Comparison of two methods for selection of out of hospital treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (01) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique J. T. Crobach ◽  
Anneke Dolsma ◽  
Marjolein L. Donker ◽  
Michiel Eijsvogel ◽  
Laura M. Faber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Outpatient Treatment ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
At Home

SummaryThe aim of this study is to compare the performance of two clinical decision rules to select patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) for outpatient treatment: the Hestia criteria and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). From 2008 to 2010, 468 patients with PE were triaged with the Hestia criteria for outpatient treatment: 247 PE patients were treated at home and 221 were treated as inpatients. The outcome of interest was all-cause 30-day mortality. In a post-hoc fashion, the sPESI items were scored and patients were classified according to the sPESI in low and high risk groups. Of the 247 patients treated at home, 189 (77%) patients were classified as low risk according to the sPESI and 58 patients (23%) as high risk. In total, 11 patients died during the first month; two patients treated at home and nine patients treated in-hospital. None of the patients treated at home died of fatal PE. Both the Hestia criteria and sPESI selected >50% of patients as low risk, with good sensitivity and negative predictive values for 30-day mortality: 82% and 99% for the Hestia criteria and 91% and 100% for the sPESI, respectively. The Hestia criteria and the sPESI classified different patients eligible for out-patient treatment, with similar low risks for 30-day mortality. This study suggests that the Hestia criteria may identify a proportion of high risk sPESI patiennts who can be safely treated at home, this however requires further validation.

scholarly journals Pentraxin-3 Levels Relate to the Wells Score and Prognosis in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haotian Yang ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Ying Huan ◽  
Yawei Xu ◽  
Rong Guo
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Medium Risk ◽  
Wells Score ◽  
The Difference

Objective. To investigate the value of the PTX-3 test in evaluating the prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Method. 117 APE patients were selected and divided into two groups according to plasma PTX-3 levels, including the group in which PTX−3≥3.0 ng/mL (n=42) and the group in which PTX−3<3.0 ng/mL (n=75). Patients were stratified into high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk groups according to the Wells scores, and the PTX-3 levels were compared among the groups. Patients had been followed-up as well. Results. According to the Wells scores, 11 patients were classified as high-risk (9.4%) and 68 were medium-risk (58.1%), while 38 were low-risk (32.5%). The PTX-3 levels in different risk groups were statistically different (all P<0.05). During the follow-up period, 6 deaths occurred in the group with elevated PTX-3 (≥3.0 ng/mL), while 2 deaths occurred in the group with nonelevated PTX-3 (<3.0 ng/mL). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.01). 13 patients were hospitalized due to recurrent pulmonary embolism, of which 12 were in the group with elevated PTX-3 (≥3.0 ng/mL), while 1 patient was in the group with nonelevated PTX-3 (<3.0 ng/mL). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion. The plasma PTX-3 level in APE patients is correlated with PE risk stratification. There is a significant correlation between PTX-3 levels and PE-related cardiac deaths, as well as the prognosis of recurrent PE. PTX-3 can be used as a clinical indicator of PE prognosis.

Hospitalization or Outpatient Treatment for Acute Pulmonary Embolism - a Retrospective Cohort Study of 439 Consecutive Patients with Community-Aquired Pulmonary Embolism

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3416-3416
Author(s):  
Sebastian Werth ◽  
Virginia Kamvissi ◽  
Eberhard Kuhlisch ◽  
Jan Beyer-Westendorf
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Outpatient Treatment ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Subjective Assessment ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Discharge Treatment ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Abstract 3416 Introduction: Therapy of pulmonary embolism (PE) today is based on risk stratification scores. Outpatient treatment for selected low-risk patients seems feasible, but data are derived from selected patient cohorts. Little is known about risk factors or clinical outcomes in unselected cohorts. In our hospital, outpatient treatment of low-risk-PE has been standard for nearly ten years. We retrospectively analyzed risk profile and 6-month-outcome of in-hospital or outpatient treatment in patients with community-aquired acute PE (CA-PE). Objectives: To evaluate the proportion of patients with outpatient or early discharge treatment of CA-PE, to evaluate the value of HESTIA score to discriminate between low and high risk patients and to assess 6-month outcome. Methods: Retrospective evaluation of all cases with CA-PE. Inclusion criteria: 1) PE symptoms as reason for hospitalization (exclusion of hospital-aquired PE); 2) symptomatic and confirmed PE (CT or V/Q scan). Evaluation of patient characteristics, hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters and lab values and group comparisons between outpatient treatment (OT; hospitalized < 24h), early discharge (ED; hospitalized < 72h) and in-hospital treatment (HT) were performed. Result: Between 2000 and 2010, 439 patients were diagnosed with acute CA-PE (table 1). About 25% of patients could be treated as outpatients (n=49; 11.2%) or early discharged (n=63; 14.4%). Patients with in-hospital treatment of PE were significantly older and had more severe PE. Interestingly, the rate of patients with a positive history of VTE was highest in the group of outpatients (45%), followed by the early-discharge group (32%), indicating that these patients are diagnosed at an earlier stage with less severe PE. In contrast, only 25% of patients requiring in-hospital treatment of PE had a positive VTE history. Despite the differences in baseline characteristics, outcomes with regard to recurrent VTE, pulmonary hypertension or mortality were not significantly different between outpatients and early discharge patients. In contrast, outcomes of patients with in-hospital treatment was significantly different with higher mortality (0.0% vs. 3.2% vs. 15.8%). Conclusion: Even before ESC and Hestia scores were implemented, physicians subjective assessment based on hemodynamic, echocardiographic and laboratory parameters clearly discriminated between low, intermediate and high risk PE patients and allowed for outpatient treatment in low-risk PE in 11% of all PE patients. Early discharge was possible in 14% of all patients, despite higher HESTIA scores and a higher rate of elevated troponin levels, initial oxygen requirement or right heart strain in echocardiography. In contrast, patients requiring in-hospital PE treatment were older, had more severe PE and a high 6-month mortality. Despite a positive Hestia score in many patients, about 25% of all community-aquired PE patients can be safely treated as outpatient or early discharge treatment with low 6-month mortality. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals MR-proADM and MR-proANP levels in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Önsel Öner ◽  
Figen Deveci ◽  
Selda Telo ◽  
Mutlu Kuluöztürk ◽  
Mehmet Balin
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Relationship

Summary Background The aim of this study was to determine levels of Mid-regional Pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and Mid-regional Pro-atrial Natriuretic Peptide (MR-proANP) in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the relationship between these parameters and the risk classification in addition to determining the relationship between 1- and 3-month mortality. Methods 82 PE patients and 50 healthy control subjects were included in the study. Blood samples for MR-proANP and MR-proADM were obtained from the subjects prior to the treatment. Risk stratification was determined according to sPESI (Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index). Following these initial measurements, cases with PE were assessed in terms of all causative and PE related mortalities. Results The mean serum MR-proANP and MR-proADM levels in acute PE patients were found to be statistically higher compared to the control group (p < 0.001, p < 0.01; respectively) and statistically significantly higher in high-risk patients than low-risk patients (p < 0.01, p < 0.05; respectively). No statistical difference was determined in high-risk patients in case of sPESI compared to low-risk patients while hospital mortality rates were higher. It was determined that the hospital mortality rate in cases with MR-proANP ≥ 123.30 pmol/L and the total 3-month mortality rate in cases with MR-proADM ≥ 152.2 pg/mL showed a statistically significant increase. Conclusions This study showed that MR-proANP and MR-proADM may be an important biochemical marker for determining high-risk cases and predicting the mortality in PE patients and we believe that these results should be supported by further and extensive studies.

scholarly journals Does Baseline BUN Have an Additive Effect on the Prediction of Mortality in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaser Jenab ◽  
Ali-Mohammad Haji-Zeinali ◽  
Mohammad Javad Alemzadeh-Ansari ◽  
Shapour Shirani ◽  
Mojtaba Salarifar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Cardiac Biomarkers ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Prediction Of Mortality ◽  
Short Term Mortality ◽  
Acute Pe

Background: In patients with heart failure, elevated levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) is a prognostic factor. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of elevated baseline BUN in short-term mortality among patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, cardiac biomarkers and BUN levels were measured in patients with acute PE. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, evaluated based on the baseline BUN (≥14 ng/L) level in 4 groups of patients according to the European Society of Cardiology’s risk stratification (low-risk, intermediate low-risk, intermediate high-risk, and high-risk). Results: Our study recruited 492 patients with a diagnosis of acute PE (mean age=60.58±16.81 y). The overall 1-month mortality rate was 6.9% (34 patients). Elevated BUN levels were reported in 316 (64.2%) patients. A high simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) score (OR: 5.23, 95% CI: 1.43–19.11; P=0.012), thrombolytic or thrombectomy therapy (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.01–5.13; P=0.021), and elevated baseline BUN levels (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03; P=0.029) were the independent predictors of 30-day mortality. According to our receiver-operating characteristics analysis for 30-day mortality, a baseline BUN level of greater than 14.8 mg/dL was considered elevated. In the intermediate-low-risk patients, mortality occurred only in those with elevated baseline BUN levels (7.2% vs. 0; P=0.008). Conclusion: An elevated baseline BUN level in our patients with PE was an independent predictor of short-term mortality, especially among those in the intermediate-risk group.

scholarly journals Contemporary Clinical Management and Course of ACUTE Pulmonary Embolism: The COPE Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3230-3230
Author(s):  
Cecilia Becattini ◽  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
Aldo P Maggioni ◽  
Francesco Dentali ◽  
Andrea Fabbri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Bayer Healthcare ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Pe

Abstract Background. New management strategies, risk stratification procedures and treatments have become available over the last years for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), leading to changes in clinical practice and potentially influencing patient's course and outcome. Methods: The COntemporary management of Pulmonary Embolism (COPE) is an academical prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study in patients with confirmed acute symptomatic PE. In-hospital and 30-day mortality were the co-primary study outcomes. At first evaluation, patients were categorized at low-risk (simplified PESI [sPESI]=0), intermediate-risk (further classified based presence/absence of increased levels and right ventricle dysfunction [RVD] at echocardiography) and high-risk (shock or cardiac arrest). Results. Among 5213 study patients, PE was confirmed by computed tomography in 96.3% and at least one test for risk stratification was obtained in more than 80% (81% echocardiography, 83% troponin, 56% brain natriuretic peptide/NT-pro BNP). Among 4885 patients entering the Emergency Department for acute PE, 1.2% were managed as outpatients and 5.8% by short-observation. In-hospital, 289 patients underwent reperfusion (5.5%); at discharge, 6.7% received a vitamin K antagonist and 75.6% a direct oral anticoagulant. Median duration of hospitalization was 7 days (IQR 5-12 days). Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.4% (49% due to PE, 16% cancer and 4.5% major bleeding) and 30-day mortality 4.8% (36% PE, 28% cancer and 4% major bleeding). In-hospital major bleeding was 2.6%. Death at 30 days occurred in 22.6% of 177 high-risk patients, in 6% of the 3281 intermediate-risk and in 0.5% of 1702 low-risk patients. Time to death at 30 days in patients at low, intermediate and high risk for death is reported in the Figure. Conclusions: COPE is the largest ever cohort of patients with acute PE. In this contemporary scenario, the majority of patients received CT for diagnosis, at least one test for risk stratification and direct oral anticoagulants as long-term treatment. Short term death remains not negligible in patients with high and intermediate-risk PE. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Becattini: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Bayer HealthCare: Honoraria. Agnelli: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Bayer HealthCare: Honoraria. Dentali: Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Boehringer: Honoraria; Alfa Sigma: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?

Thrombosis ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Shafiq ◽  
Hamza Lodhi ◽  
Zaheer Ahmed ◽  
Ata Bajwa
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Pe

Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86–105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use.

Longer follow-up data of circulating miR371a-3p expression across the spectrum of germ cell tumors (GCT).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 379-379
Author(s):  
Lucia Nappi ◽  
Marisa Thi ◽  
Neetu Saxena ◽  
Maryam Soleimani ◽  
Bernhard J. Eigl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Predictive Values

379 Background: miR371a-3p (miR371) is overexpressed in seminoma (S) and nonseminoma (NS) active germ cell malignancy (aGCM) and easily detectable in blood. We previously described1 a remarkably high accuracy of miR371 in detecting aGCM in early and advanced stages germ cell tumor (GCT) patients (pts). We here present the updated miR371 expression data with a longer follow-up, particularly relevant to assess miR371 clinical utility to predict GCT relapse in clinical stage I (CSI) and stage IIA pts. Methods:119 samples from 99 pts enrolled in the GU biobank program at the British Columbia Cancer – Vancouver were analyzed. The pts were divided according to their risk of aGCM in low (CSIA NS and CSI S), moderate (CSIB NS, stage IIA markers negative/low elevated S and NS), and high risk (definitively metastatic aGCM) groups. Blood of the low and moderate risk pts was collected post orchiectomy and at the time of the clinical relapse; prior to/post-chemotherapy in the high risk group. Plasma miR371 expression was evaluated by RT-PCR and quantified by ΔΔCT method. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV, PPV) and AUC of the ROC curve were analyzed. Results: Five (2 moderate - 3 low risks) pts were lost at follow-up and 1 high risk pt had deceased. Overall, 113 samples (50, 36, 27 in the low, moderate, and high risk groups, respectively) were analyzed. The median follow-up from study entry was 30 (6-51), 28 (20-52), and 29 (7-53) months for the low, moderate and high risk, respectively. Seven more relapses occurred: 4 in the low risk (3 S and 1 NS) and 3 in the moderate risk groups (2 NS and 1 S). miR371 was found falsely negative post-orchiectomy in 4 pts and truly negative in 3 relapsed pts (2 pure teratoma and 1 unconfirmed relapse). Serial analysis of the false negative relapsed pts showed that miR371 became detectable at the time of clinical relapse. The operating characteristics of miR371 are summarized in the table below. Conclusions: Our follow-up has exceeded the expected time of relapse even in the low risk pts. The high accuracy of miR371 in detecting aGCM was confirmed with a longer follow up. However, the few false negatives in relapsed pts and the serial analysis suggest a lack of sensitivity in the detection of microscopic disease post-orchiectomy with the current methodology while miR371 high sensitivity was confirmed in presence of radiologic measurable disease (≥ 1 cm). The definitive operating characteristics of miR371 post-orchiectomy and during the follow-up of stages I/ IIA pts will be prospectively validated by the S1823 study that is actively recruiting pts. [Table: see text]

Out of Hospital Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with a Low NT-ProBNP Level.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3996-3996
Author(s):  
Mariette J Agterof ◽  
Roger E.G. Schutgens ◽  
Repke J Snijder ◽  
G. Epping ◽  
Henny G Peltenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Pe

Abstract Abstract 3996 Poster Board III-932 Background NT-proBNP is emerging to be of great importance in risk assessment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), by identifying both high and low-risk patients. The aim of the present management study was to investigate the safety of out of hospital treatment of patients with acute PE based on a NT-proBNP < 500 pg/ml. Methods Hemodynamically stable outpatients with objectively diagnosed acute PE and a NT-proBNP level < 500 pg/ml, were considered eligible for participation in this multicenter prospective study. Patients were discharged immediately from the emergency room or within the first 24 hours of admission. The primary objective was the 10-days mortality rate. Secondary objectives were the incidence of re-admission to hospital due to PE or its treatment, the patient's satisfaction during the first ten days of treatment and the incidence of serious adverse events in a 3-month follow-up period. Results Approximately 40 percent of all patients presenting at the emergency room with acute PE fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In total, 152 patients (mean age 53.4 ± 14.3 years; 51% female) with PE were treated as outpatients. No deaths, major bleedings or recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred during the first 10 days or in a follow-up period of 3 months. Seven patients required readmission. Three patients were admitted because of complaints of their PE: two patients with anxiety and pain and one patient with dyspnoea and low oxygen saturation. There were no signs of progression of PE in these 3 patients. Four patients were re-admitted because of an illness unrelated to PE. According to the PSQ18 and anxiety score, patients were satisfied with their out of hospital treatment; they had no progression of anxiety during the first ten days of treatment. Conclusion Out of hospital treatment is safe in a group of low risk patients with non-massive PE, based on NT-proBNP levels < 500 pg/ml. Approximately 40 percent of PE-patients can be treated in an outpatient setting. Patients consider out of hospital treatment as comfortable and have no increase in anxiety scores. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

PET Parameters are Useful in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Risk Classes and Prognosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan Budak ◽  
Emrah Beyan ◽  
Abdurrahman Hamdi Inan ◽  
Ahkam Göksel Kanmaz ◽  
Onur Suleyman Aldemir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Abstract Aim We investigate the role of preoperative PET parameters to determine risk classes and prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC). Methods We enrolled 81 patients with EC who underwent preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT. PET parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG), grade, histology and size of the primary tumor, stage of the disease, the degree of myometrial invasion (MI), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), cervical invasion (CI), distant metastasis (DM) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) were recorded. The relationship between PET parameters, clinicopathological risk factors and overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Results The present study included 81 patients with EC (mean age 60). Of the total sample, 21 patients were considered low risk (endometrioid histology, stage 1A, grade 1 or 2, tumor diameter < 4 cm, and LVI negative) and 60 were deemed high risk. All of the PET parameters were higher in the presence of a high-risk state, greater tumor size, deep MI, LVI and stage 1B-4B. MTV and TLG values were higher in the patients with non-endometrioid histology, CI, grade 3 and LNM. The optimum cut-off levels for differentiating between the high and low risk patients were: 11.1 for SUVmax (AUC = 0.757), 6 for SUVmean (AUC = 0.750), 6.6 for MTV(AUC = 0.838) and 56.2 for TLG(AUC = 0.835). MTV and TLG values were found as independent prognostic factors for OS, whereas SUVmax and SUVmean values were not predictive. Conclusions The PET parameters are useful in noninvasively differentiating between risk groups of EC. Furthermore, volumetric PET parameters can be predictive for OS of EC.

Short-term risk stratification using CADILLAC risk score in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Satou ◽  
H Kitahara ◽  
K Ishikawa ◽  
T Nakayama ◽  
Y Fujimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Recurrent Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background The recent reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has made the length of hospital stay shorter without adverse events. CADILLAC risk score is reportedly one of the risk scores predicting the long-term prognosis in STEMI patients. Purpose To invenstigate the usefulness of CADILLAC risk score for predicting short-term outcomes in STEMI patients. Methods Consecutive patients admitted to our university hospital and our medical center with STEMI (excluding shock, arrest case) who underwent primary PCI between January 2012 and April 2018 (n=387) were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to the CADILLAC risk score: low risk (n=176), intermediate risk (n=87), and high risk (n=124). Data on adverse events within 30 days after hospitalization, including in-hospital death, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, recurrent myocardial infarction, heart failure requiring intravenous treatment, stroke, or clinical hemorrhage, were collected. Results In the low risk group, adverse events within 30 days were significantly less observed, compared to the intermediate and high risk groups (n=13, 7.4% vs. n=13, 14.9% vs. n=58, 46.8%, p&lt;0.001). In particular, all adverse events occurred within 3 days in the low risk group, although adverse events, such as heart failure (n=4), recurrent myocardial infarction (n=1), stroke (n=1), and gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1), were substantially observed after day 4 of hospitalization in the intermediate and high risk groups. Conclusions In STEMI patients with low CADILLAC risk score, better short-term prognosis was observed compared to the intermediate and high risk groups, and all adverse events occurred within 3 days of hospitalization, suggesting that discharge at day 4 might be safe in this study population. CADILLAC risk score may help stratify patient risk for short-term prognosis and adjust management of STEMI patients. Initial event occurrence timing Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document