Abstract 008: Machine Learning For Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction: The Artherosclerosis Risk In Communities Study

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Yu ◽  
Shannon Wongvibulsin ◽  
Linda Zhou ◽  
Kunihiro Matsushita ◽  
Pradeep Natarajan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of death in the US and has significant public health impact. However, effective risk stratification for SCD remains lacking as current prediction models do not address the dynamic impact of time-varying risk factors including interim clinical events on SCD risk. Hypothesis: A recently developed machine learning approach that uses time-dependent variables and incorporate complex interactions between risk factors, Random Forest for Survival, Longitudinal, and Multivariate Data (RF-SLAM), will be able to improve SCD risk prediction. Methods: ARIC study participants were followed for adjudicated SCD. RF-SLAM partitions the information for each individual into multiple units (analogous to risk sets) and uses Poisson regression log-likelihood as the split statistic thus allowing for modeling time-varying variables. It was compared to a Poisson regression model with stepwise selection to predict SCD. Time-varying variables collected at four visits were used as candidate predictors for both prediction models, including demographics and clinical characteristics, anthropometric variables, lifestyle factors, cardiac risk factors, medication, laboratory values and biomarkers, electrophysiologic variables, and other cardiac functional indices. Predictive accuracy was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) through out-of-bag prediction for RF-SLAM model and 10-fold cross validation for Poisson regression model. Results: Over 25 years follow-up, 590 SCD events occurred among 15792 ARIC participants mean age 54 years (55% women). Compared to Poisson regression (cross-validated mean AUC 0.75), RF-SLAM model improved prediction (mean AUC 0.83). RF-SLAM model identified prior coronary heart disease (CHD) as the top predictor for SCD. Other predictors selected by RF-SLAM included clinical characteristics (diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, prior stroke, and prior heart failure), electrophysiologic variables (T wave abnormality in any of leads I, aVL, and V6, and ST junction & segment depression in any of leads I, aVL, or V6), medication (anti-hypertensive medications and anti-diabetic medications), biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin T, troponin I, and creatinine), subclinical atherosclerotic indices (carotid intima-media thickness), as well as race, sex and visit. Using the 17 predictors selected by RF-SLAM model to fit a Poisson regression model, a generalized linear model, resulted in a mean AUC of 0.73, suggesting that the interactions captured by random forest improve prediction performance. Conclusions: Applying a novel machine-learning approach with time-varying predictors improves the prediction of SCD. Clinical characteristics, especially prior CHD, are important for predicting SCD in the general population.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oskar Flygare ◽  
Jesper Enander ◽  
Erik Andersson ◽  
Brjánn Ljótsson ◽  
Volen Z Ivanov ◽  
...  

**Background:** Previous attempts to identify predictors of treatment outcomes in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) have yielded inconsistent findings. One way to increase precision and clinical utility could be to use machine learning methods, which can incorporate multiple non-linear associations in prediction models. **Methods:** This study used a random forests machine learning approach to test if it is possible to reliably predict remission from BDD in a sample of 88 individuals that had received internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for BDD. The random forest models were compared to traditional logistic regression analyses. **Results:** Random forests correctly identified 78% of participants as remitters or non-remitters at post-treatment. The accuracy of prediction was lower in subsequent follow-ups (68%, 66% and 61% correctly classified at 3-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups, respectively). Depressive symptoms, treatment credibility, working alliance, and initial severity of BDD were among the most important predictors at the beginning of treatment. By contrast, the logistic regression models did not identify consistent and strong predictors of remission from BDD. **Conclusions:** The results provide initial support for the clinical utility of machine learning approaches in the prediction of outcomes of patients with BDD. **Trial registration:** ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02010619.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Mosavi

Several epidemiological models are being used around the world to project the number of infected individuals and the mortality rates of the COVID-19 outbreak. Advancing accurate prediction models is of utmost importance to take proper actions. Due to a high level of uncertainty or even lack of essential data, the standard epidemiological models have been challenged regarding the delivery of higher accuracy for long-term prediction. As an alternative to the susceptible-infected-resistant (SIR)-based models, this study proposes a hybrid machine learning approach to predict the COVID-19 and we exemplify its potential using data from Hungary. The hybrid machine learning methods of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and multi-layered perceptron-imperialist competitive algorithm (MLP-ICA) are used to predict time series of infected individuals and mortality rate. The models predict that by late May, the outbreak and the total morality will drop substantially. The validation is performed for nine days with promising results, which confirms the model accuracy. It is expected that the model maintains its accuracy as long as no significant interruption occurs. Based on the results reported here, and due to the complex nature of the COVID-19 outbreak and variation in its behavior from nation-to-nation, this study suggests machine learning as an effective tool to model the outbreak. This paper provides an initial benchmarking to demonstrate the potential of machine learning for future research.


Author(s):  
Philippe Saliou ◽  
Lila Calmettes ◽  
Hervé Le Bars ◽  
Christopher Payan ◽  
Valérie Narbonne ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Microbiological surveillance of bronchoscopes and automatic endoscope reprocessors (AERs)/washer disinfectors as a quality control measure is controversial. Experts also are divided on the infection risks associated with bronchoscopic procedures. Objective: We evaluated the impact of routine microbiological surveillance and audits of cleaning/disinfection practices on contamination rates of reprocessed bronchoscopes. Design: Audits were conducted of reprocessing procedures and microbiological surveillance on all flexible bronchoscopes used from January 2007 to June 2020 at a teaching hospital in France. Contamination rates per year were calculated and analyzed using a Poisson regression model. The risk factors for microbiological contamination were analyzed using a multivariable logistical regression model. Results: In total, 478 microbiological tests were conducted on 91 different bronchoscopes and 57 on AERs. The rate of bronchoscope contamination significantly decreased between 2007 and 2020, varying from 30.2 to 0% (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that retesting after a previous contaminated test was significantly associated with higher risk of bronchoscope contamination (OR, 2.58; P = .015). This finding was explained by the persistence of microorganisms in bronchoscopes despite repeated disinfections. However, the risk of persistent contamination was not associated with the age of the bronchoscope. Conclusions: Our results confirm that bronchoscopes can remain contaminated despite repeated reprocessing. Routine microbial testing of bronchoscopes for quality assurance and audit of decontamination and disinfection procedures can improve the reprocessing of bronchoscopes and minimize the rate of persistent contamination.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-44
Author(s):  
Joseph Simonian ◽  
Chenwei Wu ◽  
Daniel Itano ◽  
Vyshaal Narayanam

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document