Abstract P174: Effects of Immediate Blood Pressure Reduction on Death and Major Disability in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients According to Time from Onset to Treatment

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tan Xu ◽  
Yonghong Zhang ◽  
Yingxian Sun ◽  
Chung-Shiuan Chen ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction: Although elevated blood pressure (BP) is very common in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the management of hypertension among them remains controversial. Hypothesis: We tested the effects of immediate BP reduction on death and major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge and 3-month follow-up in patients with acute ischemic stroke according to time from stroke onset to initiation of antihypertensive treatment (<12, 12-23, and ≥24 hours). Methods: The China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS) randomly assigned patients with ischemic stroke within 48 hours of onset and elevated systolic BP (SBP) to receive antihypertensive treatment (N=2,038) or to discontinue all antihypertensive medications (N=2,033) during hospitalization. Study outcomes were assessed at 14 days or hospital discharge and 3-month post-treatment follow-up. The primary outcome was death and major disability (modified Rankin Scale score≥3), and secondary outcomes included recurrent stroke and vascular events. Results: Mean SBP was reduced 12.7% in the antihypertensive treatment group and 7.2% in the control group within 24 hours after randomization (P<0.001). Mean SBP was 137.3 mmHg in the antihypertensive treatment group and 146.5 in the control group at day 7 after randomization (P<0.001). At 14 days or hospital discharge, the primary and secondary outcomes were not significantly different between treatment and control groups according to time from onset to treatment. At the 3-month follow-up, death or major disability (odds ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97, p=0.03), recurrent stroke (odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.72, p=0.01), and vascular events (odds ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.96, p=0.04) were significantly reduced in the antihypertensive treatment group among participants with time from stroke onset to treatment initiation ≥24 hours only. Conclusion: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke, BP reduction with antihypertensive medications might reduce 3-month death and major disability, recurrent stroke, and vascular events among those who initiated antihypertensive treatment after 24 hours from stroke onset.

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tan Xu ◽  
Yonghong Zhang ◽  
Yingxian Sun ◽  
Chung-Shiuan Chen ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction: The effects of blood pressure (BP) reduction on clinical outcomes among acute stroke patient remain uncertain. Hypothesis: We tested the effects of immediate BP reduction on death and major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge and 3-month follow-up in acute ischemic stroke patients with and without a previous history of hypertension or use of antihypertensive medications. Methods: The China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS) randomly assigned patients with ischemic stroke within 48 hours of onset and elevated systolic BP (SBP) to receive antihypertensive treatment (N=2,038) or to discontinue all antihypertensive medications (N=2,033) during hospitalization. Randomization was stratified by participating hospitals and use of antihypertensive medications. Study outcomes were assessed at 14 days or hospital discharge and 3-month post-treatment follow-up. The primary outcome was death and major disability (modified Rankin Scale score≥3), and secondary outcomes included recurrent stroke and vascular events. Results: Mean SBP was reduced 12.7% in the treatment group and 7.2% in the control group within 24 hours after randomization (P<0.001). Mean SBP was 137.3 mmHg in the treatment group and 146.5 in the control group at day 7 after randomization (P<0.001). At 14 days or hospital discharge, the primary and secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the treatment and control groups by subgroups. At the 3-month follow-up, recurrent stroke was significantly reduced in the antihypertensive treatment group among patients with a history of hypertension (odds ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.75, P=0.003) and among patients with a history of use of antihypertensive medications (odds ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.84, P=0.01). All-cause mortality (odds ratio 2.84, 95% CI 1.11-7.27, P=0.03) was increased among patients without a history of hypertension. Conclusion: Immediate BP reduction lowers recurrent stroke among acute ischemic stroke patients with a previous history of hypertension or use of antihypertensive medications at 3 months. On the other hand, BP reduction increases all-cause mortality among patients without a history of hypertension.


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang He ◽  
Yonghong Zhang ◽  
Tan Xu ◽  
Dali Wang ◽  
Chung-Shiuan Chen ◽  
...  

Although elevated blood pressure (BP) is very common in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the management of hypertension among them remains controversial. We tested the effect of immediate BP reduction on two-year mortality and major disability in acute ischemic stroke patients. The China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke, a randomized, single-blind, blinded end-points trial, was conducted in 4,071 patients with ischemic stroke within 48 hours of onset and elevated systolic BP (SBP). Patients were randomly assigned to receive antihypertensive treatment (n=2,038) or to discontinue all antihypertensive medications (n=2,033) during hospitalization. Post-treatment follow-ups were conducted at 3, 12, and 24 months after hospital discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of death and major disability at the two-year follow-up visit. Mean SBP was reduced by 21.8 in the treatment group and 12.7 mm Hg in the control group within 24 hours after randomization (P<0.001). Mean SBP was 137.3 mm Hg in the treatment group and 146.5 in the control group at day 7 after randomization (P<0.001). At two-year follow-up, study outcomes were obtained in 1945 (95.4%) participants in the treatment group and 1925 (94.7%) in the control group. 78.8% of the patients in the treatment group and 72.6% in the control group reported the use of antihypertensive medications (p<0.001). SBP was 138.8 mmHg in the antihypertensive treatment group and 139.7 in the control group (p=0.02). Among patients in the antihypertensive treatment group, 24.5% (476/1945) died or had a major disability, compared with 22.1% (425/1925) in the control group (odds ratio 1.14 [95% CI 0.99 to 1.33], p=0.078). Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality (1.01 [0.81, 1.25], p=0.95), recurrent stroke (0.91 [0.73, 1.13], p=0.40), and vascular events (0.97 [0.79, 1.19], p=0.76) were not statistically significant comparing the antihypertensive treatment group to the control group. The effect of antihypertensive treatment did not differ by pre-defined subgroups. In conclusion, among patients with acute ischemic stroke, BP reduction with antihypertensive medications during hospitalization did not reduce or increase the composite outcome of death and major disability over two years.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang He ◽  
Yonghong Zhang ◽  
Tan Xu ◽  
Qi Zhao ◽  
Chung-Shiuan Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction: Observational studies have reported that a decrease in blood pressure (BP) within the first several days after stroke onset was associated with poorer, better, or no difference in adverse clinical outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Hypothesis: We investigated the association of immediate BP lowering in acute ischemic stroke patients with major clinical outcomes at 14 days or hospital discharge and at a 3 month follow-up visit. Methods: CATIS is a randomized clinical trial conducted in 4,071 Chinese patients with ischemic stroke within 48 hours of onset and elevated systolic BP (SBP). Patients were randomly assigned to receive antihypertensive treatment or control. The primary outcome was a combination of death and major disability (a modified Rankin score ≥3) at 14 days or hospital discharge or at the 3 month follow-up visit. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for baseline age, gender, SBP, NIHSS score, time of stroke onset, history of antihypertensive treatment, and intervention assignment. Results: Compared to patients with a >0-10% reduction in systolic BP within the first 24 hours after admission, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for patients with ≤0%, 11-20%, and ≥21% reduction in SBP were 1.40 (1.08, 1.82), 1.00 (0.81, 1.23), and 0.98 (0.73, 1.30) at 14 days or hospital discharge; and 1.31 (1.00, 1.71), 0.82 (0.66, 1.02), and 0.78 (0.58, 1.05) at 3 months follow-up. Compared to patients with a BP 130-139/85-89 mmHg at 7 days after admission, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for patents with BP <130/85, 140-159/90-99, and ≥160/100 mmHg were 1.07 (0.82, 1.38), 1.09 (0.89, 1.34), and 1.58 (1.18, 2.11) at 14 days or hospital discharge, and 0.89 (0.67, 1.17), 1.10 (0.89, 1.36), and 1.50 (1.11, 2.03) at 3 months follow-up, respectively. Conclusions: These data indicate that a lack of BP reduction in the first 24 hours of hospitalization and higher BP levels at 7 days after admission predict increased risk of death and major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge and at 3 months follow-up.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 186-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Bu ◽  
Changwei Li ◽  
Yonghong Zhang ◽  
Tan Xu ◽  
Dali Wang ◽  
...  

Background: Clinical trials have generally showed a neutral effect of blood pressure (BP) reduction on clinical outcomes among acute ischemic stroke patients. We conducted a prespecified subgroup analysis to assess whether disease severity modifies the effect of early antihypertensive treatment on death and disability among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: In the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke, 4,071 patients with acute ischemic stroke and elevated BP were randomly assigned to receive antihypertensive treatment or to discontinue all hypertension medications within 48 h of symptom onset. The primary outcome was a combination of death and major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. In this subgroup analysis, participants were categorized into 3 groups according to their baseline NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (0-4, 5-15, or ≥16). Results: At 24 h after randomization, mean systolic BP differences (95% CIs) were -8.5 (-10.0 to -7.1), -9.8 (-11.4 to -8.3), and -9.1 (-14.4 to -3.8) mm Hg between the treatment and control groups (all p values <0.001) for patients with a baseline NIHSS score of 0-4, 5-15, and ≥16, respectively. At day 7 after randomization, the corresponding mean systolic BP differences were -9.3 (-10.5 to -8.2), -9.1 (-10.3 to -7.8), and -10.1 (-15.1 to -5.1) mm Hg between the treatment and control groups (all p values <0.001). The primary outcome was not significantly different between the treatment and control groups at day 14 or hospital discharge among all NIHSS subgroups (p value for homogeneity = 0.66). ORs (95% CI) associated with treatment were 1.14 (0.87-1.49, p = 0.33), 1.04 (0.86-1.25, p = 0.70), and 0.67 (0.18-2.44, p = 0.54) for patients with a baseline NIHSS score of 0-4, 5-15, and ≥16, respectively. The composite outcome of death and major disability at 3-month follow-up did not differ between the 2 comparison groups for all NIHSS subgroups. In addition, vascular events and recurrent stroke were not significantly different between the 2 comparison groups at the 3-month follow-up visit among all NIHSS subgroups except that there was a suggestive risk reduction for recurrent stroke among those with an NIHSS score of 5-15 (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.99, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Early BP reduction with antihypertensive medications did not reduce or increase the risk of death, major disabilities, recurrent instances of stroke, and vascular events in acute ischemic stroke patients with a variety of disease severities.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-tae Kim ◽  
Hee-Joon Bae ◽  

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and large artery diseases (LAD) share several risk factors and often coexist in the same patient. Optimal treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with concomitant AF and LAD have not been extensively studied so far. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the addition of antiplatelet (AP) to oral anticoagulant (OAC) with that of OAC alone in AIS with AF according to the LAD. Methods: Using a multicenter stroke registry, acute (within 48h of onset) and mild-to-moderate (NIHSS score ≤15) stroke patients with AF were identified. Propensity scores using IPTW were used to adjust baseline imbalances between the OAC+AP group and the OAC alone group in all patients and in each subgroup by LAD. The primary outcome was major vascular events, defined as the composite of recurrent stroke, MI, and all-cause mortality at up to 3 months after index stroke. Results: Among the 5469 patients (age, 72±10yrs; male, 54.9%; initial NIHSS score, 4 [2-9]), 79.0% (n=4323) received OAC alone, and 21.0% (n=1146) received OAC+AP. By weighted Cox proportional hazards analysis, a tendency of increasing the risk of 3-months primary composite events in the OAC+AP group vs the OAC alone (HR 1.36 [0.99-1.87], p=0.06), with significant interaction with treatments and LAD (Pint=0.048). Briefly, among patients with moderate-to-severe large artery stenosis, tendency of decrease in 3-months primary composite events of the OAC+AP group, compared with OAC alone group, was observed (HR 0.54 [0.17-1.70]), whereas among patients with complete occlusion, the OAC+AP group markedly increased the risk of 3-months composite events (HR 2.00 [1.27-3.15]), compared with the OAC alone group. No interaction between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin on outcome was observed (Pint=0.35). Conclusion: In conclusion, treatment with addition of AP to OAC had a tendency to increase the risk of 3-months vascular events, compared with OAC alone in AIS with AF. However, the effects of antithrombotic treatment could be modified according to the LAD, with substantial benefits of OAC alone in subgroup of large artery occlusion. Our results address the need for the further study to tailor the optimal treatment in AIS with concomitant AF and LAD.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Lee ◽  
Yi-Ling Wu ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Jiann-Der Lee ◽  
Hui-Hsuan Wang ◽  
...  

Background: The efficacy of statin therapy in the prevention of recurrent stroke and major adverse cardiovascularevents (MACE) was clearly established by the SPARCL trial; but SPARCL excluded patients whose index stroke was due to a presumed cardioembolic mechanism. As such, it remains unclear whether statins are beneficial in cardioembolic stroke patients, particularly those with atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective: To evaluate the relationship between statin use and future vascular risk reduction among recent ischemic stroke patients with AF Methods: We analyzed the Taiwan National Health Insurance registry which comprises beneficiaries aged ≥ 18 years. Code ICD-9 was used to identify a primary hospitalization diagnosis of ischemic stroke and AF among subjects encountered between 2003 and 2009. Follow-up was from time of the index stroke to admission for recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction; withdrawal from the registry; and last medical claim before 1/1/2011. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether statin was prescribed (at least 30 days vs. never used) during the follow-up period. Patients were excluded if they did not take any antithrombotic agent within 30 days before an endpoint. Primary endpoint was MACE (composite of stroke and myocardial infarction) and a key secondary endpoint was any recurrent stroke. Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI for the development of events were estimated using Cox models. Model was adjusted for baseline age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction, hyperlipidemia, hospital level, and antithrombotic agent during follow-up. Results: Among 4455 eligible patients, mean age was 71 years and mean follow-up duration was 2.8 years.Compared to non-statin use, statin use was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of MACE (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99, P=0.04) and recurrent stroke (adjusted HR 0.82, 0.69 to 0.97, P=0.02). Statin use was also linked to lower ischemic stroke risk, but had neutral effects on intracranial hemorrhage and myocardial infarction. Conclusion: Among patients with an index ischemic stroke and AF, statin use is associated with a lower risk of recurrent vascular events including stroke.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
xiaoqing bu ◽  
Yonghong Zhang ◽  
Tan Xu ◽  
Hao Peng ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction: The relationship between estimated-glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and acute ischemic stroke outcomes remains controversial. Hypothesis: We aimed to evaluate the impact of eGFR on all-cause mortality, recurrent stroke, and vascular events in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: 4036 patients with acute ischemic stroke recruited from 26 hospitals across China from August 2009 to May 2013 were included in our study. GFR was estimated by CKD-EPI equations based on serum creatinine and/or cystatin C (CKD-EPIcr, CKD-EPIcys, and CKD-EPIcr-cys). The Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between declined eGFR and 1-year all-cause mortality, recurrent stroke, and vascular events. Declined eGFR was defined as <60 mL/min /1.73 m2. Results: Declined eGFR was present in 7.22% (n=281) of patients based on the CKD-EPIcr equation, 3.43% (n=119) based on the CKD-EPIcys equation, and 5.67% (n=170) based on the CKD-EPIcr-cys equation. Compared to patients with an eGFR ≥90 mL/min /1.73 m2, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality associated with eGFR<60 mL/min /1.73 m2 were 1.68 (1.06 to 2.66, p=0.026), 2.29 (1.29 to 4.06, p=0.005), and 1.79 (1.08 to 2.98, p=0.024) using CKD-EPIcr, CKD-EPIcys, and CKD-EPIcr-cys equations, respectively. For recurrent stroke, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.90 (0.49 to 1.66, p=0.743), 0.60 (0.19 to 1.93, p=0.393), and 0.89 (0.40 to 1.95, p=0.762), respectively. For vascular events, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.33 (0.81 to 2.19, p=0.266), 1.07 (0.46 to 2.47, p=0.880), and 1.31 (0.70 to 2.43, p=0.403), respectively. Conclusion: Our study indicates that declined eGFR is a strong independent risk factor for total mortality among patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, there is no association between low eGFR and recurrent stroke or vascular events among patients with acute ischemic stroke. In addition, the association of eGFR with all-cause mortality among patients with acute ischemic stroke is stronger when eGFR was calculated based on the CKD-EPIcys equation compared to CKD-EPIcr and CKD-EPIcr-cys equations.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manon Kappelhof ◽  
Manon L. Tolhuisen ◽  
Kilian M. Treurniet ◽  
Bruna G. Dutra ◽  
Heitor Alves ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Thrombus perviousness estimates residual flow along a thrombus in acute ischemic stroke, based on radiological images, and may influence the benefit of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to investigate potential endovascular treatment (EVT) effect modification by thrombus perviousness. Methods: We included 443 patients with thin-slice imaging available, out of 1766 patients from the pooled HERMES (Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke trials) data set of 7 randomized trials on EVT in the early window (most within 8 hours). Control arm patients (n=233) received intravenous alteplase if eligible (212/233; 91%). Intervention arm patients (n=210) received additional EVT (prior alteplase in 178/210; 85%). Perviousness was quantified by thrombus attenuation increase on admission computed tomography angiography compared with noncontrast computed tomography. Multivariable regression analyses were performed including multiplicative interaction terms between thrombus attenuation increase and treatment allocation. In case of significant interaction, subgroup analyses by treatment arm were performed. Our primary outcome was 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score), resulting in an adjusted common odds ratio for a one-step shift towards improved outcome. Secondary outcomes were mortality, successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, 2B–3), and follow-up infarct volume (in mL). Results: Increased perviousness was associated with improved functional outcome. After adding a multiplicative term of thrombus attenuation increase and treatment allocation, model fit improved significantly ( P =0.03), indicating interaction between perviousness and EVT benefit. Control arm patients showed significantly better outcomes with increased perviousness (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1–1.3]). In the EVT arm, no significant association was found (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.9–1.1]), and perviousness was not significantly associated with successful reperfusion. Follow-up infarct volume (12% [95% CI, 7.0–17] per 5 Hounsfield units) and chance of mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.70–0.97]) decreased with higher thrombus attenuation increase in the overall population, without significant treatment interaction. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the benefit of best medical care including alteplase, compared with additional EVT, increases in patients with more pervious thrombi.


Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1357
Author(s):  
Anthony Winder ◽  
Matthias Wilms ◽  
Jens Fiehler ◽  
Nils D. Forkert

Interventional neuroradiology is characterized by engineering- and experience-driven device development with design improvements every few months. However, clinical validation of these new devices requires lengthy and expensive randomized controlled trials. This contribution proposes a machine learning-based in silico study design to evaluate new devices more quickly with a small sample size. Acute diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI, segmented one-week follow-up imaging, and clinical variables were available for 90 acute ischemic stroke patients. Three treatment option-specific random forest models were trained to predict the one-week follow-up lesion segmentation for (1) patients successfully recanalized using intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy, (2) patients successfully recanalized using intravenous thrombolysis, and (3) non-recanalizing patients as an analogue for conservative treatment for each patient in the sample, independent of the true group membership. A repeated-measures analysis of the three predicted follow-up lesions for each patient revealed significantly larger lesions for the non-recanalizing group compared to the successful intravenous thrombolysis treatment group, which in turn showed significantly larger lesions compared to the successful mechanical thrombectomy treatment group (p < 0.001). A groupwise comparison of the true follow-up lesions for the three treatment options showed the same trend but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.19). We conclude that the proposed machine learning-based in silico trial design leads to clinically feasible results and can support new efficacy studies by providing additional power and potential early intermediate results.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Xu ◽  
Peng Zuo ◽  
Yuqin Wang ◽  
Zhiwei Gao ◽  
Kaifu Ke

Abstract Background: Recent studies have suggested that omentin-1 plays a critical role in the development of cardiovascular disease. However, reported findings are inconsistent, and no study has evaluated the association between omentin-1 levels and a poor functional outcome after ischemic stroke onset. Methods: A total of 266 acute ischemic stroke patients were included in this study. All patients were prospectively followed up for 3 months after acute ischemic stroke onset and a poor functional outcome was defined as a major disability or death occurring during the follow-up period. A multivariable logistic model was used to evaluate the association between serum omentin-1 levels and the functional outcome of ischemic stroke patients at 3 months. Results: Ischemic stroke patients with poor functional outcome had significantly lower levels of serum omentin-1 than patients without poor functional outcome at the 3-month follow-up (50.2 [40.2–59.8] vs. 58.3 [44.9–69.6] ng/mL, p<0.01). Subjects in the highest tertile of serum omentin-1 levels had a 0.38-fold risk of having poor functional outcome, compared with those in the lowest tertile (p<0.05). A negative association between omentin-1 levels and poor functional outcome was found (p for trend=0.02). The net reclassification index was significantly improved in predicting poor functional outcome when omentin-1 data was added to the multivariable logistic regression model. Conclusions: Higher omentin-1 levels at baseline were negatively associated with poor functional outcome among ischemic stroke patients. Omentin-1 may represent a biomarker for predicting poor functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document