scholarly journals Thrombolysis With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for Stroke With Unknown Time of Onset

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1530-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Koga ◽  
Haruko Yamamoto ◽  
Manabu Inoue ◽  
Koko Asakura ◽  
Junya Aoki ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— We assessed whether lower-dose alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg is efficacious and safe for acute fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-negative stroke with unknown time of onset. Methods— This was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point trial. Patients met the standard indication criteria for intravenous thrombolysis other than a time last-known-well >4.5 hours (eg, wake-up stroke). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg or standard medical treatment if magnetic resonance imaging showed acute ischemic lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging and no marked corresponding hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1). Results— Following the early stop and positive results of the WAKE-UP trial (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke), this trial was prematurely terminated with 131 of the anticipated 300 patients (55 women; mean age, 74.4±12.2 years). Favorable outcome was comparable between the alteplase group (32/68, 47.1%) and the control group (28/58, 48.3%; relative risk [RR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.68–1.41]; P =0.892). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 22 to 36 hours occurred in 1/71 and 0/60 (RR, infinity [95% CI, 0.06 to infinity]; P >0.999), respectively. Death at 90 days occurred in 2/71 and 2/60 (RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.06–12.58]; P >0.999), respectively. Conclusions— No difference in favorable outcome was seen between alteplase and control groups among patients with ischemic stroke with unknown time of onset. The safety of alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg was comparable to that of standard treatment. Early study termination precludes any definitive conclusions. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02002325.

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
Fumihiro Sakakibara ◽  
Shinichi Yoshimura ◽  
Soichiro Numa ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Norito Kinjo ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch is an early sign of acute ischemic stroke. DWI-FLAIR mismatch was reported to be valuable to select patients with unknown onset stroke who are eligible to receive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), but its utility is less studied in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). We thus investigated the functional outcomes at 90 days between patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch and those with match who underwent MT for LVO. Methods: We conducted a historical cohort study in consecutive patients who were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging for suspected stroke at a single center. We enrolled patients with occlusion of internal carotid artery or horizontal or vertical segment of middle cerebral artery who underwent MT within 24 h after they were last known to be well. DWI-FLAIR mismatch was defined when a visible acute ischemic lesion was present on DWI without traceable parenchymal hyperintensity on FLAIR. Image analysis was done by 2 stroke neurologists independently. We estimated the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of DWI-FLAIR mismatch relative to DWI-FLAIR match for moderate outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–3, favorable outcome defined as mRS 0–2 and mortality at 90 days after the onset, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 72 h after the onset. Results: Of the 380 patients who received MT, 202 were included. Patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch (146 [72%]) had significantly higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (median 16 vs. 13, p = 0.01), more transferred-in (78 vs. 63%, p = 0.02), more IVT (45 vs. 18%, p = 0.0003), more cardioembolism (69 vs. 54%, p = 0.03), and shorter onset-to-hospital door times (median 175 vs. 371 min, p < 0.0001) than patients with DWI-FLAIR match. Patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch had more moderate outcome than those with DWI-FLAIR match (61 vs. 52%, p = 0.24), and the adjusted OR was 3.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35–7.19, p = 0.008). sICH within 72 h was less frequent in the DWI-FLAIR mismatch group (10 vs. 20%, p = 0.06), with an adjusted OR of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.13–0.97, p = 0.044). The adjusted ORs for favorable outcome and mortality were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.39–1.94, p = 0.73) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.20–2.05, p = 0.44), respectively. Conclusions: DWI-FLAIR mismatch was associated with more moderate outcome and less sICH in the adjusted analysis in patients receiving MT for acute LVO. DWI-FLAIR mismatch could be useful to select patients with unknown onset stroke who are eligible to receive MT for acute LVO.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yongwoo Kim ◽  
Marie Luby ◽  
Nina-Serena Burkett ◽  
Gina Norato ◽  
Richard Leigh ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The absence of an ischemic lesion on MRI fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) is helpful in predicting stroke onset within 4.5 h. However, some ischemic strokes become visible on FLAIR within 4.5 h. We hypothesized that the early lesion visibility on FLAIR may predict stroke outcome 90 days after intravenous (IV) thrombolysis, independent of time. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We analyzed data from acute ischemic stroke patients presenting over the last 10 years who were screened with MRI and treated with IV thrombolysis within 4.5 h from onset. Three independent readers assessed whether ischemic lesions seen on diffusion-weighted imaging were also FLAIR positive based on visual inspection. Multivariable regression analyses were used to obtain an adjusted odds ratio of favorable clinical and radiological outcomes based on FLAIR positivity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 297 ischemic stroke patients, 25% had lesion visibility on initial FLAIR. The interrater agreement for the FLAIR positivity assessment was 84% (<i>κ</i> = 0.604, 95% CI: 0.557–0.652). Patients with FLAIR-positive lesions had more right hemispheric strokes (57 vs. 41%, <i>p</i> = 0.045), were imaged later (129 vs. 104 min, <i>p</i> = 0.036), and had less frequent favorable 90-day functional outcome (49 vs. 63%, <i>p</i> = 0.028), less frequent early neurologic improvement (30 vs. 58%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and more frequent contrast extravasation to the cerebrospinal fluid space (44 vs. 26%, <i>p</i> = 0.008). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Early development of stroke lesion on FLAIR within 4.5 h of onset is associated with reduced likelihood of favorable 90-day outcome after IV thrombolysis.


2021 ◽  
pp. 004947552098474
Author(s):  
Arjuman Sharmin ◽  
Ali Hossain ◽  
Nazmul Islam ◽  
Zakir H Sarker ◽  
Sheikh S Hossain ◽  
...  

The outcome of lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB) management with conventional anti-tubercular treatment alone is unsatisfactory. We conducted a randomised open-label controlled clinical trial in the Department of Respiratory Medicine in Government Institute of Dhaka, Bangladesh from April 2017 to March 2019. Compared with controls, 54 patients of LNTB received category 1 anti-tubercular treatment with additional prednisolone after randomisation. Complete resolution in 21/54 (75%) and 7 (26.9%), symptomatic improvement in 26 (92.9%) and 22 (84.6%) and complications in 11 (39.28%) and 16 (61.53%) were observed in the treatment and control group, respectively. Thus, we recommend the use of steroids in this setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
L.T. Yeraliyeva ◽  
◽  
Zh.N. Suleymenova ◽  
M.A. Smagul ◽  
M.K. Smagulova ◽  
...  

Objective. To evaluate preventive efficacy and reactogenicity of Grippol® plus vaccine in children aged 8 to 14 years residing in Almaty (Republic of Kazakhstan). Patients and methods. This open-label prospective study was conducted between October 2019 and April 2020 and included 600 children aged 8 to 14 years (mean age 10.6 ± 4.9 years) studying in two schools of Almaty. Study participants were divided into two groups (300 children in each): experimental group, in which children were vaccinated with Grippol® plus (Petrovax Pharm, Russia) in accordance with all rules and control group. Patients in both groups were matched for gender; children of the Mongoloid race prevailed in the experimental group. Parents (or official representatives) of all participants signed an informed consent before the enrollment. The efficacy of vaccination was evaluated by active monitoring (telephone contacts with parents) and assessment of the incidence of influenza and acute respiratory viral infections (ARVIs) during the next 6 months. We calculated the efficacy index and efficacy coefficient. Data analysis was performed using the Statistica 6.0 software; differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Results. Follow-up of study participants during 6 months after vaccination demonstrated significant differences in the incidence of ARVIs and influenza between the two groups: 7 cases among vaccinated children (2,3%) vs 21 cases among controls (7%) (p < 0.05). One child from the control group had two episodes of ARVI. Mean duration of influenza and ARVIs in the experimental group was 1.8 times lower than that in the control group. The efficacy index and efficacy coefficient, calculated with the consideration of influenza diagnosis confirmation by polymerase chain reaction, were 3% and 66.7%, respectively. Local and systemic reactions to vaccination were observed in 3 children, were transient, and disappeared after 2–3 days. Conclusion. The trivalent inactivated polymer-subunit vaccine Grippol® plus was safe and effective in children aged between 8 and 14 years. Key words: vaccine, influenza, children, incidence, acute respiratory viral infections, efficacy


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hua Bao ◽  
Hao-Ran Gao ◽  
Min-Lu Pan ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Hai-Bin Sun

BACKGROUND: Acute cerebral infarction (ACI) is a common cerebrovascular disease in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of alteplase and urokinase in treating ACI. METHODS: A total of 96 patients with ACI, who were treated with alteplase and urokinase, were selected as the main subjects. Among these patients, 45 patients with ultra-early acute cerebral infarction, who received intravenous thrombolysis with RT-PA (alteplase), were included in the treatment group, while 51 patients with acute cerebral infarction, who were treated with urokinase in the same time period, were included in the control group. RESULTS: The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were significantly lower in the treatment group and control group (P< 0.05) at two hours, seven days and 14 days after thrombolysis, when compared to those before thrombolysis. The bleeding rate was significantly lower in the control group, when compared to the treatment group (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: The intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase or alteplase in the ultra-early stage of acute cerebral infarction can reduce the neurological injury symptoms and effectively improve the prognosis of patients with stroke. Urokinase is lower in risk of bleeding, but better in safety, when compared to alteplase.


Author(s):  
Brooke E. Wilson ◽  
Michelle B. Nadler ◽  
Alexandra Desnoyers ◽  
Eitan Amir

Background: Censoring due to early drug discontinuation (EDD) or withdrawal of consent or loss to follow-up (WCLFU) can result in postrandomization bias. In oncology, censoring rules vary with no defined standards. In this study, we sought to describe the planned handling and transparency of censoring data in oncology trials supporting FDA approval and to compare EDD and WCLFU in experimental and control arms. Methods: We searched FDA archives to identify solid tumor drug approvals and their associated trials between 2015 and 2019, and extracted the planned handling and reporting of censored data. We compared the proportion of WCLFU and EDD between the experimental and control arms by using generalized estimating equations, and performed logistic regression to identify trial characteristics associated with WCLFU occurring more frequently in the control group. Results: Censoring rules were defined adequately in 48 (59%) of 81 included studies. Only 14 (17%) reported proportions of censored participants clearly. The proportion of WCLFU was higher in the control group than in the experimental group (mean, 3.9% vs 2.5%; β-coefficient, −2.2; 95% CI, −3.1 to −1.3; P<.001). EDD was numerically higher in the experimental arm in 61% of studies, but there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of EDD between the experimental and control groups (mean, 21.6% vs 19.9%, respectively; β-coefficient, 0.27; 95% CI, −0.32 to 0.87; P=.37). The proportion of EDD due to adverse effects (AEs) was higher in the experimental group (mean, 13.2% vs 8.5%; β-coefficient, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.57–2.45; P=.002). WCLFU was higher in the control group in studies with an active control group (odds ratio [OR], 10.1; P<.001) and in open label studies (OR, 3.00; P=.08). Conclusions: There are significant differences in WCLFU and EDD for AEs between the experimental and control arms in oncology trials. This may introduce postrandomization bias. Trials should improve the reporting and handling of censored data so that clinicians and patients are fully informed regarding the expected benefits of a treatment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Lambrecht ◽  
Karel Van Damme ◽  
Elisabeth De Leeuw ◽  
Jozefien Declercq ◽  
Bastiaan Maes ◽  
...  

Abstract Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) instructs monocytes to differentiate into alveolar macrophages (AM) that preserve lung homeostasis. By comparing AM development in mouse and human, we discovered that COVID-19 patients showed marked defects in GM-CSF-dependent AM instruction. The multi-center, open-label, randomized, controlled SARPAC-trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of 5 days of inhalation of rhu-GM-CSF (sargramostim, Leukine®) in 81 non-ventilated patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemic respiratory failure identified by PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 350mmHg. At day 6, more patients in the sargramostim group experienced at least 25% improvement in oxygenation compared with the standard of care group. Higher numbers of circulating class-switched B cells and effector virus-specific CD8 lymphocytes were found in the sargramostim group. Treatment adverse events, including signs of cytokine storm, were not different between active and control group. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of inhaled GM-CSF in restoring alveolar gas exchange, while simultaneously boosting anti-COVID-19 immunity. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04326920).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambudhar Sharma ◽  
Charu Sharma ◽  
Sujeet Raina ◽  
Balraj singh ◽  
Devendra Singh Dadhwal ◽  
...  

Abstract ObjectivesThe pathophysiology of SARS-Cov-2 is characterized by inflammation, immune dysregulation, coagulopathy, and endothelial dysfunction. No single therapeutic agent can target all these pathophysiologic substrates. Moreover, the current therapies are not fully effective in reducing mortality in moderate and severe disease. Hence, we aim to evaluate the combination of drugs (aspirin, atorvastatin, and nicorandil) with anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, immunomodulatory, and vasodilator properties as adjuvant therapy in covid- 19.Trial designSingle-centre, prospective, two-arm parallel design, open-label randomized control superiority trial. ParticipantsThe study will be conducted at the covid centre of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College Tanda Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India. All SARS-CoV-2 infected patients requiring admission to the study centre will be screened for the trial. All patients >18years who are RT-PCR/RAT positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection with pneumonia but without ARDS at presentation (presence of clinical features of dyspnoea hypoxia, fever, cough, spo2 <94% on room air and respiratory rate >24/minute) requiring hospital admission and consenting to participate in the trial will be included.Patients with documented significant liver disease/dysfunction (AST/ALT > 240), myopathy and rhabdomyolysis (CPK > 5x normal), allergy or intolerance to statins, allergy or intolerance to aspirin, patients taking medications with significant interaction with statins, prior statin use (within 30 days), prior aspirin use (within 30 days), history of active GI bleeding in past three months, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100000/ dl), pregnancy, active breastfeeding, patient unable to take oral or nasogastric medications, patients in altered mental status, shock, acute renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, sepsis and ARDS at presentation will be excluded. Intervention and comparatorAfter randomization, participants in the intervention group will receive aspirin, atorvastatin, and nicorandil. Atorvastatin will be prescribed as 40 mg starting dose followed by 40 mg oral tablets once daily for ten days or till hospital discharge whichever is later. Aspirin dose will be 325 starting dose followed by 75 mg once daily for ten days or till hospital discharge whichever is later. Nicorandil will be given as 10 mg starting dose followed by 5mg twice daily ten days or till hospital discharge whichever is later. All patients in the intervention and control group will receive a standard of care for covid management as per national guidelines. All patients will receive symptomatic treatment with antipyretics, adequate hydration, anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin, intravenous remdesivir, corticosteroids (intravenous dexamethasone for 5 days or more duration if oxygen requirement increasing or inflammatory markers are raised), and oxygen support. Patients will receive treatment for comorbid conditions as per guidelines.Main outcomesThe patients will be followed up for outcomes during the hospital stay or for ten days whichever is longer. The primary outcome will be in-hospital mortality. Any progression to ARDS, shock, acute kidney injury, impaired consciousness, length of hospital stay, length of mechanical ventilation (invasive plus non-invasive) will be secondary outcomes. Changes in serum markers (CRP, D –dimer, S ferritin) will be other secondary outcomes. The safety endpoints will be hepatotoxicity (ALT/AST > 3x ULN; hyperbilirubinemia), myalgia—muscle ache, or weakness without creatine kinase (CK) elevation, myositis—muscle symptoms with increased CK levels (3-10) ULN, rhabdomyolysis—muscle symptoms with marked CK elevation (typically substantially greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal [ULN]) and with creatinine elevation (usually with brown urine and urinary myoglobin) observed during the hospital stay. RandomizationComputer-generated block randomization will be used to randomize the participants in a 1:1 ratio to the active intervention group A (Aspirin, Atorvastatin, Nicorandil) plus conventional therapy and control group B conventional therapy only. Blinding (masking)The study will be an open-label trial. Numbers to be randomized (sample size)A total of 396 patients will participate in this study, which is randomly divided with 198 participants in each group.Trial statusThe first version of the protocol was approved by the institutional ethical committee on 1st February 2021, IEC /006/2021. The recruitment started on 8/4/2021 and will continue until 08/07/2021. A total of 281 patients have been enrolled till 21/5/2021.Trial registrationThe trial has been prospectively registered in Clinical Trial Registry – India (ICMR- NIMS): CTRI/2021/04/032648 [Registered on: 08/04/2021].Full protocolThe full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol. The study protocol has been reported under the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Clinical Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines (Additional file 2).


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 2311
Author(s):  
Anil S. Degaonkar ◽  
Pundlik T. Jamdade ◽  
Nikhil S. Bhamare ◽  
Prashant A. Shirure ◽  
Manjuprasad M. S. ◽  
...  

Background: One of the conservative management of ureteric caculi is by medical expulsive therapy by targeting common causes of obstruction such as edema, ureteral spasm and infection which will favour expulsion of calculi. The objective of this study was to assess comparative efficacy and safety of medical expulsive therapy of ureteric calculi.Methods: This was a randomized, prospective, open label, comparative study. Subjects satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized into 4 groups tamsulosin, nifedipine, progesterone and control. Medical expulsion of calculi of 6mm to 15 mm size was carried out in 120 patients. Patients were followed up on OPD basis every third day. Calculi expulsion until day 28 as confirmed by abdominal ultrasonography was taken as the end point.Results: Expulsion rate in tamsulosin group was 90%, whereas nifedipine, progesterone group were 83.33% and 70% respectively which was significant compared to control group which was 36.6% (p < 0.005). Expulsion time was also reported to be significantly less in these groups as compared to control group. Therapy related adverse effects were minor and were seen in only 6 patients.Conclusions: Medical expulsive therapy of ureteric calculi of size 6 to 15mm with Tamsulosin, nifedipine and progesterone were safe and efficacious and could be implemented for initial management in selected patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document