scholarly journals Association of Changes in Cardiovascular Health Metrics and Risk of Subsequent Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bamba Gaye ◽  
Gabriel S. Tajeu ◽  
Ramachandran S. Vasan ◽  
Camille Lassale ◽  
Norrina B. Allen ◽  
...  

Background The extent to which change in cardiovascular health (CVH) in midlife reduces risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease and mortality is unclear. Methods and Results CVH was computed at 2 ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study visits in 1987 to 1989 and 1993 to 1995, using 7 metrics (smoking, body mass index, total cholesterol, blood glucose, blood pressure, physical activity, and diet), each classified as poor, intermediate, and ideal. Overall CVH was classified as poor, intermediate, and ideal to correspond to 0 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 7 metrics at ideal levels. There 10 038 participants, aged 44 to 66 years that were eligible. From the first to the second study visit, there was an improvement in overall CVH for 17% of participants and a decrease in CVH for 21% of participants. At both study visits, 28%, 27%, and 6% had poor, intermediate, and ideal overall CVH, respectively. Compared with those with poor CVH at both visits, the risk of cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20–0.34) and mortality (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.29–0.44) was lowest in those with ideal CVH at both measures. Improvement from poor to intermediate/ideal CVH was also associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59–0.75) and mortality (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72–0.89). Conclusions Improvement in CVH or stable ideal CVH, compared with those with poor CVH over time, is associated with a lower risk of incident cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality. The change in smoking status and cholesterol may have accounted for a large part of the observed association.

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-91
Author(s):  
Logan T. Cowan ◽  
Kamakshi Lakshminarayan ◽  
Pamela L. Lutsey ◽  
James Beck ◽  
Steven Offenbacher ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e0205310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abayomi O. Oyenuga ◽  
David Couper ◽  
Kunihiro Matsushita ◽  
Eric Boerwinkle ◽  
Aaron R. Folsom

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 769-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abayomi O Oyenuga ◽  
Aaron R Folsom ◽  
Susan Cheng ◽  
Hirofumi Tanaka ◽  
Michelle L Meyer

Abstract Background Greater arterial stiffness is associated independently with increased cardiovascular disease risk. The American Heart Association (AHA) has recommended following “Life’s Simple 7 (LS7)” to optimize cardiovascular health; we tested whether better LS7 in middle age is associated with less arterial stiffness in later life. Methods We studied 4,232 black and white participants aged 45–64 years at the baseline (1987–89) visit of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort who also had arterial stiffness measured in 2011–13 (mean ± SD interval: 23.6 ± 1.0 years). We calculated a 14-point summary score for baseline LS7 and classified participants as having “poor” (0–4), “average” (5–9), or “ideal” (10–14) cardiovascular health. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for arterial stiffening: a high carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV, ≥13.23 m/s) or a high central pulse pressure (central PP, ≥ 82.35 mm Hg). Results The age, race, sex, and heart rate-adjusted ORs (95% CI) for high cfPWV in the “ideal,” “average,” and “poor” LS7 summary categories were 1 (Reference), 1.30 (1.11, 1.53), and 1.68 (1.10,2.56), respectively (P-trend = 0.0003). Similarly, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) for high central PP across LS7 summary categories were 1 (Reference), 1.48 (1.27, 1.74), and 1.63 (1.04, 2.56), respectively (P-trend <0.0001). Conclusion Greater LS7 score in middle age is associated with less arterial stiffness 2–3 decades later. These findings further support the AHA recommendation to follow LS7 for cardiovascular disease prevention.


2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 1602-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reshmi Srinath ◽  
Sherita Hill Golden ◽  
Kathryn A. Carson ◽  
Adrian Dobs

Context: Epidemiologic studies suggest that endogenous testosterone (T) levels in males may be implicated in cardiovascular disease (CVD), however further clarification is needed. Objective: We assessed the cross-sectional relationship between endogenous plasma T and mean carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), and the longitudinal relationship with incident clinical CVD events, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality using male participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Design: This study involved a subset of men from visit 4 of the ARIC study. Setting: The study was conducted in a community based cohort. Participants: Males who provided a morning blood sample excluding those taking androgen therapy, with prevalent coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, or heart failure (HF) (n = 1558). Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measures: Plasma T by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and carotid IMT using high resolution B-mode ultrasound were obtained at visit 4. Incident CHD, HF, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality were identified by surveillance through 2010 (median 12.8 years). Results: Lower T was significantly associated with higher body mass index, greater waist circumference, diabetes, hypertension, lower HDL, and never smoking (P = 0.01). T was not associated with mean cIMT in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. Following multivariable adjustment, there was no association of quartile (Q) of T with incident CHD [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87 (95% CI = 0.60–1.26) for Q1; 0.97 (95% CI = 0.69–1.38) for Q2; 0.97 (95% CI = 0.69–1.36) for Q3 compared to reference of Q4] or for incident HF [HR = 0.77 (95% CI = 0.46–1.29) for Q1; 0.72 (95% CI = 0.43–1.21) for Q2; 0.87 (95% CI = 0.53–1.42) for Q3 compared to reference of Q4]. Similarly there was no association of Q of T with mortality or cardiac-associated mortality. Conclusions: Low male plasma T is cross-sectionally associated with key CVD risk factors, but after adjustment there was no association with mean cIMT, incident cardiac events, or mortality. Our results are reassuring that neither high nor low T levels directly predict atherosclerosis, but are a marker for other cardiovascular risk factors.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Vazir ◽  
Brian Claggett ◽  
Amil Shah ◽  
Hicham Skali ◽  
Susan Cheng ◽  
...  

Background: Resting heart rate (HR) and change in resting heart rate (ΔHR) over time are associated with increased risk of adverse outcome in patients with established heart failure (HF). We assessed whether the most recent HR and ΔHR are associated with cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in participants enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort study. Methods: We studied 15,680 participants with HR recorded at baseline (age 54±6 years, women 55%, African American 27%) and over 3 follow-up visits with a median time interval between visits of 3.0 (IQR 2.9-4.0) years. ΔHR from the preceding visit was calculated. Participants were followed up for a median of 22.7 (19.8-23.7) years. We related baseline and most recent resting HR and ΔHR to all cause mortality and CV outcomes adjusting for established baseline and time-updated risk factors and medications. Results: Baseline and most recent HR and ΔHR were associated with all-cause mortality and CV outcomes (table), however most recent HR and ΔHR were more strongly associated with outcomes compared to baseline HR. Every 10bpm increase in HR from the preceding visit was associated with a 29%, 30% 22% and 15% increase risk of all-cause mortality, incident HF, incident MI and stroke respectively. Every 10 bpm higher most recent HR was associated with a 34%, 41% 23% and 14% increase risk of all-cause mortality, incident HF, incident MI and stroke respectively. Conclusion: In a community-based cohort, the most recent resting HR and ΔHR are strongly associated with outcomes; higher resting HR and increases in HR over time are associated with the greatest magnitude of risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document