scholarly journals Will China Become a Science and Technology Superpower by 2020? An Assessment based on a National Innovation System Framework

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Lan ◽  
Nancy Forbes
2020 ◽  
pp. 90-106
Author(s):  
Anatoliy Todosiychuk ◽  
Sergei Pyastolov

The «new reality» of crisis makes new demands on science in terms of its contribution to economic growth, social progress and security. The authors claim that the idea of program-oriented management is at the heart of practically all national strategies of scientific and technical development (STD), including those formed on the basis of the concepts of «National innovation system», network research. The paper observes the stages of revitalization in Russia of this newly demanded resource of management in the science and technology sector, and the reasons for the low «innovativeness» of the current economic mechanism. The inadequacy of systems for scientific activities evaluation to the realities, casual legal and linguistic uncertainty in normative papers are significant negative factors. If the influence of these factors is reduced, the methods of program-target management of STD will be much more effective.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Baldev Singh SHERGILL

<p>The present paper is an attempt to explore changing national innovation system of India in the context of conventional measure of national innovation system, science and technology indicators during pre-reform period, 1980-1992 and post reform period, 1993-2006 which reflects the policy change, liberalize license system and science and technology policy in 1991 while extensive economic reforms initiated. The paper undertakes a detailed sketch out of R&amp;D activities across industries, laboratories and institutions. R&amp;D expenditure growth rate in industrial sector, R&amp;D intensity, R&amp;D expenditure by major scientific agencies, growth rates of basic research, applied research, experimental research and other related S&amp;T activities, growth rates of advertising expenditure, new plant and machinery in public and private sector, faculty-wise enrolment in higher education, estimated stock of science and technology personnel, patent filed by different states and patent granted in different fields, subject area-wise research papers, books and technical reports published in different fields from India and comparative trends in IPR granted in India analyzed in a comparative approach. R&amp;D input indicators growth rate turned down in the post reform period as comparative to pre reform period. R&amp;D output indicators boosted during post reform period as relative to pre reform period. It is argued that increase in patent filed and IPR granted over time is basically due to the introduction of IPR regime. </p>


Author(s):  
Anatoliy B. Yaroshchuk ◽  

The article considers the current and future systems for assessing the effectiveness of the use of state resources to create a national innovation system as a factor in improving the economic security of the state, the author develops a methodological approach to assessing the effectiveness of the use of state resources to create a national innovation system. The cyclical development of the world economy in the conditions of globalization is connected, first of all, with the change of technological structures, as well as with the provision of competitiveness for all levels of economic management. In the domestic and foreign economic literature, there is an idea of the national innovation system, which covers all types of economic objects in the country with innovations, increasing their competitiveness, and, thus, the national economy as a whole, and also directly affects the increase in the level of economic security of the country. Most developed countries and many developing countries have already established or are in the process of establishing their national innovation systems, built either on the basis of models already known and tested in other countries, or new, unique models for building innovation systems. The differences between these models of creation of national innovation systems of different countries are, both in the levels of economic objects, which are the basis of innovative breakthrough, and in the degree of use of public resources: "centralized model", based on public resources, or "market model", or a mixed model of "public-private partnership". These issues are the basis for consideration of the presented article. The methodological basis for writing the article was modern scientific research methods, including: dialectical method, method of system analysis, methods of analogy, comparative analysis, expert methods, structural-functional and normative approaches.


2020 ◽  
pp. 3-23
Author(s):  
Yu.B. Vinslav

The article once again emphasizes scientific and technological (innovative) development as a process fundamental to ensuring the competitiveness of the national economy and its structural modernization. The key areas of public administration and corporate management in the field of improving the competitiveness of the domestic economy are noted. The conditions of harmonious interaction of various levels of management of the formed national innovation system are determined. The list of management actions to implement these conditions is systematized. The content of the innovation value chain as a set of successive stages of work is revealed: from a scientific and technical idea to obtaining a production result. The principles of the formation and development of corporate innovation systems have been developed, involving companies taking into account the requirements of national competitiveness priorities in business development strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document