Abstract 18785: Should We Recommend Triple Therapy for Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation With a High Score HAS-BLED?

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Sambola
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Introduction: Current clinical guidelines recommend the use of HAS-BLED score to assess the risk of bleeding in patients requiring oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting (PCI-S). Hypothesis: The use of OAC in patients requiring OAC with a high score HAS-BLED would be not safe. Objective: To evaluate the safety of OAC in patients with indication and a high risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED score ≥ 3) who undergoing PCI-s. Methods: A prospective multicenter study was conducted from 2007 to 2012 to identify patients requiring long-term OAC undergoing PCI-S. All adverse outcomes were analyzed at 1-year follow-up. Results: We identified 828 patients requiring OAC (77.3% male, 72.0±9.3 years) undergoing PCI-S. Five-hundred thirteen (62%) had a HAS-BLED ≥ 3. Of these, 329 (64.8%) received OAC. These patients had a mortality rate (10.1% vs. 10.3%) and major adverse cardiac events rate (MACE) (19.6% vs. 18.8%, p=0:46) similar to those who did not receive OAC. However, bleeding events rate was significantly higher (15.1% vs. 23.7%, p=0.01) with an excess of major bleeding (3.4% vs. 9.2%, p=0.01) in patients treated on OAC. In a multivariate analysis, in patients with a HAS-BLED ≥ 3: age (p=0.02) and renal failure (p <0.001) were predictors of mortality, but OAC was not associated with mortality. The only predictor of bleeding events was the use of OAC (p=0.01), while renal failure and use of drug eluting stents were not. Conclusions: A high percentage of patients undergoing PCI-S have a high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED ≥ 3). In these patients, the use of OAC does not seem to improve prognosis, but increases the incidence of major bleeding.

Acute coronary syndrome patients with two minor high-bleeding risk criteria have the same bleeding rate that patients with one major criteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cordero ◽  
J.M Garcia-Acuna ◽  
M Rodriguez-Manero ◽  
B Cid ◽  
B Alvarez Alvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
High Bleeding Risk ◽  
Minor Criteria

Abstract Background In 2019 the Academic Research Consortium of high-bleeding risk (ARC-HBR) proposed a new and binary definition of high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients based on the presence of 1 major or 2 minor criteria. Methods Prospective study of all consecutive patients admitted for ACS in two different centers. We analyzed bleeding incidence in patients with 1 major criteria (1MC) vs. 2 minor criteria (2mC) using the 2019 ARC-HBR consensus. Bleeding events were collected according those fitting definitions 3 or 5 of the BARC consortium. Results We included 8,724 patients included and 40.9% we classified as HBR; 20.9% for 1MC and 20.0% for 2mC. In-hospital mayor bleeding rate was 8.6%; no-HBR patients had 0.3%, 2mC 15.1% and 1MC 29.7% (p&lt;0.001 for the comparison). In contrast, the statistically highest in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with 2mC (11.4%), followed by patients with 1MC (8.0%) and no-HBR patients (2.0%). During follow-up (median time 57.8 months) all-cause mortality rate was 21.0% and cardiovascular dead 14.2%. The incidence of post-discharge major bleeding was 10.5%. No-HBR patients had the lowest bleeding rate (7.4%) and no difference was observed in patients with 1MC (14.6%) or 2mC (15.8%) (figure). The multivariate analysis, adjusted by age, gender, medical treatment, atrial fibrillation and revascularization and considering all-cause mortality as competing risk, showed independent association of 1MC (sHR: 1.46, 95% 1.22–1.75) and 2mC (sHR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.05–1.63) with post-discharge major bleeding. Conclusions HBR patients according to the 2019 ARC-HBR containing 2mC or 1MC are at similar and higher risk of in-hospital or post-discharge bleeding events Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 16570: Systemic Inflammation Alters the Bleeding-Ischemic Balance in High-Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johny Nicolas ◽  
Davide Cao ◽  
Bimmer E Claessen ◽  
Mauro Chiarito ◽  
Samantha Sartori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Syntax Score ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Introduction: Prognosis in high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is largely dependent on risk of ischemic/bleeding events. Inflammation is known to increase the ischemic risk following PCI in the general population, yet its impact on HBR patients remains unknown. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that inflammation, as reflected by elevated high-sensitivity C - reactive protein (hsCRP), increases the risk of ischemic and bleeding events in HBR patients undergoing PCI. Methods: We included patients who underwent PCI at a tertiary care center between 2014 and 2017. Patients were classified as HBR if they met ≥1 major or ≥2 minor criteria according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-HBR consensus. Patients were then stratified into high (≥3 mg/l) and low (<3 mg/ml) baseline hsCRP level; those presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) or hsCRP >10 mg/l were excluded. The main outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (composite of all-cause death, MI, and target vessel revascularization) and bleeding events. Results: Out of 7,186 patients included, 3,403 (42.3%) fulfilled the ARC-HBR definition of whom 1,046 (34.4%) had high hsCRP. These patients were frequently female, younger, and had more cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, kidney disease, and peripheral artery disease) yet similar angiographic features (multivessel disease, syntax score, and lesion length) than those with low hsCRP. Although risk of MACE at 1 year was similar in HBR patients with either high or low hsCRP, mortality risk was significantly higher in the former group ( Figure 1 ). In addition, HBR patients with high hsCRP were more likely to have periprocedural bleeding (OR 1.72, 95% CI [1.14-2.58], p=0.01) but similar risk of 1-year major bleeding as HBR patients with low hsCRP ( Figure 1 ). Conclusion: In conclusion, inflammation is associated with periprocedural bleeding and 1-year mortality in HBR patients undergoing PCI.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes in high-bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes: results from a large single-center pci registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Nicolas ◽  
D Cao ◽  
B Claessen ◽  
S Sartori ◽  
R Chandiramani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Introduction Current clinical guidelines recommend prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, an extended DAPT duration in high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients amplifies the risk of post procedural complications. Hence, clinicians often face the dilemma of prolonging DAPT duration to prevent recurrent ischaemic events at the expense of increasing the incidence of bleeding in high-risk patients. The actual incidence of ischaemic and bleeding events in this particular population is not well elucidated. Purpose To evaluate one-year ischemic and bleeding outcomes following PCI for ACS in a real-world HBR population as defined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) consensus document. Methods We included all patients who presented with ACS to a high-volume single PCI centre from 2012 to 2017 and underwent PCI with 2nd generation drug-eluting stent implantation. Patients were classified as HBR if they met ≥1 major or ≥2 minor criteria according to the recent ARC-HBR consensus. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major bleeding events, including both peri-procedural and post-discharge bleeding. All outcomes were assessed at 1-year follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analyses. Results Out of 6,097 ACS patients included in this analysis, 2,717 (44.6%) fulfilled the ARC-HBR definition. Compared to non-HBR group, HBR patients were more frequently female, older, more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) and complex coronary artery disease (e.g., multi-vessel disease, bifurcation lesions, and calcification). The 1-year incidence of MACE was significantly higher in HBR patients (16.3% vs. 8.1%, HR 2.16, 95% CI [1.81–2.59], p&lt;0.001) (Figure 1A). This finding was driven by higher rates of all-cause death and MI (Figure 1B). The 1-year incidence of major bleeding was also significantly higher in HBR patients compared to non-HBR (11.1% vs. 3.1%, HR: 3.92, 95% CI 3.10–4.95; p&lt;0.001). Conclusions HBR patients undergoing PCI for ACS are not only subject to bleeding complications but are also at an increased risk for ischemic events and all-cause mortality. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Bleeding Risk Profile in Patients on Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Prospective 24 Months Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Schukraft ◽  
Tibor Huwyler ◽  
Cindy Ottiger-Mankaka ◽  
Sonja Lehmann ◽  
Ezia Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Background: The Academic Research Consortium has identified a set of major and minor risk factors in order to standardize the definition of a high bleeding risk (ACR-HBR). Oral anticoagulation is a major criterion frequently observed.Aims: The objective of this study is to quantify the risk of bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulation with at least one additional major ACR-HBR criteria in the Cardio-Fribourg Registry.Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively included in the Cardio-Fribourg registry. The study population included patients with ongoing long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) and planned to receive triple antithrombotic therapy. Patients were divided in two groups: patients on OAC with at least one additional major ACR-HBR criteria vs. patients on OAC without additional major ACR-HBR criteria. The primary endpoint was any bleeding during the 24-month follow-up. Secondary bleeding endpoint was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Classification (BARC) ≥3.Results: Follow-up was completed in 142 patients at high bleeding risk on OAC, of which 33 (23%) had at least one additional major ACR-HBR criteria. The rate of the primary endpoint was 55% in patients on OAC with at least one additional ACR-HBR criteria compared with 14% in patients on OAC without additional ACR-HBR criteria (hazard ratio, 3.88; 95%CI, 1.85–8.14; p &lt; 0.01). Patients with additional major ACR-HBR criteria also experienced significantly higher rates of BARC ≥ 3 bleedings (39% at 24 months).Conclusion: The presence of at least one additional ACR-HBR criterion identifies patients on OAC who are at very high risk of bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in high bleeding risk patients presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes: insights from the multicenter START-ANTIPLATELET registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Gragnano ◽  
E Moscarella ◽  
P Calabro' ◽  
A Cesaro ◽  
P.C Pafundi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
P Value ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Background Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains debated. Although current guidelines recommend the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in these patients (according to the labeled indications), clopidogrel is frequently used in clinical practice based on a perceived advantage in terms of safety in the HBR population. Purpose We sought to investigate the use of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in consecutive HBR ACS patients and their impact on ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year. Methods ACS patients enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry with at least 1 HBR criterion were included in the present analysis and stratified according to DAPT type (clopidogrel versus ticagrelor). The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical endpoint (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and stroke, each individual component of NACE and MACE, and target vessel revascularization. Results Among a total of 1,209 patients with 1-year follow-up in the registry, 383 patients were considered at HBR, of whom 174 (45.4%) were on clopidogrel and 209 (54.6%) on ticagrelor. Clopidogrel was more likely to be administered in patients at increased ischemic and bleeding risk, while ticagrelor in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Mean DAPT duration was longer in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (10.40±4.29 versus 9.35±5.4; p-value=0.03). At 1-year follow-up, the risk of NACE and MACE events was significantly higher in the clopidogrel than in the ticagrelor group (NACE: HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.07–3.09; p-value=0.02; MACE: HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.04–3.24; p-value=0.03) (Figure). After multivariate adjustment for clinical and procedural characteristics, no difference in NACEs nor MACEs was observed between patients on clopidogrel versus ticagrelor (NACE: adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.71–2.27; p-value=0.42; MACE: adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.63–2.24; p-value=0.59) (Figure). Age, number of HBR criteria, and mean DAPT duration were independent predictors of NACEs. Conclusions In a real-world ACS registry, approximately 50% of patients are at HBR and frequently treated with clopidogrel. In HBR ACS patients, no difference was observed in ischemic and bleeding events between clopidogrel and ticagrelor after adjustment for potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier curves at 1-year follow-up. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

P3726Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and conservative antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindication to oral anticoagulation: a 5-year follow-up study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Pouru ◽  
S Jaakkola ◽  
J Lund ◽  
F Biancari ◽  
A Saraste ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Closure ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Device Embolization ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) having high thromboembolic risk and either a history of major bleeding or very high bleeding risk form a treatment challenge. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) offers a feasible option for stroke prevention in these patients. However, the optimal treatment strategy for AF patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (OAC) remains unclear. Purpose To study periprocedural and late events after LAAC in AF patients with contraindications to OAC therapy. Methods Data were collected into a prospective registry from all consenting AF patients who underwent LAAC from February 2009 to August 2018. Follow-up data was gathered during scheduled clinical visits, annual phone calls and by reviewing electronic patient records. Only AF patients with contraindications to OAC were considered for the present analysis. Results LAAC using mainly Amplatzer Cardiac Plugs (98.2%) was attempted in a total of 172 patients (mean age 74 years; 60 women). The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.8±1.5 and HAS-BLED score 4.0±1.0. Contraindications to OAC were prior intracranial bleeding in 112 (65.1%), other major bleeding in 33 (19.2%) and high bleeding risk in 27 patients (15.7%). Procedure was technically successful in 166 (96.5%) patients. Clinically significant in-hospital complications were as follows: two patients (1.2%) had cardiac tamponade, which was fatal in one case, one (0.6%) had device embolization and eight (4.7%) had major access site-related bleeding events. None of the patients had in-hospital thromboembolic complications. After successful implantation, 152 patients (91.6%) were discharged on aspirin. Single antiplatelet therapy was more common than dual or triple antiplatelet therapy (74.7% vs. 18.1% vs. 1.8%, respectively), while 8 patients (4.8%) received no antiplatelet therapy. The length of initial antiplatelet therapy ranged from 0.5 to 12 months and long-term antiplatelet therapy was prescribed in 53 patients (31.9%). After a median follow-up of 33 months (interquartile range 12–49) there were 29 deaths (17.5%), 16 thromboembolic events (9.6%), consisting of 11 strokes (6.6%) and 5 transient ischemic attacks (3.0%). At the time of thromboembolic event, 10 patients (62.5%) were on antithrombotic therapy. Eighteen patients (10.8%) had at least one major bleeding event after the index hospitalization. Intracranial bleeding occurred in 7 patients (4.2%) and 6 of them (85.7%) were on antithrombotic therapy when the event occurred. Most thromboembolic events (68.8%) and intracranial bleedings (57.1%) occurred after one year of follow-up. One patient (0.6%) had an asymptomatic device embolization detected at 3-month control visit. No predictive factors for thromboembolic or major bleeding events were identified. Conclusion The early outcome of this challenging patient group is good after LAAC, but thromboembolic and major bleeding events are not uncommon during later follow-up.

P686Cancer is not associated with increased cardiac and bleeding events after 2nd- and 3rd-generation drug-eluting stents implantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Muramatsu ◽  
Y Minami ◽  
K Ishida ◽  
A Kato ◽  
A Katsura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Previous studies demonstrated the impact of concomitant cancer on the increased risk of adverse cardiac and bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the impact in this 2nd- and 3rd-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) era remains to be elucidated. Purpose To clarify the impact of cancer on clinical outcomes in patients after 2nd- or 3rd -generation DES implantation. Methods A total of 932 patients who underwent PCI with 2nd- or 3rd -generation DES were included. Patients who were diagnosed with cancer after PCI were excluded from the present cohort. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target or non-target vessel revascularization, and bleeding events was compared between the patients with cancer or the history of treatment for cancer (cancer group, n=140) and the patients without cancer (no cancer group, n=792). Bleeding events were evaluated according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction definition. Further comparisons were performed between the 2 groups (cancer group, n=126; no cancer group, n=252) after the adjustment of baseline clinical characteristics using 1:2 propensity score-matching analysis. Results The incidence of MACE at median 577 [340–1043] days after the PCI was comparable between the 2 groups in both unadjusted (15.0% vs. 15.0%, p=0.984) (Panel A) and adjusted cohorts (14.3 vs. 13.1%, p=0.796), although the incidence of all cause death in the cancer group was significantly greater than the no cancer group (15.1 vs. 9.5%, p=0.007, in the adjusted cohort). The increased risk of MACE was not observed in any types of cancer or treatment (Panel B). The incidence of bleeding events was also comparable between the 2 groups (4.0 vs. 2.0%, p=0.297, in the adjusted cohort). Conclusion The increased incidence of MACE and bleeding events in patients with cancer was not demonstrated after the 2nd- or 3rd-generation DES implantation. Further studies are required to clarify the safety and efficacy of PCI in patients with cancer.

Abstract 12014: Modified HASBLED Bleeding Risk Score in Dialysis Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Murphy ◽  
William Maddox ◽  
Stan Nahman ◽  
Matthew Diamond ◽  
Robert Sorrentino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Introduction: Hemodialysis patients (HD pts) with atrial fibrillation (AF) have increased risk of stroke. The HASBLED (Hypertension (HTN), Abnl Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding Hx, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol) risk score predicts bleeding in the general AF population. It is unknown whether the HASBLED score can be applied to HD pts who are at additional bleeding risk due to uremic platelet dysfunction and the regular use of heparin. Hypothesis: To address this question, we queried the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) for bleeding events in HD pts with AF, and correlated those events with a modified HASBLED (mHASBLED) score. Methods: All incident HD pts with AF from the USRDS for 2006-2010 were queried for major bleeding events and mHASBLED parameters using ICD-9 diagnosis codes and data from CMS form 2728. For mHASBLED, the HTN parameter was defined as "HTN as the cause of renal failure", and labile INR as > 16 INRs/yr, but all other parameters could be derived from the dataset. Logistic regression (LR) analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for the mHASBLED score to predict major bleeding events. Results: 74,631 HD pts had AF, and 9.8% had a major bleeding event (GI bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke). By univariate analysis, those who bled were more likely to be elderly, have an underlying cause of renal disease due to HTN, prior bleeding event, hepatitis C, labile INR, and be on oral anticoagulants. By LR, variables with the greatest impact on bleeding were HTN as a cause of underlying renal disease, prior bleeding history, and labile INR (OR of 1.10, 2.20 and 2.24, respectively). The OR for bleeding events increased by 1.28 for each unit increase in mHASBLED. Older age, prior stroke, abnormal renal or liver function, and drug use had the least effect. Note that the lowest possible score in this cohort is 1, given that all patients had renal failure. Conclusions: In HD pts with AF, the mHASBLED predicts major bleeding events. The universal presence of renal disease, and the lack of specific clinical data from the USRDS may limit the clinical precision of a given score, however mHASBLED may remain a useful indicator of bleeding risk in this population.

Abstract 12614: Total Thrombus Formation Analysis System Can Predict High Bleeding Risk in Coronary Artery Disease Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Nakanishi ◽  
Koichi Kaikita ◽  
Kenichi Tsujita
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Research Consortium ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Introduction: Antithrombotic therapy is established for the treatment in various cardiovascular events, however, it has shown to increase the bleeding risk. Total Thrombus-formation Analysis System (T-TAS) is reported to be useful for evaluating thrombogenicity. Hypothesis: We examined whether T-TAS might predict 1-year bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study at Kumamoto University Hospital between April 2017 and March 2019. Blood samples obtained on the day of PCI were used in T-TAS to compute the thrombus formation area under the curve (AUC) (AR10-AUC30, AUC for AR chip). We divided the study population into 2 groups according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) (182 patients in ARC-HBR positive, 118 in ARC-HBR negative). The primary endpoint was 1-year bleeding events that were defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type2, 3, or 5. Results: The AR10-AUC30 levels were significantly lower in the ARC-HBR positive group than in the ARC-HBR negative group (median [interquartile range] 1568.1 [1258.5-1744.1] vs. 1723.1 [1567.0-1799.5], p<0.001). The combination of ARC-HBR and AR10-AUC30 could discriminate the bleeding risk, and improved predictive capacity compared with ARC-HBR by c-statistics and integrated discrimination improvement. In multivariate Cox hazards analyses, combining ARC-HBR and lower AR10-AUC30 levels were significantly associated with 1-year bleeding events. Decision curve analysis revealed that combining AR10-AUC30 with ARC-HBR ameliorated risk-prediction of bleeding events. Conclusions: The results highlighted that AR10-AUC30 could be a potentially useful marker for predicting high bleeding risk in patients undergoing PCI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document