Abstract WP126: Association of 24-Hour Blood Pressure Parameters Post-Intravenous Alteplase With Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taha Nisar ◽  
Toluwalase Tofade ◽  
Ava Liberman ◽  
Priyank Khandelwal

Introduction: Higher blood pressure (BP) at presentation is associated with a higher risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) post-intravenous alteplase (IV-rtPA). We investigated the association of different BP parameters post-IV-rtPA with the development of sICH at a tertiary care center. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with an acute ischemic stroke treated with IV-rtPA at a comprehensive stroke center from July 2014 to March 2018. We excluded patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. At the comprehensive stroke center, the BP values are documented according to standard post-IV-rtPA care guidelines. We recorded the BP values over a period of 24-hours post-IV-rtPA. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, pre-treatment NIHSS, atrial fibrillation, onset to treatment time, with the BP parameters as the predictors. The primary outcome was the development of sICH. SICH was defined as an intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) that causes worsening of NIHSS score by ≥4 points post-IV-rtPA. Results: 84 patients met our inclusion criteria. 45 (53.57%) patients were male. The mean age was 63.50±15 years. 5 (5.95%) patients developed sICH. In our cohort, the BP parameters of higher maximum systolic blood pressure (SBP) (195.8±9 vs.172.22±17; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.26; P 0.016), higher maximum diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (120.2±18 vs.104.76±15; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; P 0.04), wider SBP range (79.4±20 vs.58.75±18; OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P 0.033), wider DBP range (74.2±27 vs.47.27±15; OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.2; P 0.008), and coefficient variation (CV) DBP (17.7±6 vs.12.65±4; OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01-1.42; P 0.048) were significantly associated with a risk of sICH post IV-rtPA. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates significant risk of sICH with higher maximum SBP and DBP, wider SBP and DBP ranges, and CV DBP post-IV-rtPA.

Author(s):  
Yazan Radaideh

Introduction : Background: A common convention among stroke patients being transferred for mechanical thrombectomy, particularly if intravenous thrombolysis has been given, is to undergo a repeat plain brain CT at the treating stroke center. The most concerning among several concerns is the discovery of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) which would obviate the value of thrombectomy. This practice has been shown in a previous series to result in a median treatment delay of 20 minutes[1]. By determining the actual incidence of any ICH seen on neuroimaging in patients who undergo repeat imaging on arrival to comprehensive stroke center prior to intervention, we can better determine the true value of this convention of repeat imaging. Methods : Retrospective review of all patients transferred to a single academic comprehensive stroke center for mechanical thrombectomy. We evaluated for the frequency of repeat imaging, the rate of ICH and the rate of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Results : There were 682 patients transferred directly for mechanical thrombectomy evaluation over the study period. Intravenous Alteplase was administered to 391 patients prior to arrival and 2 had it on arrival to destination hospital. Plain head CT was repeated at the hub hospital in 590/682 patients (86.5%) (348 with thrombolytics and 242 without. A new intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was detected in 9 patients. In only 3 of the 9 patients was mechanical thrombectomy deferred solely due to the ICH (other 6 had no evidence of LVO (4), low ASPECTS (1) or exam improvement (1)). Conclusions : In patients being transferred for mechanical thrombectomy, the rate of ICH on arrival to site hospital was 1.5%. In only one third of those patients (0.5%) was the decision to not proceed with mechanical thrombectomy related to the new ICH. Given the delays in door to puncture times associated with repeat imaging indicated in literature and the low yield in detecting ICH in transfer patients, repeating neuroimaging at comprehensive stroke center obtained for the purpose of ruling out ICH on patients transferred for MT should be reconsidered. Limitations: Our study reflects a single center experience. Other indications for repeat imaging at comprehensive stroke center such as assessment of infarcted core, and presence of large vessel occlusion might still warrant repeat imaging at comprehensive stroke center.


Author(s):  
Taha Nisar ◽  
Toluwalase Tofade ◽  
Konrad Lebioda ◽  
Osama Abu‐Hadid ◽  
Priyank Khandelwal

Introduction : Higher blood pressure (BP) most post mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can restore perfusion to the ischemic brain tissue depending on collateral status. We aim to determine the association of 24‐hour post‐MT BP parameters with the functional outcome depending on the pre‐MT collateral status. Methods : We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent MT at a comprehensive stroke center from 7/2014 to 12/2020. The patients were divided into two groups (good versus bad) depending on collateral status. A board‐certified neuroradiologist, who was blinded to the clinical outcomes, used collateral grading scales of Mass ≥3 and modified‐Tan>50% to designate good collaterals on the pre‐MT CT Angiogram. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, NIHSS, ASPECTS≥6, TICI score≥2b, time to thrombectomy, LDL, Hemoglobin‐A1C, intravenous‐alteplase, with the 24‐hour post‐MT BP parameters as the predictors. The outcomes were good functional outcome (3‐month mRS≤2) and mortality. Results : 220 patients met the inclusion criteria. 24‐hour BP parameters of standard deviation (SD) SBP (OR, 1.16; 95% CI,1.01‐1.33; P 0.047) and maximum DBP (OR, 1.05; 95% CI,1.01‐1.09; P 0.036) had an association with a good functional outcome, while SD SBP (OR, 1.15; 95% CI,1.01‐1.31; P 0.045), coefficient variation (CV) SBP (OR, 1.19; 95% CI,1.01‐1.41; P 0.043), SBP range (OR, 1.04; 95% CI,1.01‐1.07; P 0.046), maximum DBP (OR, 0.95; 95% CI,0.91‐0.99; P 0.016), pulse pressure (OR, 1.09; 95% CI,1.02‐1.16; P 0.022) and SBP ≥140 (OR, 5.85; 95% CI,1.11‐30.85; P 0.038) had an association with mortality in patients with good collaterals according to Mass grading. 24‐hour BP parameters of SD SBP (OR, 1.13; 95% CI,1.04‐1.24; P 0.007), CV SBP (OR, 1.18; 95% CI,1.05‐1.32; P 0.006), SBP range (OR, 1.04; 95% CI,1.01‐1.06; P 0.008) and maximum DBP (OR, 0.97; 95% CI,0.94‐1; P 0.02) had an association with mortality in patients with good collaterals according to modified‐Tan grading. There was no such association in patients with bad collaterals Conclusions : Various 24‐hour BP parameters post‐MT are associated with a functional outcome or mortality in patients with good collaterals, unlike in patients with bad collaterals.


Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne W Alexandrov ◽  
Asad A Chaudhary ◽  
April Sisson ◽  
Kara Sands ◽  
Pawan Rawal ◽  
...  

Background: Blood pressure (BP) parameters for management of tPA treated patients are well known among experienced stroke clinicians, and violation of systolic and diastolic BP limits have previously been shown to be associated with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) in tPA treated patients. Non-invasive oscillometric BP monitoring measures a “true” mean arterial pressure (MAP), and then algorithmically defines what systolic and diastolic pressure "might" be. Because this form of BP monitoring has become the national standard, we examined the occurrence of MAP BP elevations to determine their association with sICH and treatment outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients that received systemic tPA. Methods: Two-years of consecutive systemic tPA cases were retrieved from our Stroke Center database and arterial blood pressures for the first 24 hours from time of bolus were entered from auto-recordings in our electronic medical records. Protocol violations in MAP were defined as greater than 120 mm Hg at any point in the first 24 hours from time of bolus. Off-label treatment with intravenous tPA beyond 4.5 hours from symptom onset was identified a priori as a potential counfounder to stroke outcome. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was defined as an increase in the NIHSS of ≥ 4 points. Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the relationship between MAP and post-tPA NIHSS score. Results: 191 tPA cases were identified for inclusion in the analysis with 150 (79%) receiving their tPA at our Comprehensive Stroke Center and another 41 (21%) administered as a telephone-consult supported drip and ship. Patients were 65.5±16 years of age with median admission NIHSS scores of 12 (IQR=7-17). All patients had normal CT scans or minor changes consistent with acute stroke without hypo-attenuation. A total of 77 (40%) patients experienced a MAP violation overall. There were 11 isolated systolic BP violations, 4 isolated diastolic BP violations, and 21 isolated MAP violations that were otherwise not detectable by a violation in systolic or diastolic parameters, averaging 123.3±2 mm Hg. A total of 2 (1%) sICHs occurred in the sample, and of these 1 was associated with on-label peri-treatment BP protocol violations affecting systolic, diastolic and MAP parameters. An increased reduction in post-tPA NIHSS points was significantly associated with higher MAPs (r=.92; p=.008). Conclusions: Evidence-based guidelines are silent on MAP limits, and MAP is rarely monitored clinically in tPA treated patients despite dependence on the MAP for assignment of systolic and diastolic pressures in oscillometric BP monitoring. Our findings suggest that an improved understanding of the contribution of MAP-dependent oscillometric methods to BP monitoring in acute stroke patients is warranted.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taha Nisar ◽  
Toluwalase Tofade ◽  
Ava Liberman ◽  
Priyank Khandelwal

Introduction: Elevation of post-stroke systolic blood pressure (SBP) can be a part of a compensatory mechanism to restore cerebral perfusion to the ischemic brain tissue, but comes at a risk of reperfusion injury. The ideal SBP in the 24-hour range post-IV-rtPA has been understudied. We investigated the association of different SBP parameters post-intravenous-alteplase (IV-rtPA) with the functional outcome at discharge at a tertiary care center. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with an acute ischemic stroke treated with IV-rtPA at a comprehensive stroke center from July 2014 to March 2018. We excluded patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. At the comprehensive stroke center, the BP values are documented according to standard post-IV-rtPA care guidelines. We recorded the SBP values over a period of 24-hours post-IV-rtPA. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, pre-treatment NIHSS, atrial fibrillation, onset to treatment time, with the SBP parameters as the predictors. The primary outcome was the functional outcome at discharge. Good outcome was defined as a modified rankin scale (mRS) of ≤2 and a poor outcome as mRS of ≥3, upon discharge. Results: 84 patients met our inclusion criteria. 45 (53.57%) patients were male. The mean age was 63.50±15 years. 25 (29.76%) patients had a good outcome (mRS≤2) at discharge. In our cohort, the parameters of higher mean SBP (144.9±14 vs.135.5±18; OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P 0.004), higher maximum SBP (176.56±17 vs.166.7±18; OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.1; P 0.005) and wider pulse pressure (65.5±12 vs.57.8±13; OR,1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14; P 0.007) were significantly associated with a poor outcome at discharge. Parameters of SBP variability like standard deviation SBP (13.5±5 vs.11.5±4; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1-1.36; P 0.058), coefficient variation SBP (9.36±4 vs.8.49±3; OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94-1.32; P 0.242), and SBP range (62.22±20 vs.54.68±15; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1-1.07; P 0.08) were not significantly associated with a poor outcome at discharge. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates an association between higher mean SBP, higher maximum SBP, and wider pulse pressure over a period of 24-hours post-IV-rtPA, and poor functional outcome upon discharge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhei Okazaki ◽  
Haruko Yamamoto ◽  
Lydia D. Foster ◽  
Mayumi Fukuda-Doi ◽  
Masatoshi Koga ◽  
...  

Background: Neurological deterioration (ND) has a major influence on the prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH); however, factors associated with ND occurring after 24 h of ICH onset are unknown. Methods: We performed exploratory analyses of data from the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage 2 trial, which compared intensive and standard blood pressure lowering treatment in ICH. NDs were captured on the adverse event case report form. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the independent predictors of late ND. Results: Among 1,000 participants with acute ICH, 82 patients (8.2%) developed early ND (≤24 h), and 64 (6.4%) had late ND. Baseline hematoma volume (adjusted OR [aOR] per 1-cm3 increase 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.06, p < 0.0001), hematoma volume increase in 24 h (aOR 2.24, 95% CI 1.23–4.07, p = 0.008), and the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH; aOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.32–4.29, p = 0.004) were independent predictors of late ND (vs. no late ND). Late ND was a significant risk factor for poor 90-day outcome (OR 3.46, 95% CI 1.82–6.56). No statistically significant difference in the incidence of late ND was noted between the 2 treatment groups. Conclusions: Initial hematoma volume, early hematoma volume expansion, and IVH are independent predictors of late ND after ICH. Intensive reduction in the systolic blood pressure level does not prevent the development of late ND.


Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1524-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Mazya ◽  
José A. Egido ◽  
Gary A. Ford ◽  
Kennedy R. Lees ◽  
Robert Mikulik ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D'Amour ◽  
Jayme Strauss ◽  
Amy K Starosciak

Introduction: Treatment time has gained sufficient popularity because it is now well-known that “Time is Brain”. Treatment rates, however, lag behind in importance even though more lives can be saved by treating more often. Our TJC Comprehensive Stroke Center has a nurse-led stroke alert process that focuses on multiple, rapid, parallel steps to reduce DTN for IV alteplase. The Baptist Emergency Stroke Team (BEST) responders are highly-trained and skilled nurses that assess, coordinate, and initiate processes to ensure the best times. We identified that our treatment rate was lower than the national rate for certified CSCs, so the BEST responders used a stepwise process to develop their own interventions to improve rates. Methods: First, the BEST responders started tracking our monthly rate. Next, they set a rate goal, and then brainstormed how to influence treatment decision-making. The BEST team initiated a monthly PI meeting that focused on the importance of treating disability rather than an NIHSS score. Then the team scripted and rehearsed critical conversations to have providers that advocated specifically for treating disability. The team adopted the motto, “Treat Disability, Not Numbers”. Results Conclusions: Our CSC observed a small decrease in median DTN but double the treatment rate after the BEST responder intervention. In comparison, these statistics did not change at the national CSC level. The sICH rate was reduced from Period A to C, meaning that increased treatment rate did not lead to increased hemorrhagic rate. Nursing initiatives can have a substantial positive effect on increasing the number of patients treated with IV alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Quinn ◽  
Mohammad Hajighasemi ◽  
Laurie Paletz ◽  
Sonia Figueroa ◽  
Konrad Schlick

Introduction: Recrudescent symptoms of remote central nervous system lesions (primarily due to prior ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) is a specific stroke mimic that is commonly in the differential diagnosis in patients presenting for emergent stroke evaluation. To date, best practices have yet to be established in terms of ensuring accurate diagnosis and the relative rates of causative systemic illnesses are not well described. We seek to better delineate the etiologies of recrudescent stroke symptoms seen at a tertiary care medical center via emergency stroke evaluation “Code Brain” (CB) as a first step towards clarifying diagnostic criteria for this entity. Methods: Data was obtained via retrospective chart review from consecutive patients via departmental database listing all CB consults seen at a tertiary care comprehensive stroke center in Los Angeles, California between the timeframe of January 2018- June 2020. Diagnoses for each case were adjudicated by faculty Vascular neurologists, in collaboration with Vascular neurology fellows and Neurology residents. Those cases with a diagnosis of stroke recrudescence were reviewed in detail for the extent of neuroimaging they underwent, as well as for identified causes of recrudescence. Results: Records of 3,998 consecutive CB activations were reviewed. 2.1% (n=85) were found after screening to have clinical diagnosis of recrudescence or chronic stroke. Of these 85 patients, 29.4% (n=25) were not found to have a causative etiology for recrudescent neurologic deficit. Of these 25 patients, 36.0% (n=9) did not undergo MRI to evaluate for interval ischemic lesion, as compared to 46.6% of those whom a causative etiology was identified. This difference (10.6%, 95% CI -12.30 to 30.67%, p=0.3719) was not significant. Discussion: At our comprehensive stroke center, recrudescent stroke is an uncommon diagnosis amongst all CB evaluations, despite being commonly considered. Despite a diagnosis of recrudescence, MRI brain is not always performed to rule out acute ischemic stroke. Standardized neuroimaging protocols should be considered in making the diagnosis of stroke recrudescence.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Slater ◽  
Holly Morhaim ◽  
Steven Rudolph

Background: Current American Heart Association guidelines for targeted blood pressure management in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), published in 2010, suggest a target mean arterial pressure of less than 110 or a blood pressure of less than 160/90 in patients without elevated intracranial pressure. These guidelines acknowledge that these recommendations have been based on incomplete efficacy evidence. A lower level recommendation was given for reducing target blood pressure to a systolic of 140, based on the INTERACT trial published in 2008. The INTERACT2 trial, published in May 2013, has been interpreted to establish the safety of rapid blood pressure lowering to 140 systolic. Purpose: To determine the current level of adoption by stroke centers of lower targets for blood pressure in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, and whether these targets have changed in 2013. Methods: We developed a web-based survey that was distributed via email and professional groups to stroke advanced practice nurses and stroke program coordinators. The survey asked specific questions regarding changes in clinical practice and stroke center policies on blood pressure management in spontaneous ICH. The survey was anonymous, and the survey software was able to exclude multiple entries from the same computer. Results: Responses were obtained from academic medical centers, community teaching hospitals, and community non-teaching hospitals. Awareness of the results of INTERACT2 was known by 65%, 50%, and 31% of stroke nurses at these hospitals, respectively. Targets for systolic blood pressure were changed in 2013 at 46%, 44%, and 11% of hospitals by group. A time target to lower blood pressure of less than one hour was adopted by 57%, 46%, and 28% respectively. Conclusion: Stroke centers have rapidly adopted changes in blood pressure management in intracerebral hemorrhage in advance of guideline revisions. Non-teaching hospitals were less likely to adopt these changes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Jagat Narayan Rajbanshi ◽  
Pankaj Raj Nepal

 Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an irreversible phenomenon inside the brain parenchyma resulting in mild to severe neurological deficit. Based on etiology it is broadly divided into primary and secondary. Primary ICH is usually due to the rupture of Charcot-Bouchard aneurysm and chronic hypertension. Charcot – Bouchard aneurysms are supposed to get formed due to lipohyalinosis. With the aim to evaluate the outcome of primary ICH admitted to our institute this study is performed. Materials and methods: This is a prospective analytical study, where all the consecutive patients of the primary ICH were collected. Quantitative variables like age, the volume of hematoma, midline shift, GCS, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were presented as mean and standard deviation (S.D). Whereas, qualitative variables like gender, site, and side of hematoma, type of treatment, best motor response were presented in frequency and percentage. The outcome of the patient was measured using the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) and the association between qualitative/quantitative variables and GOS was done using the chi-square test or Fischer exact test whenever applicable in SPSS20. Results: There were a total of 31 patients with a mean age of 59.81(S. D 15.8) year and male predominance (74%). The mean volume of hematoma was 40 ml. Similarly, midline shift ranged from zero to 14 mm. The majority of primary ICH were located in basal ganglia (35%) and on the right side (52%). The mean GCS at presentation was 12.1 (S.D 2.166). Mean Systolic blood pressure was 163.77 mmHg (S.D 34.6 mmHg) with maximum SBP up to 240mmHg. There was a 14% mortality in this study group with favorable outcome (GOS 4 and 5) in 82%. GOS was significantly associated with the volume of hematoma and midline shift. Conclusion: The outcome of primary ICH is strongly associated with the volume of hematoma and midline shift. They were generally associated with hypertension with a mean systolic blood pressure of >160 mm Hg.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document