Abstract 2545: Does Participation in a Stroke Registry Improve tPA Administration Rates?

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moges Ido ◽  
Lydia Clarkson ◽  
Deborah Camp ◽  
Kerrie Krompf ◽  
Michael Frankel
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Hospital Size ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Iv Tpa

Background: The purpose of the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry (GCASR) is to improve the quality of patient care. GCASR conducts regular quality improvement activities to educate hospital staff and improve systems and processes. Administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) is standard treatment for eligible acute ischemic stroke patients and can dramatically improve outcomes. Purpose: To determine whether GCASR hospitals were more likely to administer tPA to acute ischemic stroke patients than non-GCASR hospitals. Methods: Hospitalization data from acute care hospitals in Georgia was provided by the Georgia Hospital Association for November 2005 through December 2009. Acute ischemic stroke patients receiving tPA were identified using ICD-9 codes (433 and 434), procedure codes (9910), and healthcare common procedure system codes (J2997). A hospital was defined as a GCASR facility if it was actively participating in the registry at the time of patient hospitalization. A generalized estimating equation with robust variance estimation was applied using the SAS GLIMMIX procedure. “Hospital” was treated as a random variable. Relative risks for receiving tPA were estimated and adjusted for demographics, co-morbidities, hospital size, urbanicity, and length of stay. Results: A total of 55,403 patients were admitted with a principal diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke during the study period, and two percent (1,231) received tPA. Three percent of patients (871) seen at registry facilities received tPA, compared to 1.4% (360) of those seen at non-GCASR facilities. Age, gender, race, length of stay, hospital size, and participation in the registry all predicted tPA administration, either at or near significant levels (p-values from <0.0001 to 0.0646). Although IV tPA administration has increased over time in both hospital groups, patients treated at GCASR facilities were more likely to receive tPA after controlling for confounders (OR=1.64; 95% CI: 0.97-2.78), which approached significance (p=0.0646). Approximately 340 fewer people would have received tPA had all study patients been treated at non-GCASR facilities. Conclusions: Although all Georgia hospitals have improved their rate of tPA administration over time, GCASR hospitals maintained a higher rate than non-GCASR hospitals. This may be due in part to the quality improvement activities that registry facilities participate in and the assistance they receive. These results support the stroke registry model as a method of improving stroke patient care and outcomes.

Abstract P397: Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Presenting With Impaired Level of Consciousness

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayham Alkhachroum ◽  
Antonio Bustillo ◽  
Negar Asdaghi ◽  
Erika T Marulanda-londono ◽  
Carolina M Gutierrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Hospital Size ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Level Of Consciousness

Background: Impaired level of consciousness (LOC) on presentation after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may affect outcomes and the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment (WLST). We aim to investigate the outcomes and their trends after AISby the LOC on stroke presentation. Methods: We studied 238,989 cases with AIS in the Florida Stroke Registry from 2010-2019. Pearson chi-squared and Kruskall-Wallis tests were used to compare descriptive statistics. A multivariable-logistic regression with GEE accounted for basic demographics, comorbidities, stroke severity, location, hospital size and teaching status. Results: At stroke presentation, 32,861 (14%) cases had impaired LOC (mean age 77, 54% women, 60 white%, 19% Black, 16% Hispanic). Compared to cases with preserved LOC, impaired cases were older (77 vs. 72 years old), more women (54% vs. 48%), had more comorbidities, greater stroke severity on NIHSS ≥ 5 (49% vs. 27%), higher WLST rates (3% vs. 0.6%), and greater in-hospital mortality rates (9% vs. 3%). In our adjusted model however, no significant association was found between impaired LOC and in-hospital mortality, or length of stay. Those with preserved LOC were more likely discharged home/rehab (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.6-0.8, p<0.0001) and more likely to ambulate independently (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.6-0.9, p=0.001). Trend analysis (2010-2019) showed decreased mortality, increased length of stay, and increased rates of discharge to home/rehab in all irrespective of LOC status. Conclusion: In this large multicenter registry, AIS cases presenting with impaired LOC had more severe strokes at presentation. Although LOC was not associated with significantly worse in-hospital morality, it was associated with higher rates of WLST and more disability among survivors. Future efforts should focus on biomarkers of LOC that discriminates the potential for early recovery and reduced disability in acute stroke patients with impaired LOC.

Abstract T P267: Development of an EMS Interfacility Ground Transport Protocol for Patients During/After IV tPA Administration for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerrin Connelly ◽  
Rishi Gupta ◽  
Raul Nogueira ◽  
Arthur Yancey ◽  
Alexander Isakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transport Protocol ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Office ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Iv Tpa

Purpose: To standardize the care of acute stroke patients who receive IV tPA being transported by ground EMS from a treating hospital to a stroke center. Background: National consensus guidelines exist for the hospital management of patients receiving IV tPA for acute ischemic stroke. Such patients require close monitoring and management to minimize risk of clinical deterioration. Although patients are often emergently transported from local hospitals to a stroke center, there are no treatment specific national guidelines for managing such patients enroute. As a result, there is a need to develop and implement a standardized approach to guide EMS personnel, particularly in states like Georgia where the public health burden of stroke is high. Methods: In 2012, the “Georgia EMS Interfacility Ground Transport Protocol for Patients during/after IV tPA Administration for Acute Ischemic Stroke” was developed in conjunction with the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry, the Georgia State Office of EMS, a representative group of Georgia hospitals and EMS providers. Stakeholders were brought together with the goal of creating a unified statewide protocol. The intent was to create a streamlined protocol which could be readily implemented by pre-hospital care providers. Results: Stakeholders discussed challenges and opportunities to change the process of pre-hospital care. Challenges included recognition of the broad diversity of EMS providers representing over 250 agencies in the state. Opportunities included establishing the framework for greater collaboration across organizations and providers. The final protocol was endorsed by both the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry and the State Office of EMS, and distributed to all EMS regions in Georgia. EMS agencies are currently implementing the protocol. Conclusion: Engaging a diverse group of statewide stakeholders to develop a new treatment protocol enhances success in implementation and serves to further the public health mission of improving care of acute stroke patients.

Abstract 2268: Trends In Reasons For Non-eligibility For tPA

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Tong ◽  
Mary G George
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Rapid Improvement ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Mild Stroke ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Iv Tpa

Background: Use of IV tPA has increased over time, as has the adherence to the NQF endorsed performance measure for receipt of IV tPA within 3 hours. Little is known about trends in the reasons for patient ineligibility for IV tPA. This study examines trends in reasons for not providing IV tPA over time and by race and gender among acute ischemic stroke patients in the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry (PCNASR), a quality improvement program for acute stroke implemented by state health departments. Methods: There were 13,164 PCNASR patients enrolled from 2008- 2010 with a clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke with documentation of LKW and who arrived within 2 hours of LKW. Cochran-Armitage tests were used to test for trend on accepted reasons for not providing IV tPA within 3 hours of time last known well (LKW). Chi-square tests were used to test for differences among reasons between men and women and between non-Hispanic whites and minorities. Multiple reasons for not giving tPA could be selected. Results: Among 13,164 acute ischemic patients admitted between 2008 and 2010 with documentation of LKW and who arrived within 2 hours of LKW, 3781 (28.7%) received IV tPA, 7284 (55.3%) had documented reasons for not receiving IV tPA, and 2099 (16.0%) did not receive IV tPA. Contraindications to IV tPA, advanced age, rapid improvement and inability to determine eligibility increased over time. Mild stroke decreased over time. Conditions with warning, advanced age, limited life expectancy and family refusal were more common in women; mild stroke and rapid improvement were more common in men. Contraindications were more common in minorities; advanced age, mild stroke and rapid improvement, and family refusal were more common in non-Hispanic whites. When advanced age was selected, 46.6% of patients were over age 90 and 3.4% were under age 80. When stroke too mild was selected, 44.8% of patients had missing NIHSS scores, 42.1% of scores were 0-4, 8.8% were 5-9, and 4.3% were ≥ 10. The three most common reasons for not providing tPA were rapid improvement (40.9%), mild stroke (33.0%), and contraindications (29.2%) in 2010. Conclusions: More than half of ischemic stroke patients arriving within 2 hours of LKW were ineligible to receive IV tPA. There was little use of advanced age for patients under age 80. Documentation of stroke too mild was not substantiated by an NIHSS score in nearly half of patients. Better documentation of NIHSS score should be provided.

Acute intracranial stenting with mechanical thrombectomy is safe and efficacious in patients diagnosed with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110394
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Victor M Ringheanu ◽  
Laurie Preston ◽  
Wondwossen G Tekle ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Intracranial Stenting ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Objective To investigate whether significant differences exist in recanalization rates and primary outcomes between patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy alone versus those who undergo mechanical thrombectomy with acute intracranial stenting. Methods Through the utilization of a prospectively collected endovascular database at a comprehensive stroke center between 2012 and 2020, variables such as demographics, co-morbid conditions, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality rate at discharge, and good/poor outcomes in regard to modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score and modified Rankin Scale were examined. The outcomes between patients receiving acute intracranial stenting + mechanical thrombectomy and patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy alone were compared. Results There were a total of 420 acute ischemic stroke patients who met criteria for the study (average age 70.6 ± 13.01 years; 46.9% were women). Analysis of 46 patients from the acute stenting + mechanical thrombectomy group (average age 70.34 ± 13.75 years; 37.0% were women), and 374 patients from the mechanical thrombectomy alone group (average age 70.64 ± 12.92 years; 48.1% were women). Four patients (8.7%) in the acute stenting + mechanical thrombectomy group experienced intracerebral hemorrhage versus 45 patients (12.0%) in the mechanical thrombectomy alone group ( p = 0.506); no significant increases were noted in the median length of stay (7 vs 8 days; p = 0.208), rates of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2B-3 recanalization ( p = 0.758), or good modified Rankin Scale scores ( p = 0.806). Conclusion Acute intracranial stenting in addition to mechanical thrombectomy was not associated with an increase in overall length of stay, intracerebral hemorrhage rates, or any change in discharge modified Rankin Scale. Further research is required to determine whether mechanical thrombectomy and acute intracranial stenting in acute ischemic stroke patients is unsafe.

Abstract P119: Factors Influencing Door to Needle Administration for Acute Stroke Patients in the Emergency Department

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolle W Davis ◽  
Meghan Bailey ◽  
Natalie Buchwald ◽  
Amreen Farooqui ◽  
Anna Khanna
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Iv Tpa

Background/Objective: There is growing importance on discovering factors that delay time to intervention for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, as rapid intervention remains essential for better patient outcomes. The management of these patients involves a multidisciplinary effort and quality improvement initiatives to safely increase treatment with intravenous thrombolytic (IV tPa). The objective of this pilot is to evaluate factors of acute stroke care in the emergency department (ED) and the impact they have on IV tPa administration. Methods: A sample of 89 acute ischemic stroke patients that received IV tPa from a single academic medical institution was selected for retrospective analysis. System characteristics (presence of a stroke nurse and time of day) and patient characteristics (mode of arrival and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) on arrival) were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression to address the study question. Results: The mean door to needle time is 53.74 minutes ( + 38.06) with 74.2% of patients arriving to the ED via emergency medical services (EMS) and 25.8% having a stroke nurse present during IV tPa administration. Mode of arrival ( p = .001) and having a stroke nurse present ( p = .022) are significant predictors of door to needle time in the emergency department (ED). Conclusion: While many factors can influence door to needle times in the ED, we did not find NIHSS on arrival or time of day to be significant factors. Patients arriving to the ED by personal vehicle will have a significant delay in IV tPa administration, therefore emphasizing the importance of using EMS. Perhaps more importantly, collaborative efforts including the addition of a specialized stroke nurse significantly decreased time to IV tPa administration for AIS patients. With this dedicated role, accelerated triage and more effective management of AIS patients is accomplished, leading to decreased intervention times and potentially improving patient outcomes.

scholarly journals HUBUNGAN PERDARAHAN GASTROINTESTINAL DENGAN LUARAN PASIEN STROKE ISKEMIK AKUT

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rico Defryantho ◽  
Lisda Amalia ◽  
Ahmad Rizal ◽  
Suryani Gunadharma ◽  
Siti Aminah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
History Of ◽  
Gcs Score

     ASSOCIATION BETWEEN GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTABSTRACTIntroduction: Gastrointestinal bleeding associated by the delay in the administration of antiplatelet and anticoagulant, thus affected the clinical outcome and patient treatment.Aims: To find the association between gastrointestinal bleeding and clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patient.Methods: This study was a prospective observational, conducted at Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung in November 2017 to February 2018. Acute ischemic stroke patients that fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria were observed while being treated in the ward and the survival rate and length of stay were studied. This study used univariate, bivariate, multivariate, and stratification analysis.Results: In the study period, 100 acute ischemic stroke patients were found and 24 patients had gastrointestinal bleeding. A history of previous peptic ulcer/gastrointestinal bleeding was found in patient with gastrointestinal bleeding (20.8%). Median NIHSS score was higher (16 vs 7) and GCS score was lower (12 vs 15) in patients with bleeding. Multivariate analysis showed that gastrointestinal bleeding were significantly associated with survival and length of stay. The analysis of stratification showed subjects with infections who later experienced gastrointestinal bleeding had a lower risk of death and length of stay than subjects without infection who experienced gastrointestinal bleeding (1.7  vs  22.5 times and 1.5 vs 2 times).Discussion: Ischemic stroke with gastrointestinal bleeding had higher mortality and length of stay than without gastrointestinal bleeding in acute ischemic stroke patient.Keyword: Acute ischemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, length of stay, mortalityABSTRAKPendahuluan: Perdarahan gastrointestinal berhubungan dengan penundaan terapi antiplatelet atau antikoagulan, sehingga berpengaruh terhadap luaran dan tata laksana pasien.Tujuan: Mengetahui hubungan perdarahan gastrointestinal dengan luaran pasien stroke iskemik akut.Metode: Penelitian prospektif observasional terhadap pasien stroke iskemik akut di RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin, Bandung pada bulan November 2017 hingga Februari 2018. Pasien stroke iskemik akut yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi diobservasi selama perawatan untuk mengetahui survival dan lama perawatan di rumah sakit. Analisis statistik yang digunakan adalah univariat, bivariat, multivariat, dan stratifikasi.Hasil: Selama periode penelitian didapatkan 100 subjek stroke iskemik akut dengan 24 subjek mengalami perdarahan gastrointestinal. Riwayat ulkus peptikum/perdarahan gastrointestinal sebelumnya sebanyak 20,8% pada perdarahan gastrointestinal. Median skor NIHSS lebih tinggi (16 vs 7) dan skor GCS lebih rendah (12 vs 15) pada perdarahan. Analisis multivariat didapatkan perdarahan gastrointestinal memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan survival dan lama perawatan. Berdasarkan analisis stratifikasi subjek dengan infeksi yang kemudian mengalami perdarahan gastrointestinal memiliki risiko mortalitas dan lama perawatan lebih rendah dibandingkan subjek tanpa infeksi kemudian mengalami perdarahan gastrointestinal (1,7 vs 22,5 kali dan 1,5 vs 2 kali).Diskusi: Stroke iskemik akut yang mengalami perdarahan gastrointestinal memiliki risiko mortalitas dan lama perawatan lebih tinggi dibandingkan tanpa perdarahan gastrointestinal.Kata kunci: Lama perawatan, mortalitas, perdarahan gastrointestinal, stroke iskemik akut

Assessment and provision of rehabilitation among patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke in China: Findings from the China National Stroke Registry II

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Prvu Bettger ◽  
Zixiao Li ◽  
Ying Xian ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Xingquan Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Thrombosis Prophylaxis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Recommended Care ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Rehabilitation Assessment

Background Stroke rehabilitation improves functional recovery among stroke patients. However, little is known about clinical practice in China regarding the assessment and provision of rehabilitation among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Aims We examined the frequency and determinants of an assessment for rehabilitation among acute ischemic stroke patients from the China National Stroke Registry II. Methods Data for 19,294 acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to 219 hospitals from June 2012 to January 2013 were analyzed. The multivariable logistic regression model with the generalized estimating equation method accounting for in-hospital clustering was used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with having a rehabilitation assessment during the acute hospitalization. Results Among 19,294 acute ischemic stroke patients, 11,451 (59.4%) were assessed for rehabilitation. Rates of rehabilitation assessment varied among 219 hospitals (IQR 41.4% vs 81.5%). In the multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased likelihood of a rehabilitation assessment ( p < 0.05) included disability prior to stroke, higher NIHSS on admission, receipt of a dysphagia screen, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, carotid vessel imaging, longer length of stay, and treatment at a hospital with a higher number of hospital beds (per 100 units). In contrast, patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and hospitals with higher number of annual stroke discharges (per 100 patients) were less likely to receive rehabilitation assessment during the acute stroke hospitalization. Conclusions Rehabilitation assessment among acute ischemic stroke patients was suboptimal in China. Rates varied considerably among hospitals and support the need to improve adherence to recommended care for stroke survivors.

Abstract P201: Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Outcomes Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
RAJAN R GADHIA ◽  
Farhaan S Vahidy ◽  
Tariq Nisar ◽  
Destiny Hooper ◽  
David Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Stroke Treatment ◽  
Iv Tpa

Objective: Most acute stroke treatment trials exclude patients above the age of 80. Given the clear benefit of revascularization with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT), we sought to assess functional outcomes in patients treated above the age of 80. Methods: We conducted a review of all patients admitted to Houston Methodist Hospital between January 2019 and August 2020 with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presentation[MOU1] for whom premorbid, discharge, and 90 day modified Rankin Scale scores were available. Patients were categorized by acute stroke treatment (IV tPA, MT, both or none[MOU2] ). mRS values were assessed during admission prior to discharge and at 90 days post stroke event. A delta mRS (Discharge vs. 90-day [MOU3] ) was defined and grouped as no change, improved, or worsened to assess overall functional disability in regards to the index stroke presentation. Results: A total of 865 patients with AIS presentation were included, of whom 651 (75.3%) were <80 years and 214 (24.7%) were > 80 years of age at presentation. A total of 208 patients received IV tPA, 176 underwent revascularization with MT only, 71 had both treatments, and 552 had no acute intervention. In patients >80 yrs who had no acute stroke intervention. mRS improvement was noted in 71.4% compared to 54.1% observed in those patients <80 years. Among patients who received IV tPA, 81.5% of > 80 years improved vs. 61.6% in the younger cohort. A similar trend was noted in the MT and combined treatment groups (76.2% vs. 71.2% and 78.6% vs. 79.3%, respectively). Conclusion: Based on our cohort of acute stroke patients, there was no significant difference in outcomes (as measured by delta mRS) for octogenarians and nonagenarians when compared to younger patients. There was a trend towards improvement in the elderly patients. Chronological age by itself may be an insufficient predictor of functional outcome among stroke patients and age cutoffs for enrollment of patients in acute stroke trials may need additional considerations.

Abstract T P188: Equivalency in Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment Rates Between Primary Stroke Centers and Non-Primary Stroke Centers Through the Use of Telestroke

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Archit Bhatt ◽  
Elizabeth Barban ◽  
Leslie Corless ◽  
Tamela Stuchiner ◽  
Amit Kansara
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Patient Arrival ◽  
History Of

Background: Research has shown that subjects evaluated at (Primary Stroke Centers) PSCs are more likely to receive rt–PA than those evaluated at non–PSCs. It is unknown if telestroke evaluation affects rt-PA rates at non-PSCs. We hypothesized that with a robust telestroke system rt-TPA rates among PSCs and non-PSCs are not significantly different. Methods and Results: Data were obtained from the Providence Stroke Registry from January 2010 to December 2012. We identified ischemic stroke patients (n=3307) who received care in Oregon and Southwest Washington, which include 2 PSCs and 14 non-PSCs. Intravenous rt–PA was administered to 7.3% (n=242) of ischemic patients overall, 8.4% (n=79) at non–PSCs and 6.9% (n=163) at PSCs (p=.135). Stroke neurologists evaluated 5.2 % (n=172) of all ischemic stroke patients (n=3307) were evaluated via telestroke robot. Our analysis included AIS (Acute Ischemic Stroke) patients, those presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. We identified 1070 AIS discharges from 16 hospitals of which 77.9 % (n=833) were at PSCs and 22.1 % (n=237) non-PSCs. For acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) patients, those presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, 22.1% (n=237) received rt-PA; 21.5% (n=74) presented at non–PSCs and 23.7% (n=163) presented at PSCs. Among AIS, bivariate analysis showed significant differences in treatment rates by race, age, NIHSS at admit, previous stroke or TIA, PVD, use of robot, smoking and time from patient arrival to CT completed. Using multiple logistic regression adjusting for these variables, treatment was significantly related to admit NIHSS (AOR=1.67, p<.001), history of stroke (AOR=.323, p<.001), TIA (AOR=.303, p=.01) and PVD (AOR=.176, p=.02), time to CT (.971, p<.001), and use of robot (7.76, p<.001). PSC designation was not significantly related to treatment (p=.06). Conclusions: Through the use of a robust telestroke system, there are no significant differences in the TPA treatment rates between non-PSC and PSC facilities. Telestroke systems can ensure stroke patients access to acute stroke care at non-PSC hospitals.

Abstract 3730: Length Of Hospitalization And Discharge Disposition Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Moderate To Severe Stroke by Treatment

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A Koehler ◽  
Maxim Hammer ◽  
Vivek Reddy ◽  
Houhammad Jumaa ◽  
Syed Zaidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Cerebral Arteries ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Severe Stroke ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Data regarding length of stay and discharge disposition in patients with moderate to severe stroke are scarce. We sought to determine Length of Stay (LoS) in a consecutive group of patients admitted at a large academic center and assess for any possible difference in LoS at discharge by treatment modality received and by vessels occlusion status. Methods: Retrospective review of a database comprising acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to our center between 1/1/2009-3/31/2011. Patient Demographics, treatment modality (IV thrombolytic tissue plasminogen activator (IVtPA), Endovascular (IA), no thrombolytic (NT), LoS, occlusion of major cerebral arteries and discharge disposition were collected. Inclusion criteria were AIS with admission NIHSS ≥10. Results: A total of 744 patients 361 (48.5%) male, mean age 69.9 years were identified. Treatment modalities: 174 (23%) IVtPA, 177 (24%) IA, 393 (53%) NT. Median NIHSS 16.5 and not significant among the 3 groups (P=.603). Mean LoS was 7.38 days (SD 7.4) with no significant difference between the 3 groups (P=.056). Occlusion to one of the 3 cerebral arteries (ICA, MCA, BA) was: 84% in IVtPA, 100% in IA, 87% in NT. Discharge disposition and LoS by treatment and occlusions are shown in the Table . Among patients treated with IVtPA (n=174) mean LoS was 6.33 days (range 1-27). LoS was significantly longer among those without occlusion vs with any occlusion (P=.001). Among patients that received IA (n=177) mean LoS was 8.21 days (range 0-74). Among patients received NT (n=393) the mean LoS was 7.47 days (range 0-64). Conclusions: Thrombolytic therapy (IV or EV) in patients with strokes is not associated with longer hospitalizations duration. A significant difference between death rates in patients receiving IA thrombolytic (22%) compared to IV (32%) or NT (30%) was found with fewer death among those that received IA (P= .008). Patients discharged to long term care facilities have regardless of treatment longer LoS (12.41v 6.14) (P>.000).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document