Abstract 2386: Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction as a Predictor of Incident Heart Failure and Mortality in the Elderly: The Cardiovascular Health Study

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Pandhi ◽  
Willem J Kop ◽  
John S Gottdiener

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is an important predictor of outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. Adverse effects of LVSD in individuals without heart failure, also known as asymptomatic LVSD (ALVSD), are not well established in the elderly. This study reports outcomes and evaluates the impact of LVSD in elderly subjects with ALVSD. The Cardiovascular Health Study is a multicenter longitudinal cohort study designed to assess cardiac risk factors and outcomes in a community-based population 65 years and older. The incidence of HF and mortality was evaluated in those with ALVSD with a median follow-up of 11.9 years. Cox regression was used, adjusting for demographics and cardiac risk factors, and stratified by severity of LVSD. Incident HF occurred in 39.2% of those with ALVSD vs. 22.8% in those without LVSD (RR = 1.51, CI = 1.25–1.84). Impaired ejection fraction (EF) (< 45%) was associated with more than twice the risk of incident HF than normal systolic function (RR = 2.21; CI 1.67–2.91). Individuals with borderline EF (45–55%) did not have an increased risk of incident HF (RR = 1.21; CI 0.94–1.56). The severity of LVSD was also predictive of mortality: borderline LVSD RR = 1.23 (CI 1.04–1.47) for all-cause mortality and 1.60 (CI 1.26–2.03) for cardiac death; impaired LVSD RR = 1.54 (CI 1.24–1.92) for all-cause mortality and RR = 2.12 (CI 1.60–2.81) for cardiac death. ALVSD is associated with increased risk of heart failure, death, and cardiac death when compared to normal systolic function. Furthermore, the degree of systolic dysfunction has a significant impact in predicting these outcomes in elderly individuals with ALVSD.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Borrelli ◽  
P Sciarrone ◽  
F Gentile ◽  
N Ghionzoli ◽  
G Mirizzi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Central apneas (CA) and obstructive apneas (OA) are highly prevalent in heart failure (HF) both with reduced and preserved systolic function. However, a comprehensive evaluation of apnea prevalence across HF according to ejection fraction (i.e HF with patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction- HFrEf, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively) throughout the 24 hours has never been done before. Materials and methods 700 HF patients were prospectively enrolled and then divided according to left ventricular EF (408 HFrEF, 117 HFmrEF, 175 HFpEF). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation including: 2D echocardiography; 24-h Holter-ECG monitoring; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; neuro-hormonal assessment and 24-h cardiorespiratory monitoring. Results In the whole population, prevalence of normal breathing (NB), CA and OA at daytime was 40%, 51%, and 9%, respectively, while at nighttime 15%, 55%, and 30%, respectively. When stratified according to left ventricular EF, CA prevalence decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF and HFpEF: (daytime CA: 57% vs. 43% vs. 42%, respectively, p=0.001; nighttime CA: 66% vs. 48% vs. 34%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001), while OA prevalence increased (daytime OA: 5% vs. 8% vs. 18%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001; nighttime OA: 20 vs. 29 vs. 53%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001). When assessing moderte-severe apneas, defined with an apnea/hypopnea index &gt;15 events/hour, prevalence of CA was again higher in HFrEF than HFmrEF and HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe CA: 28% vs. 19% and 23%, respectively, p&lt;0.05) and at nighttime (nighttime moderate-severe CA: 50% vs. 39% and 28%, respectively, p&lt;0.05). Conversely, moderate-severe OA decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF to HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe OA: 1% vs. 3% and 8%, respectively, p&lt;0.05) and nighttime (noghttime moderate-severe OA: 10% vs. 11% and 30%, respectively, p&lt;0.05). Conclusions Daytime and nighttime apneas, both central and obstructive in nature, are highly prevalent in HF regardless of EF. Across the whole spectrum of HF, CA prevalence increases and OA decreases as left ventricular systolic dysfunction progresses, both during daytime and nighttime. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2001 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneel TALWAR ◽  
Iain B. SQUIRE ◽  
Russell J. O'BRIEN ◽  
Paul F. DOWNIE ◽  
Joan E. DAVIES ◽  
...  

The glycoprotein 130 (gp130) signalling pathway is important in the development of heart failure. Cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1), a cytokine acting via the gp130 pathway, is involved in the process of ventricular remodelling following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in animals. The aims of the present study were to examine the profile of plasma CT-1 following AMI in humans, and its relationship with echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Serial measurements of plasma CT-1 levels were made in 60 patients at 14-48h, 49-72h, 73-120h and 121-192h following AMI and at a later clinic visit. LV function was assessed using a LV wall motion index (WMI) score on admission (WMI-1) and at the clinic visit (WMI-2). Compared with values in control subjects (29.5±3.6fmol/ml), the plasma CT-1 concentration was elevated in AMI patients at 14-48h (108.1±15.1fmol/ml), 49-72h (105.2±19.7fmol/ml), 73-120h (91.2±14.9fmol/ml) and 121-192h (118.8±22.6fmol/ml), and at the clinic visit (174.9±30.9 fmol/ml) (P < 0.0001). Levels were higher following anterior compared with inferior AMI. For patients with anterior AMI, CT-1 levels were higher at the clinic visit than at earlier times. WMI-1 correlated with CT-1 at all times prior to hospital discharge (P < 0.05). On best subsets analysis, the strongest correlate with WMI-1 was CT-1 level at 49-72h (R2 = 20%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, plasma levels of CT-1 are elevated soon after AMI in humans and rise further in the subsequent weeks in patients after anterior infarction. CT-1 measured soon after AMI is indicative of LV dysfunction, and this cytokine may have a role in the development of ventricular remodelling and heart failure after AMI.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Pandhi ◽  
Willem J Kop ◽  
John S Gottdiener

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction without heart failure (HF), also known as asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ALVSD), is at least as prevalent in the general population as left ventricular systolic dysfunction with heart failure (HF-LVSD). However, the clinical characteristics of ALVSD have not been well defined in an elderly population. Our aim is to evaluate the clinical features of elderly community-based individuals with ALVSD. The Cardiovascular Health Study is a multicenter cohort study designed to assess cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes in a population 65 years and older. This study quantifies baseline demographic variables and cardiovascular risk factors in participants with ALVSD. Comparisons were made with two reference groups: individuals with HF-LVSD, and those with normal left ventricular systolic function without HF (NL-LVSF). ALVSD was present in 385 of 5152 participants (7.5%) at baseline, whereas HF-LVSD was present in 84 participants (1.6%). Among those with ALVSD, 251 (65.2%) had borderline ejection fraction (EF) (45–54%), and 134 (34.8%) had impaired EF (< 45%). ALVSD was associated with elevated cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities compared to NL-LVSF but lower than those in individuals with HF-LVSD (see table ). Among participants with ALVSD, impaired EF was associated with male sex and higher prevalence of coronary disease and LVH compared with borderline LV function. ALVSD is more common than HF-LVSD in community-dwelling elderly individuals. Furthermore, it is characterized by more cardiac risk factors and comorbidities than those with NL-LVSF, but less than those with HF-LVSD. The severity of systolic dysfunction is associated with comorbid cardiovascular risk factors. ALVSD may identify an important group of individuals at high risk for heart failure and cardiovascular mortality. Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Between ALVSD, NL-LVSF, and HF-LVSD


2000 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. TALWAR ◽  
I. B. SQUIRE ◽  
P. F. DOWNIE ◽  
R. J. O'BRIEN ◽  
J. E. DAVIES ◽  
...  

Cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1) is a cytokine that has been implicated as a factor involved in myocardial remodelling. The objective of the present study was to establish the relationship between circulating levels of CT-1 and measures of left ventricular size and systolic function in patients with heart failure. We recruited 15 normal subjects [six male; median age 60 years (range 30–79 years)] and 15 patients [11 male; median age 66 years (range 43–84 years)] with a clinical diagnosis of heart failure and echocardiographic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Echocardiographic variables (left ventricular wall motion index, end-diastolic and -systolic volumes, stroke volume, fractional shortening) and plasma CT-1 levels were determined. In patients with LVSD [median wall motion index 0.6 (range 0.3–1.4)], CT-1 was elevated [median 110.4 fmol/ml (range 33–516 fmol/ml)] compared with controls [wall motion index 2 in all cases; median CT-1 level 34.2 fmol/ml (range 6.9–54.1 fmol/ml); P < 0.0001]. Log CT-1 was correlated with log wall motion index (r = -0.76, P < 0.0001), log left ventricular end-systolic volume (r = 0.54, P < 0.05), stroke volume (r = -0.60, P = 0.007) and log fractional shortening (r = -0.70, P = 0.001). In a multivariate model of the predictors of log wall motion index, the only significant predictor was log CT-1 (R2 = 56%, P = 0.006). This is the first assessment of the relationship between plasma CT-1 levels and the degree of LVSD in humans, and demonstrates that CT-1 is elevated in heart failure in relation to the severity of LVSD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document