the maximum percentage of aggregation induced by the tested agonists and identified the differential diagnosis of the simulated platelet function disorders with one exception, which was due to technical problems. In contrast, there was a high variability of the laboratory-internal inductors regarding reagent type, concentrations and pathological cut-off values. Our study showed that the shipment of agonists is suitable for an inter-laboratory survey of LTA. However, there is still a remarkable need for standardization of agonist reagents and their concentration as well as for definition of reference ranges.

Assessment of ADP-induced platelet aggregation with light transmission aggregometry and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry before and after clopidogrel treatment

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (01) ◽  
pp. 121-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siegmund Braun ◽  
Stefan Jawansky ◽  
Wolfgang Vogt ◽  
Julinda Mehilli ◽  
Albert Schömig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Aggregation ◽  
Platelet Function ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Light Transmission ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Platelet Aggregometry ◽  
Light Transmission Aggregometry ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Standardized Method ◽  
Multiple Electrode

SummaryThe level of platelet aggregation, measured with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in platelet rich plasma (PRP), has been shown to predict outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, measuring parameters of platelet function with LTA is time consuming and weakly standardized. Thus, a fast and standardized method to assess platelet function after clopidogrel treatment would be of great value for clinical practice. A new method, multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA), to rapidly measure platelet aggregation in whole blood has recently been developed. The aim of this study was to assess parameters of platelet function with MEA and LTA before and after administration of 600 mg clopidogrel. Blood samples from 149 patients scheduled for coronary angiography were taken after clopidogrel treatment; in addition, in 60 of the patients samples were available before clopidogrel treatment. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was measured with LTA and simultaneously in whole blood with MEA on the Multiplate analyzer. Platelet aggregation measured with MEA decreased significantly after clopidogrel treatment (P<0.0001). ADP-induced platelet aggregation assessed with MEA and LTA correlated significantly (Spearman rank correlation coefficient=0.71; P<0.0001).The results of MEA, a fast and standardized method to assess the platelet response to ADP prior to and after clopidogrel treatment, correlate well with LTA.

scholarly journals Flow Cytometric Assessment of AKT Signaling in Platelet Activation: An Alternative Diagnostic Tool for Small Volumes of Blood

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S21-S25
Author(s):  
K. Althaus ◽  
M. Wagner ◽  
I. Marini ◽  
T. Bakchoul ◽  
L. Pelzl
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Platelet Function ◽  
Light Transmission ◽  
Akt Signaling ◽  
Flow Cytometer ◽  
Platelet Function Disorders ◽  
Light Transmission Aggregometry ◽  
Blood Volumes

Abstract Introduction The diagnosis of platelet function disorder in children is challenging. Light transmission aggregometry is the gold standard for platelet function disorders. However, large blood volumes are required. Currently, there are no existing tools for the diagnosis of platelet function disorders that use small blood volumes. AKT signaling plays a central role in platelet activation during hemostasis and might be visualized by flow cytometry. Methods Platelet-rich plasma obtained by centrifugation of citrated blood from healthy volunteers was activated with arachidonic acid, thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 (TRAP-6), collagen, adenosine diphosphate ADP, collagen-related peptide (CRP), and epinephrine. After platelet activation, the phosphorylation of AKT was assessed by flow cytometer using a Navios cytometer. Results Healthy volunteers showed a reproducible phosphorylation of AKT upon activation. In comparison to nonactivated platelets, we documented an increase in pAKT expression with all agonists. Especially TRAP-6 and CRP caused considerable increase in percentage of pAKT expression throughout all the tested healthy volunteers. Conclusion An activation of the AKT-signal pathway by different agonists can clearly be detected on the flow cytometer, indicating that the visualization of signaling in platelets by flow cytometry might be an efficient alternative for light transmission aggregometry to test platelet function in children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document