scholarly journals What is Left in the “Too Hard Basket”? Developments and Challenges for the Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessa Lynch ◽  
Ton Liefaard
Keyword(s):  
Justice System ◽  
Academic Discipline ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
Age Limits ◽  
The Law ◽  
Cross National

The 30 years since the enactment of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child has seen extensive developments in the theory and practice of children’s rights. Children’s rights are now an established academic discipline with the study of children in conflict with the law being a fundamental area of analysis. This paper takes the approach of highlighting three areas of development of children’s rights scholarship in relation to the criminal justice system: children’s rights, developmental science and notable themes emerging from cross-national scholarship, including age limits, diversion, effective participation and deprivation of liberty. In addition, it analyses three gaps or challenges which are “left in the too-hard basket” for the coming decades.

Children’s rights education and social work: Contrasting models and understandings

2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didier Reynaert ◽  
Maria Bouverne-De Bie ◽  
Stijn Vandevelde
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Social Action ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Social Work Theory ◽  
United Nations Convention

Despite the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the interest in developing a theoretical grounding for children’s rights education seems to be rather limited. This article argues for a better understanding of children’s rights education as a distinctive practice in social work. Two different conceptions of children’s rights education are identified: as an implementation strategy and as social action. Their relevance to both social work theory and practice are examined.

scholarly journals Diversion in the Form of Protection of Human Rights

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
Arhjayati Rahim
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Law

Crimes committed by children in Indonesia has reached its peak it signified the increasing rate of crimes committed by children. A dilemma when it comes to handling the perpetrators of crimes committed by children, on the other hand children are vulnerable creatures and  tend not to be accountable as a result of his actions, on the other hand the child has committed a criminal offense that harm others. That many regulations that have been published  to address the issue. The most recent is the Law No. 11 Year 2012 on child criminal justice system, which emphasizes the process of diversion in solving criminal cases involving children.             Diversion destination is clear in Act No. 11 of 2012 concerning juvenile justice system Article 6 of diversion aims: Achieving peace victims and children, Resolving cases of children outside the judicial process, Protects children from the deprivation of liberty, Encouraging people to participate, Instill a sense of responsibility answer to this Child. Hal accordance with the principle of fulfillment of children's rights. So in this paper will discuss setting How Diversion Law as a form of Human Rights Protection. The existence of a diversion process in some cases of child crime that must be sought, it is hoped that in the future it will provide ideal and comprehensive protection for handling cases of children facing the law so that the fulfillment of children's rights both as victims and perpetrators can be carried out effectively and lead to fulfillment human rights because the truth is that human rights are inherent rights and exist in every human being and must be protected by the state  Keywords : Human Rights , Rights of the Child , Diversion

UN-BLURRING THE MYTHS AND REALITIES OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-120
Author(s):  
T N Sithole ◽  
Kgothatso B Shai
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Vulnerable Groups ◽  
Great Awareness ◽  
Policy Theory ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
The Status ◽  
Customary Practices

Awareness of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW 1979) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC 1989) is relatively high within academic and political circles in South Africa and elsewhere around the world. In South Africa, this can be ascribed mainly to the powerful women’s lobby movements represented in government and academic sectors. Women and children’s issues have been especially highlighted in South Africa over the last few years. In this process, the aforementioned two international human rights instruments have proved very useful. There is a gender desk in each national department. The Office on the Status of Women and the Office on Child Rights have been established within the Office of the President, indicating the importance attached to these institutions. These offices are responsible for co-ordinating governmental efforts towards the promotion and protection of women and children’s rights respectively, including the two relevant treaties. Furthermore, there is also a great awareness amongst non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in respect of CEDAW and CRC. This can be ascribed mainly to the fact that there is a very strong women’s NGO lobby and NGOs are actively committed to the promotion of children’s rights. Women are increasingly vocal and active within the politics of South Africa, but the weight of customary practices remains heavy. The foregoing is evident of the widening gap between policy theory and practice in the fraternity of vulnerable groups – children and women in particular.

From “Perverse” to Progressive?: Advocating for Children’s Rights in Argentina

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-89
Author(s):  
Amy Risley
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
Economic Reforms ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Socioeconomic Conditions ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
The Social ◽  
United Nations Convention

This article argues that social issues are central to the children’s rights movement in Argentina. For more than a decade, child advocates have traced the plight of children to poverty, marginality, and neoliberal economic reforms. In particular, they have framed the issue of child welfare as closely related to socioeconomic conditions, underscored the “perverse” characteristics of the country’s existing institutions and policies, and called for reforms that accord with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Although the country’s policies are gradually being transformed due to a landmark child-protection law passed in 2005, a dramatically more progressive framework for children’s rights has not yet been adopted. Given that policymakers have largely failed to reverse the trends that activists perceive as harming children, it is expected that advocates will continue to criticise the gap between domestic realities and the social and economic rights included in the Convention.

scholarly journals Children’s Views on Children’s Rights: A Systematic Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-871
Author(s):  
Nicola Fairhall ◽  
Kevin Woods
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
Children’S Views ◽  
Broad Level

Abstract Children’s rights are set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This systematic literature review aimed to investigate children’s views of children’s rights, at a broad level. Nine papers were included, from a range of countries and contexts. They all accessed the views of children and young people (aged up to 18 years). A content analysis was carried out using a recursive process of hybrid aggregative-configurative synthesis, and themes within children’s views and factors that may affect these were identified. These were ‘awareness of rights’, ‘value placed on (importance of) rights’, ‘impact of having/not having rights fulfilled’, ‘realisation and respect of rights’, ‘equality of rights’, ‘identifying and categorising of rights’, and ‘factors that may affect children’s views’. These were developed into a progression of rights realisation and implications for practice and further research were considered.

scholarly journals Family Support as a right of the child

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Dolan ◽  
Nevenca Zegarac ◽  
Jelena Arsic
Keyword(s):  
Family Support ◽  
Family Environment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Legal Standards ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Relationship

This paper considers Family Support as a fundamental right of the child. It examines the relationship between the well-being of the child as the core concept of contemporary legal and welfare systems and family as a vital institution in society for the protection, development and ensuring the overall well-being of the child. Considering the fact that international legal standards recognise that children’s rights are best met in the family environment, the paper analyses what kind of support is being provided to families by the modern societies in the exercising of children’s rights and with what rhetoric and outcomes. Family Support is also considered as a specific, theoretically grounded and empirically tested practical approach to exercising and protecting the rights of the child. Finally, international legal standards are observed in the context of contemporary theory and practice of Family Support, while the conclusion provides the implications of such an approach.

“Evolving Capacities” and “Parental Guidance” in The context of Youth Justice

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 500-520
Author(s):  
Ursula Kilkelly
Keyword(s):  
Parental Support ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Youth Justice ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Parental Guidance ◽  
The Law ◽  
Role Of Parents ◽  
Article 5

Abstract Article 5 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (uncrc) is a pivotal children’s rights provision, which recognises the ‘responsibilities, rights and duties of parents’ to provide ‘appropriate direction and guidance’ to the child in the exercise of his/her rights, in a manner consistent with ‘the evolving capacities of the child’. Underpinning children as holders of rights, Article 5 bridges the gap between children who require parental support to exercise their rights and those who are capable of exercising them on their own behalf. There has been limited consideration of Article 5 to date and even less in specific contexts like juvenile justice. The uncrc has particular relevance to children in conflict with the law where issues of criminal responsibility, capacity and the role of parents are central. This article explores the application of Article 5 by querying the relevance of the principle of “evolving capacities” to children in conflict with the law and to the exercise of children’s rights in the criminal justice system. It considers what role, if any, ‘the responsibilities, rights and duties’ of parents have in such proceedings while addressing, more generally, whether Article 5 adds value to the child’s rights approach to youth justice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document