scholarly journals Blood Pressure and Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Hemodialysis

Hypertension ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisha Bansal ◽  
Charles E. McCulloch ◽  
Mahboob Rahman ◽  
John W. Kusek ◽  
Amanda H. Anderson ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Rivera ◽  
Leonardo Tamariz ◽  
Maritza Suarez ◽  
Gabriel Contreras

Background: Management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients includes efforts directed toward modifying traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Such efforts include optimal management of hypertension together with the initiation of statin therapy. Methods: In this observational study, we determine the modifying effect of statins on the relationship of systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal with mortality and other outcomes in patients with CKD participating in a clinical trial. At baseline, 2,646 CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were randomized to an intensive SBP goal < 120 mm Hg or standard SBP goal <140 mm Hg. One thousand two hundred and seventy-three were not on statin, 1,354 were on a statin, and in 19 the use of statin was unknown. The 2 primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Results: The relationships of SBP goal with all-cause mortality (interaction p = 0.009) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (interaction p = 0.021) were modified by the use of statin after adjusting for age, gender, race, CVD history, smoking, aspirin use, and blood pressure at baseline. In the statin group, targeting SBP to < 120 mm Hg compared to SBP < 140 mm Hg significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.44 [0.28–0.71]; event rates 1.16 vs. 2.5 per 100 patient-years) and CV mortality (aHR 0.29 [0.12–0.74]; event rates 0.28 vs. 0.92 per 100 patient-years) after a median follow-up of 3.26 years. In the non-statin group, the risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 1.07 [0.69–1.66]; event rates 2.01 vs. 1.94 per 100 patient-years) and CV mortality (aHR 1.42 [0.56–3.59]; event rates 0.52 vs. 0.41 per 100 patient-years) were not significantly different in both SBP goal arms. Conclusion: The combination of statin therapy and intensive SBP management leads to improved survival in hypertensive patients with CKD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 858-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy O Mathew ◽  
Jerome Fleg ◽  
Janani Rangaswami ◽  
Bo Cai ◽  
Arif Asif ◽  
...  

AbstractBACKGROUNDCentral arteriovenous fistula (cAVF) has been investigated as a therapeutic measure for treatment-resistant hypertension in patients without advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). There is considerable experience with the use of AVF for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, there is sparse data on the blood pressure (BP) effects of an AVF among patients with ESRD. We hypothesized that AVF creation would significantly reduce BP compared with patients who did not have an AVF among patients with ESRD before starting hemodialysis.METHODSBPs were compared during the 12 months before hemodialysis initiation in 399 patients with an AVF or AV graft created and 4,696 patients without either.RESULTSAfter propensity score matching 1:2 ratio (AVF to no AVF), repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significant reductions of –1.7 mm Hg systolic and –3.9 mm Hg diastolic BP 12 months in patients after AVF creation; P = 0.025 and P &lt; 0.001, respectively, compared with those with no AVF.CONCLUSIONSThese findings suggest that AVF creation results in modest BP reduction in patients with pre-dialysis ESRD who require AVF for eventual hemodialysis therapy. Preferential diastolic BP reduction suggests that greater work is needed to characterize the ideal patient subset in which to use cAVF for treatment-resistant hypertension in those without advanced CKD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard L Fu ◽  
Alicia Uijl ◽  
Friedo W Dekker ◽  
Lars H Lund ◽  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Beta-blockers reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) were underrepresented in landmark trials. We evaluated if beta-blockers are associated with improved survival in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD. Method We identified 3906 persons with an ejection fraction &lt;40% and advanced CKD (eGFR &lt;30 mL/min/1.73m2) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry during 2001-2016. The associations between beta-blocker use, 5-year all-cause mortality, and the composite of time to cardiovascular (CV) mortality/first HF hospitalization were assessed by multivariable Cox regression. Analyses were adjusted for 36 variables, including demographics, laboratory measures, comorbidities, medication use, medical procedures, and socioeconomic status. To assess consistency, the same analyses were performed in a positive control cohort of 12,673 patients with moderate CKD (eGFR &lt;60-30 mL/min/1.73m2). Results The majority (89%) of individuals with HFrEF and advanced CKD received treatment with beta-blockers. Median (IQR) age was 81 (74-86) years, 36% were women and median eGFR was 26 (20-28) mL/min/173m2. During 5 years of follow-up, 2086 (53.4%) individuals had a subsequent HF hospitalization, and 2954 (75.6%) individuals died, of which 2089 (70.1%) due to cardiovascular causes. Beta-blocker use was associated with a significant reduction in 5-year all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.96)] and CV mortality/HF hospitalization (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.98). The magnitude of the associations between beta-blocker use and outcomes was similar to that observed for HFrEF patients with mild/moderate CKD, with adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality and CV mortality/HF hospitalization of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.96), respectively. Conclusion Despite lack of trial evidence, the use of beta-blockers in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD was high in routine Swedish care, and was independently associated with reduced mortality to the same degree as HFrEF with moderate CKD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Solis-Jimenez ◽  
R Valdez-Ortiz ◽  
L.M Perez-Navarro ◽  
J.E Reyes-Tovilla

Abstract Introduction Current treatment for hypertension and volume overload in chronic kidney disease consists of loop diuretics, nevertheless, chronic use leads to adaptive changes at the distal nephron, which in turn decreases their efficacy. The use of thiazide diuretics could be another treatment option in these patients, notwithstanding, there's not enough evidence to justify their use in this population. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with bumetanide plus chlorthalidone in in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Methods A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at our hospital. Thirty-two patients with hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage IV/V, and chronic loop diuretic use where divided in two groups. The dual treatment group received bumetanide (4 mg QD) plus chlorthalidone (100 mg QD), while the control group was given bumetanide (4 mg QD) plus placebo, both for twenty-eight days. Systemic blood pressure, bioimpedance, and urinary electrolytes were measured at seven and twenty-eight days of treatment. Results There was a significant decrease of systemic blood pressure in the dual treatment group when compared with the control group; systolic blood pressure −26.1±15.3 vs. −10±23.3 mmHg (p=0.028), diastolic blood pressure −13.5±10.7 vs. −3.4±11.9 mmHg (p=0.018), and mean arterial pressure −18.1±8.7 vs. −5.4±14.3 mmHg (p=0.006). There was also a significant decrease of volume overload in the dual treatment group when compared to the control group; total body water −4.36±3.29 vs. +0.075±1.78 litres (p&lt;0.001), extracellular water −2.55±1.1 vs. +0.150±1.2 litres (p&lt;0.001), and extracellular water to total body water ratio −2.92±4.76 vs. −0.24±1.42 (p=0.039). The treatment group increased its fractional excretion of sodium, while the control group demonstrated an increase, though differences were non-significant. As for adverse effects, there was a non-significant increase of urea and creatinine levels in the dual treatment group when compared with controls. Conclusions In advanced chronic kidney disease plus hypertension patients whose treatment with loop diuretics is insufficient, combined use of bumetanide plus chlorthalidone can be useful for systemic blood pressure and volume overload control. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Hospital General de México


Hypertension ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Thomas ◽  
Dawei Xie ◽  
Hsiang-Yu Chen ◽  
Amanda H. Anderson ◽  
Lawrence J. Appel ◽  
...  

The association between apparent treatment resistant hypertension (ATRH) and clinical outcomes is not well studied in chronic kidney disease. We analyzed data on 3367 hypertensive participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) to determine prevalence, associations, and clinical outcomes of ATRH in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients. ATRH was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg on ≥3 antihypertensives, or use of ≥4 antihypertensives with blood pressure at goal at baseline visit. Prevalence of ATRH was 40.4%. Older age, male sex, black race, diabetes mellitus, and higher body mass index were independently associated with higher odds of having ATRH. Participants with ATRH had a higher risk of clinical events than participants without ATRH—composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.38 [1.22–1.56]); renal events (1.28 [1.11–1.46]); CHF (1.66 [1.38–2.00]); and all-cause mortality (1.24 [1.06–1.45]). The subset of participants with ATRH and blood pressure at goal on ≥4 medications also had higher risk for composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, CHF, and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], (1.30 [1.12–1.51]) and CHF (1.59 [1.28–1.99]) than those without ATRH. ATRH was associated with significantly higher risk for CHF and renal events only among those with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 . Our findings show that ATRH is common and associated with high risk of adverse outcomes in a cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease. This underscores the need for early identification and management of patients with ATRH and chronic kidney disease.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 782-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber O Molnar ◽  
William Petrcich ◽  
Matthew A Weir ◽  
Amit X Garg ◽  
Michael Walsh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Whether the survival benefit of β-blockers in congestive heart failure (CHF) from randomized trials extends to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt;30 mL/min/1.73 m2 but not receiving dialysis] is uncertain. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using administrative datasets. Older adults from Ontario, Canada, with incident CHF (median age 79 years) from April 2002 to March 2014 were included. We matched new users of β-blockers to nonusers on age, sex, eGFR categories (&gt;60, 30–60, &lt;30), CHF diagnosis date and a high-dimensional propensity score. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we examined the association of β-blocker use versus nonuse with all-cause mortality. Results We matched 5862 incident β-blocker users (eGFR &gt;60, n = 3136; eGFR 30–60, n = 2368; eGFR &lt;30, n = 358). There were 2361 mortality events during follow-up. β-Blocker use was associated with reduced all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54–0.64]. This result was consistent across all eGFR categories (&gt;60: adjusted HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49–0.62; 30–60: adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.55–0.71; &lt;30: adjusted HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41–0.73; interaction term, P = 0.30). The results were consistent in an intention-to-treat analysis and with β-blocker use treated as a time-varying exposure. Conclusions β-Blocker use is associated with reduced all-cause mortality in elderly patients with CHF and CKD, including those with an eGFR &lt;30. Randomized trials that examine β-blockers in patients with CHF and advanced CKD are needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document